Cargando…

Impact of the time interval between end of induction and autologous hematopoietic transplantation in newly diagnosed patients with multiple myeloma

Multiple Myeloma patients eligible for autologous hematopoietic transplantation (AHT) typically receive 3–6 cycles of induction therapy before transplant. The last induction cycle is completed 2–4 weeks prior to mobilization. We evaluated the impact of the time interval between end of induction and...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Charalampous, Charalampos, Goel, Utkarsh, Gertz, Morie, Lacy, Martha, Dispenzieri, Angela, Hayman, Suzanne, Dingli, David, Buadi, Francis, Kapoor, Prashant, Kourelis, Taxiarchis, Warsame, Rahma, Hogan, William J., Kumar, Shaji
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9812760/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36203088
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41409-022-01835-y
_version_ 1784863800727437312
author Charalampous, Charalampos
Goel, Utkarsh
Gertz, Morie
Lacy, Martha
Dispenzieri, Angela
Hayman, Suzanne
Dingli, David
Buadi, Francis
Kapoor, Prashant
Kourelis, Taxiarchis
Warsame, Rahma
Hogan, William J.
Kumar, Shaji
author_facet Charalampous, Charalampos
Goel, Utkarsh
Gertz, Morie
Lacy, Martha
Dispenzieri, Angela
Hayman, Suzanne
Dingli, David
Buadi, Francis
Kapoor, Prashant
Kourelis, Taxiarchis
Warsame, Rahma
Hogan, William J.
Kumar, Shaji
author_sort Charalampous, Charalampos
collection PubMed
description Multiple Myeloma patients eligible for autologous hematopoietic transplantation (AHT) typically receive 3–6 cycles of induction therapy before transplant. The last induction cycle is completed 2–4 weeks prior to mobilization. We evaluated the impact of the time interval between end of induction and AHT on progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). A total of 1055 patients who underwent AHT were identified. The median time to transplant (TTT) was 33 days (27–42 quartile range). Patients with less than 33 days of TTT had significantly prolonged PFS (35.6 vs. 32.1 months, p < 0.03) but non-significant OS differences compared to those with more than 33 days. Quartile comparisons showed that patients in the 1st quartile (less than 27 days) had significantly prolonged PFS (36.7 vs. 30.9 months, p < 0.01) compared to the 4th quartile group (more than 42 days). In a subgroup analysis of patients with partial or worse biochemical response prior to transplant, patients in the 1st quartile had significantly prolonged PFS (37.7 vs. 28.7 months, p < 0.04) compared to the 4th quartile group. In conclusion, we showed that a prolonged TTT is associated with inferior outcomes compared to tighter chemotherapy schedules. This finding was especially prevalent in patients with partial response at induction.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9812760
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-98127602023-01-06 Impact of the time interval between end of induction and autologous hematopoietic transplantation in newly diagnosed patients with multiple myeloma Charalampous, Charalampos Goel, Utkarsh Gertz, Morie Lacy, Martha Dispenzieri, Angela Hayman, Suzanne Dingli, David Buadi, Francis Kapoor, Prashant Kourelis, Taxiarchis Warsame, Rahma Hogan, William J. Kumar, Shaji Bone Marrow Transplant Article Multiple Myeloma patients eligible for autologous hematopoietic transplantation (AHT) typically receive 3–6 cycles of induction therapy before transplant. The last induction cycle is completed 2–4 weeks prior to mobilization. We evaluated the impact of the time interval between end of induction and AHT on progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). A total of 1055 patients who underwent AHT were identified. The median time to transplant (TTT) was 33 days (27–42 quartile range). Patients with less than 33 days of TTT had significantly prolonged PFS (35.6 vs. 32.1 months, p < 0.03) but non-significant OS differences compared to those with more than 33 days. Quartile comparisons showed that patients in the 1st quartile (less than 27 days) had significantly prolonged PFS (36.7 vs. 30.9 months, p < 0.01) compared to the 4th quartile group (more than 42 days). In a subgroup analysis of patients with partial or worse biochemical response prior to transplant, patients in the 1st quartile had significantly prolonged PFS (37.7 vs. 28.7 months, p < 0.04) compared to the 4th quartile group. In conclusion, we showed that a prolonged TTT is associated with inferior outcomes compared to tighter chemotherapy schedules. This finding was especially prevalent in patients with partial response at induction. Nature Publishing Group UK 2022-10-06 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC9812760/ /pubmed/36203088 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41409-022-01835-y Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Article
Charalampous, Charalampos
Goel, Utkarsh
Gertz, Morie
Lacy, Martha
Dispenzieri, Angela
Hayman, Suzanne
Dingli, David
Buadi, Francis
Kapoor, Prashant
Kourelis, Taxiarchis
Warsame, Rahma
Hogan, William J.
Kumar, Shaji
Impact of the time interval between end of induction and autologous hematopoietic transplantation in newly diagnosed patients with multiple myeloma
title Impact of the time interval between end of induction and autologous hematopoietic transplantation in newly diagnosed patients with multiple myeloma
title_full Impact of the time interval between end of induction and autologous hematopoietic transplantation in newly diagnosed patients with multiple myeloma
title_fullStr Impact of the time interval between end of induction and autologous hematopoietic transplantation in newly diagnosed patients with multiple myeloma
title_full_unstemmed Impact of the time interval between end of induction and autologous hematopoietic transplantation in newly diagnosed patients with multiple myeloma
title_short Impact of the time interval between end of induction and autologous hematopoietic transplantation in newly diagnosed patients with multiple myeloma
title_sort impact of the time interval between end of induction and autologous hematopoietic transplantation in newly diagnosed patients with multiple myeloma
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9812760/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36203088
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41409-022-01835-y
work_keys_str_mv AT charalampouscharalampos impactofthetimeintervalbetweenendofinductionandautologoushematopoietictransplantationinnewlydiagnosedpatientswithmultiplemyeloma
AT goelutkarsh impactofthetimeintervalbetweenendofinductionandautologoushematopoietictransplantationinnewlydiagnosedpatientswithmultiplemyeloma
AT gertzmorie impactofthetimeintervalbetweenendofinductionandautologoushematopoietictransplantationinnewlydiagnosedpatientswithmultiplemyeloma
AT lacymartha impactofthetimeintervalbetweenendofinductionandautologoushematopoietictransplantationinnewlydiagnosedpatientswithmultiplemyeloma
AT dispenzieriangela impactofthetimeintervalbetweenendofinductionandautologoushematopoietictransplantationinnewlydiagnosedpatientswithmultiplemyeloma
AT haymansuzanne impactofthetimeintervalbetweenendofinductionandautologoushematopoietictransplantationinnewlydiagnosedpatientswithmultiplemyeloma
AT dinglidavid impactofthetimeintervalbetweenendofinductionandautologoushematopoietictransplantationinnewlydiagnosedpatientswithmultiplemyeloma
AT buadifrancis impactofthetimeintervalbetweenendofinductionandautologoushematopoietictransplantationinnewlydiagnosedpatientswithmultiplemyeloma
AT kapoorprashant impactofthetimeintervalbetweenendofinductionandautologoushematopoietictransplantationinnewlydiagnosedpatientswithmultiplemyeloma
AT kourelistaxiarchis impactofthetimeintervalbetweenendofinductionandautologoushematopoietictransplantationinnewlydiagnosedpatientswithmultiplemyeloma
AT warsamerahma impactofthetimeintervalbetweenendofinductionandautologoushematopoietictransplantationinnewlydiagnosedpatientswithmultiplemyeloma
AT hoganwilliamj impactofthetimeintervalbetweenendofinductionandautologoushematopoietictransplantationinnewlydiagnosedpatientswithmultiplemyeloma
AT kumarshaji impactofthetimeintervalbetweenendofinductionandautologoushematopoietictransplantationinnewlydiagnosedpatientswithmultiplemyeloma