Cargando…

A gated group sequential design for seamless Phase II/III trial with subpopulation selection

BACKGROUND: Due to the high cost and high failure rate of Phase III trials where a classical group sequential design (GSD) is usually used, seamless Phase II/III designs are more and more popular to improve trial efficiency. A potential attraction of Phase II/III design is to allow a randomized proo...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Miao, Guanhong, Liao, Jason J. Z., Yang, Jing, Anderson, Keaven
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9809114/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36597042
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12874-022-01825-0
_version_ 1784863058078728192
author Miao, Guanhong
Liao, Jason J. Z.
Yang, Jing
Anderson, Keaven
author_facet Miao, Guanhong
Liao, Jason J. Z.
Yang, Jing
Anderson, Keaven
author_sort Miao, Guanhong
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Due to the high cost and high failure rate of Phase III trials where a classical group sequential design (GSD) is usually used, seamless Phase II/III designs are more and more popular to improve trial efficiency. A potential attraction of Phase II/III design is to allow a randomized proof-of-concept stage prior to committing to the full cost of a Phase III trial. Population selection during the trial allows a trial to adapt and focus investment where it is most likely to provide patient benefit. Previous methods have been developed for this problem when there is a single primary endpoint and two possible populations. METHODS: To find the population that potentially benefits with one or two primary endpoints (e.g., progression free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS)), we propose a gated group sequential design for a seamless Phase II/III trial design with adaptive population selection. RESULTS: The investigated design controls the familywise error rate and allows multiple interim analyses to enable early stopping for efficacy or futility. Simulations and an illustrative example suggest that the proposed gated group sequential design has more power and requires less time and resources compared to the group sequential design and adaptive design. CONCLUSIONS: Combining the group sequential design and adaptive design, the gated group sequential design has more power and higher efficiency while controlling for the familywise error rate. It has the potential to save drug development cost and more quickly fulfill unmet medical needs.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9809114
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-98091142023-01-04 A gated group sequential design for seamless Phase II/III trial with subpopulation selection Miao, Guanhong Liao, Jason J. Z. Yang, Jing Anderson, Keaven BMC Med Res Methodol Research BACKGROUND: Due to the high cost and high failure rate of Phase III trials where a classical group sequential design (GSD) is usually used, seamless Phase II/III designs are more and more popular to improve trial efficiency. A potential attraction of Phase II/III design is to allow a randomized proof-of-concept stage prior to committing to the full cost of a Phase III trial. Population selection during the trial allows a trial to adapt and focus investment where it is most likely to provide patient benefit. Previous methods have been developed for this problem when there is a single primary endpoint and two possible populations. METHODS: To find the population that potentially benefits with one or two primary endpoints (e.g., progression free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS)), we propose a gated group sequential design for a seamless Phase II/III trial design with adaptive population selection. RESULTS: The investigated design controls the familywise error rate and allows multiple interim analyses to enable early stopping for efficacy or futility. Simulations and an illustrative example suggest that the proposed gated group sequential design has more power and requires less time and resources compared to the group sequential design and adaptive design. CONCLUSIONS: Combining the group sequential design and adaptive design, the gated group sequential design has more power and higher efficiency while controlling for the familywise error rate. It has the potential to save drug development cost and more quickly fulfill unmet medical needs. BioMed Central 2023-01-03 /pmc/articles/PMC9809114/ /pubmed/36597042 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12874-022-01825-0 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Miao, Guanhong
Liao, Jason J. Z.
Yang, Jing
Anderson, Keaven
A gated group sequential design for seamless Phase II/III trial with subpopulation selection
title A gated group sequential design for seamless Phase II/III trial with subpopulation selection
title_full A gated group sequential design for seamless Phase II/III trial with subpopulation selection
title_fullStr A gated group sequential design for seamless Phase II/III trial with subpopulation selection
title_full_unstemmed A gated group sequential design for seamless Phase II/III trial with subpopulation selection
title_short A gated group sequential design for seamless Phase II/III trial with subpopulation selection
title_sort gated group sequential design for seamless phase ii/iii trial with subpopulation selection
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9809114/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36597042
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12874-022-01825-0
work_keys_str_mv AT miaoguanhong agatedgroupsequentialdesignforseamlessphaseiiiiitrialwithsubpopulationselection
AT liaojasonjz agatedgroupsequentialdesignforseamlessphaseiiiiitrialwithsubpopulationselection
AT yangjing agatedgroupsequentialdesignforseamlessphaseiiiiitrialwithsubpopulationselection
AT andersonkeaven agatedgroupsequentialdesignforseamlessphaseiiiiitrialwithsubpopulationselection
AT miaoguanhong gatedgroupsequentialdesignforseamlessphaseiiiiitrialwithsubpopulationselection
AT liaojasonjz gatedgroupsequentialdesignforseamlessphaseiiiiitrialwithsubpopulationselection
AT yangjing gatedgroupsequentialdesignforseamlessphaseiiiiitrialwithsubpopulationselection
AT andersonkeaven gatedgroupsequentialdesignforseamlessphaseiiiiitrialwithsubpopulationselection