Cargando…

Shock Wave Lithotripsy in Pediatric Stone Disease: A 15-Year Single-Center Experience with 2 Types of Lithotripters

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: We report our experience with pediatric shock wave lithotripsy (SWL) using two types of lithotripters: Dornier HM3 (HM3) and Dornier Lithotripter SII (DLS). STUDY DESIGN: We retrospectively reviewed the charts of children who underwent SWL between 2002 and 2016. Patients...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zisman, Ariel, Assadi, Akram, Goldin, Oleg, Malshy, Kamil, Nativ, Omri, Meretyk, Shimon, Amiel, Gilad E., Mullerad, Michael, Livne, Pinhas M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: S. Karger AG 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9811415/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35172318
http://dx.doi.org/10.1159/000522079
_version_ 1784863527285030912
author Zisman, Ariel
Assadi, Akram
Goldin, Oleg
Malshy, Kamil
Nativ, Omri
Meretyk, Shimon
Amiel, Gilad E.
Mullerad, Michael
Livne, Pinhas M.
author_facet Zisman, Ariel
Assadi, Akram
Goldin, Oleg
Malshy, Kamil
Nativ, Omri
Meretyk, Shimon
Amiel, Gilad E.
Mullerad, Michael
Livne, Pinhas M.
author_sort Zisman, Ariel
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: We report our experience with pediatric shock wave lithotripsy (SWL) using two types of lithotripters: Dornier HM3 (HM3) and Dornier Lithotripter SII (DLS). STUDY DESIGN: We retrospectively reviewed the charts of children who underwent SWL between 2002 and 2016. Patients were divided into two groups based on the type of the lithotripter: during 2002–2009, we used the electrohydraulic HM3 lithotripter which was replaced in 2009 with the DLS electromagnetic lithotripter. Clinical and perioperative parameters were compared. RESULTS: Our cohort included 107 children who underwent SWL. Average age was 11.5 ± 5.1 years. Average stone size was 10.6 ± 4.9 mm. HM3 was used in 38% of children and DLS2 in 62% (n = 41 and 66, respectively). There were no significant differences in age, gender, stone size, or location between the groups. The total SFR did not differ statistically between HM3 and DLS (83% vs. 74%, p = 0.35). SFR after one SWL was higher with the HM3 (78% vs. 62%, p = 0.093). Re-treatment rate was 22% and 17% (HM3 vs. DLS, p = 0.61). Complication rates were low, with renal colic being the most common (HM3 10%, DLS 20%, NS). CONCLUSIONS: SWL in the pediatric population using the DLS showed good results with low complication rates that are equivalent to the gold standard HM3.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9811415
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher S. Karger AG
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-98114152023-01-05 Shock Wave Lithotripsy in Pediatric Stone Disease: A 15-Year Single-Center Experience with 2 Types of Lithotripters Zisman, Ariel Assadi, Akram Goldin, Oleg Malshy, Kamil Nativ, Omri Meretyk, Shimon Amiel, Gilad E. Mullerad, Michael Livne, Pinhas M. Urol Int Research Article INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: We report our experience with pediatric shock wave lithotripsy (SWL) using two types of lithotripters: Dornier HM3 (HM3) and Dornier Lithotripter SII (DLS). STUDY DESIGN: We retrospectively reviewed the charts of children who underwent SWL between 2002 and 2016. Patients were divided into two groups based on the type of the lithotripter: during 2002–2009, we used the electrohydraulic HM3 lithotripter which was replaced in 2009 with the DLS electromagnetic lithotripter. Clinical and perioperative parameters were compared. RESULTS: Our cohort included 107 children who underwent SWL. Average age was 11.5 ± 5.1 years. Average stone size was 10.6 ± 4.9 mm. HM3 was used in 38% of children and DLS2 in 62% (n = 41 and 66, respectively). There were no significant differences in age, gender, stone size, or location between the groups. The total SFR did not differ statistically between HM3 and DLS (83% vs. 74%, p = 0.35). SFR after one SWL was higher with the HM3 (78% vs. 62%, p = 0.093). Re-treatment rate was 22% and 17% (HM3 vs. DLS, p = 0.61). Complication rates were low, with renal colic being the most common (HM3 10%, DLS 20%, NS). CONCLUSIONS: SWL in the pediatric population using the DLS showed good results with low complication rates that are equivalent to the gold standard HM3. S. Karger AG 2022-12 2022-02-16 /pmc/articles/PMC9811415/ /pubmed/35172318 http://dx.doi.org/10.1159/000522079 Text en Copyright © 2022 by The Author(s). Published by S. Karger AG, Basel https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This article is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC). Usage and distribution for commercial purposes requires written permission.
spellingShingle Research Article
Zisman, Ariel
Assadi, Akram
Goldin, Oleg
Malshy, Kamil
Nativ, Omri
Meretyk, Shimon
Amiel, Gilad E.
Mullerad, Michael
Livne, Pinhas M.
Shock Wave Lithotripsy in Pediatric Stone Disease: A 15-Year Single-Center Experience with 2 Types of Lithotripters
title Shock Wave Lithotripsy in Pediatric Stone Disease: A 15-Year Single-Center Experience with 2 Types of Lithotripters
title_full Shock Wave Lithotripsy in Pediatric Stone Disease: A 15-Year Single-Center Experience with 2 Types of Lithotripters
title_fullStr Shock Wave Lithotripsy in Pediatric Stone Disease: A 15-Year Single-Center Experience with 2 Types of Lithotripters
title_full_unstemmed Shock Wave Lithotripsy in Pediatric Stone Disease: A 15-Year Single-Center Experience with 2 Types of Lithotripters
title_short Shock Wave Lithotripsy in Pediatric Stone Disease: A 15-Year Single-Center Experience with 2 Types of Lithotripters
title_sort shock wave lithotripsy in pediatric stone disease: a 15-year single-center experience with 2 types of lithotripters
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9811415/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35172318
http://dx.doi.org/10.1159/000522079
work_keys_str_mv AT zismanariel shockwavelithotripsyinpediatricstonediseasea15yearsinglecenterexperiencewith2typesoflithotripters
AT assadiakram shockwavelithotripsyinpediatricstonediseasea15yearsinglecenterexperiencewith2typesoflithotripters
AT goldinoleg shockwavelithotripsyinpediatricstonediseasea15yearsinglecenterexperiencewith2typesoflithotripters
AT malshykamil shockwavelithotripsyinpediatricstonediseasea15yearsinglecenterexperiencewith2typesoflithotripters
AT nativomri shockwavelithotripsyinpediatricstonediseasea15yearsinglecenterexperiencewith2typesoflithotripters
AT meretykshimon shockwavelithotripsyinpediatricstonediseasea15yearsinglecenterexperiencewith2typesoflithotripters
AT amielgilade shockwavelithotripsyinpediatricstonediseasea15yearsinglecenterexperiencewith2typesoflithotripters
AT mulleradmichael shockwavelithotripsyinpediatricstonediseasea15yearsinglecenterexperiencewith2typesoflithotripters
AT livnepinhasm shockwavelithotripsyinpediatricstonediseasea15yearsinglecenterexperiencewith2typesoflithotripters