Cargando…

A Comparison of Bioimpedance Spectroscopy or Tape Measure Triggered Compression Intervention in Chronic Breast Cancer Lymphedema Prevention

BACKGROUND: This study compared rates of progression to chronic breast cancer-related lymphedema (defined as ≥ 10% arm volume change from baseline requiring complex decongestive physiotherapy [CDP]) following an intervention for subclinical lymphedema (S-BCRL) triggered by bioimpedance spectroscopy...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ridner, Sheila H., Dietrich, Mary S., Boyages, John, Koelmeyer, Louise, Elder, Elisabeth, Hughes, T. Michael, French, James, Ngui, Nicholas, Hsu, Jeremy, Abramson, Vandana G., Moore, Andrew, Shah, Chirag
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Mary Ann Liebert, Inc., publishers 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9810346/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35099283
http://dx.doi.org/10.1089/lrb.2021.0084
_version_ 1784863292666150912
author Ridner, Sheila H.
Dietrich, Mary S.
Boyages, John
Koelmeyer, Louise
Elder, Elisabeth
Hughes, T. Michael
French, James
Ngui, Nicholas
Hsu, Jeremy
Abramson, Vandana G.
Moore, Andrew
Shah, Chirag
author_facet Ridner, Sheila H.
Dietrich, Mary S.
Boyages, John
Koelmeyer, Louise
Elder, Elisabeth
Hughes, T. Michael
French, James
Ngui, Nicholas
Hsu, Jeremy
Abramson, Vandana G.
Moore, Andrew
Shah, Chirag
author_sort Ridner, Sheila H.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: This study compared rates of progression to chronic breast cancer-related lymphedema (defined as ≥ 10% arm volume change from baseline requiring complex decongestive physiotherapy [CDP]) following an intervention for subclinical lymphedema (S-BCRL) triggered by bioimpedance spectroscopy (BIS) or by tape measurement (TM). METHODS AND RESULTS: This stratified, randomized, international trial enrolled new breast cancer patients undergoing: mastectomy/partial mastectomy, axillary treatment (dissection, sentinel lymph node biopsy [SLNB] >6 nodes or radiation), radiation therapy (chest wall/breast, supraclavicular fossa), or taxane-based chemotherapy. Following postsurgery eligibility reassessment, centralized, 1:1 randomization to prospective surveillance by BIS or TM occurred. S-BCRL detection triggered a 4-week, 12-hour per day, compression sleeve, and gauntlet intervention. The primary outcome (n = 209), rates of postintervention progression to CDP, was assessed over 3 years. Between June 24, 2014 and September 11, 2018, 1200 patients were enrolled, 963 randomized (BIS n = 482; TM n = 481) and 879 analyzed (BIS n = 442; TM n = 437). Median follow-up was 32.9 months (interquartile range = 22, 35). BIS patients triggered an intervention at a lower rate than TM patients (20.1%, n = 89 vs. 27.5%, n = 120, p = 0.011). Median months to trigger were longer with BIS than TM (9.7; 95% confidence interval [CI], 8.2–12.6 vs. 3.9; 95% CI, 2.8–4.5, p = 0.001). Overall, 14.4% (n = 30) progressed post-intervention, with reduced likelihood for BIS patients than TM patients (7.9%, n = 7 vs. 19.2%, n = 23; relative risk = 0.41; 95% CI, 0.13–0.81; absolute reduction 11.3%; 95% CI, 2.3–20.3; p = 0.016). CONCLUSIONS: Compared to TM, BIS provides a more precise identification of patients likely to benefit from an early compression intervention. Clinical Trial Registration number: NCT02167659.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9810346
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Mary Ann Liebert, Inc., publishers
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-98103462023-01-11 A Comparison of Bioimpedance Spectroscopy or Tape Measure Triggered Compression Intervention in Chronic Breast Cancer Lymphedema Prevention Ridner, Sheila H. Dietrich, Mary S. Boyages, John Koelmeyer, Louise Elder, Elisabeth Hughes, T. Michael French, James Ngui, Nicholas Hsu, Jeremy Abramson, Vandana G. Moore, Andrew Shah, Chirag Lymphat Res Biol Article BACKGROUND: This study compared rates of progression to chronic breast cancer-related lymphedema (defined as ≥ 10% arm volume change from baseline requiring complex decongestive physiotherapy [CDP]) following an intervention for subclinical lymphedema (S-BCRL) triggered by bioimpedance spectroscopy (BIS) or by tape measurement (TM). METHODS AND RESULTS: This stratified, randomized, international trial enrolled new breast cancer patients undergoing: mastectomy/partial mastectomy, axillary treatment (dissection, sentinel lymph node biopsy [SLNB] >6 nodes or radiation), radiation therapy (chest wall/breast, supraclavicular fossa), or taxane-based chemotherapy. Following postsurgery eligibility reassessment, centralized, 1:1 randomization to prospective surveillance by BIS or TM occurred. S-BCRL detection triggered a 4-week, 12-hour per day, compression sleeve, and gauntlet intervention. The primary outcome (n = 209), rates of postintervention progression to CDP, was assessed over 3 years. Between June 24, 2014 and September 11, 2018, 1200 patients were enrolled, 963 randomized (BIS n = 482; TM n = 481) and 879 analyzed (BIS n = 442; TM n = 437). Median follow-up was 32.9 months (interquartile range = 22, 35). BIS patients triggered an intervention at a lower rate than TM patients (20.1%, n = 89 vs. 27.5%, n = 120, p = 0.011). Median months to trigger were longer with BIS than TM (9.7; 95% confidence interval [CI], 8.2–12.6 vs. 3.9; 95% CI, 2.8–4.5, p = 0.001). Overall, 14.4% (n = 30) progressed post-intervention, with reduced likelihood for BIS patients than TM patients (7.9%, n = 7 vs. 19.2%, n = 23; relative risk = 0.41; 95% CI, 0.13–0.81; absolute reduction 11.3%; 95% CI, 2.3–20.3; p = 0.016). CONCLUSIONS: Compared to TM, BIS provides a more precise identification of patients likely to benefit from an early compression intervention. Clinical Trial Registration number: NCT02167659. Mary Ann Liebert, Inc., publishers 2022-12-01 2022-12-15 /pmc/articles/PMC9810346/ /pubmed/35099283 http://dx.doi.org/10.1089/lrb.2021.0084 Text en © Sheila H. Ridner et al. 2022; Published by Mary Ann Liebert, Inc. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This Open Access article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons License [CC-BY] (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Article
Ridner, Sheila H.
Dietrich, Mary S.
Boyages, John
Koelmeyer, Louise
Elder, Elisabeth
Hughes, T. Michael
French, James
Ngui, Nicholas
Hsu, Jeremy
Abramson, Vandana G.
Moore, Andrew
Shah, Chirag
A Comparison of Bioimpedance Spectroscopy or Tape Measure Triggered Compression Intervention in Chronic Breast Cancer Lymphedema Prevention
title A Comparison of Bioimpedance Spectroscopy or Tape Measure Triggered Compression Intervention in Chronic Breast Cancer Lymphedema Prevention
title_full A Comparison of Bioimpedance Spectroscopy or Tape Measure Triggered Compression Intervention in Chronic Breast Cancer Lymphedema Prevention
title_fullStr A Comparison of Bioimpedance Spectroscopy or Tape Measure Triggered Compression Intervention in Chronic Breast Cancer Lymphedema Prevention
title_full_unstemmed A Comparison of Bioimpedance Spectroscopy or Tape Measure Triggered Compression Intervention in Chronic Breast Cancer Lymphedema Prevention
title_short A Comparison of Bioimpedance Spectroscopy or Tape Measure Triggered Compression Intervention in Chronic Breast Cancer Lymphedema Prevention
title_sort comparison of bioimpedance spectroscopy or tape measure triggered compression intervention in chronic breast cancer lymphedema prevention
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9810346/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35099283
http://dx.doi.org/10.1089/lrb.2021.0084
work_keys_str_mv AT ridnersheilah acomparisonofbioimpedancespectroscopyortapemeasuretriggeredcompressioninterventioninchronicbreastcancerlymphedemaprevention
AT dietrichmarys acomparisonofbioimpedancespectroscopyortapemeasuretriggeredcompressioninterventioninchronicbreastcancerlymphedemaprevention
AT boyagesjohn acomparisonofbioimpedancespectroscopyortapemeasuretriggeredcompressioninterventioninchronicbreastcancerlymphedemaprevention
AT koelmeyerlouise acomparisonofbioimpedancespectroscopyortapemeasuretriggeredcompressioninterventioninchronicbreastcancerlymphedemaprevention
AT elderelisabeth acomparisonofbioimpedancespectroscopyortapemeasuretriggeredcompressioninterventioninchronicbreastcancerlymphedemaprevention
AT hughestmichael acomparisonofbioimpedancespectroscopyortapemeasuretriggeredcompressioninterventioninchronicbreastcancerlymphedemaprevention
AT frenchjames acomparisonofbioimpedancespectroscopyortapemeasuretriggeredcompressioninterventioninchronicbreastcancerlymphedemaprevention
AT nguinicholas acomparisonofbioimpedancespectroscopyortapemeasuretriggeredcompressioninterventioninchronicbreastcancerlymphedemaprevention
AT hsujeremy acomparisonofbioimpedancespectroscopyortapemeasuretriggeredcompressioninterventioninchronicbreastcancerlymphedemaprevention
AT abramsonvandanag acomparisonofbioimpedancespectroscopyortapemeasuretriggeredcompressioninterventioninchronicbreastcancerlymphedemaprevention
AT mooreandrew acomparisonofbioimpedancespectroscopyortapemeasuretriggeredcompressioninterventioninchronicbreastcancerlymphedemaprevention
AT shahchirag acomparisonofbioimpedancespectroscopyortapemeasuretriggeredcompressioninterventioninchronicbreastcancerlymphedemaprevention
AT ridnersheilah comparisonofbioimpedancespectroscopyortapemeasuretriggeredcompressioninterventioninchronicbreastcancerlymphedemaprevention
AT dietrichmarys comparisonofbioimpedancespectroscopyortapemeasuretriggeredcompressioninterventioninchronicbreastcancerlymphedemaprevention
AT boyagesjohn comparisonofbioimpedancespectroscopyortapemeasuretriggeredcompressioninterventioninchronicbreastcancerlymphedemaprevention
AT koelmeyerlouise comparisonofbioimpedancespectroscopyortapemeasuretriggeredcompressioninterventioninchronicbreastcancerlymphedemaprevention
AT elderelisabeth comparisonofbioimpedancespectroscopyortapemeasuretriggeredcompressioninterventioninchronicbreastcancerlymphedemaprevention
AT hughestmichael comparisonofbioimpedancespectroscopyortapemeasuretriggeredcompressioninterventioninchronicbreastcancerlymphedemaprevention
AT frenchjames comparisonofbioimpedancespectroscopyortapemeasuretriggeredcompressioninterventioninchronicbreastcancerlymphedemaprevention
AT nguinicholas comparisonofbioimpedancespectroscopyortapemeasuretriggeredcompressioninterventioninchronicbreastcancerlymphedemaprevention
AT hsujeremy comparisonofbioimpedancespectroscopyortapemeasuretriggeredcompressioninterventioninchronicbreastcancerlymphedemaprevention
AT abramsonvandanag comparisonofbioimpedancespectroscopyortapemeasuretriggeredcompressioninterventioninchronicbreastcancerlymphedemaprevention
AT mooreandrew comparisonofbioimpedancespectroscopyortapemeasuretriggeredcompressioninterventioninchronicbreastcancerlymphedemaprevention
AT shahchirag comparisonofbioimpedancespectroscopyortapemeasuretriggeredcompressioninterventioninchronicbreastcancerlymphedemaprevention