Cargando…
Antidepressants for the treatment of adults with major depressive disorder in the maintenance phase: a systematic review and network meta-analysis
A systematic review and random-effects model network meta-analysis were conducted to compare the efficacy, acceptability, tolerability, and safety of antidepressants to treat adults with major depressive disorder (MDD) in the maintenance phase. This study searched the PubMed, Cochrane Library, and E...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group UK
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9812779/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36253442 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41380-022-01824-z |
_version_ | 1784863805496360960 |
---|---|
author | Kishi, Taro Ikuta, Toshikazu Sakuma, Kenji Okuya, Makoto Hatano, Masakazu Matsuda, Yuki Iwata, Nakao |
author_facet | Kishi, Taro Ikuta, Toshikazu Sakuma, Kenji Okuya, Makoto Hatano, Masakazu Matsuda, Yuki Iwata, Nakao |
author_sort | Kishi, Taro |
collection | PubMed |
description | A systematic review and random-effects model network meta-analysis were conducted to compare the efficacy, acceptability, tolerability, and safety of antidepressants to treat adults with major depressive disorder (MDD) in the maintenance phase. This study searched the PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Embase databases and included only double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trials with an enrichment design: patients were stabilized on the antidepressant of interest during the open-label study and then randomized to receive the same antidepressant or placebo. The outcomes were the 6-month relapse rate (primary outcome, efficacy), all-cause discontinuation (acceptability), discontinuation due to adverse events (tolerability), and the incidence of individual adverse events. The risk ratio with a 95% credible interval was calculated. The meta-analysis comprised 34 studies (n = 9384, mean age = 43.80 years, and %females = 68.10%) on 20 antidepressants (agomelatine, amitriptyline, bupropion, citalopram, desvenlafaxine, duloxetine, escitalopram, fluoxetine, fluvoxamine, levomilnacipran, milnacipran, mirtazapine, nefazodone, paroxetine, reboxetine, sertraline, tianeptine, venlafaxine, vilazodone, and vortioxetine) and a placebo. In terms of the 6-month relapse rate, amitriptyline, citalopram, desvenlafaxine, duloxetine, fluoxetine, fluvoxamine, mirtazapine, nefazodone, paroxetine, reboxetine, sertraline, tianeptine, venlafaxine, and vortioxetine outperformed placebo. Compared to placebo, desvenlafaxine, paroxetine, sertraline, venlafaxine, and vortioxetine had lower all-cause discontinuation; however, sertraline had a higher discontinuation rate due to adverse events. Compared to placebo, venlafaxine was associated with a lower incidence of dizziness, while desvenlafaxine, sertraline, and vortioxetine were associated with a higher incidence of nausea/vomiting. In conclusion, desvenlafaxine, paroxetine, venlafaxine, and vortioxetine had reasonable efficacy, acceptability, and tolerability in the treatment of adults with stable MDD. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9812779 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group UK |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-98127792023-01-06 Antidepressants for the treatment of adults with major depressive disorder in the maintenance phase: a systematic review and network meta-analysis Kishi, Taro Ikuta, Toshikazu Sakuma, Kenji Okuya, Makoto Hatano, Masakazu Matsuda, Yuki Iwata, Nakao Mol Psychiatry Systematic Review A systematic review and random-effects model network meta-analysis were conducted to compare the efficacy, acceptability, tolerability, and safety of antidepressants to treat adults with major depressive disorder (MDD) in the maintenance phase. This study searched the PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Embase databases and included only double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trials with an enrichment design: patients were stabilized on the antidepressant of interest during the open-label study and then randomized to receive the same antidepressant or placebo. The outcomes were the 6-month relapse rate (primary outcome, efficacy), all-cause discontinuation (acceptability), discontinuation due to adverse events (tolerability), and the incidence of individual adverse events. The risk ratio with a 95% credible interval was calculated. The meta-analysis comprised 34 studies (n = 9384, mean age = 43.80 years, and %females = 68.10%) on 20 antidepressants (agomelatine, amitriptyline, bupropion, citalopram, desvenlafaxine, duloxetine, escitalopram, fluoxetine, fluvoxamine, levomilnacipran, milnacipran, mirtazapine, nefazodone, paroxetine, reboxetine, sertraline, tianeptine, venlafaxine, vilazodone, and vortioxetine) and a placebo. In terms of the 6-month relapse rate, amitriptyline, citalopram, desvenlafaxine, duloxetine, fluoxetine, fluvoxamine, mirtazapine, nefazodone, paroxetine, reboxetine, sertraline, tianeptine, venlafaxine, and vortioxetine outperformed placebo. Compared to placebo, desvenlafaxine, paroxetine, sertraline, venlafaxine, and vortioxetine had lower all-cause discontinuation; however, sertraline had a higher discontinuation rate due to adverse events. Compared to placebo, venlafaxine was associated with a lower incidence of dizziness, while desvenlafaxine, sertraline, and vortioxetine were associated with a higher incidence of nausea/vomiting. In conclusion, desvenlafaxine, paroxetine, venlafaxine, and vortioxetine had reasonable efficacy, acceptability, and tolerability in the treatment of adults with stable MDD. Nature Publishing Group UK 2022-10-17 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC9812779/ /pubmed/36253442 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41380-022-01824-z Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Systematic Review Kishi, Taro Ikuta, Toshikazu Sakuma, Kenji Okuya, Makoto Hatano, Masakazu Matsuda, Yuki Iwata, Nakao Antidepressants for the treatment of adults with major depressive disorder in the maintenance phase: a systematic review and network meta-analysis |
title | Antidepressants for the treatment of adults with major depressive disorder in the maintenance phase: a systematic review and network meta-analysis |
title_full | Antidepressants for the treatment of adults with major depressive disorder in the maintenance phase: a systematic review and network meta-analysis |
title_fullStr | Antidepressants for the treatment of adults with major depressive disorder in the maintenance phase: a systematic review and network meta-analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Antidepressants for the treatment of adults with major depressive disorder in the maintenance phase: a systematic review and network meta-analysis |
title_short | Antidepressants for the treatment of adults with major depressive disorder in the maintenance phase: a systematic review and network meta-analysis |
title_sort | antidepressants for the treatment of adults with major depressive disorder in the maintenance phase: a systematic review and network meta-analysis |
topic | Systematic Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9812779/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36253442 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41380-022-01824-z |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kishitaro antidepressantsforthetreatmentofadultswithmajordepressivedisorderinthemaintenancephaseasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis AT ikutatoshikazu antidepressantsforthetreatmentofadultswithmajordepressivedisorderinthemaintenancephaseasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis AT sakumakenji antidepressantsforthetreatmentofadultswithmajordepressivedisorderinthemaintenancephaseasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis AT okuyamakoto antidepressantsforthetreatmentofadultswithmajordepressivedisorderinthemaintenancephaseasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis AT hatanomasakazu antidepressantsforthetreatmentofadultswithmajordepressivedisorderinthemaintenancephaseasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis AT matsudayuki antidepressantsforthetreatmentofadultswithmajordepressivedisorderinthemaintenancephaseasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis AT iwatanakao antidepressantsforthetreatmentofadultswithmajordepressivedisorderinthemaintenancephaseasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis |