Cargando…

Mental healthcare in primary and community-based settings: evidence beyond the WHO Mental Health Gap Action Programme (mhGAP) Intervention Guide

OBJECTIVES: The WHO’s Mental Health Gap Action Programme Intervention Guide (mhGAP-IG) has been widely used in low and middle-income countries. We reviewed literature describing interventions and training programmes beyond the mhGAP-IG, in primary healthcare (PHC) and community-based healthcare (CBH...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Keynejad, Roxanne C, Spagnolo, Jessica, Thornicroft, Graham
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9811100/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35473750
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/ebmental-2021-300401
_version_ 1784863458278244352
author Keynejad, Roxanne C
Spagnolo, Jessica
Thornicroft, Graham
author_facet Keynejad, Roxanne C
Spagnolo, Jessica
Thornicroft, Graham
author_sort Keynejad, Roxanne C
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: The WHO’s Mental Health Gap Action Programme Intervention Guide (mhGAP-IG) has been widely used in low and middle-income countries. We reviewed literature describing interventions and training programmes beyond the mhGAP-IG, in primary healthcare (PHC) and community-based healthcare (CBH). DESIGN: We searched studies excluded from our updated mhGAP-IG systematic review, and included in other relevant systematic reviews, for evidence and experience of initiatives integrating mental health into PHC and CBH. Our 24 November 2020 mhGAP-IG search encompassed MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO, Web of Knowledge, Scopus, CINAHL, LILACS, ScieELO, Cochrane, PubMed databases, 3ie and Google Scholar. Although heterogeneity prevented meta-analysis, we descriptively summarised the evidence-base. RESULTS: Out of 1827 results, we identified 208 relevant records. They described randomised controlled trials of mental health interventions (98 studies, n=55 523 participants), non-randomised studies measuring clinical outcomes (22 studies, n=7405), training outcomes (36 studies, n=12 280) and implementation outcomes (21 studies, n=1090), plus descriptive accounts (18 studies, n=2526), baseline surveys and exploratory studies (6 studies, n=17 093) and commentaries (7 studies). Most (40%) were conducted in the African region, region of the Americas (16%), and South-East Asia (13%). Randomised and non-randomised studies reported improved symptoms, substance use, functioning, parenting and child outcomes. Non-randomised studies reported improved clinical knowledge, confidence and skills following training. CONCLUSIONS: The literature beyond the mhGAP-IG is extensive and shares common findings. Future priorities are less-studied regions, interventions for severe mental illness, exploring ways that mhGAP-IG and alternative approaches complement each other in different contexts and scaling-up mental health integration. PROSPERO registration number CRD42017068459.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9811100
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-98111002023-01-05 Mental healthcare in primary and community-based settings: evidence beyond the WHO Mental Health Gap Action Programme (mhGAP) Intervention Guide Keynejad, Roxanne C Spagnolo, Jessica Thornicroft, Graham Evid Based Ment Health Systematic Review OBJECTIVES: The WHO’s Mental Health Gap Action Programme Intervention Guide (mhGAP-IG) has been widely used in low and middle-income countries. We reviewed literature describing interventions and training programmes beyond the mhGAP-IG, in primary healthcare (PHC) and community-based healthcare (CBH). DESIGN: We searched studies excluded from our updated mhGAP-IG systematic review, and included in other relevant systematic reviews, for evidence and experience of initiatives integrating mental health into PHC and CBH. Our 24 November 2020 mhGAP-IG search encompassed MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO, Web of Knowledge, Scopus, CINAHL, LILACS, ScieELO, Cochrane, PubMed databases, 3ie and Google Scholar. Although heterogeneity prevented meta-analysis, we descriptively summarised the evidence-base. RESULTS: Out of 1827 results, we identified 208 relevant records. They described randomised controlled trials of mental health interventions (98 studies, n=55 523 participants), non-randomised studies measuring clinical outcomes (22 studies, n=7405), training outcomes (36 studies, n=12 280) and implementation outcomes (21 studies, n=1090), plus descriptive accounts (18 studies, n=2526), baseline surveys and exploratory studies (6 studies, n=17 093) and commentaries (7 studies). Most (40%) were conducted in the African region, region of the Americas (16%), and South-East Asia (13%). Randomised and non-randomised studies reported improved symptoms, substance use, functioning, parenting and child outcomes. Non-randomised studies reported improved clinical knowledge, confidence and skills following training. CONCLUSIONS: The literature beyond the mhGAP-IG is extensive and shares common findings. Future priorities are less-studied regions, interventions for severe mental illness, exploring ways that mhGAP-IG and alternative approaches complement each other in different contexts and scaling-up mental health integration. PROSPERO registration number CRD42017068459. BMJ Publishing Group 2022-12 2022-04-26 /pmc/articles/PMC9811100/ /pubmed/35473750 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/ebmental-2021-300401 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to copy, redistribute, remix, transform and build upon this work for any purpose, provided the original work is properly cited, a link to the licence is given, and indication of whether changes were made. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Systematic Review
Keynejad, Roxanne C
Spagnolo, Jessica
Thornicroft, Graham
Mental healthcare in primary and community-based settings: evidence beyond the WHO Mental Health Gap Action Programme (mhGAP) Intervention Guide
title Mental healthcare in primary and community-based settings: evidence beyond the WHO Mental Health Gap Action Programme (mhGAP) Intervention Guide
title_full Mental healthcare in primary and community-based settings: evidence beyond the WHO Mental Health Gap Action Programme (mhGAP) Intervention Guide
title_fullStr Mental healthcare in primary and community-based settings: evidence beyond the WHO Mental Health Gap Action Programme (mhGAP) Intervention Guide
title_full_unstemmed Mental healthcare in primary and community-based settings: evidence beyond the WHO Mental Health Gap Action Programme (mhGAP) Intervention Guide
title_short Mental healthcare in primary and community-based settings: evidence beyond the WHO Mental Health Gap Action Programme (mhGAP) Intervention Guide
title_sort mental healthcare in primary and community-based settings: evidence beyond the who mental health gap action programme (mhgap) intervention guide
topic Systematic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9811100/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35473750
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/ebmental-2021-300401
work_keys_str_mv AT keynejadroxannec mentalhealthcareinprimaryandcommunitybasedsettingsevidencebeyondthewhomentalhealthgapactionprogrammemhgapinterventionguide
AT spagnolojessica mentalhealthcareinprimaryandcommunitybasedsettingsevidencebeyondthewhomentalhealthgapactionprogrammemhgapinterventionguide
AT thornicroftgraham mentalhealthcareinprimaryandcommunitybasedsettingsevidencebeyondthewhomentalhealthgapactionprogrammemhgapinterventionguide