Cargando…

Comparison of the anesthesia effect of ultrasound-guided middle and low interscalene brachial plexus block: a randomized, controlled, non-inferiority trial

BACKGROUND: Ultrasound-guided low interscalene brachial plexus block (LISB) can provide satisfactory anesthesia for surgery at or below the elbow. However, the anesthesia effect of ultrasound-guided middle interscalene brachial plexus block (MISB) has not been fully investigated. We hypothesized tha...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zhao, Yang, Qin, Shiming, Yang, Xue, Gao, Chongmei, Yuan, Xia, Li, Tao, Chen, Zhaohui
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9808947/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36597045
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12871-022-01963-4
_version_ 1784863031842308096
author Zhao, Yang
Qin, Shiming
Yang, Xue
Gao, Chongmei
Yuan, Xia
Li, Tao
Chen, Zhaohui
author_facet Zhao, Yang
Qin, Shiming
Yang, Xue
Gao, Chongmei
Yuan, Xia
Li, Tao
Chen, Zhaohui
author_sort Zhao, Yang
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Ultrasound-guided low interscalene brachial plexus block (LISB) can provide satisfactory anesthesia for surgery at or below the elbow. However, the anesthesia effect of ultrasound-guided middle interscalene brachial plexus block (MISB) has not been fully investigated. We hypothesized that MISB provides a non-inferior anesthesia effect to LISB for surgery at or below the elbow. METHODS: A total of 82 patients with ASA I-III (18–65 years) scheduled for elective surgery at or below the elbow were randomized to the MISB group or the LISB group equally, located 1/2 or 2/3 of the caudal distance from C6 to the clavicle. Both groups were administered 15 mL 0.5% ropivacaine at the lower part of the brachial plexus with the first injection and equivalent volume at the upper part with the second injection. RESULTS: For the primary outcome, 92.3% in the MISB group experienced successful anesthesia compared to 94.6% in the LISB group [difference: –2.3%, 95% confidence interval (CI) –13.4% to 8.8%], exceeding the predefined non-inferiority margin -15%. For the secondary outcomes, the incidence of pleura suppression for the first injection (7.7% vs. 45.9%, P < 0.001) and the time to perform the block (9.9 ± 1.3 vs. 10.7 ± 1.3 min, P = 0.006) were significantly less in MISB compared to LISB. No significant differences were observed in the consumption of perioperative rescue analgesics, VAS score, and adverse events within the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: MISB provides a non-inferior anesthesia effect to LISB for surgery at or below the elbow. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Chinese Clinical Trial Register (identifier: ChiCTR2100054196).
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9808947
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-98089472023-01-04 Comparison of the anesthesia effect of ultrasound-guided middle and low interscalene brachial plexus block: a randomized, controlled, non-inferiority trial Zhao, Yang Qin, Shiming Yang, Xue Gao, Chongmei Yuan, Xia Li, Tao Chen, Zhaohui BMC Anesthesiol Research BACKGROUND: Ultrasound-guided low interscalene brachial plexus block (LISB) can provide satisfactory anesthesia for surgery at or below the elbow. However, the anesthesia effect of ultrasound-guided middle interscalene brachial plexus block (MISB) has not been fully investigated. We hypothesized that MISB provides a non-inferior anesthesia effect to LISB for surgery at or below the elbow. METHODS: A total of 82 patients with ASA I-III (18–65 years) scheduled for elective surgery at or below the elbow were randomized to the MISB group or the LISB group equally, located 1/2 or 2/3 of the caudal distance from C6 to the clavicle. Both groups were administered 15 mL 0.5% ropivacaine at the lower part of the brachial plexus with the first injection and equivalent volume at the upper part with the second injection. RESULTS: For the primary outcome, 92.3% in the MISB group experienced successful anesthesia compared to 94.6% in the LISB group [difference: –2.3%, 95% confidence interval (CI) –13.4% to 8.8%], exceeding the predefined non-inferiority margin -15%. For the secondary outcomes, the incidence of pleura suppression for the first injection (7.7% vs. 45.9%, P < 0.001) and the time to perform the block (9.9 ± 1.3 vs. 10.7 ± 1.3 min, P = 0.006) were significantly less in MISB compared to LISB. No significant differences were observed in the consumption of perioperative rescue analgesics, VAS score, and adverse events within the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: MISB provides a non-inferior anesthesia effect to LISB for surgery at or below the elbow. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Chinese Clinical Trial Register (identifier: ChiCTR2100054196). BioMed Central 2023-01-03 /pmc/articles/PMC9808947/ /pubmed/36597045 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12871-022-01963-4 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Zhao, Yang
Qin, Shiming
Yang, Xue
Gao, Chongmei
Yuan, Xia
Li, Tao
Chen, Zhaohui
Comparison of the anesthesia effect of ultrasound-guided middle and low interscalene brachial plexus block: a randomized, controlled, non-inferiority trial
title Comparison of the anesthesia effect of ultrasound-guided middle and low interscalene brachial plexus block: a randomized, controlled, non-inferiority trial
title_full Comparison of the anesthesia effect of ultrasound-guided middle and low interscalene brachial plexus block: a randomized, controlled, non-inferiority trial
title_fullStr Comparison of the anesthesia effect of ultrasound-guided middle and low interscalene brachial plexus block: a randomized, controlled, non-inferiority trial
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of the anesthesia effect of ultrasound-guided middle and low interscalene brachial plexus block: a randomized, controlled, non-inferiority trial
title_short Comparison of the anesthesia effect of ultrasound-guided middle and low interscalene brachial plexus block: a randomized, controlled, non-inferiority trial
title_sort comparison of the anesthesia effect of ultrasound-guided middle and low interscalene brachial plexus block: a randomized, controlled, non-inferiority trial
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9808947/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36597045
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12871-022-01963-4
work_keys_str_mv AT zhaoyang comparisonoftheanesthesiaeffectofultrasoundguidedmiddleandlowinterscalenebrachialplexusblockarandomizedcontrollednoninferioritytrial
AT qinshiming comparisonoftheanesthesiaeffectofultrasoundguidedmiddleandlowinterscalenebrachialplexusblockarandomizedcontrollednoninferioritytrial
AT yangxue comparisonoftheanesthesiaeffectofultrasoundguidedmiddleandlowinterscalenebrachialplexusblockarandomizedcontrollednoninferioritytrial
AT gaochongmei comparisonoftheanesthesiaeffectofultrasoundguidedmiddleandlowinterscalenebrachialplexusblockarandomizedcontrollednoninferioritytrial
AT yuanxia comparisonoftheanesthesiaeffectofultrasoundguidedmiddleandlowinterscalenebrachialplexusblockarandomizedcontrollednoninferioritytrial
AT litao comparisonoftheanesthesiaeffectofultrasoundguidedmiddleandlowinterscalenebrachialplexusblockarandomizedcontrollednoninferioritytrial
AT chenzhaohui comparisonoftheanesthesiaeffectofultrasoundguidedmiddleandlowinterscalenebrachialplexusblockarandomizedcontrollednoninferioritytrial