Cargando…
Outcomes of transcatheter edge-to-edge mitral valve repair with percutaneous coronary intervention vs. surgical mitral valve repair with coronary artery bypass grafting
AIMS: Patients with severe ischemic mitral regurgitation (IMR) may receive concurrent coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) with surgical mitral valve repair (SMVr) or percutaneous coronary stent implantation (PCI) with transcatheter edge-to-edge mitral valve repair (TMVr). However, there is no consen...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9810628/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36620639 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fcvm.2022.953875 |
_version_ | 1784863348666400768 |
---|---|
author | Wang, Xiqiang Ma, Yanpeng Liu, Jing Wang, Ting Zhu, Ling Fan, Xiude Cui, Qianwei Liu, Chengfeng Guan, Gongchang Wang, Junkui Pan, Shuo Liu, Zhongwei Zhang, Yong |
author_facet | Wang, Xiqiang Ma, Yanpeng Liu, Jing Wang, Ting Zhu, Ling Fan, Xiude Cui, Qianwei Liu, Chengfeng Guan, Gongchang Wang, Junkui Pan, Shuo Liu, Zhongwei Zhang, Yong |
author_sort | Wang, Xiqiang |
collection | PubMed |
description | AIMS: Patients with severe ischemic mitral regurgitation (IMR) may receive concurrent coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) with surgical mitral valve repair (SMVr) or percutaneous coronary stent implantation (PCI) with transcatheter edge-to-edge mitral valve repair (TMVr). However, there is no consensus on the management of severe IMR in this setting. We aimed to compare the outcomes of combined SMVr with CABG to concurrent TMVr with PCI among patients with IMR in the National Inpatient Sample (NIS) database. METHODS AND RESULTS: The National Inpatient Sample was queried for all patients diagnosed with IMR who underwent SMVr with CABG or TMVr with PCI during the years 2016–2018. Study outcomes included all-cause in-hospital mortality, periprocedural complications, and resources used. A total of 1,360 potentially eligible patients were included in the study. After 1:5 propensity score matching, 133 patients were classified in the SMVr + CABG group and 29 patients in the TMVr + PCI group. Adjusted mortality was higher in the TMVr + PCI group compared with the SMVr + CABG group (13.8% vs. 4.5%, P = 0.034). Perioperative complications were higher among patients who underwent SMVr + CABG including blood transfusions (29.3% vs. 6.9%, P = 0.01) and post-procedural cardiogenic shock (11.3% vs. 0%, P = 0.044). The cost of care was higher (USD$783548.80 vs. USD$331846.523, P = 0.001) and the length of stay was longer (17.9 vs. 15.44 days, P < 0.001) in the TMVr + PCI group. On multivariable analysis, age (OR, 1.039 [95% CI, 1.006–1.072]; P = 0.032), renal failure (OR, 3.465 [95% CI, 1.867–6.433]; P < 0.001), and liver disease (OR, 5.012 [95% CI, 2.578–9.686]; P < 0.001) were associated with in-hospital mortality. CONCLUSION: TMVr + PCI was associated with higher resource use and in-hospital mortality but with improved perioperative complications compared with SMVr + CABG. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9810628 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-98106282023-01-05 Outcomes of transcatheter edge-to-edge mitral valve repair with percutaneous coronary intervention vs. surgical mitral valve repair with coronary artery bypass grafting Wang, Xiqiang Ma, Yanpeng Liu, Jing Wang, Ting Zhu, Ling Fan, Xiude Cui, Qianwei Liu, Chengfeng Guan, Gongchang Wang, Junkui Pan, Shuo Liu, Zhongwei Zhang, Yong Front Cardiovasc Med Cardiovascular Medicine AIMS: Patients with severe ischemic mitral regurgitation (IMR) may receive concurrent coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) with surgical mitral valve repair (SMVr) or percutaneous coronary stent implantation (PCI) with transcatheter edge-to-edge mitral valve repair (TMVr). However, there is no consensus on the management of severe IMR in this setting. We aimed to compare the outcomes of combined SMVr with CABG to concurrent TMVr with PCI among patients with IMR in the National Inpatient Sample (NIS) database. METHODS AND RESULTS: The National Inpatient Sample was queried for all patients diagnosed with IMR who underwent SMVr with CABG or TMVr with PCI during the years 2016–2018. Study outcomes included all-cause in-hospital mortality, periprocedural complications, and resources used. A total of 1,360 potentially eligible patients were included in the study. After 1:5 propensity score matching, 133 patients were classified in the SMVr + CABG group and 29 patients in the TMVr + PCI group. Adjusted mortality was higher in the TMVr + PCI group compared with the SMVr + CABG group (13.8% vs. 4.5%, P = 0.034). Perioperative complications were higher among patients who underwent SMVr + CABG including blood transfusions (29.3% vs. 6.9%, P = 0.01) and post-procedural cardiogenic shock (11.3% vs. 0%, P = 0.044). The cost of care was higher (USD$783548.80 vs. USD$331846.523, P = 0.001) and the length of stay was longer (17.9 vs. 15.44 days, P < 0.001) in the TMVr + PCI group. On multivariable analysis, age (OR, 1.039 [95% CI, 1.006–1.072]; P = 0.032), renal failure (OR, 3.465 [95% CI, 1.867–6.433]; P < 0.001), and liver disease (OR, 5.012 [95% CI, 2.578–9.686]; P < 0.001) were associated with in-hospital mortality. CONCLUSION: TMVr + PCI was associated with higher resource use and in-hospital mortality but with improved perioperative complications compared with SMVr + CABG. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-12-21 /pmc/articles/PMC9810628/ /pubmed/36620639 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fcvm.2022.953875 Text en Copyright © 2022 Wang, Ma, Liu, Wang, Zhu, Fan, Cui, Liu, Guan, Wang, Pan, Liu and Zhang. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Cardiovascular Medicine Wang, Xiqiang Ma, Yanpeng Liu, Jing Wang, Ting Zhu, Ling Fan, Xiude Cui, Qianwei Liu, Chengfeng Guan, Gongchang Wang, Junkui Pan, Shuo Liu, Zhongwei Zhang, Yong Outcomes of transcatheter edge-to-edge mitral valve repair with percutaneous coronary intervention vs. surgical mitral valve repair with coronary artery bypass grafting |
title | Outcomes of transcatheter edge-to-edge mitral valve repair with percutaneous coronary intervention vs. surgical mitral valve repair with coronary artery bypass grafting |
title_full | Outcomes of transcatheter edge-to-edge mitral valve repair with percutaneous coronary intervention vs. surgical mitral valve repair with coronary artery bypass grafting |
title_fullStr | Outcomes of transcatheter edge-to-edge mitral valve repair with percutaneous coronary intervention vs. surgical mitral valve repair with coronary artery bypass grafting |
title_full_unstemmed | Outcomes of transcatheter edge-to-edge mitral valve repair with percutaneous coronary intervention vs. surgical mitral valve repair with coronary artery bypass grafting |
title_short | Outcomes of transcatheter edge-to-edge mitral valve repair with percutaneous coronary intervention vs. surgical mitral valve repair with coronary artery bypass grafting |
title_sort | outcomes of transcatheter edge-to-edge mitral valve repair with percutaneous coronary intervention vs. surgical mitral valve repair with coronary artery bypass grafting |
topic | Cardiovascular Medicine |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9810628/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36620639 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fcvm.2022.953875 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT wangxiqiang outcomesoftranscatheteredgetoedgemitralvalverepairwithpercutaneouscoronaryinterventionvssurgicalmitralvalverepairwithcoronaryarterybypassgrafting AT mayanpeng outcomesoftranscatheteredgetoedgemitralvalverepairwithpercutaneouscoronaryinterventionvssurgicalmitralvalverepairwithcoronaryarterybypassgrafting AT liujing outcomesoftranscatheteredgetoedgemitralvalverepairwithpercutaneouscoronaryinterventionvssurgicalmitralvalverepairwithcoronaryarterybypassgrafting AT wangting outcomesoftranscatheteredgetoedgemitralvalverepairwithpercutaneouscoronaryinterventionvssurgicalmitralvalverepairwithcoronaryarterybypassgrafting AT zhuling outcomesoftranscatheteredgetoedgemitralvalverepairwithpercutaneouscoronaryinterventionvssurgicalmitralvalverepairwithcoronaryarterybypassgrafting AT fanxiude outcomesoftranscatheteredgetoedgemitralvalverepairwithpercutaneouscoronaryinterventionvssurgicalmitralvalverepairwithcoronaryarterybypassgrafting AT cuiqianwei outcomesoftranscatheteredgetoedgemitralvalverepairwithpercutaneouscoronaryinterventionvssurgicalmitralvalverepairwithcoronaryarterybypassgrafting AT liuchengfeng outcomesoftranscatheteredgetoedgemitralvalverepairwithpercutaneouscoronaryinterventionvssurgicalmitralvalverepairwithcoronaryarterybypassgrafting AT guangongchang outcomesoftranscatheteredgetoedgemitralvalverepairwithpercutaneouscoronaryinterventionvssurgicalmitralvalverepairwithcoronaryarterybypassgrafting AT wangjunkui outcomesoftranscatheteredgetoedgemitralvalverepairwithpercutaneouscoronaryinterventionvssurgicalmitralvalverepairwithcoronaryarterybypassgrafting AT panshuo outcomesoftranscatheteredgetoedgemitralvalverepairwithpercutaneouscoronaryinterventionvssurgicalmitralvalverepairwithcoronaryarterybypassgrafting AT liuzhongwei outcomesoftranscatheteredgetoedgemitralvalverepairwithpercutaneouscoronaryinterventionvssurgicalmitralvalverepairwithcoronaryarterybypassgrafting AT zhangyong outcomesoftranscatheteredgetoedgemitralvalverepairwithpercutaneouscoronaryinterventionvssurgicalmitralvalverepairwithcoronaryarterybypassgrafting |