Cargando…
“I was never one of those people who just jumped right in for me”: patient perspectives on self-advocacy training for women with advanced cancer
PURPOSE: Patients with advanced cancer experience many complicated situations that can make self-advocacy (defined as the ability speak up for yourself in the face of a challenge) difficult. Few self-advocacy interventions exist, and most are atheoretical with minimal patient engagement. The purpose...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9811054/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36598659 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00520-022-07531-3 |
_version_ | 1784863447246176256 |
---|---|
author | Thomas, Teresa Hagan Murray, Patty Jo Rosenzweig, Margaret Taylor, Sarah Brufsky, Adam Bender, Catherine Larkin, Mikayla Schenker, Yael |
author_facet | Thomas, Teresa Hagan Murray, Patty Jo Rosenzweig, Margaret Taylor, Sarah Brufsky, Adam Bender, Catherine Larkin, Mikayla Schenker, Yael |
author_sort | Thomas, Teresa Hagan |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: Patients with advanced cancer experience many complicated situations that can make self-advocacy (defined as the ability speak up for yourself in the face of a challenge) difficult. Few self-advocacy interventions exist, and most are atheoretical with minimal patient engagement. The purpose of this study is to describe participant perspectives of a novel, self-advocacy serious game intervention called Strong Together. METHODS: This was a qualitative cross-sectional descriptive study among women receiving cancer care at an academic cancer center within 3 months of an advanced gynecologic or breast cancer diagnosis. Participants randomized to receive the intervention completed one-on-one semi-structured interviews 3-months post Strong Together and had the option to share voice journals about their experiences. Inductive qualitative approaches were used to descriptively analyze transcripts and voice journals. Descriptive content analysis approaches were used to group similar codes together into themes summarizing participants’ experiences engaging with the Strong Together intervention. RESULTS: Participants (N = 40) reported that the Strong Together intervention was acceptable, noting that it was realistic and reflective of their personal experiences. Overarching themes included seeing myself in most scenarios and wanting more content; giving me the go ahead to expect more; offering ideas for how to stand up for myself; reinforcing what I am already doing; and reminding me of what I have. Participants suggested adding additional content including diverse characters. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrated that women with advanced cancer were receptive to a self-advocacy skills-building intervention. Future research should explore the mechanisms linking serious games to learning and health outcomes. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00520-022-07531-3. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9811054 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Springer Berlin Heidelberg |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-98110542023-01-04 “I was never one of those people who just jumped right in for me”: patient perspectives on self-advocacy training for women with advanced cancer Thomas, Teresa Hagan Murray, Patty Jo Rosenzweig, Margaret Taylor, Sarah Brufsky, Adam Bender, Catherine Larkin, Mikayla Schenker, Yael Support Care Cancer Original Article PURPOSE: Patients with advanced cancer experience many complicated situations that can make self-advocacy (defined as the ability speak up for yourself in the face of a challenge) difficult. Few self-advocacy interventions exist, and most are atheoretical with minimal patient engagement. The purpose of this study is to describe participant perspectives of a novel, self-advocacy serious game intervention called Strong Together. METHODS: This was a qualitative cross-sectional descriptive study among women receiving cancer care at an academic cancer center within 3 months of an advanced gynecologic or breast cancer diagnosis. Participants randomized to receive the intervention completed one-on-one semi-structured interviews 3-months post Strong Together and had the option to share voice journals about their experiences. Inductive qualitative approaches were used to descriptively analyze transcripts and voice journals. Descriptive content analysis approaches were used to group similar codes together into themes summarizing participants’ experiences engaging with the Strong Together intervention. RESULTS: Participants (N = 40) reported that the Strong Together intervention was acceptable, noting that it was realistic and reflective of their personal experiences. Overarching themes included seeing myself in most scenarios and wanting more content; giving me the go ahead to expect more; offering ideas for how to stand up for myself; reinforcing what I am already doing; and reminding me of what I have. Participants suggested adding additional content including diverse characters. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrated that women with advanced cancer were receptive to a self-advocacy skills-building intervention. Future research should explore the mechanisms linking serious games to learning and health outcomes. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00520-022-07531-3. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2023-01-04 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC9811054/ /pubmed/36598659 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00520-022-07531-3 Text en © The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2022, Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law. This article is made available via the PMC Open Access Subset for unrestricted research re-use and secondary analysis in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for the duration of the World Health Organization (WHO) declaration of COVID-19 as a global pandemic. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Thomas, Teresa Hagan Murray, Patty Jo Rosenzweig, Margaret Taylor, Sarah Brufsky, Adam Bender, Catherine Larkin, Mikayla Schenker, Yael “I was never one of those people who just jumped right in for me”: patient perspectives on self-advocacy training for women with advanced cancer |
title | “I was never one of those people who just jumped right in for me”: patient perspectives on self-advocacy training for women with advanced cancer |
title_full | “I was never one of those people who just jumped right in for me”: patient perspectives on self-advocacy training for women with advanced cancer |
title_fullStr | “I was never one of those people who just jumped right in for me”: patient perspectives on self-advocacy training for women with advanced cancer |
title_full_unstemmed | “I was never one of those people who just jumped right in for me”: patient perspectives on self-advocacy training for women with advanced cancer |
title_short | “I was never one of those people who just jumped right in for me”: patient perspectives on self-advocacy training for women with advanced cancer |
title_sort | “i was never one of those people who just jumped right in for me”: patient perspectives on self-advocacy training for women with advanced cancer |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9811054/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36598659 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00520-022-07531-3 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT thomasteresahagan iwasneveroneofthosepeoplewhojustjumpedrightinformepatientperspectivesonselfadvocacytrainingforwomenwithadvancedcancer AT murraypattyjo iwasneveroneofthosepeoplewhojustjumpedrightinformepatientperspectivesonselfadvocacytrainingforwomenwithadvancedcancer AT rosenzweigmargaret iwasneveroneofthosepeoplewhojustjumpedrightinformepatientperspectivesonselfadvocacytrainingforwomenwithadvancedcancer AT taylorsarah iwasneveroneofthosepeoplewhojustjumpedrightinformepatientperspectivesonselfadvocacytrainingforwomenwithadvancedcancer AT brufskyadam iwasneveroneofthosepeoplewhojustjumpedrightinformepatientperspectivesonselfadvocacytrainingforwomenwithadvancedcancer AT bendercatherine iwasneveroneofthosepeoplewhojustjumpedrightinformepatientperspectivesonselfadvocacytrainingforwomenwithadvancedcancer AT larkinmikayla iwasneveroneofthosepeoplewhojustjumpedrightinformepatientperspectivesonselfadvocacytrainingforwomenwithadvancedcancer AT schenkeryael iwasneveroneofthosepeoplewhojustjumpedrightinformepatientperspectivesonselfadvocacytrainingforwomenwithadvancedcancer |