Cargando…

Protein–protein complexes can undermine ultrasensitivity-dependent biological adaptation

Robust perfect adaptation (RPA) is a ubiquitously observed signalling response across all scales of biological organization. A major class of network architectures that drive RPA in complex networks is the Opposer module—a feedback-regulated network into which specialized integral-computing ‘opposer...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jeynes-Smith, C., Araujo, R. P.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Royal Society 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9810431/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36596458
http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rsif.2022.0553
_version_ 1784863309208485888
author Jeynes-Smith, C.
Araujo, R. P.
author_facet Jeynes-Smith, C.
Araujo, R. P.
author_sort Jeynes-Smith, C.
collection PubMed
description Robust perfect adaptation (RPA) is a ubiquitously observed signalling response across all scales of biological organization. A major class of network architectures that drive RPA in complex networks is the Opposer module—a feedback-regulated network into which specialized integral-computing ‘opposer node(s)’ are embedded. Although ultrasensitivity-generating chemical reactions have long been considered a possible mechanism for such adaptation-conferring opposer nodes, this hypothesis has relied on simplified Michaelian models, which neglect the presence of protein–protein complexes. Here we develop complex-complete models of interlinked covalent-modification cycles with embedded ultrasensitivity, explicitly capturing all molecular interactions and protein complexes. Strikingly, we demonstrate that the presence of protein–protein complexes thwarts the network’s capacity for RPA in any ‘free’ active protein form, conferring RPA capacity instead on the concentration of a larger protein pool consisting of two distinct forms of a single protein. We further show that the presence of enzyme–substrate complexes, even at comparatively low concentrations, play a crucial and previously unrecognized role in controlling the RPA response—significantly reducing the range of network inputs for which RPA can obtain, and imposing greater parametric requirements on the RPA response. These surprising results raise fundamental new questions as to the biochemical requirements for adaptation-conferring Opposer modules within complex cellular networks.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9810431
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher The Royal Society
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-98104312023-01-11 Protein–protein complexes can undermine ultrasensitivity-dependent biological adaptation Jeynes-Smith, C. Araujo, R. P. J R Soc Interface Life Sciences–Mathematics interface Robust perfect adaptation (RPA) is a ubiquitously observed signalling response across all scales of biological organization. A major class of network architectures that drive RPA in complex networks is the Opposer module—a feedback-regulated network into which specialized integral-computing ‘opposer node(s)’ are embedded. Although ultrasensitivity-generating chemical reactions have long been considered a possible mechanism for such adaptation-conferring opposer nodes, this hypothesis has relied on simplified Michaelian models, which neglect the presence of protein–protein complexes. Here we develop complex-complete models of interlinked covalent-modification cycles with embedded ultrasensitivity, explicitly capturing all molecular interactions and protein complexes. Strikingly, we demonstrate that the presence of protein–protein complexes thwarts the network’s capacity for RPA in any ‘free’ active protein form, conferring RPA capacity instead on the concentration of a larger protein pool consisting of two distinct forms of a single protein. We further show that the presence of enzyme–substrate complexes, even at comparatively low concentrations, play a crucial and previously unrecognized role in controlling the RPA response—significantly reducing the range of network inputs for which RPA can obtain, and imposing greater parametric requirements on the RPA response. These surprising results raise fundamental new questions as to the biochemical requirements for adaptation-conferring Opposer modules within complex cellular networks. The Royal Society 2023-01-04 /pmc/articles/PMC9810431/ /pubmed/36596458 http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rsif.2022.0553 Text en © 2023 The Authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Published by the Royal Society under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Life Sciences–Mathematics interface
Jeynes-Smith, C.
Araujo, R. P.
Protein–protein complexes can undermine ultrasensitivity-dependent biological adaptation
title Protein–protein complexes can undermine ultrasensitivity-dependent biological adaptation
title_full Protein–protein complexes can undermine ultrasensitivity-dependent biological adaptation
title_fullStr Protein–protein complexes can undermine ultrasensitivity-dependent biological adaptation
title_full_unstemmed Protein–protein complexes can undermine ultrasensitivity-dependent biological adaptation
title_short Protein–protein complexes can undermine ultrasensitivity-dependent biological adaptation
title_sort protein–protein complexes can undermine ultrasensitivity-dependent biological adaptation
topic Life Sciences–Mathematics interface
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9810431/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36596458
http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rsif.2022.0553
work_keys_str_mv AT jeynessmithc proteinproteincomplexescanundermineultrasensitivitydependentbiologicaladaptation
AT araujorp proteinproteincomplexescanundermineultrasensitivitydependentbiologicaladaptation