Cargando…
Stage 1 Registered Report: Refinement of tickling protocols to improve positive animal welfare in laboratory rats
Rat tickling is a heterospecific interaction for experimenters to mimic the interactions of rat play, where they produce 50 kHz ultrasonic vocalisations (USV), symptoms of positive affect; tickling can improve laboratory rat welfare. The standard rat tickling protocol involves gently pinning the rat...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
F1000 Research Limited
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9811030/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36636473 http://dx.doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.125649.2 |
_version_ | 1784863442115493888 |
---|---|
author | Bombail, Vincent Brown, Sarah M. Martin, Jessica E. Meddle, Simone L. Mendl, Michael Robinson, Emma S.J. Hammond, Tayla J. Nielsen, Birte L. LaFollette, Megan R. Vinuela-Fernandez, Ignacio Tivey, Emma K.L. Lawrence, Alistair B. |
author_facet | Bombail, Vincent Brown, Sarah M. Martin, Jessica E. Meddle, Simone L. Mendl, Michael Robinson, Emma S.J. Hammond, Tayla J. Nielsen, Birte L. LaFollette, Megan R. Vinuela-Fernandez, Ignacio Tivey, Emma K.L. Lawrence, Alistair B. |
author_sort | Bombail, Vincent |
collection | PubMed |
description | Rat tickling is a heterospecific interaction for experimenters to mimic the interactions of rat play, where they produce 50 kHz ultrasonic vocalisations (USV), symptoms of positive affect; tickling can improve laboratory rat welfare. The standard rat tickling protocol involves gently pinning the rat in a supine position. However, individual response to this protocol varies. This suggests there is a risk that some rats may perceive tickling as only a neutral experience, while others as a positive one, depending on how tickling is performed. Based on our research experiences of the standard tickling protocol we have developed a playful handling (PH) protocol, with reduced emphasis on pinning, intended to mimic more closely the dynamic nature of play. We will test whether our PH protocol gives rise to more uniform increases in positive affect across individuals relative to protocols involving pinning. We will compare the response of juvenile male and female Wistar rats as: Control (hand remains still against the side of the test arena), P0 (PH with no pinning), P1 (PH with one pin), P4 (PH with four pins). P1 and P4 consist of a background of PH, with treatments involving administration of an increasing dosage of pinning per PH session. We hypothesise that rats exposed to handling protocols that maximise playful interactions (where pinning number per session decreases) will show an overall increase in total 50 kHz USV as an indicator of positive affect, with less variability. We will explore whether behavioural and physiological changes associated with alterations in PH experience are less variable. We propose that maximising the numbers of rats experiencing tickling as a positive experience will reduce the variation in response variables affected by tickling and increase the repeatability of research where tickling is applied either as a social enrichment or as a treatment. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9811030 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | F1000 Research Limited |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-98110302023-01-11 Stage 1 Registered Report: Refinement of tickling protocols to improve positive animal welfare in laboratory rats Bombail, Vincent Brown, Sarah M. Martin, Jessica E. Meddle, Simone L. Mendl, Michael Robinson, Emma S.J. Hammond, Tayla J. Nielsen, Birte L. LaFollette, Megan R. Vinuela-Fernandez, Ignacio Tivey, Emma K.L. Lawrence, Alistair B. F1000Res Study Protocol Rat tickling is a heterospecific interaction for experimenters to mimic the interactions of rat play, where they produce 50 kHz ultrasonic vocalisations (USV), symptoms of positive affect; tickling can improve laboratory rat welfare. The standard rat tickling protocol involves gently pinning the rat in a supine position. However, individual response to this protocol varies. This suggests there is a risk that some rats may perceive tickling as only a neutral experience, while others as a positive one, depending on how tickling is performed. Based on our research experiences of the standard tickling protocol we have developed a playful handling (PH) protocol, with reduced emphasis on pinning, intended to mimic more closely the dynamic nature of play. We will test whether our PH protocol gives rise to more uniform increases in positive affect across individuals relative to protocols involving pinning. We will compare the response of juvenile male and female Wistar rats as: Control (hand remains still against the side of the test arena), P0 (PH with no pinning), P1 (PH with one pin), P4 (PH with four pins). P1 and P4 consist of a background of PH, with treatments involving administration of an increasing dosage of pinning per PH session. We hypothesise that rats exposed to handling protocols that maximise playful interactions (where pinning number per session decreases) will show an overall increase in total 50 kHz USV as an indicator of positive affect, with less variability. We will explore whether behavioural and physiological changes associated with alterations in PH experience are less variable. We propose that maximising the numbers of rats experiencing tickling as a positive experience will reduce the variation in response variables affected by tickling and increase the repeatability of research where tickling is applied either as a social enrichment or as a treatment. F1000 Research Limited 2022-11-18 /pmc/articles/PMC9811030/ /pubmed/36636473 http://dx.doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.125649.2 Text en Copyright: © 2022 Bombail V et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Licence, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Study Protocol Bombail, Vincent Brown, Sarah M. Martin, Jessica E. Meddle, Simone L. Mendl, Michael Robinson, Emma S.J. Hammond, Tayla J. Nielsen, Birte L. LaFollette, Megan R. Vinuela-Fernandez, Ignacio Tivey, Emma K.L. Lawrence, Alistair B. Stage 1 Registered Report: Refinement of tickling protocols to improve positive animal welfare in laboratory rats |
title | Stage 1 Registered Report: Refinement of tickling protocols to improve positive animal welfare in laboratory rats |
title_full | Stage 1 Registered Report: Refinement of tickling protocols to improve positive animal welfare in laboratory rats |
title_fullStr | Stage 1 Registered Report: Refinement of tickling protocols to improve positive animal welfare in laboratory rats |
title_full_unstemmed | Stage 1 Registered Report: Refinement of tickling protocols to improve positive animal welfare in laboratory rats |
title_short | Stage 1 Registered Report: Refinement of tickling protocols to improve positive animal welfare in laboratory rats |
title_sort | stage 1 registered report: refinement of tickling protocols to improve positive animal welfare in laboratory rats |
topic | Study Protocol |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9811030/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36636473 http://dx.doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.125649.2 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT bombailvincent stage1registeredreportrefinementofticklingprotocolstoimprovepositiveanimalwelfareinlaboratoryrats AT brownsarahm stage1registeredreportrefinementofticklingprotocolstoimprovepositiveanimalwelfareinlaboratoryrats AT martinjessicae stage1registeredreportrefinementofticklingprotocolstoimprovepositiveanimalwelfareinlaboratoryrats AT meddlesimonel stage1registeredreportrefinementofticklingprotocolstoimprovepositiveanimalwelfareinlaboratoryrats AT mendlmichael stage1registeredreportrefinementofticklingprotocolstoimprovepositiveanimalwelfareinlaboratoryrats AT robinsonemmasj stage1registeredreportrefinementofticklingprotocolstoimprovepositiveanimalwelfareinlaboratoryrats AT hammondtaylaj stage1registeredreportrefinementofticklingprotocolstoimprovepositiveanimalwelfareinlaboratoryrats AT nielsenbirtel stage1registeredreportrefinementofticklingprotocolstoimprovepositiveanimalwelfareinlaboratoryrats AT lafollettemeganr stage1registeredreportrefinementofticklingprotocolstoimprovepositiveanimalwelfareinlaboratoryrats AT vinuelafernandezignacio stage1registeredreportrefinementofticklingprotocolstoimprovepositiveanimalwelfareinlaboratoryrats AT tiveyemmakl stage1registeredreportrefinementofticklingprotocolstoimprovepositiveanimalwelfareinlaboratoryrats AT lawrencealistairb stage1registeredreportrefinementofticklingprotocolstoimprovepositiveanimalwelfareinlaboratoryrats |