Cargando…

Pool vs single sample determination of serum prolactin to explore venipuncture associated stress induced variation

Stress is identified as a cause of transient hyperprolactinemia, whereas venipuncture is considered a source of stress for patient. The aim of this study was to investigate the association of venipuncture-induced stress with elevation of serum prolactin. This was a cross-sectional observational stud...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Das, Madhumita, Gogoi, Chitralekha
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9810589/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36596817
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-27051-8
_version_ 1784863340404670464
author Das, Madhumita
Gogoi, Chitralekha
author_facet Das, Madhumita
Gogoi, Chitralekha
author_sort Das, Madhumita
collection PubMed
description Stress is identified as a cause of transient hyperprolactinemia, whereas venipuncture is considered a source of stress for patient. The aim of this study was to investigate the association of venipuncture-induced stress with elevation of serum prolactin. This was a cross-sectional observational study conducted on a group of 150 outdoor patients visiting a tertiary care hospital. Serial sampling was performed by drawing venous blood at different time intervals (0, 30 and 60 min) by single venipuncture to measure serum prolactin to diagnose stress-induced hyperprolactinemia. The study was conducted in two phases, namely, Phase 1 and Phase 2, at different times. The Phase 1 results were divided into two groups: Group 1 (0 min) and Group 5 (pool prepared from samples collected at 0 + 30 + 60 min). Likewise, the results of Phase 2 were segregated into five groups; Group 1 (0 min), Group 2 (30 min), Group 3 (60 min), Group 4 (average of three groups), and Group 5 (pool from samples collected at 0 + 30 + 60 min). In both Phase 1 and Phase 2 of the study, there was a statistically significant (p = 0.0003 in Phase 1 and p = 0.02 in Phase 2) decrease in the mean prolactin (17.99 ± 24.76 ng/mL in Phase 1 and 19.61 ± 23.42 ng/mL in Phase 2) in the pooled samples (Group 5) in comparison to the mean prolactin (19.67 ± 27.69 ng/mL in Phase 1 and 21.06 ± 25.06 ng/mL in Phase 2) of the serum collected at 0 h (Group 1). There was no significant difference in the mean prolactin measured from the pooled samples and average prolactin calculated after individual testing from each sample collected at 0 h, 30 min and 60 min. Venipuncture-triggered fear and apprehension may result in transient hyperprolactinemia. In comparison to performing multiple testing on the samples collected at different time intervals and determining the mean, measurement of the analyte from the pooled serum is the better alternative as it can conserve both time and resources.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9810589
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-98105892023-01-05 Pool vs single sample determination of serum prolactin to explore venipuncture associated stress induced variation Das, Madhumita Gogoi, Chitralekha Sci Rep Article Stress is identified as a cause of transient hyperprolactinemia, whereas venipuncture is considered a source of stress for patient. The aim of this study was to investigate the association of venipuncture-induced stress with elevation of serum prolactin. This was a cross-sectional observational study conducted on a group of 150 outdoor patients visiting a tertiary care hospital. Serial sampling was performed by drawing venous blood at different time intervals (0, 30 and 60 min) by single venipuncture to measure serum prolactin to diagnose stress-induced hyperprolactinemia. The study was conducted in two phases, namely, Phase 1 and Phase 2, at different times. The Phase 1 results were divided into two groups: Group 1 (0 min) and Group 5 (pool prepared from samples collected at 0 + 30 + 60 min). Likewise, the results of Phase 2 were segregated into five groups; Group 1 (0 min), Group 2 (30 min), Group 3 (60 min), Group 4 (average of three groups), and Group 5 (pool from samples collected at 0 + 30 + 60 min). In both Phase 1 and Phase 2 of the study, there was a statistically significant (p = 0.0003 in Phase 1 and p = 0.02 in Phase 2) decrease in the mean prolactin (17.99 ± 24.76 ng/mL in Phase 1 and 19.61 ± 23.42 ng/mL in Phase 2) in the pooled samples (Group 5) in comparison to the mean prolactin (19.67 ± 27.69 ng/mL in Phase 1 and 21.06 ± 25.06 ng/mL in Phase 2) of the serum collected at 0 h (Group 1). There was no significant difference in the mean prolactin measured from the pooled samples and average prolactin calculated after individual testing from each sample collected at 0 h, 30 min and 60 min. Venipuncture-triggered fear and apprehension may result in transient hyperprolactinemia. In comparison to performing multiple testing on the samples collected at different time intervals and determining the mean, measurement of the analyte from the pooled serum is the better alternative as it can conserve both time and resources. Nature Publishing Group UK 2023-01-03 /pmc/articles/PMC9810589/ /pubmed/36596817 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-27051-8 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Article
Das, Madhumita
Gogoi, Chitralekha
Pool vs single sample determination of serum prolactin to explore venipuncture associated stress induced variation
title Pool vs single sample determination of serum prolactin to explore venipuncture associated stress induced variation
title_full Pool vs single sample determination of serum prolactin to explore venipuncture associated stress induced variation
title_fullStr Pool vs single sample determination of serum prolactin to explore venipuncture associated stress induced variation
title_full_unstemmed Pool vs single sample determination of serum prolactin to explore venipuncture associated stress induced variation
title_short Pool vs single sample determination of serum prolactin to explore venipuncture associated stress induced variation
title_sort pool vs single sample determination of serum prolactin to explore venipuncture associated stress induced variation
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9810589/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36596817
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-27051-8
work_keys_str_mv AT dasmadhumita poolvssinglesampledeterminationofserumprolactintoexplorevenipunctureassociatedstressinducedvariation
AT gogoichitralekha poolvssinglesampledeterminationofserumprolactintoexplorevenipunctureassociatedstressinducedvariation