Cargando…

Evaluating accurate and efficient sampling strategies designed to measure social behavior and brush use in drylot housed cattle

Efficient sampling strategies expedite behavioral data collection. While multiple studies have evaluated sampling strategies for core behaviors in cattle, few have focused on social interactions. To identify sampling strategies that accurately captured cattle social behaviors and brush use feedlot s...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lozada, Claudia Carolina, Park, Rachel M., Daigle, Courtney L.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9810158/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36595554
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0278233
_version_ 1784863251422511104
author Lozada, Claudia Carolina
Park, Rachel M.
Daigle, Courtney L.
author_facet Lozada, Claudia Carolina
Park, Rachel M.
Daigle, Courtney L.
author_sort Lozada, Claudia Carolina
collection PubMed
description Efficient sampling strategies expedite behavioral data collection. While multiple studies have evaluated sampling strategies for core behaviors in cattle, few have focused on social interactions. To identify sampling strategies that accurately captured cattle social behaviors and brush use feedlot steers (n = 3 pens; 9 steers/pen) were observed from 8:00 to 17:00. Average bout duration (sec), total duration per day (sec), and bout frequency were recorded for allogrooming, bar licking, tongue rolling, and brush utilization. Frequency was recorded for headbutting and mounting. Data was extracted from continuous observation datasets using eight different sampling strategies and the results subsequently compared. Differences among sampling strategies were evaluated using a non-parametric One-Way ANOVA Kruskal-Wallis Test. Pearson correlation evaluated the strength of association between a specific sampling strategy and continuous observations. Bout duration for allogrooming (P > 0.65), bar licking (P > 0.60), tongue rolling (P > 0.99), brush use (P > 0.99), and mounting frequency (P > 0.70) did not differ from continuous observations. Tongue rolling (r(2) > 0.95, P <0.0001) and brush use (r(2) > 0.70, P < 0.0003) were best captured when cattle were observed from 08:00 to 14:00. When cattle were continuously observed from 08:00 to 14:00 or for 15 minutes every 30 minutes, allogrooming (P > 0.2) (frequency, duration), bar licking (P > 0.95) (frequency, duration), brush use (P > 0.1) (frequency, duration), heat butt (P > 0.30) (frequency), or tongue rolling (P > 0.30) (frequency, duration) did not differ from continuous observations. Observing cattle for 15 minutes every 30 minutes yielded the highest accuracy for all behavioral metrics and was considered the most effective strategy for comprehensively evaluating cattle social behavior (r(2) > 75; P < 0.05). These results provide insight into accurate and efficient sampling strategies that expedite social behavior data collection in cattle and will facilitate efficient generation of new knowledge regarding cattle social behaviors.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9810158
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-98101582023-01-04 Evaluating accurate and efficient sampling strategies designed to measure social behavior and brush use in drylot housed cattle Lozada, Claudia Carolina Park, Rachel M. Daigle, Courtney L. PLoS One Research Article Efficient sampling strategies expedite behavioral data collection. While multiple studies have evaluated sampling strategies for core behaviors in cattle, few have focused on social interactions. To identify sampling strategies that accurately captured cattle social behaviors and brush use feedlot steers (n = 3 pens; 9 steers/pen) were observed from 8:00 to 17:00. Average bout duration (sec), total duration per day (sec), and bout frequency were recorded for allogrooming, bar licking, tongue rolling, and brush utilization. Frequency was recorded for headbutting and mounting. Data was extracted from continuous observation datasets using eight different sampling strategies and the results subsequently compared. Differences among sampling strategies were evaluated using a non-parametric One-Way ANOVA Kruskal-Wallis Test. Pearson correlation evaluated the strength of association between a specific sampling strategy and continuous observations. Bout duration for allogrooming (P > 0.65), bar licking (P > 0.60), tongue rolling (P > 0.99), brush use (P > 0.99), and mounting frequency (P > 0.70) did not differ from continuous observations. Tongue rolling (r(2) > 0.95, P <0.0001) and brush use (r(2) > 0.70, P < 0.0003) were best captured when cattle were observed from 08:00 to 14:00. When cattle were continuously observed from 08:00 to 14:00 or for 15 minutes every 30 minutes, allogrooming (P > 0.2) (frequency, duration), bar licking (P > 0.95) (frequency, duration), brush use (P > 0.1) (frequency, duration), heat butt (P > 0.30) (frequency), or tongue rolling (P > 0.30) (frequency, duration) did not differ from continuous observations. Observing cattle for 15 minutes every 30 minutes yielded the highest accuracy for all behavioral metrics and was considered the most effective strategy for comprehensively evaluating cattle social behavior (r(2) > 75; P < 0.05). These results provide insight into accurate and efficient sampling strategies that expedite social behavior data collection in cattle and will facilitate efficient generation of new knowledge regarding cattle social behaviors. Public Library of Science 2023-01-03 /pmc/articles/PMC9810158/ /pubmed/36595554 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0278233 Text en © 2023 Lozada et al https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Lozada, Claudia Carolina
Park, Rachel M.
Daigle, Courtney L.
Evaluating accurate and efficient sampling strategies designed to measure social behavior and brush use in drylot housed cattle
title Evaluating accurate and efficient sampling strategies designed to measure social behavior and brush use in drylot housed cattle
title_full Evaluating accurate and efficient sampling strategies designed to measure social behavior and brush use in drylot housed cattle
title_fullStr Evaluating accurate and efficient sampling strategies designed to measure social behavior and brush use in drylot housed cattle
title_full_unstemmed Evaluating accurate and efficient sampling strategies designed to measure social behavior and brush use in drylot housed cattle
title_short Evaluating accurate and efficient sampling strategies designed to measure social behavior and brush use in drylot housed cattle
title_sort evaluating accurate and efficient sampling strategies designed to measure social behavior and brush use in drylot housed cattle
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9810158/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36595554
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0278233
work_keys_str_mv AT lozadaclaudiacarolina evaluatingaccurateandefficientsamplingstrategiesdesignedtomeasuresocialbehaviorandbrushuseindrylothousedcattle
AT parkrachelm evaluatingaccurateandefficientsamplingstrategiesdesignedtomeasuresocialbehaviorandbrushuseindrylothousedcattle
AT daiglecourtneyl evaluatingaccurateandefficientsamplingstrategiesdesignedtomeasuresocialbehaviorandbrushuseindrylothousedcattle