Cargando…
Shock Wave Lithotripsy in Pediatric Stone Disease: A 15-Year Single-Center Experience with 2 Types of Lithotripters
INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: We report our experience with pediatric shock wave lithotripsy (SWL) using two types of lithotripters: Dornier HM3 (HM3) and Dornier Lithotripter SII (DLS). STUDY DESIGN: We retrospectively reviewed the charts of children who underwent SWL between 2002 and 2016. Patients...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
S. Karger AG
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9811415/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35172318 http://dx.doi.org/10.1159/000522079 |
_version_ | 1784863527285030912 |
---|---|
author | Zisman, Ariel Assadi, Akram Goldin, Oleg Malshy, Kamil Nativ, Omri Meretyk, Shimon Amiel, Gilad E. Mullerad, Michael Livne, Pinhas M. |
author_facet | Zisman, Ariel Assadi, Akram Goldin, Oleg Malshy, Kamil Nativ, Omri Meretyk, Shimon Amiel, Gilad E. Mullerad, Michael Livne, Pinhas M. |
author_sort | Zisman, Ariel |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: We report our experience with pediatric shock wave lithotripsy (SWL) using two types of lithotripters: Dornier HM3 (HM3) and Dornier Lithotripter SII (DLS). STUDY DESIGN: We retrospectively reviewed the charts of children who underwent SWL between 2002 and 2016. Patients were divided into two groups based on the type of the lithotripter: during 2002–2009, we used the electrohydraulic HM3 lithotripter which was replaced in 2009 with the DLS electromagnetic lithotripter. Clinical and perioperative parameters were compared. RESULTS: Our cohort included 107 children who underwent SWL. Average age was 11.5 ± 5.1 years. Average stone size was 10.6 ± 4.9 mm. HM3 was used in 38% of children and DLS2 in 62% (n = 41 and 66, respectively). There were no significant differences in age, gender, stone size, or location between the groups. The total SFR did not differ statistically between HM3 and DLS (83% vs. 74%, p = 0.35). SFR after one SWL was higher with the HM3 (78% vs. 62%, p = 0.093). Re-treatment rate was 22% and 17% (HM3 vs. DLS, p = 0.61). Complication rates were low, with renal colic being the most common (HM3 10%, DLS 20%, NS). CONCLUSIONS: SWL in the pediatric population using the DLS showed good results with low complication rates that are equivalent to the gold standard HM3. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9811415 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | S. Karger AG |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-98114152023-01-05 Shock Wave Lithotripsy in Pediatric Stone Disease: A 15-Year Single-Center Experience with 2 Types of Lithotripters Zisman, Ariel Assadi, Akram Goldin, Oleg Malshy, Kamil Nativ, Omri Meretyk, Shimon Amiel, Gilad E. Mullerad, Michael Livne, Pinhas M. Urol Int Research Article INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: We report our experience with pediatric shock wave lithotripsy (SWL) using two types of lithotripters: Dornier HM3 (HM3) and Dornier Lithotripter SII (DLS). STUDY DESIGN: We retrospectively reviewed the charts of children who underwent SWL between 2002 and 2016. Patients were divided into two groups based on the type of the lithotripter: during 2002–2009, we used the electrohydraulic HM3 lithotripter which was replaced in 2009 with the DLS electromagnetic lithotripter. Clinical and perioperative parameters were compared. RESULTS: Our cohort included 107 children who underwent SWL. Average age was 11.5 ± 5.1 years. Average stone size was 10.6 ± 4.9 mm. HM3 was used in 38% of children and DLS2 in 62% (n = 41 and 66, respectively). There were no significant differences in age, gender, stone size, or location between the groups. The total SFR did not differ statistically between HM3 and DLS (83% vs. 74%, p = 0.35). SFR after one SWL was higher with the HM3 (78% vs. 62%, p = 0.093). Re-treatment rate was 22% and 17% (HM3 vs. DLS, p = 0.61). Complication rates were low, with renal colic being the most common (HM3 10%, DLS 20%, NS). CONCLUSIONS: SWL in the pediatric population using the DLS showed good results with low complication rates that are equivalent to the gold standard HM3. S. Karger AG 2022-12 2022-02-16 /pmc/articles/PMC9811415/ /pubmed/35172318 http://dx.doi.org/10.1159/000522079 Text en Copyright © 2022 by The Author(s). Published by S. Karger AG, Basel https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This article is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC). Usage and distribution for commercial purposes requires written permission. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Zisman, Ariel Assadi, Akram Goldin, Oleg Malshy, Kamil Nativ, Omri Meretyk, Shimon Amiel, Gilad E. Mullerad, Michael Livne, Pinhas M. Shock Wave Lithotripsy in Pediatric Stone Disease: A 15-Year Single-Center Experience with 2 Types of Lithotripters |
title | Shock Wave Lithotripsy in Pediatric Stone Disease: A 15-Year Single-Center Experience with 2 Types of Lithotripters |
title_full | Shock Wave Lithotripsy in Pediatric Stone Disease: A 15-Year Single-Center Experience with 2 Types of Lithotripters |
title_fullStr | Shock Wave Lithotripsy in Pediatric Stone Disease: A 15-Year Single-Center Experience with 2 Types of Lithotripters |
title_full_unstemmed | Shock Wave Lithotripsy in Pediatric Stone Disease: A 15-Year Single-Center Experience with 2 Types of Lithotripters |
title_short | Shock Wave Lithotripsy in Pediatric Stone Disease: A 15-Year Single-Center Experience with 2 Types of Lithotripters |
title_sort | shock wave lithotripsy in pediatric stone disease: a 15-year single-center experience with 2 types of lithotripters |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9811415/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35172318 http://dx.doi.org/10.1159/000522079 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT zismanariel shockwavelithotripsyinpediatricstonediseasea15yearsinglecenterexperiencewith2typesoflithotripters AT assadiakram shockwavelithotripsyinpediatricstonediseasea15yearsinglecenterexperiencewith2typesoflithotripters AT goldinoleg shockwavelithotripsyinpediatricstonediseasea15yearsinglecenterexperiencewith2typesoflithotripters AT malshykamil shockwavelithotripsyinpediatricstonediseasea15yearsinglecenterexperiencewith2typesoflithotripters AT nativomri shockwavelithotripsyinpediatricstonediseasea15yearsinglecenterexperiencewith2typesoflithotripters AT meretykshimon shockwavelithotripsyinpediatricstonediseasea15yearsinglecenterexperiencewith2typesoflithotripters AT amielgilade shockwavelithotripsyinpediatricstonediseasea15yearsinglecenterexperiencewith2typesoflithotripters AT mulleradmichael shockwavelithotripsyinpediatricstonediseasea15yearsinglecenterexperiencewith2typesoflithotripters AT livnepinhasm shockwavelithotripsyinpediatricstonediseasea15yearsinglecenterexperiencewith2typesoflithotripters |