Cargando…

“I was never one of those people who just jumped right in for me”: patient perspectives on self-advocacy training for women with advanced cancer

PURPOSE: Patients with advanced cancer experience many complicated situations that can make self-advocacy (defined as the ability speak up for yourself in the face of a challenge) difficult. Few self-advocacy interventions exist, and most are atheoretical with minimal patient engagement. The purpose...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Thomas, Teresa Hagan, Murray, Patty Jo, Rosenzweig, Margaret, Taylor, Sarah, Brufsky, Adam, Bender, Catherine, Larkin, Mikayla, Schenker, Yael
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9811054/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36598659
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00520-022-07531-3
_version_ 1784863447246176256
author Thomas, Teresa Hagan
Murray, Patty Jo
Rosenzweig, Margaret
Taylor, Sarah
Brufsky, Adam
Bender, Catherine
Larkin, Mikayla
Schenker, Yael
author_facet Thomas, Teresa Hagan
Murray, Patty Jo
Rosenzweig, Margaret
Taylor, Sarah
Brufsky, Adam
Bender, Catherine
Larkin, Mikayla
Schenker, Yael
author_sort Thomas, Teresa Hagan
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Patients with advanced cancer experience many complicated situations that can make self-advocacy (defined as the ability speak up for yourself in the face of a challenge) difficult. Few self-advocacy interventions exist, and most are atheoretical with minimal patient engagement. The purpose of this study is to describe participant perspectives of a novel, self-advocacy serious game intervention called Strong Together. METHODS: This was a qualitative cross-sectional descriptive study among women receiving cancer care at an academic cancer center within 3 months of an advanced gynecologic or breast cancer diagnosis. Participants randomized to receive the intervention completed one-on-one semi-structured interviews 3-months post Strong Together and had the option to share voice journals about their experiences. Inductive qualitative approaches were used to descriptively analyze transcripts and voice journals. Descriptive content analysis approaches were used to group similar codes together into themes summarizing participants’ experiences engaging with the Strong Together intervention. RESULTS: Participants (N = 40) reported that the Strong Together intervention was acceptable, noting that it was realistic and reflective of their personal experiences. Overarching themes included seeing myself in most scenarios and wanting more content; giving me the go ahead to expect more; offering ideas for how to stand up for myself; reinforcing what I am already doing; and reminding me of what I have. Participants suggested adding additional content including diverse characters. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrated that women with advanced cancer were receptive to a self-advocacy skills-building intervention. Future research should explore the mechanisms linking serious games to learning and health outcomes. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00520-022-07531-3.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9811054
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-98110542023-01-04 “I was never one of those people who just jumped right in for me”: patient perspectives on self-advocacy training for women with advanced cancer Thomas, Teresa Hagan Murray, Patty Jo Rosenzweig, Margaret Taylor, Sarah Brufsky, Adam Bender, Catherine Larkin, Mikayla Schenker, Yael Support Care Cancer Original Article PURPOSE: Patients with advanced cancer experience many complicated situations that can make self-advocacy (defined as the ability speak up for yourself in the face of a challenge) difficult. Few self-advocacy interventions exist, and most are atheoretical with minimal patient engagement. The purpose of this study is to describe participant perspectives of a novel, self-advocacy serious game intervention called Strong Together. METHODS: This was a qualitative cross-sectional descriptive study among women receiving cancer care at an academic cancer center within 3 months of an advanced gynecologic or breast cancer diagnosis. Participants randomized to receive the intervention completed one-on-one semi-structured interviews 3-months post Strong Together and had the option to share voice journals about their experiences. Inductive qualitative approaches were used to descriptively analyze transcripts and voice journals. Descriptive content analysis approaches were used to group similar codes together into themes summarizing participants’ experiences engaging with the Strong Together intervention. RESULTS: Participants (N = 40) reported that the Strong Together intervention was acceptable, noting that it was realistic and reflective of their personal experiences. Overarching themes included seeing myself in most scenarios and wanting more content; giving me the go ahead to expect more; offering ideas for how to stand up for myself; reinforcing what I am already doing; and reminding me of what I have. Participants suggested adding additional content including diverse characters. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrated that women with advanced cancer were receptive to a self-advocacy skills-building intervention. Future research should explore the mechanisms linking serious games to learning and health outcomes. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00520-022-07531-3. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2023-01-04 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC9811054/ /pubmed/36598659 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00520-022-07531-3 Text en © The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2022, Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law. This article is made available via the PMC Open Access Subset for unrestricted research re-use and secondary analysis in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for the duration of the World Health Organization (WHO) declaration of COVID-19 as a global pandemic.
spellingShingle Original Article
Thomas, Teresa Hagan
Murray, Patty Jo
Rosenzweig, Margaret
Taylor, Sarah
Brufsky, Adam
Bender, Catherine
Larkin, Mikayla
Schenker, Yael
“I was never one of those people who just jumped right in for me”: patient perspectives on self-advocacy training for women with advanced cancer
title “I was never one of those people who just jumped right in for me”: patient perspectives on self-advocacy training for women with advanced cancer
title_full “I was never one of those people who just jumped right in for me”: patient perspectives on self-advocacy training for women with advanced cancer
title_fullStr “I was never one of those people who just jumped right in for me”: patient perspectives on self-advocacy training for women with advanced cancer
title_full_unstemmed “I was never one of those people who just jumped right in for me”: patient perspectives on self-advocacy training for women with advanced cancer
title_short “I was never one of those people who just jumped right in for me”: patient perspectives on self-advocacy training for women with advanced cancer
title_sort “i was never one of those people who just jumped right in for me”: patient perspectives on self-advocacy training for women with advanced cancer
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9811054/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36598659
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00520-022-07531-3
work_keys_str_mv AT thomasteresahagan iwasneveroneofthosepeoplewhojustjumpedrightinformepatientperspectivesonselfadvocacytrainingforwomenwithadvancedcancer
AT murraypattyjo iwasneveroneofthosepeoplewhojustjumpedrightinformepatientperspectivesonselfadvocacytrainingforwomenwithadvancedcancer
AT rosenzweigmargaret iwasneveroneofthosepeoplewhojustjumpedrightinformepatientperspectivesonselfadvocacytrainingforwomenwithadvancedcancer
AT taylorsarah iwasneveroneofthosepeoplewhojustjumpedrightinformepatientperspectivesonselfadvocacytrainingforwomenwithadvancedcancer
AT brufskyadam iwasneveroneofthosepeoplewhojustjumpedrightinformepatientperspectivesonselfadvocacytrainingforwomenwithadvancedcancer
AT bendercatherine iwasneveroneofthosepeoplewhojustjumpedrightinformepatientperspectivesonselfadvocacytrainingforwomenwithadvancedcancer
AT larkinmikayla iwasneveroneofthosepeoplewhojustjumpedrightinformepatientperspectivesonselfadvocacytrainingforwomenwithadvancedcancer
AT schenkeryael iwasneveroneofthosepeoplewhojustjumpedrightinformepatientperspectivesonselfadvocacytrainingforwomenwithadvancedcancer