Cargando…

Prevention and the treatment of oral mucositis: the efficacy of sodium bicarbonate vs other agents: a systematic review

INTRODUCTION: Oral mucositis (OM) is a major side effect of cancer therapy, which is associated with significant symptoms, treatment delays and increased costs for the health system. It is an important component of the quality of life of cancer patients and, until now, there has been no gold standar...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Di Fede, O., Canepa, F., Maniscalco, L., Tozzo, P., Matranga, D., Giuliana, G.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9811717/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36597048
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12903-022-02586-4
_version_ 1784863584494288896
author Di Fede, O.
Canepa, F.
Maniscalco, L.
Tozzo, P.
Matranga, D.
Giuliana, G.
author_facet Di Fede, O.
Canepa, F.
Maniscalco, L.
Tozzo, P.
Matranga, D.
Giuliana, G.
author_sort Di Fede, O.
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Oral mucositis (OM) is a major side effect of cancer therapy, which is associated with significant symptoms, treatment delays and increased costs for the health system. It is an important component of the quality of life of cancer patients and, until now, there has been no gold standard regarding prevention or treatment of this pathology. Notwithstanding the paucity of treatment guidelines (due to limited evidence from high-quality, rigorous studies), sodium bicarbonate (SB) rinses are one of the most used agents for OM management. OBJECTIVES: A systematic review (2000–2022) was performed in order to compare and examine different agents versus sodium bicarbonate (SB) in preventing or treating OM. SOURCES: Eleven randomized controlled trials (RCT) were evaluated: four were conducted for the prevention and seven for the management of OM. The risk of bias of RCTs was assessed using the revised Cochrane risk of bias tool for randomized trials. STUDY SELECTION: According to the RoB2 evaluation for randomized trials, four RCTs were judged to be at a high risk of bias, two were rated as ‘problematic’, while five were deemed to be a low risk of bias. CONCLUSIONS: The results revealed that there was no evidence for supporting SB in OM treatment regarding management and prevention. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: Results showed in this review takes on a strategic importance in the use of SB for OM management or prevention; indiscriminate use of SB could be counterproductive because it causes a sudden pH increase and it delays proper OM pharmacological treatment.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9811717
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-98117172023-01-05 Prevention and the treatment of oral mucositis: the efficacy of sodium bicarbonate vs other agents: a systematic review Di Fede, O. Canepa, F. Maniscalco, L. Tozzo, P. Matranga, D. Giuliana, G. BMC Oral Health Research INTRODUCTION: Oral mucositis (OM) is a major side effect of cancer therapy, which is associated with significant symptoms, treatment delays and increased costs for the health system. It is an important component of the quality of life of cancer patients and, until now, there has been no gold standard regarding prevention or treatment of this pathology. Notwithstanding the paucity of treatment guidelines (due to limited evidence from high-quality, rigorous studies), sodium bicarbonate (SB) rinses are one of the most used agents for OM management. OBJECTIVES: A systematic review (2000–2022) was performed in order to compare and examine different agents versus sodium bicarbonate (SB) in preventing or treating OM. SOURCES: Eleven randomized controlled trials (RCT) were evaluated: four were conducted for the prevention and seven for the management of OM. The risk of bias of RCTs was assessed using the revised Cochrane risk of bias tool for randomized trials. STUDY SELECTION: According to the RoB2 evaluation for randomized trials, four RCTs were judged to be at a high risk of bias, two were rated as ‘problematic’, while five were deemed to be a low risk of bias. CONCLUSIONS: The results revealed that there was no evidence for supporting SB in OM treatment regarding management and prevention. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: Results showed in this review takes on a strategic importance in the use of SB for OM management or prevention; indiscriminate use of SB could be counterproductive because it causes a sudden pH increase and it delays proper OM pharmacological treatment. BioMed Central 2023-01-03 /pmc/articles/PMC9811717/ /pubmed/36597048 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12903-022-02586-4 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Di Fede, O.
Canepa, F.
Maniscalco, L.
Tozzo, P.
Matranga, D.
Giuliana, G.
Prevention and the treatment of oral mucositis: the efficacy of sodium bicarbonate vs other agents: a systematic review
title Prevention and the treatment of oral mucositis: the efficacy of sodium bicarbonate vs other agents: a systematic review
title_full Prevention and the treatment of oral mucositis: the efficacy of sodium bicarbonate vs other agents: a systematic review
title_fullStr Prevention and the treatment of oral mucositis: the efficacy of sodium bicarbonate vs other agents: a systematic review
title_full_unstemmed Prevention and the treatment of oral mucositis: the efficacy of sodium bicarbonate vs other agents: a systematic review
title_short Prevention and the treatment of oral mucositis: the efficacy of sodium bicarbonate vs other agents: a systematic review
title_sort prevention and the treatment of oral mucositis: the efficacy of sodium bicarbonate vs other agents: a systematic review
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9811717/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36597048
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12903-022-02586-4
work_keys_str_mv AT difedeo preventionandthetreatmentoforalmucositistheefficacyofsodiumbicarbonatevsotheragentsasystematicreview
AT canepaf preventionandthetreatmentoforalmucositistheefficacyofsodiumbicarbonatevsotheragentsasystematicreview
AT maniscalcol preventionandthetreatmentoforalmucositistheefficacyofsodiumbicarbonatevsotheragentsasystematicreview
AT tozzop preventionandthetreatmentoforalmucositistheefficacyofsodiumbicarbonatevsotheragentsasystematicreview
AT matrangad preventionandthetreatmentoforalmucositistheefficacyofsodiumbicarbonatevsotheragentsasystematicreview
AT giulianag preventionandthetreatmentoforalmucositistheefficacyofsodiumbicarbonatevsotheragentsasystematicreview