Cargando…
Impact of the time interval between end of induction and autologous hematopoietic transplantation in newly diagnosed patients with multiple myeloma
Multiple Myeloma patients eligible for autologous hematopoietic transplantation (AHT) typically receive 3–6 cycles of induction therapy before transplant. The last induction cycle is completed 2–4 weeks prior to mobilization. We evaluated the impact of the time interval between end of induction and...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group UK
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9812760/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36203088 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41409-022-01835-y |
_version_ | 1784863800727437312 |
---|---|
author | Charalampous, Charalampos Goel, Utkarsh Gertz, Morie Lacy, Martha Dispenzieri, Angela Hayman, Suzanne Dingli, David Buadi, Francis Kapoor, Prashant Kourelis, Taxiarchis Warsame, Rahma Hogan, William J. Kumar, Shaji |
author_facet | Charalampous, Charalampos Goel, Utkarsh Gertz, Morie Lacy, Martha Dispenzieri, Angela Hayman, Suzanne Dingli, David Buadi, Francis Kapoor, Prashant Kourelis, Taxiarchis Warsame, Rahma Hogan, William J. Kumar, Shaji |
author_sort | Charalampous, Charalampos |
collection | PubMed |
description | Multiple Myeloma patients eligible for autologous hematopoietic transplantation (AHT) typically receive 3–6 cycles of induction therapy before transplant. The last induction cycle is completed 2–4 weeks prior to mobilization. We evaluated the impact of the time interval between end of induction and AHT on progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). A total of 1055 patients who underwent AHT were identified. The median time to transplant (TTT) was 33 days (27–42 quartile range). Patients with less than 33 days of TTT had significantly prolonged PFS (35.6 vs. 32.1 months, p < 0.03) but non-significant OS differences compared to those with more than 33 days. Quartile comparisons showed that patients in the 1st quartile (less than 27 days) had significantly prolonged PFS (36.7 vs. 30.9 months, p < 0.01) compared to the 4th quartile group (more than 42 days). In a subgroup analysis of patients with partial or worse biochemical response prior to transplant, patients in the 1st quartile had significantly prolonged PFS (37.7 vs. 28.7 months, p < 0.04) compared to the 4th quartile group. In conclusion, we showed that a prolonged TTT is associated with inferior outcomes compared to tighter chemotherapy schedules. This finding was especially prevalent in patients with partial response at induction. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9812760 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group UK |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-98127602023-01-06 Impact of the time interval between end of induction and autologous hematopoietic transplantation in newly diagnosed patients with multiple myeloma Charalampous, Charalampos Goel, Utkarsh Gertz, Morie Lacy, Martha Dispenzieri, Angela Hayman, Suzanne Dingli, David Buadi, Francis Kapoor, Prashant Kourelis, Taxiarchis Warsame, Rahma Hogan, William J. Kumar, Shaji Bone Marrow Transplant Article Multiple Myeloma patients eligible for autologous hematopoietic transplantation (AHT) typically receive 3–6 cycles of induction therapy before transplant. The last induction cycle is completed 2–4 weeks prior to mobilization. We evaluated the impact of the time interval between end of induction and AHT on progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). A total of 1055 patients who underwent AHT were identified. The median time to transplant (TTT) was 33 days (27–42 quartile range). Patients with less than 33 days of TTT had significantly prolonged PFS (35.6 vs. 32.1 months, p < 0.03) but non-significant OS differences compared to those with more than 33 days. Quartile comparisons showed that patients in the 1st quartile (less than 27 days) had significantly prolonged PFS (36.7 vs. 30.9 months, p < 0.01) compared to the 4th quartile group (more than 42 days). In a subgroup analysis of patients with partial or worse biochemical response prior to transplant, patients in the 1st quartile had significantly prolonged PFS (37.7 vs. 28.7 months, p < 0.04) compared to the 4th quartile group. In conclusion, we showed that a prolonged TTT is associated with inferior outcomes compared to tighter chemotherapy schedules. This finding was especially prevalent in patients with partial response at induction. Nature Publishing Group UK 2022-10-06 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC9812760/ /pubmed/36203088 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41409-022-01835-y Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Article Charalampous, Charalampos Goel, Utkarsh Gertz, Morie Lacy, Martha Dispenzieri, Angela Hayman, Suzanne Dingli, David Buadi, Francis Kapoor, Prashant Kourelis, Taxiarchis Warsame, Rahma Hogan, William J. Kumar, Shaji Impact of the time interval between end of induction and autologous hematopoietic transplantation in newly diagnosed patients with multiple myeloma |
title | Impact of the time interval between end of induction and autologous hematopoietic transplantation in newly diagnosed patients with multiple myeloma |
title_full | Impact of the time interval between end of induction and autologous hematopoietic transplantation in newly diagnosed patients with multiple myeloma |
title_fullStr | Impact of the time interval between end of induction and autologous hematopoietic transplantation in newly diagnosed patients with multiple myeloma |
title_full_unstemmed | Impact of the time interval between end of induction and autologous hematopoietic transplantation in newly diagnosed patients with multiple myeloma |
title_short | Impact of the time interval between end of induction and autologous hematopoietic transplantation in newly diagnosed patients with multiple myeloma |
title_sort | impact of the time interval between end of induction and autologous hematopoietic transplantation in newly diagnosed patients with multiple myeloma |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9812760/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36203088 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41409-022-01835-y |
work_keys_str_mv | AT charalampouscharalampos impactofthetimeintervalbetweenendofinductionandautologoushematopoietictransplantationinnewlydiagnosedpatientswithmultiplemyeloma AT goelutkarsh impactofthetimeintervalbetweenendofinductionandautologoushematopoietictransplantationinnewlydiagnosedpatientswithmultiplemyeloma AT gertzmorie impactofthetimeintervalbetweenendofinductionandautologoushematopoietictransplantationinnewlydiagnosedpatientswithmultiplemyeloma AT lacymartha impactofthetimeintervalbetweenendofinductionandautologoushematopoietictransplantationinnewlydiagnosedpatientswithmultiplemyeloma AT dispenzieriangela impactofthetimeintervalbetweenendofinductionandautologoushematopoietictransplantationinnewlydiagnosedpatientswithmultiplemyeloma AT haymansuzanne impactofthetimeintervalbetweenendofinductionandautologoushematopoietictransplantationinnewlydiagnosedpatientswithmultiplemyeloma AT dinglidavid impactofthetimeintervalbetweenendofinductionandautologoushematopoietictransplantationinnewlydiagnosedpatientswithmultiplemyeloma AT buadifrancis impactofthetimeintervalbetweenendofinductionandautologoushematopoietictransplantationinnewlydiagnosedpatientswithmultiplemyeloma AT kapoorprashant impactofthetimeintervalbetweenendofinductionandautologoushematopoietictransplantationinnewlydiagnosedpatientswithmultiplemyeloma AT kourelistaxiarchis impactofthetimeintervalbetweenendofinductionandautologoushematopoietictransplantationinnewlydiagnosedpatientswithmultiplemyeloma AT warsamerahma impactofthetimeintervalbetweenendofinductionandautologoushematopoietictransplantationinnewlydiagnosedpatientswithmultiplemyeloma AT hoganwilliamj impactofthetimeintervalbetweenendofinductionandautologoushematopoietictransplantationinnewlydiagnosedpatientswithmultiplemyeloma AT kumarshaji impactofthetimeintervalbetweenendofinductionandautologoushematopoietictransplantationinnewlydiagnosedpatientswithmultiplemyeloma |