Cargando…

Researchers’ and Research Users’ Experiences With and Reasons for Working Together in Spinal Cord Injury Research Partnerships: A Qualitative Study

Background: Research partnership approaches are becoming popular within spinal cord injury (SCI) health research system, providing opportunities to explore experiences of and learn from SCI research partnership champions. This study aimed to explore and describe SCI researchers’ and research users’...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hoekstra, Femke, Schaefer, Lee, Athanasopoulos, Peter, Gainforth, Heather L.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Kerman University of Medical Sciences 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9808362/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34060273
http://dx.doi.org/10.34172/ijhpm.2021.35
_version_ 1784862926311522304
author Hoekstra, Femke
Schaefer, Lee
Athanasopoulos, Peter
Gainforth, Heather L.
author_facet Hoekstra, Femke
Schaefer, Lee
Athanasopoulos, Peter
Gainforth, Heather L.
author_sort Hoekstra, Femke
collection PubMed
description Background: Research partnership approaches are becoming popular within spinal cord injury (SCI) health research system, providing opportunities to explore experiences of and learn from SCI research partnership champions. This study aimed to explore and describe SCI researchers’ and research users’ (RU’) experiences with and reasons for conducting and/or disseminating (health) research in partnership in order to gain more insight into potentially ways to build capacity for and foster change to support research partnerships within a health research system. Methods: Underpinned by a pragmatic perspective, ten semi-structured timeline interviews were conducted with researchers and RU who have experiences with SCI research partnerships. Interviews focused on experiences in participants’ lives that have led them to become a person who conducts and/or disseminates research in partnership. Data were analysed using narrative thematic analysis. Results: We identified three threads from participants’ stories: (1) seeing and valuing different perspectives, (2) inspirational role models, and (3) relational and personal aspect of research partnerships. We identified sub-threads related to experiences that participants draw on how they came to be a person who engage in (health) research partnerships, and sub-threads related to participants’ reasons for engaging in research partnerships. While most sub-threads were identified from both researchers’ and RU’ perspectives (eg, partnership successes and failures), some were unique for researchers (morally the right thing to do) or RU (advocating). Conclusion: Using a narrative and pragmatic approach, this study provided a new understanding of SCI researchers’ and RU’ partnership experiences over time. We found that participants’ research partnership experiences and motivations align with components of leadership theories. The findings from this study may be used to inform strategies and policy programs to build capacity for conducting and disseminating (health) research in partnership, within and beyond SCI research.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9808362
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Kerman University of Medical Sciences
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-98083622023-01-10 Researchers’ and Research Users’ Experiences With and Reasons for Working Together in Spinal Cord Injury Research Partnerships: A Qualitative Study Hoekstra, Femke Schaefer, Lee Athanasopoulos, Peter Gainforth, Heather L. Int J Health Policy Manag Original Article Background: Research partnership approaches are becoming popular within spinal cord injury (SCI) health research system, providing opportunities to explore experiences of and learn from SCI research partnership champions. This study aimed to explore and describe SCI researchers’ and research users’ (RU’) experiences with and reasons for conducting and/or disseminating (health) research in partnership in order to gain more insight into potentially ways to build capacity for and foster change to support research partnerships within a health research system. Methods: Underpinned by a pragmatic perspective, ten semi-structured timeline interviews were conducted with researchers and RU who have experiences with SCI research partnerships. Interviews focused on experiences in participants’ lives that have led them to become a person who conducts and/or disseminates research in partnership. Data were analysed using narrative thematic analysis. Results: We identified three threads from participants’ stories: (1) seeing and valuing different perspectives, (2) inspirational role models, and (3) relational and personal aspect of research partnerships. We identified sub-threads related to experiences that participants draw on how they came to be a person who engage in (health) research partnerships, and sub-threads related to participants’ reasons for engaging in research partnerships. While most sub-threads were identified from both researchers’ and RU’ perspectives (eg, partnership successes and failures), some were unique for researchers (morally the right thing to do) or RU (advocating). Conclusion: Using a narrative and pragmatic approach, this study provided a new understanding of SCI researchers’ and RU’ partnership experiences over time. We found that participants’ research partnership experiences and motivations align with components of leadership theories. The findings from this study may be used to inform strategies and policy programs to build capacity for conducting and disseminating (health) research in partnership, within and beyond SCI research. Kerman University of Medical Sciences 2021-05-11 /pmc/articles/PMC9808362/ /pubmed/34060273 http://dx.doi.org/10.34172/ijhpm.2021.35 Text en © 2022 The Author(s); Published by Kerman University of Medical Sciences https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Hoekstra, Femke
Schaefer, Lee
Athanasopoulos, Peter
Gainforth, Heather L.
Researchers’ and Research Users’ Experiences With and Reasons for Working Together in Spinal Cord Injury Research Partnerships: A Qualitative Study
title Researchers’ and Research Users’ Experiences With and Reasons for Working Together in Spinal Cord Injury Research Partnerships: A Qualitative Study
title_full Researchers’ and Research Users’ Experiences With and Reasons for Working Together in Spinal Cord Injury Research Partnerships: A Qualitative Study
title_fullStr Researchers’ and Research Users’ Experiences With and Reasons for Working Together in Spinal Cord Injury Research Partnerships: A Qualitative Study
title_full_unstemmed Researchers’ and Research Users’ Experiences With and Reasons for Working Together in Spinal Cord Injury Research Partnerships: A Qualitative Study
title_short Researchers’ and Research Users’ Experiences With and Reasons for Working Together in Spinal Cord Injury Research Partnerships: A Qualitative Study
title_sort researchers’ and research users’ experiences with and reasons for working together in spinal cord injury research partnerships: a qualitative study
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9808362/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34060273
http://dx.doi.org/10.34172/ijhpm.2021.35
work_keys_str_mv AT hoekstrafemke researchersandresearchusersexperienceswithandreasonsforworkingtogetherinspinalcordinjuryresearchpartnershipsaqualitativestudy
AT schaeferlee researchersandresearchusersexperienceswithandreasonsforworkingtogetherinspinalcordinjuryresearchpartnershipsaqualitativestudy
AT athanasopoulospeter researchersandresearchusersexperienceswithandreasonsforworkingtogetherinspinalcordinjuryresearchpartnershipsaqualitativestudy
AT researchersandresearchusersexperienceswithandreasonsforworkingtogetherinspinalcordinjuryresearchpartnershipsaqualitativestudy
AT gainforthheatherl researchersandresearchusersexperienceswithandreasonsforworkingtogetherinspinalcordinjuryresearchpartnershipsaqualitativestudy