Cargando…
Comparison of Modified Ultrafast Giemsa Stain with the Standard May Grunwald Giemsa Stain in FNAC of Various Organs
BACKGROUND: The May-Grünwald Giemsa Stain is one of the preferred Romanwsky stains in studying cell morphology of air-dried smears with respect to cellular and nuclear size details and metachromatic extracellular ground with an approximate staining time of 20–30 min. A reduction in staining time and...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9809423/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36605869 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/joc.joc_43_22 |
_version_ | 1784863121554276352 |
---|---|
author | Deepthi, B. Prayaga, Aruna K. Rukmangadha, N. |
author_facet | Deepthi, B. Prayaga, Aruna K. Rukmangadha, N. |
author_sort | Deepthi, B. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The May-Grünwald Giemsa Stain is one of the preferred Romanwsky stains in studying cell morphology of air-dried smears with respect to cellular and nuclear size details and metachromatic extracellular ground with an approximate staining time of 20–30 min. A reduction in staining time and possible application of an ultrafast stain for rapid onsite evaluation (ROSE) of cytological material is the need of the hour. With the application of the new modified ultrafast Giemsa (MUFG) technique, rapid staining can be achieved, thereby helping in triaging of samples and, most importantly, providing an early preliminary diagnosis. AIMS: The aim is to assess the quality index of the MUFG technique in FNAC of various organs in comparison with the standard MGG stain. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 61 FNAC cases were studied by random sampling. Two smears were prepared for each case and stained by both. Scores were given based on five parameters, and the quality index was calculated. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: Results were analyzed using mean, median, standard deviation, “t” paired test, “P” value, and M-diff for statistical significance. RESULTS: The quality index of MUFG smears was comparable to the standard MGG stain in salivary gland, breast, and thyroid aspirates and low in lymph node and soft tissue aspirates. MUFG is a rapid cost-effective stain which can be applied in the setting of ROSE for a preliminary diagnosis. CONCLUSION: MUFG is a reliable alternative and rapid technique for cytology diagnosis. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9809423 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Wolters Kluwer - Medknow |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-98094232023-01-04 Comparison of Modified Ultrafast Giemsa Stain with the Standard May Grunwald Giemsa Stain in FNAC of Various Organs Deepthi, B. Prayaga, Aruna K. Rukmangadha, N. J Cytol Original Article BACKGROUND: The May-Grünwald Giemsa Stain is one of the preferred Romanwsky stains in studying cell morphology of air-dried smears with respect to cellular and nuclear size details and metachromatic extracellular ground with an approximate staining time of 20–30 min. A reduction in staining time and possible application of an ultrafast stain for rapid onsite evaluation (ROSE) of cytological material is the need of the hour. With the application of the new modified ultrafast Giemsa (MUFG) technique, rapid staining can be achieved, thereby helping in triaging of samples and, most importantly, providing an early preliminary diagnosis. AIMS: The aim is to assess the quality index of the MUFG technique in FNAC of various organs in comparison with the standard MGG stain. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 61 FNAC cases were studied by random sampling. Two smears were prepared for each case and stained by both. Scores were given based on five parameters, and the quality index was calculated. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: Results were analyzed using mean, median, standard deviation, “t” paired test, “P” value, and M-diff for statistical significance. RESULTS: The quality index of MUFG smears was comparable to the standard MGG stain in salivary gland, breast, and thyroid aspirates and low in lymph node and soft tissue aspirates. MUFG is a rapid cost-effective stain which can be applied in the setting of ROSE for a preliminary diagnosis. CONCLUSION: MUFG is a reliable alternative and rapid technique for cytology diagnosis. Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2022 2022-11-08 /pmc/articles/PMC9809423/ /pubmed/36605869 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/joc.joc_43_22 Text en Copyright: © 2022 Journal of Cytology https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Deepthi, B. Prayaga, Aruna K. Rukmangadha, N. Comparison of Modified Ultrafast Giemsa Stain with the Standard May Grunwald Giemsa Stain in FNAC of Various Organs |
title | Comparison of Modified Ultrafast Giemsa Stain with the Standard May Grunwald Giemsa Stain in FNAC of Various Organs |
title_full | Comparison of Modified Ultrafast Giemsa Stain with the Standard May Grunwald Giemsa Stain in FNAC of Various Organs |
title_fullStr | Comparison of Modified Ultrafast Giemsa Stain with the Standard May Grunwald Giemsa Stain in FNAC of Various Organs |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of Modified Ultrafast Giemsa Stain with the Standard May Grunwald Giemsa Stain in FNAC of Various Organs |
title_short | Comparison of Modified Ultrafast Giemsa Stain with the Standard May Grunwald Giemsa Stain in FNAC of Various Organs |
title_sort | comparison of modified ultrafast giemsa stain with the standard may grunwald giemsa stain in fnac of various organs |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9809423/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36605869 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/joc.joc_43_22 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT deepthib comparisonofmodifiedultrafastgiemsastainwiththestandardmaygrunwaldgiemsastaininfnacofvariousorgans AT prayagaarunak comparisonofmodifiedultrafastgiemsastainwiththestandardmaygrunwaldgiemsastaininfnacofvariousorgans AT rukmangadhan comparisonofmodifiedultrafastgiemsastainwiththestandardmaygrunwaldgiemsastaininfnacofvariousorgans |