Cargando…

Technical versus biological variability in a synthetic human gut community

Synthetic communities grown in well-controlled conditions are an important tool to decipher the mechanisms driving community dynamics. However, replicate time series of synthetic human gut communities in chemostats are rare, and it is thus still an open question to what extent stochasticity impacts...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: van de Velde, Charlotte, Joseph, Clémence, Simoens, Kenneth, Raes, Jeroen, Bernaerts, Kristel, Faust, Karoline
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Taylor & Francis 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9809966/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36580382
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/19490976.2022.2155019
_version_ 1784863231792119808
author van de Velde, Charlotte
Joseph, Clémence
Simoens, Kenneth
Raes, Jeroen
Bernaerts, Kristel
Faust, Karoline
author_facet van de Velde, Charlotte
Joseph, Clémence
Simoens, Kenneth
Raes, Jeroen
Bernaerts, Kristel
Faust, Karoline
author_sort van de Velde, Charlotte
collection PubMed
description Synthetic communities grown in well-controlled conditions are an important tool to decipher the mechanisms driving community dynamics. However, replicate time series of synthetic human gut communities in chemostats are rare, and it is thus still an open question to what extent stochasticity impacts gut community dynamics. Here, we address this question with a synthetic human gut bacterial community using an automated fermentation system that allows for a larger number of biological replicates. We collected six biological replicates for a community initially consisting of five common gut bacterial species that fill different metabolic niches. After an initial 12 hours in batch mode, we switched to chemostat mode and observed the community to stabilize after 2–3 days. Community profiling with 16S rRNA resulted in high variability across replicate vessels and high technical variability, while the variability across replicates was significantly lower for flow cytometric data. Both techniques agree on the decrease in the abundance of Bacteroides thetaiotaomicron, accompanied by an initial increase in Blautia hydrogenotrophica. These changes occurred together with reproducible metabolic shifts, namely a fast depletion of glucose and trehalose concentration in batch followed by a decrease in formic acid and pyruvic acid concentrations within the first 12 hours after the switch to chemostat mode. In conclusion, the observed variability in the synthetic bacterial human gut community, as assessed with 16S rRNA gene sequencing, is largely due to technical variability. The low variability seen in HPLC and flow cytometry data suggests a highly deterministic system.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9809966
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Taylor & Francis
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-98099662023-01-04 Technical versus biological variability in a synthetic human gut community van de Velde, Charlotte Joseph, Clémence Simoens, Kenneth Raes, Jeroen Bernaerts, Kristel Faust, Karoline Gut Microbes Research Paper Synthetic communities grown in well-controlled conditions are an important tool to decipher the mechanisms driving community dynamics. However, replicate time series of synthetic human gut communities in chemostats are rare, and it is thus still an open question to what extent stochasticity impacts gut community dynamics. Here, we address this question with a synthetic human gut bacterial community using an automated fermentation system that allows for a larger number of biological replicates. We collected six biological replicates for a community initially consisting of five common gut bacterial species that fill different metabolic niches. After an initial 12 hours in batch mode, we switched to chemostat mode and observed the community to stabilize after 2–3 days. Community profiling with 16S rRNA resulted in high variability across replicate vessels and high technical variability, while the variability across replicates was significantly lower for flow cytometric data. Both techniques agree on the decrease in the abundance of Bacteroides thetaiotaomicron, accompanied by an initial increase in Blautia hydrogenotrophica. These changes occurred together with reproducible metabolic shifts, namely a fast depletion of glucose and trehalose concentration in batch followed by a decrease in formic acid and pyruvic acid concentrations within the first 12 hours after the switch to chemostat mode. In conclusion, the observed variability in the synthetic bacterial human gut community, as assessed with 16S rRNA gene sequencing, is largely due to technical variability. The low variability seen in HPLC and flow cytometry data suggests a highly deterministic system. Taylor & Francis 2022-12-29 /pmc/articles/PMC9809966/ /pubmed/36580382 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/19490976.2022.2155019 Text en © 2022 The Author(s). Published with license by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Paper
van de Velde, Charlotte
Joseph, Clémence
Simoens, Kenneth
Raes, Jeroen
Bernaerts, Kristel
Faust, Karoline
Technical versus biological variability in a synthetic human gut community
title Technical versus biological variability in a synthetic human gut community
title_full Technical versus biological variability in a synthetic human gut community
title_fullStr Technical versus biological variability in a synthetic human gut community
title_full_unstemmed Technical versus biological variability in a synthetic human gut community
title_short Technical versus biological variability in a synthetic human gut community
title_sort technical versus biological variability in a synthetic human gut community
topic Research Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9809966/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36580382
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/19490976.2022.2155019
work_keys_str_mv AT vandeveldecharlotte technicalversusbiologicalvariabilityinasynthetichumangutcommunity
AT josephclemence technicalversusbiologicalvariabilityinasynthetichumangutcommunity
AT simoenskenneth technicalversusbiologicalvariabilityinasynthetichumangutcommunity
AT raesjeroen technicalversusbiologicalvariabilityinasynthetichumangutcommunity
AT bernaertskristel technicalversusbiologicalvariabilityinasynthetichumangutcommunity
AT faustkaroline technicalversusbiologicalvariabilityinasynthetichumangutcommunity