Cargando…

Experimental suppression of transcranial magnetic stimulation‐electroencephalography sensory potentials

The sensory experience of transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) evokes cortical responses measured in electroencephalography (EEG) that confound interpretation of TMS‐evoked potentials (TEPs). Methods for sensory masking have been proposed to minimize sensory contributions to the TEP, but the most...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ross, Jessica M., Sarkar, Manjima, Keller, Corey J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9812254/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35770956
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/hbm.25990
_version_ 1784863689739862016
author Ross, Jessica M.
Sarkar, Manjima
Keller, Corey J.
author_facet Ross, Jessica M.
Sarkar, Manjima
Keller, Corey J.
author_sort Ross, Jessica M.
collection PubMed
description The sensory experience of transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) evokes cortical responses measured in electroencephalography (EEG) that confound interpretation of TMS‐evoked potentials (TEPs). Methods for sensory masking have been proposed to minimize sensory contributions to the TEP, but the most effective combination for suprathreshold TMS to dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (dlPFC) is unknown. We applied sensory suppression techniques and quantified electrophysiology and perception from suprathreshold dlPFC TMS to identify the best combination to minimize the sensory TEP. In 21 healthy adults, we applied single pulse TMS at 120% resting motor threshold (rMT) to the left dlPFC and compared EEG vertex N100‐P200 and perception. Conditions included three protocols: No masking (no auditory masking, no foam, and jittered interstimulus interval [ISI]), Standard masking (auditory noise, foam, and jittered ISI), and our ATTENUATE protocol (auditory noise, foam, over‐the‐ear protection, and unjittered ISI). ATTENUATE reduced vertex N100‐P200 by 56%, “click” loudness perception by 50%, and scalp sensation by 36%. We show that sensory prediction, induced with predictable ISI, has a suppressive effect on vertex N100‐P200, and that combining standard suppression protocols with sensory prediction provides the best N100‐P200 suppression. ATTENUATE was more effective than Standard masking, which only reduced vertex N100‐P200 by 22%, loudness by 27%, and scalp sensation by 24%. We introduce a sensory suppression protocol superior to Standard masking and demonstrate that using an unjittered ISI can contribute to minimizing sensory confounds. ATTENUATE provides superior sensory suppression to increase TEP signal‐to‐noise and contributes to a growing understanding of TMS‐EEG sensory neuroscience.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9812254
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-98122542023-01-05 Experimental suppression of transcranial magnetic stimulation‐electroencephalography sensory potentials Ross, Jessica M. Sarkar, Manjima Keller, Corey J. Hum Brain Mapp Research Articles The sensory experience of transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) evokes cortical responses measured in electroencephalography (EEG) that confound interpretation of TMS‐evoked potentials (TEPs). Methods for sensory masking have been proposed to minimize sensory contributions to the TEP, but the most effective combination for suprathreshold TMS to dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (dlPFC) is unknown. We applied sensory suppression techniques and quantified electrophysiology and perception from suprathreshold dlPFC TMS to identify the best combination to minimize the sensory TEP. In 21 healthy adults, we applied single pulse TMS at 120% resting motor threshold (rMT) to the left dlPFC and compared EEG vertex N100‐P200 and perception. Conditions included three protocols: No masking (no auditory masking, no foam, and jittered interstimulus interval [ISI]), Standard masking (auditory noise, foam, and jittered ISI), and our ATTENUATE protocol (auditory noise, foam, over‐the‐ear protection, and unjittered ISI). ATTENUATE reduced vertex N100‐P200 by 56%, “click” loudness perception by 50%, and scalp sensation by 36%. We show that sensory prediction, induced with predictable ISI, has a suppressive effect on vertex N100‐P200, and that combining standard suppression protocols with sensory prediction provides the best N100‐P200 suppression. ATTENUATE was more effective than Standard masking, which only reduced vertex N100‐P200 by 22%, loudness by 27%, and scalp sensation by 24%. We introduce a sensory suppression protocol superior to Standard masking and demonstrate that using an unjittered ISI can contribute to minimizing sensory confounds. ATTENUATE provides superior sensory suppression to increase TEP signal‐to‐noise and contributes to a growing understanding of TMS‐EEG sensory neuroscience. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2022-06-30 /pmc/articles/PMC9812254/ /pubmed/35770956 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/hbm.25990 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Human Brain Mapping published by Wiley Periodicals LLC. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Research Articles
Ross, Jessica M.
Sarkar, Manjima
Keller, Corey J.
Experimental suppression of transcranial magnetic stimulation‐electroencephalography sensory potentials
title Experimental suppression of transcranial magnetic stimulation‐electroencephalography sensory potentials
title_full Experimental suppression of transcranial magnetic stimulation‐electroencephalography sensory potentials
title_fullStr Experimental suppression of transcranial magnetic stimulation‐electroencephalography sensory potentials
title_full_unstemmed Experimental suppression of transcranial magnetic stimulation‐electroencephalography sensory potentials
title_short Experimental suppression of transcranial magnetic stimulation‐electroencephalography sensory potentials
title_sort experimental suppression of transcranial magnetic stimulation‐electroencephalography sensory potentials
topic Research Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9812254/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35770956
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/hbm.25990
work_keys_str_mv AT rossjessicam experimentalsuppressionoftranscranialmagneticstimulationelectroencephalographysensorypotentials
AT sarkarmanjima experimentalsuppressionoftranscranialmagneticstimulationelectroencephalographysensorypotentials
AT kellercoreyj experimentalsuppressionoftranscranialmagneticstimulationelectroencephalographysensorypotentials