Cargando…
Implanting intracranial electrodes does not affect spikes or network connectivity in nearby or connected brain regions
To determine the effect of implanting electrodes on electrographic features of nearby and connected brain regions in patients with drug-resistant epilepsy, we analyzed intracranial EEG recordings from 10 patients with drug-resistant epilepsy who underwent implant revision (placement of additional el...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MIT Press
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9810371/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36607198 http://dx.doi.org/10.1162/netn_a_00248 |
_version_ | 1784863296947486720 |
---|---|
author | Conrad, Erin C. Shinohara, Russell T. Gugger, James J. Revell, Andrew Y. Das, Sandhitsu Stein, Joel M. Marsh, Eric D. Davis, Kathryn A. Litt, Brian |
author_facet | Conrad, Erin C. Shinohara, Russell T. Gugger, James J. Revell, Andrew Y. Das, Sandhitsu Stein, Joel M. Marsh, Eric D. Davis, Kathryn A. Litt, Brian |
author_sort | Conrad, Erin C. |
collection | PubMed |
description | To determine the effect of implanting electrodes on electrographic features of nearby and connected brain regions in patients with drug-resistant epilepsy, we analyzed intracranial EEG recordings from 10 patients with drug-resistant epilepsy who underwent implant revision (placement of additional electrodes) during their hospitalization. We performed automated spike detection and measured EEG functional networks. We analyzed the original electrodes that remained in place throughout the full EEG recording, and we measured the change in spike rates and network connectivity in these original electrodes in response to implanting new electrodes. There was no change in overall spike rate pre- to post-implant revision (t(9) = 0.1, p = 0.95). The peri-revision change in the distribution of spike rate and connectivity across electrodes was no greater than chance (Monte Carlo method, spikes: p = 0.40, connectivity: p = 0.42). Electrodes closer to or more functionally connected to the revision site had no greater change in spike rate or connectivity than more distant or less connected electrodes. Changes in electrographic features surrounding electrode implantation are no greater than baseline fluctuations occurring throughout the intracranial recording. These findings argue against an implant effect on spikes or network connectivity in nearby or connected brain regions. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9810371 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | MIT Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-98103712023-01-04 Implanting intracranial electrodes does not affect spikes or network connectivity in nearby or connected brain regions Conrad, Erin C. Shinohara, Russell T. Gugger, James J. Revell, Andrew Y. Das, Sandhitsu Stein, Joel M. Marsh, Eric D. Davis, Kathryn A. Litt, Brian Netw Neurosci Research Article To determine the effect of implanting electrodes on electrographic features of nearby and connected brain regions in patients with drug-resistant epilepsy, we analyzed intracranial EEG recordings from 10 patients with drug-resistant epilepsy who underwent implant revision (placement of additional electrodes) during their hospitalization. We performed automated spike detection and measured EEG functional networks. We analyzed the original electrodes that remained in place throughout the full EEG recording, and we measured the change in spike rates and network connectivity in these original electrodes in response to implanting new electrodes. There was no change in overall spike rate pre- to post-implant revision (t(9) = 0.1, p = 0.95). The peri-revision change in the distribution of spike rate and connectivity across electrodes was no greater than chance (Monte Carlo method, spikes: p = 0.40, connectivity: p = 0.42). Electrodes closer to or more functionally connected to the revision site had no greater change in spike rate or connectivity than more distant or less connected electrodes. Changes in electrographic features surrounding electrode implantation are no greater than baseline fluctuations occurring throughout the intracranial recording. These findings argue against an implant effect on spikes or network connectivity in nearby or connected brain regions. MIT Press 2022-07-01 /pmc/articles/PMC9810371/ /pubmed/36607198 http://dx.doi.org/10.1162/netn_a_00248 Text en © 2022 Massachusetts Institute of Technology https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For a full description of the license, please visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Conrad, Erin C. Shinohara, Russell T. Gugger, James J. Revell, Andrew Y. Das, Sandhitsu Stein, Joel M. Marsh, Eric D. Davis, Kathryn A. Litt, Brian Implanting intracranial electrodes does not affect spikes or network connectivity in nearby or connected brain regions |
title | Implanting intracranial electrodes does not affect spikes or network connectivity in nearby or connected brain regions |
title_full | Implanting intracranial electrodes does not affect spikes or network connectivity in nearby or connected brain regions |
title_fullStr | Implanting intracranial electrodes does not affect spikes or network connectivity in nearby or connected brain regions |
title_full_unstemmed | Implanting intracranial electrodes does not affect spikes or network connectivity in nearby or connected brain regions |
title_short | Implanting intracranial electrodes does not affect spikes or network connectivity in nearby or connected brain regions |
title_sort | implanting intracranial electrodes does not affect spikes or network connectivity in nearby or connected brain regions |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9810371/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36607198 http://dx.doi.org/10.1162/netn_a_00248 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT conraderinc implantingintracranialelectrodesdoesnotaffectspikesornetworkconnectivityinnearbyorconnectedbrainregions AT shinohararussellt implantingintracranialelectrodesdoesnotaffectspikesornetworkconnectivityinnearbyorconnectedbrainregions AT guggerjamesj implantingintracranialelectrodesdoesnotaffectspikesornetworkconnectivityinnearbyorconnectedbrainregions AT revellandrewy implantingintracranialelectrodesdoesnotaffectspikesornetworkconnectivityinnearbyorconnectedbrainregions AT dassandhitsu implantingintracranialelectrodesdoesnotaffectspikesornetworkconnectivityinnearbyorconnectedbrainregions AT steinjoelm implantingintracranialelectrodesdoesnotaffectspikesornetworkconnectivityinnearbyorconnectedbrainregions AT marshericd implantingintracranialelectrodesdoesnotaffectspikesornetworkconnectivityinnearbyorconnectedbrainregions AT daviskathryna implantingintracranialelectrodesdoesnotaffectspikesornetworkconnectivityinnearbyorconnectedbrainregions AT littbrian implantingintracranialelectrodesdoesnotaffectspikesornetworkconnectivityinnearbyorconnectedbrainregions |