Cargando…

Implanting intracranial electrodes does not affect spikes or network connectivity in nearby or connected brain regions

To determine the effect of implanting electrodes on electrographic features of nearby and connected brain regions in patients with drug-resistant epilepsy, we analyzed intracranial EEG recordings from 10 patients with drug-resistant epilepsy who underwent implant revision (placement of additional el...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Conrad, Erin C., Shinohara, Russell T., Gugger, James J., Revell, Andrew Y., Das, Sandhitsu, Stein, Joel M., Marsh, Eric D., Davis, Kathryn A., Litt, Brian
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MIT Press 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9810371/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36607198
http://dx.doi.org/10.1162/netn_a_00248
_version_ 1784863296947486720
author Conrad, Erin C.
Shinohara, Russell T.
Gugger, James J.
Revell, Andrew Y.
Das, Sandhitsu
Stein, Joel M.
Marsh, Eric D.
Davis, Kathryn A.
Litt, Brian
author_facet Conrad, Erin C.
Shinohara, Russell T.
Gugger, James J.
Revell, Andrew Y.
Das, Sandhitsu
Stein, Joel M.
Marsh, Eric D.
Davis, Kathryn A.
Litt, Brian
author_sort Conrad, Erin C.
collection PubMed
description To determine the effect of implanting electrodes on electrographic features of nearby and connected brain regions in patients with drug-resistant epilepsy, we analyzed intracranial EEG recordings from 10 patients with drug-resistant epilepsy who underwent implant revision (placement of additional electrodes) during their hospitalization. We performed automated spike detection and measured EEG functional networks. We analyzed the original electrodes that remained in place throughout the full EEG recording, and we measured the change in spike rates and network connectivity in these original electrodes in response to implanting new electrodes. There was no change in overall spike rate pre- to post-implant revision (t(9) = 0.1, p = 0.95). The peri-revision change in the distribution of spike rate and connectivity across electrodes was no greater than chance (Monte Carlo method, spikes: p = 0.40, connectivity: p = 0.42). Electrodes closer to or more functionally connected to the revision site had no greater change in spike rate or connectivity than more distant or less connected electrodes. Changes in electrographic features surrounding electrode implantation are no greater than baseline fluctuations occurring throughout the intracranial recording. These findings argue against an implant effect on spikes or network connectivity in nearby or connected brain regions.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9810371
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MIT Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-98103712023-01-04 Implanting intracranial electrodes does not affect spikes or network connectivity in nearby or connected brain regions Conrad, Erin C. Shinohara, Russell T. Gugger, James J. Revell, Andrew Y. Das, Sandhitsu Stein, Joel M. Marsh, Eric D. Davis, Kathryn A. Litt, Brian Netw Neurosci Research Article To determine the effect of implanting electrodes on electrographic features of nearby and connected brain regions in patients with drug-resistant epilepsy, we analyzed intracranial EEG recordings from 10 patients with drug-resistant epilepsy who underwent implant revision (placement of additional electrodes) during their hospitalization. We performed automated spike detection and measured EEG functional networks. We analyzed the original electrodes that remained in place throughout the full EEG recording, and we measured the change in spike rates and network connectivity in these original electrodes in response to implanting new electrodes. There was no change in overall spike rate pre- to post-implant revision (t(9) = 0.1, p = 0.95). The peri-revision change in the distribution of spike rate and connectivity across electrodes was no greater than chance (Monte Carlo method, spikes: p = 0.40, connectivity: p = 0.42). Electrodes closer to or more functionally connected to the revision site had no greater change in spike rate or connectivity than more distant or less connected electrodes. Changes in electrographic features surrounding electrode implantation are no greater than baseline fluctuations occurring throughout the intracranial recording. These findings argue against an implant effect on spikes or network connectivity in nearby or connected brain regions. MIT Press 2022-07-01 /pmc/articles/PMC9810371/ /pubmed/36607198 http://dx.doi.org/10.1162/netn_a_00248 Text en © 2022 Massachusetts Institute of Technology https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For a full description of the license, please visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Research Article
Conrad, Erin C.
Shinohara, Russell T.
Gugger, James J.
Revell, Andrew Y.
Das, Sandhitsu
Stein, Joel M.
Marsh, Eric D.
Davis, Kathryn A.
Litt, Brian
Implanting intracranial electrodes does not affect spikes or network connectivity in nearby or connected brain regions
title Implanting intracranial electrodes does not affect spikes or network connectivity in nearby or connected brain regions
title_full Implanting intracranial electrodes does not affect spikes or network connectivity in nearby or connected brain regions
title_fullStr Implanting intracranial electrodes does not affect spikes or network connectivity in nearby or connected brain regions
title_full_unstemmed Implanting intracranial electrodes does not affect spikes or network connectivity in nearby or connected brain regions
title_short Implanting intracranial electrodes does not affect spikes or network connectivity in nearby or connected brain regions
title_sort implanting intracranial electrodes does not affect spikes or network connectivity in nearby or connected brain regions
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9810371/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36607198
http://dx.doi.org/10.1162/netn_a_00248
work_keys_str_mv AT conraderinc implantingintracranialelectrodesdoesnotaffectspikesornetworkconnectivityinnearbyorconnectedbrainregions
AT shinohararussellt implantingintracranialelectrodesdoesnotaffectspikesornetworkconnectivityinnearbyorconnectedbrainregions
AT guggerjamesj implantingintracranialelectrodesdoesnotaffectspikesornetworkconnectivityinnearbyorconnectedbrainregions
AT revellandrewy implantingintracranialelectrodesdoesnotaffectspikesornetworkconnectivityinnearbyorconnectedbrainregions
AT dassandhitsu implantingintracranialelectrodesdoesnotaffectspikesornetworkconnectivityinnearbyorconnectedbrainregions
AT steinjoelm implantingintracranialelectrodesdoesnotaffectspikesornetworkconnectivityinnearbyorconnectedbrainregions
AT marshericd implantingintracranialelectrodesdoesnotaffectspikesornetworkconnectivityinnearbyorconnectedbrainregions
AT daviskathryna implantingintracranialelectrodesdoesnotaffectspikesornetworkconnectivityinnearbyorconnectedbrainregions
AT littbrian implantingintracranialelectrodesdoesnotaffectspikesornetworkconnectivityinnearbyorconnectedbrainregions