Cargando…

Can vegetation be discretely classified in species‐poor environments? Testing plant community concepts for vegetation monitoring on sub‐Antarctic Marion Island

The updating and rethinking of vegetation classifications is important for ecosystem monitoring in a rapidly changing world, where the distribution of vegetation is changing. The general assumption that discrete and persistent plant communities exist that can be monitored efficiently, is rarely test...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: van der Merwe, Stephni, Greve, Michelle, Skowno, Andrew Luke, Hoffman, Michael Timm, Cramer, Michael Denis
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9811060/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36620413
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.9681
_version_ 1784863448689016832
author van der Merwe, Stephni
Greve, Michelle
Skowno, Andrew Luke
Hoffman, Michael Timm
Cramer, Michael Denis
author_facet van der Merwe, Stephni
Greve, Michelle
Skowno, Andrew Luke
Hoffman, Michael Timm
Cramer, Michael Denis
author_sort van der Merwe, Stephni
collection PubMed
description The updating and rethinking of vegetation classifications is important for ecosystem monitoring in a rapidly changing world, where the distribution of vegetation is changing. The general assumption that discrete and persistent plant communities exist that can be monitored efficiently, is rarely tested before undertaking a classification. Marion Island (MI) is comprised of species‐poor vegetation undergoing rapid environmental change. It presents a unique opportunity to test the ability to discretely classify species‐poor vegetation with recently developed objective classification techniques and relate it to previous classifications. We classified vascular species data of 476 plots sampled across MI, using Ward hierarchical clustering, divisive analysis clustering, non‐hierarchical kmeans and partitioning around medoids. Internal cluster validation was performed using silhouette widths, Dunn index, connectivity of clusters and gap statistic. Indicator species analyses were also conducted on the best performing clustering methods. We evaluated the outputs against previously classified units. Ward clustering performed the best, with the highest average silhouette width and Dunn index, as well as the lowest connectivity. The number of clusters differed amongst the clustering methods, but most validation measures, including for Ward clustering, indicated that two and three clusters are the best fit for the data. However, all classification methods produced weakly separated, highly connected clusters with low compactness and low fidelity and specificity to clusters. There was no particularly robust and effective classification outcome that could group plots into previously suggested vegetation units based on species composition alone. The relatively recent age (c. 450,000 years B.P.), glaciation history (last glacial maximum 34,500 years B.P.) and isolation of the sub‐Antarctic islands may have hindered the development of strong vascular plant species assemblages with discrete boundaries. Discrete classification at the community‐level using species composition may not be suitable in such species‐poor environments. Species‐level, rather than community‐level, monitoring may thus be more appropriate in species‐poor environments, aligning with continuum theory rather than community theory.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9811060
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-98110602023-01-05 Can vegetation be discretely classified in species‐poor environments? Testing plant community concepts for vegetation monitoring on sub‐Antarctic Marion Island van der Merwe, Stephni Greve, Michelle Skowno, Andrew Luke Hoffman, Michael Timm Cramer, Michael Denis Ecol Evol Research Articles The updating and rethinking of vegetation classifications is important for ecosystem monitoring in a rapidly changing world, where the distribution of vegetation is changing. The general assumption that discrete and persistent plant communities exist that can be monitored efficiently, is rarely tested before undertaking a classification. Marion Island (MI) is comprised of species‐poor vegetation undergoing rapid environmental change. It presents a unique opportunity to test the ability to discretely classify species‐poor vegetation with recently developed objective classification techniques and relate it to previous classifications. We classified vascular species data of 476 plots sampled across MI, using Ward hierarchical clustering, divisive analysis clustering, non‐hierarchical kmeans and partitioning around medoids. Internal cluster validation was performed using silhouette widths, Dunn index, connectivity of clusters and gap statistic. Indicator species analyses were also conducted on the best performing clustering methods. We evaluated the outputs against previously classified units. Ward clustering performed the best, with the highest average silhouette width and Dunn index, as well as the lowest connectivity. The number of clusters differed amongst the clustering methods, but most validation measures, including for Ward clustering, indicated that two and three clusters are the best fit for the data. However, all classification methods produced weakly separated, highly connected clusters with low compactness and low fidelity and specificity to clusters. There was no particularly robust and effective classification outcome that could group plots into previously suggested vegetation units based on species composition alone. The relatively recent age (c. 450,000 years B.P.), glaciation history (last glacial maximum 34,500 years B.P.) and isolation of the sub‐Antarctic islands may have hindered the development of strong vascular plant species assemblages with discrete boundaries. Discrete classification at the community‐level using species composition may not be suitable in such species‐poor environments. Species‐level, rather than community‐level, monitoring may thus be more appropriate in species‐poor environments, aligning with continuum theory rather than community theory. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2023-01-03 /pmc/articles/PMC9811060/ /pubmed/36620413 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.9681 Text en © 2023 The Authors. Ecology and Evolution published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Articles
van der Merwe, Stephni
Greve, Michelle
Skowno, Andrew Luke
Hoffman, Michael Timm
Cramer, Michael Denis
Can vegetation be discretely classified in species‐poor environments? Testing plant community concepts for vegetation monitoring on sub‐Antarctic Marion Island
title Can vegetation be discretely classified in species‐poor environments? Testing plant community concepts for vegetation monitoring on sub‐Antarctic Marion Island
title_full Can vegetation be discretely classified in species‐poor environments? Testing plant community concepts for vegetation monitoring on sub‐Antarctic Marion Island
title_fullStr Can vegetation be discretely classified in species‐poor environments? Testing plant community concepts for vegetation monitoring on sub‐Antarctic Marion Island
title_full_unstemmed Can vegetation be discretely classified in species‐poor environments? Testing plant community concepts for vegetation monitoring on sub‐Antarctic Marion Island
title_short Can vegetation be discretely classified in species‐poor environments? Testing plant community concepts for vegetation monitoring on sub‐Antarctic Marion Island
title_sort can vegetation be discretely classified in species‐poor environments? testing plant community concepts for vegetation monitoring on sub‐antarctic marion island
topic Research Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9811060/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36620413
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.9681
work_keys_str_mv AT vandermerwestephni canvegetationbediscretelyclassifiedinspeciespoorenvironmentstestingplantcommunityconceptsforvegetationmonitoringonsubantarcticmarionisland
AT grevemichelle canvegetationbediscretelyclassifiedinspeciespoorenvironmentstestingplantcommunityconceptsforvegetationmonitoringonsubantarcticmarionisland
AT skownoandrewluke canvegetationbediscretelyclassifiedinspeciespoorenvironmentstestingplantcommunityconceptsforvegetationmonitoringonsubantarcticmarionisland
AT hoffmanmichaeltimm canvegetationbediscretelyclassifiedinspeciespoorenvironmentstestingplantcommunityconceptsforvegetationmonitoringonsubantarcticmarionisland
AT cramermichaeldenis canvegetationbediscretelyclassifiedinspeciespoorenvironmentstestingplantcommunityconceptsforvegetationmonitoringonsubantarcticmarionisland