Cargando…

Motivations and Limits for COVID-19 Policy Compliance in Germany and Switzerland

Background: In contrast to neighboring countries, German and Swiss authorities refrained from general curfews during the first pandemic wave in spring 2020, calling for solidarity and personal responsibility instead. Using a qualitative methodology, this study aims to explore why people in Germany a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zimmermann, Bettina M., Fiske, Amelia, McLennan, Stuart, Sierawska, Anna, Hangel, Nora, Buyx, Alena
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Kerman University of Medical Sciences 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9808338/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33949815
http://dx.doi.org/10.34172/ijhpm.2021.30
_version_ 1784862920521285632
author Zimmermann, Bettina M.
Fiske, Amelia
McLennan, Stuart
Sierawska, Anna
Hangel, Nora
Buyx, Alena
author_facet Zimmermann, Bettina M.
Fiske, Amelia
McLennan, Stuart
Sierawska, Anna
Hangel, Nora
Buyx, Alena
author_sort Zimmermann, Bettina M.
collection PubMed
description Background: In contrast to neighboring countries, German and Swiss authorities refrained from general curfews during the first pandemic wave in spring 2020, calling for solidarity and personal responsibility instead. Using a qualitative methodology, this study aims to explore why people in Germany and Switzerland were motivated to comply with policy measures during the first wave of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, and what factors hindered or limited their motivation. While quantitative surveys can measure the level of compliance, or broadly ask what motives people had for compliance, we here strive to explain why and how these motives lead to compliance. Methods: This publication has been made possible by the joint work of the members of the "Solidarity in times of pandemics" (SolPan) research commons. Seventy-seven semi-structured qualitative interviews were conducted with members of the general public in Germany (n = 46) and the German-speaking part of Switzerland (n = 31) in April 2020. Interviews were transcribed and analyzed following a grounded theory approach. Results: Three themes were identified that summarize factors contributing to compliant or noncompliant behavior. (1) Social cohesion was, on the one hand, an important motivator for compliance, but at the same time related to conflicting needs, illustrating the limits of compliance. (2) Consequences were considered on both the individual level (eg, consequences of individual infection) and societal level (eg, the societal and economic consequences of restrictions). (3) While for some participants following the rules was perceived as a matter of principle, others stressed the importance of making their own risk assessment, which was often associated with with a need for evidence on the effectiveness and reasons behind measures. Conclusion: A variety of motives contribute to COVID-19 related compliance. Authorities should seek to address these multi-faceted aspects to support motivation for compliance in a large proportion of the population.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9808338
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Kerman University of Medical Sciences
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-98083382023-01-10 Motivations and Limits for COVID-19 Policy Compliance in Germany and Switzerland Zimmermann, Bettina M. Fiske, Amelia McLennan, Stuart Sierawska, Anna Hangel, Nora Buyx, Alena Int J Health Policy Manag Original Article Background: In contrast to neighboring countries, German and Swiss authorities refrained from general curfews during the first pandemic wave in spring 2020, calling for solidarity and personal responsibility instead. Using a qualitative methodology, this study aims to explore why people in Germany and Switzerland were motivated to comply with policy measures during the first wave of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, and what factors hindered or limited their motivation. While quantitative surveys can measure the level of compliance, or broadly ask what motives people had for compliance, we here strive to explain why and how these motives lead to compliance. Methods: This publication has been made possible by the joint work of the members of the "Solidarity in times of pandemics" (SolPan) research commons. Seventy-seven semi-structured qualitative interviews were conducted with members of the general public in Germany (n = 46) and the German-speaking part of Switzerland (n = 31) in April 2020. Interviews were transcribed and analyzed following a grounded theory approach. Results: Three themes were identified that summarize factors contributing to compliant or noncompliant behavior. (1) Social cohesion was, on the one hand, an important motivator for compliance, but at the same time related to conflicting needs, illustrating the limits of compliance. (2) Consequences were considered on both the individual level (eg, consequences of individual infection) and societal level (eg, the societal and economic consequences of restrictions). (3) While for some participants following the rules was perceived as a matter of principle, others stressed the importance of making their own risk assessment, which was often associated with with a need for evidence on the effectiveness and reasons behind measures. Conclusion: A variety of motives contribute to COVID-19 related compliance. Authorities should seek to address these multi-faceted aspects to support motivation for compliance in a large proportion of the population. Kerman University of Medical Sciences 2021-04-21 /pmc/articles/PMC9808338/ /pubmed/33949815 http://dx.doi.org/10.34172/ijhpm.2021.30 Text en © 2022 The Author(s); Published by Kerman University of Medical Sciences https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Zimmermann, Bettina M.
Fiske, Amelia
McLennan, Stuart
Sierawska, Anna
Hangel, Nora
Buyx, Alena
Motivations and Limits for COVID-19 Policy Compliance in Germany and Switzerland
title Motivations and Limits for COVID-19 Policy Compliance in Germany and Switzerland
title_full Motivations and Limits for COVID-19 Policy Compliance in Germany and Switzerland
title_fullStr Motivations and Limits for COVID-19 Policy Compliance in Germany and Switzerland
title_full_unstemmed Motivations and Limits for COVID-19 Policy Compliance in Germany and Switzerland
title_short Motivations and Limits for COVID-19 Policy Compliance in Germany and Switzerland
title_sort motivations and limits for covid-19 policy compliance in germany and switzerland
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9808338/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33949815
http://dx.doi.org/10.34172/ijhpm.2021.30
work_keys_str_mv AT zimmermannbettinam motivationsandlimitsforcovid19policycomplianceingermanyandswitzerland
AT fiskeamelia motivationsandlimitsforcovid19policycomplianceingermanyandswitzerland
AT mclennanstuart motivationsandlimitsforcovid19policycomplianceingermanyandswitzerland
AT sierawskaanna motivationsandlimitsforcovid19policycomplianceingermanyandswitzerland
AT hangelnora motivationsandlimitsforcovid19policycomplianceingermanyandswitzerland
AT buyxalena motivationsandlimitsforcovid19policycomplianceingermanyandswitzerland