Cargando…

The impact of single agent PD-1 or PD-L1 inhibition on advanced endometrial cancers: meta-analysis

BACKGROUND: Immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapy is an emerging option for advanced endometrial cancer (EC). Mismatch repair (MMR) status is widely regarded as a biomarker predictive of response to ICIs. The predictive value of MMR based on small, single-arm trials, however, is conflicting. In...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kok, P.-S., Antill, Y.C., Scott, C.L., Lee, C.K.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9808459/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36410086
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.esmoop.2022.100635
_version_ 1784862947416211456
author Kok, P.-S.
Antill, Y.C.
Scott, C.L.
Lee, C.K.
author_facet Kok, P.-S.
Antill, Y.C.
Scott, C.L.
Lee, C.K.
author_sort Kok, P.-S.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapy is an emerging option for advanced endometrial cancer (EC). Mismatch repair (MMR) status is widely regarded as a biomarker predictive of response to ICIs. The predictive value of MMR based on small, single-arm trials, however, is conflicting. In this meta-analysis, we aimed to assess the activity of single-agent ICI in advanced EC, and compared the magnitude of treatment benefit in MMR deficient (dMMR) and MMR proficient (pMMR) EC. METHODS: We carried out an electronic search to identify prospective trials of single-agent ICI in advanced EC. Data on objective response rate (ORR) and progression-free survival (PFS) were extracted and pooled. ORR was estimated using the inverse variance method and subgroup difference by MMR status was examined. PFS difference according to MMR status was summarized using the Kaplan–Meier approach. RESULTS: From eight trials with 492 women, the pooled ORR was 19% [95% confidence interval (CI) 16% to 22%]. ORR was significantly greater in dMMR (n = 281) than pMMR EC (n = 211) (dMMR: 46%, pMMR: 8%; risk ratio 5.74, 95% CI 3.58-9.21; interaction P < 0.001). Complete response was 11% and 0.05% and median PFS was 8.3 and 2.1 months in dMMR and pMMR EC, respectively (hazard ratio PFS 0.58, 95% CI 0.38-0.89; P = 0.01). The 12-month PFS rates were 42.0% and 20.7%, respectively. CONCLUSION: Single-agent ICI is associated with a 5.74 times greater objective response and 42% reduction in risk of disease progression or death in dMMR compared with pMMR EC. MMR status should be determined prospectively and be used as a stratification factor in future trials of advanced EC. Further translational analysis is urgently required to identify the cause of dMMR and allow subclassification of EC into different dMMR molecular subtypes.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9808459
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-98084592023-01-04 The impact of single agent PD-1 or PD-L1 inhibition on advanced endometrial cancers: meta-analysis Kok, P.-S. Antill, Y.C. Scott, C.L. Lee, C.K. ESMO Open Original Research BACKGROUND: Immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapy is an emerging option for advanced endometrial cancer (EC). Mismatch repair (MMR) status is widely regarded as a biomarker predictive of response to ICIs. The predictive value of MMR based on small, single-arm trials, however, is conflicting. In this meta-analysis, we aimed to assess the activity of single-agent ICI in advanced EC, and compared the magnitude of treatment benefit in MMR deficient (dMMR) and MMR proficient (pMMR) EC. METHODS: We carried out an electronic search to identify prospective trials of single-agent ICI in advanced EC. Data on objective response rate (ORR) and progression-free survival (PFS) were extracted and pooled. ORR was estimated using the inverse variance method and subgroup difference by MMR status was examined. PFS difference according to MMR status was summarized using the Kaplan–Meier approach. RESULTS: From eight trials with 492 women, the pooled ORR was 19% [95% confidence interval (CI) 16% to 22%]. ORR was significantly greater in dMMR (n = 281) than pMMR EC (n = 211) (dMMR: 46%, pMMR: 8%; risk ratio 5.74, 95% CI 3.58-9.21; interaction P < 0.001). Complete response was 11% and 0.05% and median PFS was 8.3 and 2.1 months in dMMR and pMMR EC, respectively (hazard ratio PFS 0.58, 95% CI 0.38-0.89; P = 0.01). The 12-month PFS rates were 42.0% and 20.7%, respectively. CONCLUSION: Single-agent ICI is associated with a 5.74 times greater objective response and 42% reduction in risk of disease progression or death in dMMR compared with pMMR EC. MMR status should be determined prospectively and be used as a stratification factor in future trials of advanced EC. Further translational analysis is urgently required to identify the cause of dMMR and allow subclassification of EC into different dMMR molecular subtypes. Elsevier 2022-11-18 /pmc/articles/PMC9808459/ /pubmed/36410086 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.esmoop.2022.100635 Text en © 2022 The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Original Research
Kok, P.-S.
Antill, Y.C.
Scott, C.L.
Lee, C.K.
The impact of single agent PD-1 or PD-L1 inhibition on advanced endometrial cancers: meta-analysis
title The impact of single agent PD-1 or PD-L1 inhibition on advanced endometrial cancers: meta-analysis
title_full The impact of single agent PD-1 or PD-L1 inhibition on advanced endometrial cancers: meta-analysis
title_fullStr The impact of single agent PD-1 or PD-L1 inhibition on advanced endometrial cancers: meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed The impact of single agent PD-1 or PD-L1 inhibition on advanced endometrial cancers: meta-analysis
title_short The impact of single agent PD-1 or PD-L1 inhibition on advanced endometrial cancers: meta-analysis
title_sort impact of single agent pd-1 or pd-l1 inhibition on advanced endometrial cancers: meta-analysis
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9808459/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36410086
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.esmoop.2022.100635
work_keys_str_mv AT kokps theimpactofsingleagentpd1orpdl1inhibitiononadvancedendometrialcancersmetaanalysis
AT antillyc theimpactofsingleagentpd1orpdl1inhibitiononadvancedendometrialcancersmetaanalysis
AT scottcl theimpactofsingleagentpd1orpdl1inhibitiononadvancedendometrialcancersmetaanalysis
AT leeck theimpactofsingleagentpd1orpdl1inhibitiononadvancedendometrialcancersmetaanalysis
AT kokps impactofsingleagentpd1orpdl1inhibitiononadvancedendometrialcancersmetaanalysis
AT antillyc impactofsingleagentpd1orpdl1inhibitiononadvancedendometrialcancersmetaanalysis
AT scottcl impactofsingleagentpd1orpdl1inhibitiononadvancedendometrialcancersmetaanalysis
AT leeck impactofsingleagentpd1orpdl1inhibitiononadvancedendometrialcancersmetaanalysis