Cargando…

A Systematic Review of Echocardiographic Parameters for the Screening of Pulmonary Hypertension: What Are the Odds?

Pulmonary hypertension (PH) is an insidious disease that often presents in late stages due to nonspecific signs and symptoms. Right heart catheterization (RHC) is the gold standard diagnostic test, and echocardiogram (ECHO) is the best screening tool. However, the strength of evidence and diagnostic...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Balakrishnan, Bathmapriya, Owens, Bradley, Hayes, Ryan, Wen, Sijin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Cureus 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9810508/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36620785
http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.32185
_version_ 1784863320571904000
author Balakrishnan, Bathmapriya
Owens, Bradley
Hayes, Ryan
Wen, Sijin
author_facet Balakrishnan, Bathmapriya
Owens, Bradley
Hayes, Ryan
Wen, Sijin
author_sort Balakrishnan, Bathmapriya
collection PubMed
description Pulmonary hypertension (PH) is an insidious disease that often presents in late stages due to nonspecific signs and symptoms. Right heart catheterization (RHC) is the gold standard diagnostic test, and echocardiogram (ECHO) is the best screening tool. However, the strength of evidence and diagnostic utility of various echocardiographic parameters to screen for is not well elucidated. This systematic review (SR) is reported in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement. Literature searches was performed for the period of January 1, 2016, to June 1, 2021, on seven databases. We included full-text studies with adult patients that used RHC for comparison and provided sensitivity and specificity results. Likelihood ratios (LRs) and diagnostic odds ratios (DORs) were calculated. Risk of bias was assessed using the Quality Assessment Tool for the Observational Cohort and Cross-Sectional Studies. We identified 102 studies, but only 14 satisfied our inclusion criteria. The most significant parameters identified for PH screening based on LRs are, in descending order, tricuspid regurgitation gradient peak >36mmHg, systolic pulmonary artery pressure >41mmHg, and tricuspid regurgitation velocity >2.9 m/s. There is strong correlation between LR and DOR for these parameters. This SR indicates the superiority of some ECHO parameters over others to aid in the screening and severity assessment of PH. Variables with low LR (-) ratios may help to prevent unnecessary invasive assessment for PH. Clinicians should utilize a multi-parameter approach when interpreting echocardiograms for PH assessment.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9810508
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Cureus
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-98105082023-01-05 A Systematic Review of Echocardiographic Parameters for the Screening of Pulmonary Hypertension: What Are the Odds? Balakrishnan, Bathmapriya Owens, Bradley Hayes, Ryan Wen, Sijin Cureus Cardiology Pulmonary hypertension (PH) is an insidious disease that often presents in late stages due to nonspecific signs and symptoms. Right heart catheterization (RHC) is the gold standard diagnostic test, and echocardiogram (ECHO) is the best screening tool. However, the strength of evidence and diagnostic utility of various echocardiographic parameters to screen for is not well elucidated. This systematic review (SR) is reported in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement. Literature searches was performed for the period of January 1, 2016, to June 1, 2021, on seven databases. We included full-text studies with adult patients that used RHC for comparison and provided sensitivity and specificity results. Likelihood ratios (LRs) and diagnostic odds ratios (DORs) were calculated. Risk of bias was assessed using the Quality Assessment Tool for the Observational Cohort and Cross-Sectional Studies. We identified 102 studies, but only 14 satisfied our inclusion criteria. The most significant parameters identified for PH screening based on LRs are, in descending order, tricuspid regurgitation gradient peak >36mmHg, systolic pulmonary artery pressure >41mmHg, and tricuspid regurgitation velocity >2.9 m/s. There is strong correlation between LR and DOR for these parameters. This SR indicates the superiority of some ECHO parameters over others to aid in the screening and severity assessment of PH. Variables with low LR (-) ratios may help to prevent unnecessary invasive assessment for PH. Clinicians should utilize a multi-parameter approach when interpreting echocardiograms for PH assessment. Cureus 2022-12-04 /pmc/articles/PMC9810508/ /pubmed/36620785 http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.32185 Text en Copyright © 2022, Balakrishnan et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Cardiology
Balakrishnan, Bathmapriya
Owens, Bradley
Hayes, Ryan
Wen, Sijin
A Systematic Review of Echocardiographic Parameters for the Screening of Pulmonary Hypertension: What Are the Odds?
title A Systematic Review of Echocardiographic Parameters for the Screening of Pulmonary Hypertension: What Are the Odds?
title_full A Systematic Review of Echocardiographic Parameters for the Screening of Pulmonary Hypertension: What Are the Odds?
title_fullStr A Systematic Review of Echocardiographic Parameters for the Screening of Pulmonary Hypertension: What Are the Odds?
title_full_unstemmed A Systematic Review of Echocardiographic Parameters for the Screening of Pulmonary Hypertension: What Are the Odds?
title_short A Systematic Review of Echocardiographic Parameters for the Screening of Pulmonary Hypertension: What Are the Odds?
title_sort systematic review of echocardiographic parameters for the screening of pulmonary hypertension: what are the odds?
topic Cardiology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9810508/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36620785
http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.32185
work_keys_str_mv AT balakrishnanbathmapriya asystematicreviewofechocardiographicparametersforthescreeningofpulmonaryhypertensionwhataretheodds
AT owensbradley asystematicreviewofechocardiographicparametersforthescreeningofpulmonaryhypertensionwhataretheodds
AT hayesryan asystematicreviewofechocardiographicparametersforthescreeningofpulmonaryhypertensionwhataretheodds
AT wensijin asystematicreviewofechocardiographicparametersforthescreeningofpulmonaryhypertensionwhataretheodds
AT balakrishnanbathmapriya systematicreviewofechocardiographicparametersforthescreeningofpulmonaryhypertensionwhataretheodds
AT owensbradley systematicreviewofechocardiographicparametersforthescreeningofpulmonaryhypertensionwhataretheodds
AT hayesryan systematicreviewofechocardiographicparametersforthescreeningofpulmonaryhypertensionwhataretheodds
AT wensijin systematicreviewofechocardiographicparametersforthescreeningofpulmonaryhypertensionwhataretheodds