Cargando…
Experimental suppression of transcranial magnetic stimulation‐electroencephalography sensory potentials
The sensory experience of transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) evokes cortical responses measured in electroencephalography (EEG) that confound interpretation of TMS‐evoked potentials (TEPs). Methods for sensory masking have been proposed to minimize sensory contributions to the TEP, but the most...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9812254/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35770956 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/hbm.25990 |
_version_ | 1784863689739862016 |
---|---|
author | Ross, Jessica M. Sarkar, Manjima Keller, Corey J. |
author_facet | Ross, Jessica M. Sarkar, Manjima Keller, Corey J. |
author_sort | Ross, Jessica M. |
collection | PubMed |
description | The sensory experience of transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) evokes cortical responses measured in electroencephalography (EEG) that confound interpretation of TMS‐evoked potentials (TEPs). Methods for sensory masking have been proposed to minimize sensory contributions to the TEP, but the most effective combination for suprathreshold TMS to dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (dlPFC) is unknown. We applied sensory suppression techniques and quantified electrophysiology and perception from suprathreshold dlPFC TMS to identify the best combination to minimize the sensory TEP. In 21 healthy adults, we applied single pulse TMS at 120% resting motor threshold (rMT) to the left dlPFC and compared EEG vertex N100‐P200 and perception. Conditions included three protocols: No masking (no auditory masking, no foam, and jittered interstimulus interval [ISI]), Standard masking (auditory noise, foam, and jittered ISI), and our ATTENUATE protocol (auditory noise, foam, over‐the‐ear protection, and unjittered ISI). ATTENUATE reduced vertex N100‐P200 by 56%, “click” loudness perception by 50%, and scalp sensation by 36%. We show that sensory prediction, induced with predictable ISI, has a suppressive effect on vertex N100‐P200, and that combining standard suppression protocols with sensory prediction provides the best N100‐P200 suppression. ATTENUATE was more effective than Standard masking, which only reduced vertex N100‐P200 by 22%, loudness by 27%, and scalp sensation by 24%. We introduce a sensory suppression protocol superior to Standard masking and demonstrate that using an unjittered ISI can contribute to minimizing sensory confounds. ATTENUATE provides superior sensory suppression to increase TEP signal‐to‐noise and contributes to a growing understanding of TMS‐EEG sensory neuroscience. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9812254 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | John Wiley & Sons, Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-98122542023-01-05 Experimental suppression of transcranial magnetic stimulation‐electroencephalography sensory potentials Ross, Jessica M. Sarkar, Manjima Keller, Corey J. Hum Brain Mapp Research Articles The sensory experience of transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) evokes cortical responses measured in electroencephalography (EEG) that confound interpretation of TMS‐evoked potentials (TEPs). Methods for sensory masking have been proposed to minimize sensory contributions to the TEP, but the most effective combination for suprathreshold TMS to dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (dlPFC) is unknown. We applied sensory suppression techniques and quantified electrophysiology and perception from suprathreshold dlPFC TMS to identify the best combination to minimize the sensory TEP. In 21 healthy adults, we applied single pulse TMS at 120% resting motor threshold (rMT) to the left dlPFC and compared EEG vertex N100‐P200 and perception. Conditions included three protocols: No masking (no auditory masking, no foam, and jittered interstimulus interval [ISI]), Standard masking (auditory noise, foam, and jittered ISI), and our ATTENUATE protocol (auditory noise, foam, over‐the‐ear protection, and unjittered ISI). ATTENUATE reduced vertex N100‐P200 by 56%, “click” loudness perception by 50%, and scalp sensation by 36%. We show that sensory prediction, induced with predictable ISI, has a suppressive effect on vertex N100‐P200, and that combining standard suppression protocols with sensory prediction provides the best N100‐P200 suppression. ATTENUATE was more effective than Standard masking, which only reduced vertex N100‐P200 by 22%, loudness by 27%, and scalp sensation by 24%. We introduce a sensory suppression protocol superior to Standard masking and demonstrate that using an unjittered ISI can contribute to minimizing sensory confounds. ATTENUATE provides superior sensory suppression to increase TEP signal‐to‐noise and contributes to a growing understanding of TMS‐EEG sensory neuroscience. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2022-06-30 /pmc/articles/PMC9812254/ /pubmed/35770956 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/hbm.25990 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Human Brain Mapping published by Wiley Periodicals LLC. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made. |
spellingShingle | Research Articles Ross, Jessica M. Sarkar, Manjima Keller, Corey J. Experimental suppression of transcranial magnetic stimulation‐electroencephalography sensory potentials |
title | Experimental suppression of transcranial magnetic stimulation‐electroencephalography sensory potentials |
title_full | Experimental suppression of transcranial magnetic stimulation‐electroencephalography sensory potentials |
title_fullStr | Experimental suppression of transcranial magnetic stimulation‐electroencephalography sensory potentials |
title_full_unstemmed | Experimental suppression of transcranial magnetic stimulation‐electroencephalography sensory potentials |
title_short | Experimental suppression of transcranial magnetic stimulation‐electroencephalography sensory potentials |
title_sort | experimental suppression of transcranial magnetic stimulation‐electroencephalography sensory potentials |
topic | Research Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9812254/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35770956 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/hbm.25990 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT rossjessicam experimentalsuppressionoftranscranialmagneticstimulationelectroencephalographysensorypotentials AT sarkarmanjima experimentalsuppressionoftranscranialmagneticstimulationelectroencephalographysensorypotentials AT kellercoreyj experimentalsuppressionoftranscranialmagneticstimulationelectroencephalographysensorypotentials |