Cargando…
Evaluating accurate and efficient sampling strategies designed to measure social behavior and brush use in drylot housed cattle
Efficient sampling strategies expedite behavioral data collection. While multiple studies have evaluated sampling strategies for core behaviors in cattle, few have focused on social interactions. To identify sampling strategies that accurately captured cattle social behaviors and brush use feedlot s...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9810158/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36595554 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0278233 |
_version_ | 1784863251422511104 |
---|---|
author | Lozada, Claudia Carolina Park, Rachel M. Daigle, Courtney L. |
author_facet | Lozada, Claudia Carolina Park, Rachel M. Daigle, Courtney L. |
author_sort | Lozada, Claudia Carolina |
collection | PubMed |
description | Efficient sampling strategies expedite behavioral data collection. While multiple studies have evaluated sampling strategies for core behaviors in cattle, few have focused on social interactions. To identify sampling strategies that accurately captured cattle social behaviors and brush use feedlot steers (n = 3 pens; 9 steers/pen) were observed from 8:00 to 17:00. Average bout duration (sec), total duration per day (sec), and bout frequency were recorded for allogrooming, bar licking, tongue rolling, and brush utilization. Frequency was recorded for headbutting and mounting. Data was extracted from continuous observation datasets using eight different sampling strategies and the results subsequently compared. Differences among sampling strategies were evaluated using a non-parametric One-Way ANOVA Kruskal-Wallis Test. Pearson correlation evaluated the strength of association between a specific sampling strategy and continuous observations. Bout duration for allogrooming (P > 0.65), bar licking (P > 0.60), tongue rolling (P > 0.99), brush use (P > 0.99), and mounting frequency (P > 0.70) did not differ from continuous observations. Tongue rolling (r(2) > 0.95, P <0.0001) and brush use (r(2) > 0.70, P < 0.0003) were best captured when cattle were observed from 08:00 to 14:00. When cattle were continuously observed from 08:00 to 14:00 or for 15 minutes every 30 minutes, allogrooming (P > 0.2) (frequency, duration), bar licking (P > 0.95) (frequency, duration), brush use (P > 0.1) (frequency, duration), heat butt (P > 0.30) (frequency), or tongue rolling (P > 0.30) (frequency, duration) did not differ from continuous observations. Observing cattle for 15 minutes every 30 minutes yielded the highest accuracy for all behavioral metrics and was considered the most effective strategy for comprehensively evaluating cattle social behavior (r(2) > 75; P < 0.05). These results provide insight into accurate and efficient sampling strategies that expedite social behavior data collection in cattle and will facilitate efficient generation of new knowledge regarding cattle social behaviors. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9810158 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-98101582023-01-04 Evaluating accurate and efficient sampling strategies designed to measure social behavior and brush use in drylot housed cattle Lozada, Claudia Carolina Park, Rachel M. Daigle, Courtney L. PLoS One Research Article Efficient sampling strategies expedite behavioral data collection. While multiple studies have evaluated sampling strategies for core behaviors in cattle, few have focused on social interactions. To identify sampling strategies that accurately captured cattle social behaviors and brush use feedlot steers (n = 3 pens; 9 steers/pen) were observed from 8:00 to 17:00. Average bout duration (sec), total duration per day (sec), and bout frequency were recorded for allogrooming, bar licking, tongue rolling, and brush utilization. Frequency was recorded for headbutting and mounting. Data was extracted from continuous observation datasets using eight different sampling strategies and the results subsequently compared. Differences among sampling strategies were evaluated using a non-parametric One-Way ANOVA Kruskal-Wallis Test. Pearson correlation evaluated the strength of association between a specific sampling strategy and continuous observations. Bout duration for allogrooming (P > 0.65), bar licking (P > 0.60), tongue rolling (P > 0.99), brush use (P > 0.99), and mounting frequency (P > 0.70) did not differ from continuous observations. Tongue rolling (r(2) > 0.95, P <0.0001) and brush use (r(2) > 0.70, P < 0.0003) were best captured when cattle were observed from 08:00 to 14:00. When cattle were continuously observed from 08:00 to 14:00 or for 15 minutes every 30 minutes, allogrooming (P > 0.2) (frequency, duration), bar licking (P > 0.95) (frequency, duration), brush use (P > 0.1) (frequency, duration), heat butt (P > 0.30) (frequency), or tongue rolling (P > 0.30) (frequency, duration) did not differ from continuous observations. Observing cattle for 15 minutes every 30 minutes yielded the highest accuracy for all behavioral metrics and was considered the most effective strategy for comprehensively evaluating cattle social behavior (r(2) > 75; P < 0.05). These results provide insight into accurate and efficient sampling strategies that expedite social behavior data collection in cattle and will facilitate efficient generation of new knowledge regarding cattle social behaviors. Public Library of Science 2023-01-03 /pmc/articles/PMC9810158/ /pubmed/36595554 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0278233 Text en © 2023 Lozada et al https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Lozada, Claudia Carolina Park, Rachel M. Daigle, Courtney L. Evaluating accurate and efficient sampling strategies designed to measure social behavior and brush use in drylot housed cattle |
title | Evaluating accurate and efficient sampling strategies designed to measure social behavior and brush use in drylot housed cattle |
title_full | Evaluating accurate and efficient sampling strategies designed to measure social behavior and brush use in drylot housed cattle |
title_fullStr | Evaluating accurate and efficient sampling strategies designed to measure social behavior and brush use in drylot housed cattle |
title_full_unstemmed | Evaluating accurate and efficient sampling strategies designed to measure social behavior and brush use in drylot housed cattle |
title_short | Evaluating accurate and efficient sampling strategies designed to measure social behavior and brush use in drylot housed cattle |
title_sort | evaluating accurate and efficient sampling strategies designed to measure social behavior and brush use in drylot housed cattle |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9810158/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36595554 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0278233 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT lozadaclaudiacarolina evaluatingaccurateandefficientsamplingstrategiesdesignedtomeasuresocialbehaviorandbrushuseindrylothousedcattle AT parkrachelm evaluatingaccurateandefficientsamplingstrategiesdesignedtomeasuresocialbehaviorandbrushuseindrylothousedcattle AT daiglecourtneyl evaluatingaccurateandefficientsamplingstrategiesdesignedtomeasuresocialbehaviorandbrushuseindrylothousedcattle |