Cargando…

Intra- and inter-operator reliability assessment of a novel extramedullary accelerometer-based smart cutting guide for total knee arthroplasty: an in vivo study

PURPOSE: The purpose is to verify the intra- and inter-operator reliability of an extramedullary (EM) accelerometer-based smart cutting guide for distal femoral resection during primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA). The hypothesis of the present study was that the use of the device would result in...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Marcheggiani Muccioli, Giulio Maria, Alesi, Domenico, Russo, Arcangelo, Lo Presti, Mirco, Sassoli, Iacopo, La Verde, Matteo, Zaffagnini, Stefano
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9810562/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36102981
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00264-022-05571-2
_version_ 1784863334782205952
author Marcheggiani Muccioli, Giulio Maria
Alesi, Domenico
Russo, Arcangelo
Lo Presti, Mirco
Sassoli, Iacopo
La Verde, Matteo
Zaffagnini, Stefano
author_facet Marcheggiani Muccioli, Giulio Maria
Alesi, Domenico
Russo, Arcangelo
Lo Presti, Mirco
Sassoli, Iacopo
La Verde, Matteo
Zaffagnini, Stefano
author_sort Marcheggiani Muccioli, Giulio Maria
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: The purpose is to verify the intra- and inter-operator reliability of an extramedullary (EM) accelerometer-based smart cutting guide for distal femoral resection during primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA). The hypothesis of the present study was that the use of the device would result in a good correlation between different operators with a difference between repeated measurements of less than 1°. METHODS: Twenty-five not consecutive patients with knee osteoarthritis undergone to primary TKA using an EM inertial-based cutting guide to perform distal femoral resection. In order to assess the agreement in femoral axis definition of the device, two operators performed three time each the manoeuvres necessary to define axis. Inter-rater agreement was evaluated with Bland and Altman agreement test. Intra-rater repeatability was evaluated analysing average results distribution of repeated measurements. Accuracy of the device was evaluated comparing differences between intra-operative device data with final implant alignment measured on post-operative longstanding x-rays using Students’ t test. RESULTS: Agreement between the two operators was statistically significant (p < 0.05) with a bias of − 0.4° (95% CI − 0.6° to − 0.2°). Average difference between cut orientation measured with device and final implant position, measured on x-rays, was 0.2° (95% CI − 1.5° to 1.7°) with no statistical difference between the two measurements. Final implant alignment, measured on x-ray, was 90.2°, with 95% of cases distributed within range 88.0° to 92.0° for varus-valgus and 2.8° and with 95% of cases distributed within range 2.0° to 4.0° for flexion–extension. CONCLUSIONS: The EM accelerometer-based smart cutting guide used to perform distal femoral resection during primary TKA demonstrated a good intra- and inter-operator reliability in the present in vivo study.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9810562
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-98105622023-01-05 Intra- and inter-operator reliability assessment of a novel extramedullary accelerometer-based smart cutting guide for total knee arthroplasty: an in vivo study Marcheggiani Muccioli, Giulio Maria Alesi, Domenico Russo, Arcangelo Lo Presti, Mirco Sassoli, Iacopo La Verde, Matteo Zaffagnini, Stefano Int Orthop Original Paper PURPOSE: The purpose is to verify the intra- and inter-operator reliability of an extramedullary (EM) accelerometer-based smart cutting guide for distal femoral resection during primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA). The hypothesis of the present study was that the use of the device would result in a good correlation between different operators with a difference between repeated measurements of less than 1°. METHODS: Twenty-five not consecutive patients with knee osteoarthritis undergone to primary TKA using an EM inertial-based cutting guide to perform distal femoral resection. In order to assess the agreement in femoral axis definition of the device, two operators performed three time each the manoeuvres necessary to define axis. Inter-rater agreement was evaluated with Bland and Altman agreement test. Intra-rater repeatability was evaluated analysing average results distribution of repeated measurements. Accuracy of the device was evaluated comparing differences between intra-operative device data with final implant alignment measured on post-operative longstanding x-rays using Students’ t test. RESULTS: Agreement between the two operators was statistically significant (p < 0.05) with a bias of − 0.4° (95% CI − 0.6° to − 0.2°). Average difference between cut orientation measured with device and final implant position, measured on x-rays, was 0.2° (95% CI − 1.5° to 1.7°) with no statistical difference between the two measurements. Final implant alignment, measured on x-ray, was 90.2°, with 95% of cases distributed within range 88.0° to 92.0° for varus-valgus and 2.8° and with 95% of cases distributed within range 2.0° to 4.0° for flexion–extension. CONCLUSIONS: The EM accelerometer-based smart cutting guide used to perform distal femoral resection during primary TKA demonstrated a good intra- and inter-operator reliability in the present in vivo study. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2022-09-14 2023-01 /pmc/articles/PMC9810562/ /pubmed/36102981 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00264-022-05571-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Paper
Marcheggiani Muccioli, Giulio Maria
Alesi, Domenico
Russo, Arcangelo
Lo Presti, Mirco
Sassoli, Iacopo
La Verde, Matteo
Zaffagnini, Stefano
Intra- and inter-operator reliability assessment of a novel extramedullary accelerometer-based smart cutting guide for total knee arthroplasty: an in vivo study
title Intra- and inter-operator reliability assessment of a novel extramedullary accelerometer-based smart cutting guide for total knee arthroplasty: an in vivo study
title_full Intra- and inter-operator reliability assessment of a novel extramedullary accelerometer-based smart cutting guide for total knee arthroplasty: an in vivo study
title_fullStr Intra- and inter-operator reliability assessment of a novel extramedullary accelerometer-based smart cutting guide for total knee arthroplasty: an in vivo study
title_full_unstemmed Intra- and inter-operator reliability assessment of a novel extramedullary accelerometer-based smart cutting guide for total knee arthroplasty: an in vivo study
title_short Intra- and inter-operator reliability assessment of a novel extramedullary accelerometer-based smart cutting guide for total knee arthroplasty: an in vivo study
title_sort intra- and inter-operator reliability assessment of a novel extramedullary accelerometer-based smart cutting guide for total knee arthroplasty: an in vivo study
topic Original Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9810562/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36102981
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00264-022-05571-2
work_keys_str_mv AT marcheggianimuccioligiuliomaria intraandinteroperatorreliabilityassessmentofanovelextramedullaryaccelerometerbasedsmartcuttingguidefortotalkneearthroplastyaninvivostudy
AT alesidomenico intraandinteroperatorreliabilityassessmentofanovelextramedullaryaccelerometerbasedsmartcuttingguidefortotalkneearthroplastyaninvivostudy
AT russoarcangelo intraandinteroperatorreliabilityassessmentofanovelextramedullaryaccelerometerbasedsmartcuttingguidefortotalkneearthroplastyaninvivostudy
AT loprestimirco intraandinteroperatorreliabilityassessmentofanovelextramedullaryaccelerometerbasedsmartcuttingguidefortotalkneearthroplastyaninvivostudy
AT sassoliiacopo intraandinteroperatorreliabilityassessmentofanovelextramedullaryaccelerometerbasedsmartcuttingguidefortotalkneearthroplastyaninvivostudy
AT laverdematteo intraandinteroperatorreliabilityassessmentofanovelextramedullaryaccelerometerbasedsmartcuttingguidefortotalkneearthroplastyaninvivostudy
AT zaffagninistefano intraandinteroperatorreliabilityassessmentofanovelextramedullaryaccelerometerbasedsmartcuttingguidefortotalkneearthroplastyaninvivostudy