Cargando…

A new ranking index to identify the work-related psychosocial factors most impacting mental health: a cross-sectional study

OBJECTIVES: In modern professional life, mental health prevention and promotion have become a major challenge for decision-makers. Devising appropriate actions requires better understanding the role played by each work-related psychosocial factor (WPSF). The objective of this study was to present a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Daouda, Oumou Salama, Chevance, Astrid, Temime, Laura, Légeron, Patrick, Gaillard, Raphaël, Saporta, Gilbert, Hocine, Mounia N
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9809236/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36585133
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-046444
_version_ 1784863079130988544
author Daouda, Oumou Salama
Chevance, Astrid
Temime, Laura
Légeron, Patrick
Gaillard, Raphaël
Saporta, Gilbert
Hocine, Mounia N
author_facet Daouda, Oumou Salama
Chevance, Astrid
Temime, Laura
Légeron, Patrick
Gaillard, Raphaël
Saporta, Gilbert
Hocine, Mounia N
author_sort Daouda, Oumou Salama
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: In modern professional life, mental health prevention and promotion have become a major challenge for decision-makers. Devising appropriate actions requires better understanding the role played by each work-related psychosocial factor (WPSF). The objective of this study was to present a relevant tool to hierarchise WPSFs that jointly takes into account their importance (impact on mental health) and their prevalence (the proportion of the population exposed to WPSF). DESIGN: A cross-sectional study was conducted in March 2018 among 3200 French workers which are representative of the French working population. SETTING: France. PARTICIPANTS: Individuals aged 18–80 years who declared currently having a job (even a part-time job) whatever their occupation or status (employee or self-employed) were eligible. We excluded students, unemployed individuals, housewives/husbands and retired people. The mental health level was assessed using the General Health Questionnaire-28 and 44 items were gathered from theoretical models of WPSFs. We assessed two distinct multivariate methods for calculating WPSF importance: (1) weifila (weighted first last) method in a linear regression context and (2) random forests in a non-linear context. Both methods were adjusted on individual, health and job characteristics. RESULTS: The WPSF rankings obtained with the two methods to calculate importance are strongly consistent with each other (correlation coefficient=0.88). We highlighted nine WPSFs that are ranked high by both methods. In particular, irrespective of the chosen method, lack of communication, lack of social and hierarchy support and personal–professional life imbalance, emotional demands at work and dissatisfaction with the compensation received came out as top-ranking WPSFs. CONCLUSIONS: A total of nine WPSFs were identified as key for decision-making. The easy-to-use tools we propose can help decision-makers identify priority WPSFs and design effective strategies to promote mental health in the workplace.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9809236
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-98092362023-01-04 A new ranking index to identify the work-related psychosocial factors most impacting mental health: a cross-sectional study Daouda, Oumou Salama Chevance, Astrid Temime, Laura Légeron, Patrick Gaillard, Raphaël Saporta, Gilbert Hocine, Mounia N BMJ Open Occupational and Environmental Medicine OBJECTIVES: In modern professional life, mental health prevention and promotion have become a major challenge for decision-makers. Devising appropriate actions requires better understanding the role played by each work-related psychosocial factor (WPSF). The objective of this study was to present a relevant tool to hierarchise WPSFs that jointly takes into account their importance (impact on mental health) and their prevalence (the proportion of the population exposed to WPSF). DESIGN: A cross-sectional study was conducted in March 2018 among 3200 French workers which are representative of the French working population. SETTING: France. PARTICIPANTS: Individuals aged 18–80 years who declared currently having a job (even a part-time job) whatever their occupation or status (employee or self-employed) were eligible. We excluded students, unemployed individuals, housewives/husbands and retired people. The mental health level was assessed using the General Health Questionnaire-28 and 44 items were gathered from theoretical models of WPSFs. We assessed two distinct multivariate methods for calculating WPSF importance: (1) weifila (weighted first last) method in a linear regression context and (2) random forests in a non-linear context. Both methods were adjusted on individual, health and job characteristics. RESULTS: The WPSF rankings obtained with the two methods to calculate importance are strongly consistent with each other (correlation coefficient=0.88). We highlighted nine WPSFs that are ranked high by both methods. In particular, irrespective of the chosen method, lack of communication, lack of social and hierarchy support and personal–professional life imbalance, emotional demands at work and dissatisfaction with the compensation received came out as top-ranking WPSFs. CONCLUSIONS: A total of nine WPSFs were identified as key for decision-making. The easy-to-use tools we propose can help decision-makers identify priority WPSFs and design effective strategies to promote mental health in the workplace. BMJ Publishing Group 2022-12-30 /pmc/articles/PMC9809236/ /pubmed/36585133 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-046444 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Occupational and Environmental Medicine
Daouda, Oumou Salama
Chevance, Astrid
Temime, Laura
Légeron, Patrick
Gaillard, Raphaël
Saporta, Gilbert
Hocine, Mounia N
A new ranking index to identify the work-related psychosocial factors most impacting mental health: a cross-sectional study
title A new ranking index to identify the work-related psychosocial factors most impacting mental health: a cross-sectional study
title_full A new ranking index to identify the work-related psychosocial factors most impacting mental health: a cross-sectional study
title_fullStr A new ranking index to identify the work-related psychosocial factors most impacting mental health: a cross-sectional study
title_full_unstemmed A new ranking index to identify the work-related psychosocial factors most impacting mental health: a cross-sectional study
title_short A new ranking index to identify the work-related psychosocial factors most impacting mental health: a cross-sectional study
title_sort new ranking index to identify the work-related psychosocial factors most impacting mental health: a cross-sectional study
topic Occupational and Environmental Medicine
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9809236/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36585133
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-046444
work_keys_str_mv AT daoudaoumousalama anewrankingindextoidentifytheworkrelatedpsychosocialfactorsmostimpactingmentalhealthacrosssectionalstudy
AT chevanceastrid anewrankingindextoidentifytheworkrelatedpsychosocialfactorsmostimpactingmentalhealthacrosssectionalstudy
AT temimelaura anewrankingindextoidentifytheworkrelatedpsychosocialfactorsmostimpactingmentalhealthacrosssectionalstudy
AT legeronpatrick anewrankingindextoidentifytheworkrelatedpsychosocialfactorsmostimpactingmentalhealthacrosssectionalstudy
AT gaillardraphael anewrankingindextoidentifytheworkrelatedpsychosocialfactorsmostimpactingmentalhealthacrosssectionalstudy
AT saportagilbert anewrankingindextoidentifytheworkrelatedpsychosocialfactorsmostimpactingmentalhealthacrosssectionalstudy
AT hocinemounian anewrankingindextoidentifytheworkrelatedpsychosocialfactorsmostimpactingmentalhealthacrosssectionalstudy
AT daoudaoumousalama newrankingindextoidentifytheworkrelatedpsychosocialfactorsmostimpactingmentalhealthacrosssectionalstudy
AT chevanceastrid newrankingindextoidentifytheworkrelatedpsychosocialfactorsmostimpactingmentalhealthacrosssectionalstudy
AT temimelaura newrankingindextoidentifytheworkrelatedpsychosocialfactorsmostimpactingmentalhealthacrosssectionalstudy
AT legeronpatrick newrankingindextoidentifytheworkrelatedpsychosocialfactorsmostimpactingmentalhealthacrosssectionalstudy
AT gaillardraphael newrankingindextoidentifytheworkrelatedpsychosocialfactorsmostimpactingmentalhealthacrosssectionalstudy
AT saportagilbert newrankingindextoidentifytheworkrelatedpsychosocialfactorsmostimpactingmentalhealthacrosssectionalstudy
AT hocinemounian newrankingindextoidentifytheworkrelatedpsychosocialfactorsmostimpactingmentalhealthacrosssectionalstudy