Cargando…
A Comparison of Bioimpedance Spectroscopy or Tape Measure Triggered Compression Intervention in Chronic Breast Cancer Lymphedema Prevention
BACKGROUND: This study compared rates of progression to chronic breast cancer-related lymphedema (defined as ≥ 10% arm volume change from baseline requiring complex decongestive physiotherapy [CDP]) following an intervention for subclinical lymphedema (S-BCRL) triggered by bioimpedance spectroscopy...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Mary Ann Liebert, Inc., publishers
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9810346/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35099283 http://dx.doi.org/10.1089/lrb.2021.0084 |
_version_ | 1784863292666150912 |
---|---|
author | Ridner, Sheila H. Dietrich, Mary S. Boyages, John Koelmeyer, Louise Elder, Elisabeth Hughes, T. Michael French, James Ngui, Nicholas Hsu, Jeremy Abramson, Vandana G. Moore, Andrew Shah, Chirag |
author_facet | Ridner, Sheila H. Dietrich, Mary S. Boyages, John Koelmeyer, Louise Elder, Elisabeth Hughes, T. Michael French, James Ngui, Nicholas Hsu, Jeremy Abramson, Vandana G. Moore, Andrew Shah, Chirag |
author_sort | Ridner, Sheila H. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: This study compared rates of progression to chronic breast cancer-related lymphedema (defined as ≥ 10% arm volume change from baseline requiring complex decongestive physiotherapy [CDP]) following an intervention for subclinical lymphedema (S-BCRL) triggered by bioimpedance spectroscopy (BIS) or by tape measurement (TM). METHODS AND RESULTS: This stratified, randomized, international trial enrolled new breast cancer patients undergoing: mastectomy/partial mastectomy, axillary treatment (dissection, sentinel lymph node biopsy [SLNB] >6 nodes or radiation), radiation therapy (chest wall/breast, supraclavicular fossa), or taxane-based chemotherapy. Following postsurgery eligibility reassessment, centralized, 1:1 randomization to prospective surveillance by BIS or TM occurred. S-BCRL detection triggered a 4-week, 12-hour per day, compression sleeve, and gauntlet intervention. The primary outcome (n = 209), rates of postintervention progression to CDP, was assessed over 3 years. Between June 24, 2014 and September 11, 2018, 1200 patients were enrolled, 963 randomized (BIS n = 482; TM n = 481) and 879 analyzed (BIS n = 442; TM n = 437). Median follow-up was 32.9 months (interquartile range = 22, 35). BIS patients triggered an intervention at a lower rate than TM patients (20.1%, n = 89 vs. 27.5%, n = 120, p = 0.011). Median months to trigger were longer with BIS than TM (9.7; 95% confidence interval [CI], 8.2–12.6 vs. 3.9; 95% CI, 2.8–4.5, p = 0.001). Overall, 14.4% (n = 30) progressed post-intervention, with reduced likelihood for BIS patients than TM patients (7.9%, n = 7 vs. 19.2%, n = 23; relative risk = 0.41; 95% CI, 0.13–0.81; absolute reduction 11.3%; 95% CI, 2.3–20.3; p = 0.016). CONCLUSIONS: Compared to TM, BIS provides a more precise identification of patients likely to benefit from an early compression intervention. Clinical Trial Registration number: NCT02167659. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9810346 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Mary Ann Liebert, Inc., publishers |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-98103462023-01-11 A Comparison of Bioimpedance Spectroscopy or Tape Measure Triggered Compression Intervention in Chronic Breast Cancer Lymphedema Prevention Ridner, Sheila H. Dietrich, Mary S. Boyages, John Koelmeyer, Louise Elder, Elisabeth Hughes, T. Michael French, James Ngui, Nicholas Hsu, Jeremy Abramson, Vandana G. Moore, Andrew Shah, Chirag Lymphat Res Biol Article BACKGROUND: This study compared rates of progression to chronic breast cancer-related lymphedema (defined as ≥ 10% arm volume change from baseline requiring complex decongestive physiotherapy [CDP]) following an intervention for subclinical lymphedema (S-BCRL) triggered by bioimpedance spectroscopy (BIS) or by tape measurement (TM). METHODS AND RESULTS: This stratified, randomized, international trial enrolled new breast cancer patients undergoing: mastectomy/partial mastectomy, axillary treatment (dissection, sentinel lymph node biopsy [SLNB] >6 nodes or radiation), radiation therapy (chest wall/breast, supraclavicular fossa), or taxane-based chemotherapy. Following postsurgery eligibility reassessment, centralized, 1:1 randomization to prospective surveillance by BIS or TM occurred. S-BCRL detection triggered a 4-week, 12-hour per day, compression sleeve, and gauntlet intervention. The primary outcome (n = 209), rates of postintervention progression to CDP, was assessed over 3 years. Between June 24, 2014 and September 11, 2018, 1200 patients were enrolled, 963 randomized (BIS n = 482; TM n = 481) and 879 analyzed (BIS n = 442; TM n = 437). Median follow-up was 32.9 months (interquartile range = 22, 35). BIS patients triggered an intervention at a lower rate than TM patients (20.1%, n = 89 vs. 27.5%, n = 120, p = 0.011). Median months to trigger were longer with BIS than TM (9.7; 95% confidence interval [CI], 8.2–12.6 vs. 3.9; 95% CI, 2.8–4.5, p = 0.001). Overall, 14.4% (n = 30) progressed post-intervention, with reduced likelihood for BIS patients than TM patients (7.9%, n = 7 vs. 19.2%, n = 23; relative risk = 0.41; 95% CI, 0.13–0.81; absolute reduction 11.3%; 95% CI, 2.3–20.3; p = 0.016). CONCLUSIONS: Compared to TM, BIS provides a more precise identification of patients likely to benefit from an early compression intervention. Clinical Trial Registration number: NCT02167659. Mary Ann Liebert, Inc., publishers 2022-12-01 2022-12-15 /pmc/articles/PMC9810346/ /pubmed/35099283 http://dx.doi.org/10.1089/lrb.2021.0084 Text en © Sheila H. Ridner et al. 2022; Published by Mary Ann Liebert, Inc. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This Open Access article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons License [CC-BY] (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Article Ridner, Sheila H. Dietrich, Mary S. Boyages, John Koelmeyer, Louise Elder, Elisabeth Hughes, T. Michael French, James Ngui, Nicholas Hsu, Jeremy Abramson, Vandana G. Moore, Andrew Shah, Chirag A Comparison of Bioimpedance Spectroscopy or Tape Measure Triggered Compression Intervention in Chronic Breast Cancer Lymphedema Prevention |
title | A Comparison of Bioimpedance Spectroscopy or Tape Measure Triggered Compression Intervention in Chronic Breast Cancer Lymphedema Prevention |
title_full | A Comparison of Bioimpedance Spectroscopy or Tape Measure Triggered Compression Intervention in Chronic Breast Cancer Lymphedema Prevention |
title_fullStr | A Comparison of Bioimpedance Spectroscopy or Tape Measure Triggered Compression Intervention in Chronic Breast Cancer Lymphedema Prevention |
title_full_unstemmed | A Comparison of Bioimpedance Spectroscopy or Tape Measure Triggered Compression Intervention in Chronic Breast Cancer Lymphedema Prevention |
title_short | A Comparison of Bioimpedance Spectroscopy or Tape Measure Triggered Compression Intervention in Chronic Breast Cancer Lymphedema Prevention |
title_sort | comparison of bioimpedance spectroscopy or tape measure triggered compression intervention in chronic breast cancer lymphedema prevention |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9810346/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35099283 http://dx.doi.org/10.1089/lrb.2021.0084 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ridnersheilah acomparisonofbioimpedancespectroscopyortapemeasuretriggeredcompressioninterventioninchronicbreastcancerlymphedemaprevention AT dietrichmarys acomparisonofbioimpedancespectroscopyortapemeasuretriggeredcompressioninterventioninchronicbreastcancerlymphedemaprevention AT boyagesjohn acomparisonofbioimpedancespectroscopyortapemeasuretriggeredcompressioninterventioninchronicbreastcancerlymphedemaprevention AT koelmeyerlouise acomparisonofbioimpedancespectroscopyortapemeasuretriggeredcompressioninterventioninchronicbreastcancerlymphedemaprevention AT elderelisabeth acomparisonofbioimpedancespectroscopyortapemeasuretriggeredcompressioninterventioninchronicbreastcancerlymphedemaprevention AT hughestmichael acomparisonofbioimpedancespectroscopyortapemeasuretriggeredcompressioninterventioninchronicbreastcancerlymphedemaprevention AT frenchjames acomparisonofbioimpedancespectroscopyortapemeasuretriggeredcompressioninterventioninchronicbreastcancerlymphedemaprevention AT nguinicholas acomparisonofbioimpedancespectroscopyortapemeasuretriggeredcompressioninterventioninchronicbreastcancerlymphedemaprevention AT hsujeremy acomparisonofbioimpedancespectroscopyortapemeasuretriggeredcompressioninterventioninchronicbreastcancerlymphedemaprevention AT abramsonvandanag acomparisonofbioimpedancespectroscopyortapemeasuretriggeredcompressioninterventioninchronicbreastcancerlymphedemaprevention AT mooreandrew acomparisonofbioimpedancespectroscopyortapemeasuretriggeredcompressioninterventioninchronicbreastcancerlymphedemaprevention AT shahchirag acomparisonofbioimpedancespectroscopyortapemeasuretriggeredcompressioninterventioninchronicbreastcancerlymphedemaprevention AT ridnersheilah comparisonofbioimpedancespectroscopyortapemeasuretriggeredcompressioninterventioninchronicbreastcancerlymphedemaprevention AT dietrichmarys comparisonofbioimpedancespectroscopyortapemeasuretriggeredcompressioninterventioninchronicbreastcancerlymphedemaprevention AT boyagesjohn comparisonofbioimpedancespectroscopyortapemeasuretriggeredcompressioninterventioninchronicbreastcancerlymphedemaprevention AT koelmeyerlouise comparisonofbioimpedancespectroscopyortapemeasuretriggeredcompressioninterventioninchronicbreastcancerlymphedemaprevention AT elderelisabeth comparisonofbioimpedancespectroscopyortapemeasuretriggeredcompressioninterventioninchronicbreastcancerlymphedemaprevention AT hughestmichael comparisonofbioimpedancespectroscopyortapemeasuretriggeredcompressioninterventioninchronicbreastcancerlymphedemaprevention AT frenchjames comparisonofbioimpedancespectroscopyortapemeasuretriggeredcompressioninterventioninchronicbreastcancerlymphedemaprevention AT nguinicholas comparisonofbioimpedancespectroscopyortapemeasuretriggeredcompressioninterventioninchronicbreastcancerlymphedemaprevention AT hsujeremy comparisonofbioimpedancespectroscopyortapemeasuretriggeredcompressioninterventioninchronicbreastcancerlymphedemaprevention AT abramsonvandanag comparisonofbioimpedancespectroscopyortapemeasuretriggeredcompressioninterventioninchronicbreastcancerlymphedemaprevention AT mooreandrew comparisonofbioimpedancespectroscopyortapemeasuretriggeredcompressioninterventioninchronicbreastcancerlymphedemaprevention AT shahchirag comparisonofbioimpedancespectroscopyortapemeasuretriggeredcompressioninterventioninchronicbreastcancerlymphedemaprevention |