Cargando…

Effects of hysterectomy on pelvic floor function and sexual function—A prospective cohort study

INTRODUCTION: Hysterectomy is one of the most common major surgical procedures in women. The effects of hysterectomy on pelvic floor and sexual function are uncertain. Our objective was to investigate the effects of hysterectomy for benign indications on pelvic floor and sexual function and to compa...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Forsgren, Catharina, Amato, Martina, Johannesson, Ulrika
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9812090/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36004493
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/aogs.14437
_version_ 1784863656121466880
author Forsgren, Catharina
Amato, Martina
Johannesson, Ulrika
author_facet Forsgren, Catharina
Amato, Martina
Johannesson, Ulrika
author_sort Forsgren, Catharina
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Hysterectomy is one of the most common major surgical procedures in women. The effects of hysterectomy on pelvic floor and sexual function are uncertain. Our objective was to investigate the effects of hysterectomy for benign indications on pelvic floor and sexual function and to compare different modes of surgery. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We performed a prospective clinical cohort study. In all, 260 women scheduled for hysterectomy answered validated questionnaires (Pelvic Floor Impact Questionnaire, Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory and Female Sexual Function Index). Participants were followed 6 months and 1 year after surgery. Data were analyzed using nonparametric statistics and mixed effect models. RESULTS: Women with subtotal hysterectomy, vaginal hysterectomy, laparoscopic assisted vaginal hysterectomy, and previous prolapse/incontinence surgery were excluded from further analysis, leaving the remaining cohort to 242 patients. The response rate at 6 months and 1 year follow‐up was 180/242 (74.3%) and 169/242 (69.8%), respectively. There was an improvement of pelvic floor function at both follow‐ups; mean score of Pelvic Floor Impact Questionnaire at baseline was 42.5 (51.7), at 6 months 19.9 (42.2) and at 1 year 23.7 (50.3) (p < 0.001). The mean score of Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory at baseline was 69.6 (51.1), at 6 months 49 (43.2) and at 1 year 49 (43.2) (p < 0.001). There was an improvement of sexual function after 6 months (mean score of Female Sexual Function Index at baseline 17.9 [SD 11.7] and at 6 months 21.0 [SD 11.7]) (p < 0.001). There was no difference in pelvic floor or sexual function when comparing surgical techniques. CONCLUSIONS: Robotic assisted laparoscopic hysterectomy, laparoscopic hysterectomy and abdominal hysterectomy improve pelvic floor function to the same extent at 6 months and 1 year after surgery. There was an overall improvement of sexual function 6 months after hysterectomy, but this did not persist after 1 year.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9812090
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-98120902023-01-05 Effects of hysterectomy on pelvic floor function and sexual function—A prospective cohort study Forsgren, Catharina Amato, Martina Johannesson, Ulrika Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand Gynecological Surgery INTRODUCTION: Hysterectomy is one of the most common major surgical procedures in women. The effects of hysterectomy on pelvic floor and sexual function are uncertain. Our objective was to investigate the effects of hysterectomy for benign indications on pelvic floor and sexual function and to compare different modes of surgery. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We performed a prospective clinical cohort study. In all, 260 women scheduled for hysterectomy answered validated questionnaires (Pelvic Floor Impact Questionnaire, Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory and Female Sexual Function Index). Participants were followed 6 months and 1 year after surgery. Data were analyzed using nonparametric statistics and mixed effect models. RESULTS: Women with subtotal hysterectomy, vaginal hysterectomy, laparoscopic assisted vaginal hysterectomy, and previous prolapse/incontinence surgery were excluded from further analysis, leaving the remaining cohort to 242 patients. The response rate at 6 months and 1 year follow‐up was 180/242 (74.3%) and 169/242 (69.8%), respectively. There was an improvement of pelvic floor function at both follow‐ups; mean score of Pelvic Floor Impact Questionnaire at baseline was 42.5 (51.7), at 6 months 19.9 (42.2) and at 1 year 23.7 (50.3) (p < 0.001). The mean score of Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory at baseline was 69.6 (51.1), at 6 months 49 (43.2) and at 1 year 49 (43.2) (p < 0.001). There was an improvement of sexual function after 6 months (mean score of Female Sexual Function Index at baseline 17.9 [SD 11.7] and at 6 months 21.0 [SD 11.7]) (p < 0.001). There was no difference in pelvic floor or sexual function when comparing surgical techniques. CONCLUSIONS: Robotic assisted laparoscopic hysterectomy, laparoscopic hysterectomy and abdominal hysterectomy improve pelvic floor function to the same extent at 6 months and 1 year after surgery. There was an overall improvement of sexual function 6 months after hysterectomy, but this did not persist after 1 year. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-08-25 /pmc/articles/PMC9812090/ /pubmed/36004493 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/aogs.14437 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Nordic Federation of Societies of Obstetrics and Gynecology (NFOG). https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Gynecological Surgery
Forsgren, Catharina
Amato, Martina
Johannesson, Ulrika
Effects of hysterectomy on pelvic floor function and sexual function—A prospective cohort study
title Effects of hysterectomy on pelvic floor function and sexual function—A prospective cohort study
title_full Effects of hysterectomy on pelvic floor function and sexual function—A prospective cohort study
title_fullStr Effects of hysterectomy on pelvic floor function and sexual function—A prospective cohort study
title_full_unstemmed Effects of hysterectomy on pelvic floor function and sexual function—A prospective cohort study
title_short Effects of hysterectomy on pelvic floor function and sexual function—A prospective cohort study
title_sort effects of hysterectomy on pelvic floor function and sexual function—a prospective cohort study
topic Gynecological Surgery
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9812090/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36004493
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/aogs.14437
work_keys_str_mv AT forsgrencatharina effectsofhysterectomyonpelvicfloorfunctionandsexualfunctionaprospectivecohortstudy
AT amatomartina effectsofhysterectomyonpelvicfloorfunctionandsexualfunctionaprospectivecohortstudy
AT johannessonulrika effectsofhysterectomyonpelvicfloorfunctionandsexualfunctionaprospectivecohortstudy