Cargando…

Effect of retained embryos on pregnancy outcomes of in vitro fertilization: a matched retrospective cohort study

OBJECTIVES: To explore the incidence of retained embryos (REs) in embryo transfer (ET) cycles and its effects on pregnancy outcomes in women undergoing in vitro fertilization (IVF). METHODS: This was a matched retrospective cohort study involving 29,160 ET cycles conducted from March 2016 to Februar...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zhang, Hui xia, Li, Fei, Jin, Haixia, Song, Wen yan, Su, Yingchun, Li, Gang
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9811760/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36600221
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12884-022-05315-5
_version_ 1784863593272967168
author Zhang, Hui xia
Li, Fei
Jin, Haixia
Song, Wen yan
Su, Yingchun
Li, Gang
author_facet Zhang, Hui xia
Li, Fei
Jin, Haixia
Song, Wen yan
Su, Yingchun
Li, Gang
author_sort Zhang, Hui xia
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: To explore the incidence of retained embryos (REs) in embryo transfer (ET) cycles and its effects on pregnancy outcomes in women undergoing in vitro fertilization (IVF). METHODS: This was a matched retrospective cohort study involving 29,160 ET cycles conducted from March 2016 to February 2021, in which ET cycles without RE were matched to the RE group at a 2:1 ratio. Clinical pregnancy, implantation, miscarriage, and live birth rates were compared between the with-RE and without-RE groups. RESULTS: Our study showed that the overall incidence of REs was 0.33% (95/29,160). There was a statistically significant difference in RE rate among the operators (P < 0.001), suggesting that the embryo retention rate may be affected by the individual operator. A total of 95 repeated ET cycles due to RE were included in the study group, and 190 ET cycles without RE were matched to the study group (1:2). There were no significant differences between the RE and matched groups in terms of implantation rate (35.6 vs. 38.0%; P = 0.608), clinical pregnancy rate (47.4 vs. 54.7%; P = 0.240), biochemical pregnancy rate (5.3 vs. 4.7%; P = 0.846), miscarriage rate (11.1 vs. 9.6%; P = 0.781), ectopic pregnancy rate (2.2 vs. 1.9%; P = 1.000) or live birth rate (41.1 vs. 48.9%; P = 0.208). CONCLUSIONS: The present findings demonstrated that immediate retransfer of REs did not significantly affect IVF outcomes, which may provide counselling information for patients when REs are identified and ET is reattempted. The incidence of REs was associated with the operator who expelled the embryos from the catheter. Attention to detail and frequent assessment of the operator’s technique may facilitate avoidance of embryo retention.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9811760
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-98117602023-01-05 Effect of retained embryos on pregnancy outcomes of in vitro fertilization: a matched retrospective cohort study Zhang, Hui xia Li, Fei Jin, Haixia Song, Wen yan Su, Yingchun Li, Gang BMC Pregnancy Childbirth Research OBJECTIVES: To explore the incidence of retained embryos (REs) in embryo transfer (ET) cycles and its effects on pregnancy outcomes in women undergoing in vitro fertilization (IVF). METHODS: This was a matched retrospective cohort study involving 29,160 ET cycles conducted from March 2016 to February 2021, in which ET cycles without RE were matched to the RE group at a 2:1 ratio. Clinical pregnancy, implantation, miscarriage, and live birth rates were compared between the with-RE and without-RE groups. RESULTS: Our study showed that the overall incidence of REs was 0.33% (95/29,160). There was a statistically significant difference in RE rate among the operators (P < 0.001), suggesting that the embryo retention rate may be affected by the individual operator. A total of 95 repeated ET cycles due to RE were included in the study group, and 190 ET cycles without RE were matched to the study group (1:2). There were no significant differences between the RE and matched groups in terms of implantation rate (35.6 vs. 38.0%; P = 0.608), clinical pregnancy rate (47.4 vs. 54.7%; P = 0.240), biochemical pregnancy rate (5.3 vs. 4.7%; P = 0.846), miscarriage rate (11.1 vs. 9.6%; P = 0.781), ectopic pregnancy rate (2.2 vs. 1.9%; P = 1.000) or live birth rate (41.1 vs. 48.9%; P = 0.208). CONCLUSIONS: The present findings demonstrated that immediate retransfer of REs did not significantly affect IVF outcomes, which may provide counselling information for patients when REs are identified and ET is reattempted. The incidence of REs was associated with the operator who expelled the embryos from the catheter. Attention to detail and frequent assessment of the operator’s technique may facilitate avoidance of embryo retention. BioMed Central 2023-01-04 /pmc/articles/PMC9811760/ /pubmed/36600221 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12884-022-05315-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Zhang, Hui xia
Li, Fei
Jin, Haixia
Song, Wen yan
Su, Yingchun
Li, Gang
Effect of retained embryos on pregnancy outcomes of in vitro fertilization: a matched retrospective cohort study
title Effect of retained embryos on pregnancy outcomes of in vitro fertilization: a matched retrospective cohort study
title_full Effect of retained embryos on pregnancy outcomes of in vitro fertilization: a matched retrospective cohort study
title_fullStr Effect of retained embryos on pregnancy outcomes of in vitro fertilization: a matched retrospective cohort study
title_full_unstemmed Effect of retained embryos on pregnancy outcomes of in vitro fertilization: a matched retrospective cohort study
title_short Effect of retained embryos on pregnancy outcomes of in vitro fertilization: a matched retrospective cohort study
title_sort effect of retained embryos on pregnancy outcomes of in vitro fertilization: a matched retrospective cohort study
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9811760/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36600221
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12884-022-05315-5
work_keys_str_mv AT zhanghuixia effectofretainedembryosonpregnancyoutcomesofinvitrofertilizationamatchedretrospectivecohortstudy
AT lifei effectofretainedembryosonpregnancyoutcomesofinvitrofertilizationamatchedretrospectivecohortstudy
AT jinhaixia effectofretainedembryosonpregnancyoutcomesofinvitrofertilizationamatchedretrospectivecohortstudy
AT songwenyan effectofretainedembryosonpregnancyoutcomesofinvitrofertilizationamatchedretrospectivecohortstudy
AT suyingchun effectofretainedembryosonpregnancyoutcomesofinvitrofertilizationamatchedretrospectivecohortstudy
AT ligang effectofretainedembryosonpregnancyoutcomesofinvitrofertilizationamatchedretrospectivecohortstudy