Cargando…
A Systematic Review of Echocardiographic Parameters for the Screening of Pulmonary Hypertension: What Are the Odds?
Pulmonary hypertension (PH) is an insidious disease that often presents in late stages due to nonspecific signs and symptoms. Right heart catheterization (RHC) is the gold standard diagnostic test, and echocardiogram (ECHO) is the best screening tool. However, the strength of evidence and diagnostic...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Cureus
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9810508/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36620785 http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.32185 |
_version_ | 1784863320571904000 |
---|---|
author | Balakrishnan, Bathmapriya Owens, Bradley Hayes, Ryan Wen, Sijin |
author_facet | Balakrishnan, Bathmapriya Owens, Bradley Hayes, Ryan Wen, Sijin |
author_sort | Balakrishnan, Bathmapriya |
collection | PubMed |
description | Pulmonary hypertension (PH) is an insidious disease that often presents in late stages due to nonspecific signs and symptoms. Right heart catheterization (RHC) is the gold standard diagnostic test, and echocardiogram (ECHO) is the best screening tool. However, the strength of evidence and diagnostic utility of various echocardiographic parameters to screen for is not well elucidated. This systematic review (SR) is reported in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement. Literature searches was performed for the period of January 1, 2016, to June 1, 2021, on seven databases. We included full-text studies with adult patients that used RHC for comparison and provided sensitivity and specificity results. Likelihood ratios (LRs) and diagnostic odds ratios (DORs) were calculated. Risk of bias was assessed using the Quality Assessment Tool for the Observational Cohort and Cross-Sectional Studies. We identified 102 studies, but only 14 satisfied our inclusion criteria. The most significant parameters identified for PH screening based on LRs are, in descending order, tricuspid regurgitation gradient peak >36mmHg, systolic pulmonary artery pressure >41mmHg, and tricuspid regurgitation velocity >2.9 m/s. There is strong correlation between LR and DOR for these parameters. This SR indicates the superiority of some ECHO parameters over others to aid in the screening and severity assessment of PH. Variables with low LR (-) ratios may help to prevent unnecessary invasive assessment for PH. Clinicians should utilize a multi-parameter approach when interpreting echocardiograms for PH assessment. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9810508 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Cureus |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-98105082023-01-05 A Systematic Review of Echocardiographic Parameters for the Screening of Pulmonary Hypertension: What Are the Odds? Balakrishnan, Bathmapriya Owens, Bradley Hayes, Ryan Wen, Sijin Cureus Cardiology Pulmonary hypertension (PH) is an insidious disease that often presents in late stages due to nonspecific signs and symptoms. Right heart catheterization (RHC) is the gold standard diagnostic test, and echocardiogram (ECHO) is the best screening tool. However, the strength of evidence and diagnostic utility of various echocardiographic parameters to screen for is not well elucidated. This systematic review (SR) is reported in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement. Literature searches was performed for the period of January 1, 2016, to June 1, 2021, on seven databases. We included full-text studies with adult patients that used RHC for comparison and provided sensitivity and specificity results. Likelihood ratios (LRs) and diagnostic odds ratios (DORs) were calculated. Risk of bias was assessed using the Quality Assessment Tool for the Observational Cohort and Cross-Sectional Studies. We identified 102 studies, but only 14 satisfied our inclusion criteria. The most significant parameters identified for PH screening based on LRs are, in descending order, tricuspid regurgitation gradient peak >36mmHg, systolic pulmonary artery pressure >41mmHg, and tricuspid regurgitation velocity >2.9 m/s. There is strong correlation between LR and DOR for these parameters. This SR indicates the superiority of some ECHO parameters over others to aid in the screening and severity assessment of PH. Variables with low LR (-) ratios may help to prevent unnecessary invasive assessment for PH. Clinicians should utilize a multi-parameter approach when interpreting echocardiograms for PH assessment. Cureus 2022-12-04 /pmc/articles/PMC9810508/ /pubmed/36620785 http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.32185 Text en Copyright © 2022, Balakrishnan et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Cardiology Balakrishnan, Bathmapriya Owens, Bradley Hayes, Ryan Wen, Sijin A Systematic Review of Echocardiographic Parameters for the Screening of Pulmonary Hypertension: What Are the Odds? |
title | A Systematic Review of Echocardiographic Parameters for the Screening of Pulmonary Hypertension: What Are the Odds? |
title_full | A Systematic Review of Echocardiographic Parameters for the Screening of Pulmonary Hypertension: What Are the Odds? |
title_fullStr | A Systematic Review of Echocardiographic Parameters for the Screening of Pulmonary Hypertension: What Are the Odds? |
title_full_unstemmed | A Systematic Review of Echocardiographic Parameters for the Screening of Pulmonary Hypertension: What Are the Odds? |
title_short | A Systematic Review of Echocardiographic Parameters for the Screening of Pulmonary Hypertension: What Are the Odds? |
title_sort | systematic review of echocardiographic parameters for the screening of pulmonary hypertension: what are the odds? |
topic | Cardiology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9810508/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36620785 http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.32185 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT balakrishnanbathmapriya asystematicreviewofechocardiographicparametersforthescreeningofpulmonaryhypertensionwhataretheodds AT owensbradley asystematicreviewofechocardiographicparametersforthescreeningofpulmonaryhypertensionwhataretheodds AT hayesryan asystematicreviewofechocardiographicparametersforthescreeningofpulmonaryhypertensionwhataretheodds AT wensijin asystematicreviewofechocardiographicparametersforthescreeningofpulmonaryhypertensionwhataretheodds AT balakrishnanbathmapriya systematicreviewofechocardiographicparametersforthescreeningofpulmonaryhypertensionwhataretheodds AT owensbradley systematicreviewofechocardiographicparametersforthescreeningofpulmonaryhypertensionwhataretheodds AT hayesryan systematicreviewofechocardiographicparametersforthescreeningofpulmonaryhypertensionwhataretheodds AT wensijin systematicreviewofechocardiographicparametersforthescreeningofpulmonaryhypertensionwhataretheodds |