Cargando…

Multicenter, single-blind, randomized controlled study of the efficacy and safety of favipiravir and nafamostat mesilate in patients with COVID-19 pneumonia

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of nafamostat combined with favipiravir for the treatment of COVID-19. METHODS: We conducted a multicenter, randomized, single-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel assignment study in hospitalized patients with mild-to-moderate COVID-19 pneumonia. Patie...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ikeda, Mahoko, Okugawa, Shu, Kashiwabara, Kosuke, Moritoyo, Takashi, Kanno, Yoshiaki, Jubishi, Daisuke, Hashimoto, Hideki, Okamoto, Koh, Tsushima, Kenji, Uchida, Yasuki, Mitsumura, Takahiro, Igari, Hidetoshi, Tsutsumi, Takeya, Araoka, Hideki, Yatera, Kazuhiro, Yamamoto, Yoshihiro, Nakamura, Yuki, Otani, Amato, Yamashita, Marie, Wakimoto, Yuji, Shinohara, Takayuki, Adachi-Katayama, Maho, Oyabu, Tatsunori, Kanematsu, Aoi, Harada, Sohei, Takeshita, Yuichiro, Nakano, Yasutaka, Miyazaki, Yasunari, Sakao, Seiichiro, Saito, Makoto, Ogura, Sho, Yamasaki, Kei, Kawasuji, Hitoshi, Hataji, Osamu, Inoue, Jun-Ichiro, Seto, Yasuyuki, Moriya, Kyoji
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd on behalf of International Society for Infectious Diseases. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9810545/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36610659
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijid.2022.12.039
Descripción
Sumario:OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of nafamostat combined with favipiravir for the treatment of COVID-19. METHODS: We conducted a multicenter, randomized, single-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel assignment study in hospitalized patients with mild-to-moderate COVID-19 pneumonia. Patients were randomly assigned to receive favipiravir alone (n = 24) or nafamostat with favipiravir (n = 21). The outcomes included changes in the World Health Organization clinical progression scale score, time to improvement in body temperature, and improvement in oxygen saturation (SpO(2)). RESULTS: There was no significant difference in the changes in the clinical progression scale between nafamostat with favipiravir and favipiravir alone groups (median, -0.444 vs -0.150, respectively; least-squares mean difference, -0.294; P = 0.364). The time to improvement in body temperature was significantly shorter in the combination group (5.0 days; 95% confidence interval, 4.0-7.0) than in the favipiravir group (9.0 days; 95% confidence interval, 7.0-18.0; P =0.009). The changes in SpO(2) were greater in the combination group than in the favipiravir group (0.526% vs -1.304%, respectively; least-squares mean difference, 1.831; P = 0.022). No serious adverse events or deaths were reported, but phlebitis occurred in 57.1% of the patients in the combination group. CONCLUSION: Although our study showed no differences in clinical progression, earlier defervescence, and recovery of SpO(2) were observed in the combination group.