Cargando…

‘Building back better’ or sustaining the unsustainable? The climate impacts of Bank of England QE in the Covid-19 pandemic

The environmental impacts of monetary policy received academic attention after the 2008 financial crisis and the ‘market neutral’ quantitative easing policies that followed. This article examines the Bank of England’s Corporate Covid Financing Facility (CCFF) and the Asset Purchasing Facility (APF)...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Bailey, Daniel
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Palgrave Macmillan UK 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9808683/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36620429
http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/s41293-022-00223-w
_version_ 1784862984055554048
author Bailey, Daniel
author_facet Bailey, Daniel
author_sort Bailey, Daniel
collection PubMed
description The environmental impacts of monetary policy received academic attention after the 2008 financial crisis and the ‘market neutral’ quantitative easing policies that followed. This article examines the Bank of England’s Corporate Covid Financing Facility (CCFF) and the Asset Purchasing Facility (APF) between June 2020 and June 2021 to assess whether the Bank’s response to the COVID-19 pandemic was aligned with the transition to sustainability. The data indicates that the Bank of England’s monetary allocation schemes again served as a panacea for businesses with ecologically intensive business models and a Treasury committed to restoring the pre-existing growth model. Indeed, the Bank’s QE schemes now represents an element of the crisis management governance that repeatedly ‘locks in’ the ecologically-calamitous economic trajectory at potential critical junctures. The Bank’s shielding of its technocratic and depoliticised status has thus far inhibited any leadership role in tackling the climate crisis, despite its growing power as an actor of economic governance at times of crisis and purported enthusiasm to ‘build back better’.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9808683
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Palgrave Macmillan UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-98086832023-01-04 ‘Building back better’ or sustaining the unsustainable? The climate impacts of Bank of England QE in the Covid-19 pandemic Bailey, Daniel Br Politics Original Article The environmental impacts of monetary policy received academic attention after the 2008 financial crisis and the ‘market neutral’ quantitative easing policies that followed. This article examines the Bank of England’s Corporate Covid Financing Facility (CCFF) and the Asset Purchasing Facility (APF) between June 2020 and June 2021 to assess whether the Bank’s response to the COVID-19 pandemic was aligned with the transition to sustainability. The data indicates that the Bank of England’s monetary allocation schemes again served as a panacea for businesses with ecologically intensive business models and a Treasury committed to restoring the pre-existing growth model. Indeed, the Bank’s QE schemes now represents an element of the crisis management governance that repeatedly ‘locks in’ the ecologically-calamitous economic trajectory at potential critical junctures. The Bank’s shielding of its technocratic and depoliticised status has thus far inhibited any leadership role in tackling the climate crisis, despite its growing power as an actor of economic governance at times of crisis and purported enthusiasm to ‘build back better’. Palgrave Macmillan UK 2023-01-03 /pmc/articles/PMC9808683/ /pubmed/36620429 http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/s41293-022-00223-w Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Article
Bailey, Daniel
‘Building back better’ or sustaining the unsustainable? The climate impacts of Bank of England QE in the Covid-19 pandemic
title ‘Building back better’ or sustaining the unsustainable? The climate impacts of Bank of England QE in the Covid-19 pandemic
title_full ‘Building back better’ or sustaining the unsustainable? The climate impacts of Bank of England QE in the Covid-19 pandemic
title_fullStr ‘Building back better’ or sustaining the unsustainable? The climate impacts of Bank of England QE in the Covid-19 pandemic
title_full_unstemmed ‘Building back better’ or sustaining the unsustainable? The climate impacts of Bank of England QE in the Covid-19 pandemic
title_short ‘Building back better’ or sustaining the unsustainable? The climate impacts of Bank of England QE in the Covid-19 pandemic
title_sort ‘building back better’ or sustaining the unsustainable? the climate impacts of bank of england qe in the covid-19 pandemic
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9808683/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36620429
http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/s41293-022-00223-w
work_keys_str_mv AT baileydaniel buildingbackbetterorsustainingtheunsustainabletheclimateimpactsofbankofenglandqeinthecovid19pandemic