Cargando…
Prevention and the treatment of oral mucositis: the efficacy of sodium bicarbonate vs other agents: a systematic review
INTRODUCTION: Oral mucositis (OM) is a major side effect of cancer therapy, which is associated with significant symptoms, treatment delays and increased costs for the health system. It is an important component of the quality of life of cancer patients and, until now, there has been no gold standar...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9811717/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36597048 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12903-022-02586-4 |
_version_ | 1784863584494288896 |
---|---|
author | Di Fede, O. Canepa, F. Maniscalco, L. Tozzo, P. Matranga, D. Giuliana, G. |
author_facet | Di Fede, O. Canepa, F. Maniscalco, L. Tozzo, P. Matranga, D. Giuliana, G. |
author_sort | Di Fede, O. |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Oral mucositis (OM) is a major side effect of cancer therapy, which is associated with significant symptoms, treatment delays and increased costs for the health system. It is an important component of the quality of life of cancer patients and, until now, there has been no gold standard regarding prevention or treatment of this pathology. Notwithstanding the paucity of treatment guidelines (due to limited evidence from high-quality, rigorous studies), sodium bicarbonate (SB) rinses are one of the most used agents for OM management. OBJECTIVES: A systematic review (2000–2022) was performed in order to compare and examine different agents versus sodium bicarbonate (SB) in preventing or treating OM. SOURCES: Eleven randomized controlled trials (RCT) were evaluated: four were conducted for the prevention and seven for the management of OM. The risk of bias of RCTs was assessed using the revised Cochrane risk of bias tool for randomized trials. STUDY SELECTION: According to the RoB2 evaluation for randomized trials, four RCTs were judged to be at a high risk of bias, two were rated as ‘problematic’, while five were deemed to be a low risk of bias. CONCLUSIONS: The results revealed that there was no evidence for supporting SB in OM treatment regarding management and prevention. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: Results showed in this review takes on a strategic importance in the use of SB for OM management or prevention; indiscriminate use of SB could be counterproductive because it causes a sudden pH increase and it delays proper OM pharmacological treatment. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9811717 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-98117172023-01-05 Prevention and the treatment of oral mucositis: the efficacy of sodium bicarbonate vs other agents: a systematic review Di Fede, O. Canepa, F. Maniscalco, L. Tozzo, P. Matranga, D. Giuliana, G. BMC Oral Health Research INTRODUCTION: Oral mucositis (OM) is a major side effect of cancer therapy, which is associated with significant symptoms, treatment delays and increased costs for the health system. It is an important component of the quality of life of cancer patients and, until now, there has been no gold standard regarding prevention or treatment of this pathology. Notwithstanding the paucity of treatment guidelines (due to limited evidence from high-quality, rigorous studies), sodium bicarbonate (SB) rinses are one of the most used agents for OM management. OBJECTIVES: A systematic review (2000–2022) was performed in order to compare and examine different agents versus sodium bicarbonate (SB) in preventing or treating OM. SOURCES: Eleven randomized controlled trials (RCT) were evaluated: four were conducted for the prevention and seven for the management of OM. The risk of bias of RCTs was assessed using the revised Cochrane risk of bias tool for randomized trials. STUDY SELECTION: According to the RoB2 evaluation for randomized trials, four RCTs were judged to be at a high risk of bias, two were rated as ‘problematic’, while five were deemed to be a low risk of bias. CONCLUSIONS: The results revealed that there was no evidence for supporting SB in OM treatment regarding management and prevention. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: Results showed in this review takes on a strategic importance in the use of SB for OM management or prevention; indiscriminate use of SB could be counterproductive because it causes a sudden pH increase and it delays proper OM pharmacological treatment. BioMed Central 2023-01-03 /pmc/articles/PMC9811717/ /pubmed/36597048 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12903-022-02586-4 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Di Fede, O. Canepa, F. Maniscalco, L. Tozzo, P. Matranga, D. Giuliana, G. Prevention and the treatment of oral mucositis: the efficacy of sodium bicarbonate vs other agents: a systematic review |
title | Prevention and the treatment of oral mucositis: the efficacy of sodium bicarbonate vs other agents: a systematic review |
title_full | Prevention and the treatment of oral mucositis: the efficacy of sodium bicarbonate vs other agents: a systematic review |
title_fullStr | Prevention and the treatment of oral mucositis: the efficacy of sodium bicarbonate vs other agents: a systematic review |
title_full_unstemmed | Prevention and the treatment of oral mucositis: the efficacy of sodium bicarbonate vs other agents: a systematic review |
title_short | Prevention and the treatment of oral mucositis: the efficacy of sodium bicarbonate vs other agents: a systematic review |
title_sort | prevention and the treatment of oral mucositis: the efficacy of sodium bicarbonate vs other agents: a systematic review |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9811717/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36597048 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12903-022-02586-4 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT difedeo preventionandthetreatmentoforalmucositistheefficacyofsodiumbicarbonatevsotheragentsasystematicreview AT canepaf preventionandthetreatmentoforalmucositistheefficacyofsodiumbicarbonatevsotheragentsasystematicreview AT maniscalcol preventionandthetreatmentoforalmucositistheefficacyofsodiumbicarbonatevsotheragentsasystematicreview AT tozzop preventionandthetreatmentoforalmucositistheefficacyofsodiumbicarbonatevsotheragentsasystematicreview AT matrangad preventionandthetreatmentoforalmucositistheefficacyofsodiumbicarbonatevsotheragentsasystematicreview AT giulianag preventionandthetreatmentoforalmucositistheefficacyofsodiumbicarbonatevsotheragentsasystematicreview |