Cargando…
The Open Field Test as a Tool for Behaviour Analysis in Pigs: Recommendations for Set-Up Standardization − A Systematic Review
INTRODUCTION: The open field test (OFT) is a common tool to assess anxiety and behavioural changes in rodents. It has been adapted to pigs with no systematic investigation of how environmental changes may alter the performance of pigs. Currently, the number of published studies including the OFT in...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
S. Karger AG
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9808745/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35732140 http://dx.doi.org/10.1159/000525680 |
_version_ | 1784862997635661824 |
---|---|
author | Schulz, Mareike Zieglowski, Leonie Kopaczka, Marcin Tolba, René H. |
author_facet | Schulz, Mareike Zieglowski, Leonie Kopaczka, Marcin Tolba, René H. |
author_sort | Schulz, Mareike |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: The open field test (OFT) is a common tool to assess anxiety and behavioural changes in rodents. It has been adapted to pigs with no systematic investigation of how environmental changes may alter the performance of pigs. Currently, the number of published studies including the OFT in domestic pig models is increasing without standardization. METHODS: Our review aimed to investigate the open field (OF) set-ups in published studies and the similarities between performance and published parameters. RESULTS: Following the PRISMA guidelines for reviews, we selected 69 studies for inclusion in this systematic review. We determined the specific set-up conditions such as dimensions, duration, and time of day for most of the included studies; we found high variability across studies with respect to these test specifics. DISCUSSION: Our results indicate the inconsistent implementation of the set-up, including dimensions, timing, parameters, and additional combined tests (e.g., new object tests). Based on our findings, we have made recommendations for the performance of the OFT, according to the current literature. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9808745 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | S. Karger AG |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-98087452023-01-04 The Open Field Test as a Tool for Behaviour Analysis in Pigs: Recommendations for Set-Up Standardization − A Systematic Review Schulz, Mareike Zieglowski, Leonie Kopaczka, Marcin Tolba, René H. Eur Surg Res Systematic Review INTRODUCTION: The open field test (OFT) is a common tool to assess anxiety and behavioural changes in rodents. It has been adapted to pigs with no systematic investigation of how environmental changes may alter the performance of pigs. Currently, the number of published studies including the OFT in domestic pig models is increasing without standardization. METHODS: Our review aimed to investigate the open field (OF) set-ups in published studies and the similarities between performance and published parameters. RESULTS: Following the PRISMA guidelines for reviews, we selected 69 studies for inclusion in this systematic review. We determined the specific set-up conditions such as dimensions, duration, and time of day for most of the included studies; we found high variability across studies with respect to these test specifics. DISCUSSION: Our results indicate the inconsistent implementation of the set-up, including dimensions, timing, parameters, and additional combined tests (e.g., new object tests). Based on our findings, we have made recommendations for the performance of the OFT, according to the current literature. S. Karger AG 2022-06-22 /pmc/articles/PMC9808745/ /pubmed/35732140 http://dx.doi.org/10.1159/000525680 Text en The Author(s). Published by S. Karger AG, Basel https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This article is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC). Usage and distribution for commercial purposes requires written permission. |
spellingShingle | Systematic Review Schulz, Mareike Zieglowski, Leonie Kopaczka, Marcin Tolba, René H. The Open Field Test as a Tool for Behaviour Analysis in Pigs: Recommendations for Set-Up Standardization − A Systematic Review |
title | The Open Field Test as a Tool for Behaviour Analysis in Pigs: Recommendations for Set-Up Standardization − A Systematic Review |
title_full | The Open Field Test as a Tool for Behaviour Analysis in Pigs: Recommendations for Set-Up Standardization − A Systematic Review |
title_fullStr | The Open Field Test as a Tool for Behaviour Analysis in Pigs: Recommendations for Set-Up Standardization − A Systematic Review |
title_full_unstemmed | The Open Field Test as a Tool for Behaviour Analysis in Pigs: Recommendations for Set-Up Standardization − A Systematic Review |
title_short | The Open Field Test as a Tool for Behaviour Analysis in Pigs: Recommendations for Set-Up Standardization − A Systematic Review |
title_sort | open field test as a tool for behaviour analysis in pigs: recommendations for set-up standardization − a systematic review |
topic | Systematic Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9808745/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35732140 http://dx.doi.org/10.1159/000525680 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT schulzmareike theopenfieldtestasatoolforbehaviouranalysisinpigsrecommendationsforsetupstandardizationasystematicreview AT zieglowskileonie theopenfieldtestasatoolforbehaviouranalysisinpigsrecommendationsforsetupstandardizationasystematicreview AT kopaczkamarcin theopenfieldtestasatoolforbehaviouranalysisinpigsrecommendationsforsetupstandardizationasystematicreview AT tolbareneh theopenfieldtestasatoolforbehaviouranalysisinpigsrecommendationsforsetupstandardizationasystematicreview AT schulzmareike openfieldtestasatoolforbehaviouranalysisinpigsrecommendationsforsetupstandardizationasystematicreview AT zieglowskileonie openfieldtestasatoolforbehaviouranalysisinpigsrecommendationsforsetupstandardizationasystematicreview AT kopaczkamarcin openfieldtestasatoolforbehaviouranalysisinpigsrecommendationsforsetupstandardizationasystematicreview AT tolbareneh openfieldtestasatoolforbehaviouranalysisinpigsrecommendationsforsetupstandardizationasystematicreview |