Cargando…

Antidepressants for the treatment of adults with major depressive disorder in the maintenance phase: a systematic review and network meta-analysis

A systematic review and random-effects model network meta-analysis were conducted to compare the efficacy, acceptability, tolerability, and safety of antidepressants to treat adults with major depressive disorder (MDD) in the maintenance phase. This study searched the PubMed, Cochrane Library, and E...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kishi, Taro, Ikuta, Toshikazu, Sakuma, Kenji, Okuya, Makoto, Hatano, Masakazu, Matsuda, Yuki, Iwata, Nakao
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9812779/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36253442
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41380-022-01824-z
_version_ 1784863805496360960
author Kishi, Taro
Ikuta, Toshikazu
Sakuma, Kenji
Okuya, Makoto
Hatano, Masakazu
Matsuda, Yuki
Iwata, Nakao
author_facet Kishi, Taro
Ikuta, Toshikazu
Sakuma, Kenji
Okuya, Makoto
Hatano, Masakazu
Matsuda, Yuki
Iwata, Nakao
author_sort Kishi, Taro
collection PubMed
description A systematic review and random-effects model network meta-analysis were conducted to compare the efficacy, acceptability, tolerability, and safety of antidepressants to treat adults with major depressive disorder (MDD) in the maintenance phase. This study searched the PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Embase databases and included only double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trials with an enrichment design: patients were stabilized on the antidepressant of interest during the open-label study and then randomized to receive the same antidepressant or placebo. The outcomes were the 6-month relapse rate (primary outcome, efficacy), all-cause discontinuation (acceptability), discontinuation due to adverse events (tolerability), and the incidence of individual adverse events. The risk ratio with a 95% credible interval was calculated. The meta-analysis comprised 34 studies (n = 9384, mean age = 43.80 years, and %females = 68.10%) on 20 antidepressants (agomelatine, amitriptyline, bupropion, citalopram, desvenlafaxine, duloxetine, escitalopram, fluoxetine, fluvoxamine, levomilnacipran, milnacipran, mirtazapine, nefazodone, paroxetine, reboxetine, sertraline, tianeptine, venlafaxine, vilazodone, and vortioxetine) and a placebo. In terms of the 6-month relapse rate, amitriptyline, citalopram, desvenlafaxine, duloxetine, fluoxetine, fluvoxamine, mirtazapine, nefazodone, paroxetine, reboxetine, sertraline, tianeptine, venlafaxine, and vortioxetine outperformed placebo. Compared to placebo, desvenlafaxine, paroxetine, sertraline, venlafaxine, and vortioxetine had lower all-cause discontinuation; however, sertraline had a higher discontinuation rate due to adverse events. Compared to placebo, venlafaxine was associated with a lower incidence of dizziness, while desvenlafaxine, sertraline, and vortioxetine were associated with a higher incidence of nausea/vomiting. In conclusion, desvenlafaxine, paroxetine, venlafaxine, and vortioxetine had reasonable efficacy, acceptability, and tolerability in the treatment of adults with stable MDD.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9812779
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-98127792023-01-06 Antidepressants for the treatment of adults with major depressive disorder in the maintenance phase: a systematic review and network meta-analysis Kishi, Taro Ikuta, Toshikazu Sakuma, Kenji Okuya, Makoto Hatano, Masakazu Matsuda, Yuki Iwata, Nakao Mol Psychiatry Systematic Review A systematic review and random-effects model network meta-analysis were conducted to compare the efficacy, acceptability, tolerability, and safety of antidepressants to treat adults with major depressive disorder (MDD) in the maintenance phase. This study searched the PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Embase databases and included only double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trials with an enrichment design: patients were stabilized on the antidepressant of interest during the open-label study and then randomized to receive the same antidepressant or placebo. The outcomes were the 6-month relapse rate (primary outcome, efficacy), all-cause discontinuation (acceptability), discontinuation due to adverse events (tolerability), and the incidence of individual adverse events. The risk ratio with a 95% credible interval was calculated. The meta-analysis comprised 34 studies (n = 9384, mean age = 43.80 years, and %females = 68.10%) on 20 antidepressants (agomelatine, amitriptyline, bupropion, citalopram, desvenlafaxine, duloxetine, escitalopram, fluoxetine, fluvoxamine, levomilnacipran, milnacipran, mirtazapine, nefazodone, paroxetine, reboxetine, sertraline, tianeptine, venlafaxine, vilazodone, and vortioxetine) and a placebo. In terms of the 6-month relapse rate, amitriptyline, citalopram, desvenlafaxine, duloxetine, fluoxetine, fluvoxamine, mirtazapine, nefazodone, paroxetine, reboxetine, sertraline, tianeptine, venlafaxine, and vortioxetine outperformed placebo. Compared to placebo, desvenlafaxine, paroxetine, sertraline, venlafaxine, and vortioxetine had lower all-cause discontinuation; however, sertraline had a higher discontinuation rate due to adverse events. Compared to placebo, venlafaxine was associated with a lower incidence of dizziness, while desvenlafaxine, sertraline, and vortioxetine were associated with a higher incidence of nausea/vomiting. In conclusion, desvenlafaxine, paroxetine, venlafaxine, and vortioxetine had reasonable efficacy, acceptability, and tolerability in the treatment of adults with stable MDD. Nature Publishing Group UK 2022-10-17 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC9812779/ /pubmed/36253442 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41380-022-01824-z Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Systematic Review
Kishi, Taro
Ikuta, Toshikazu
Sakuma, Kenji
Okuya, Makoto
Hatano, Masakazu
Matsuda, Yuki
Iwata, Nakao
Antidepressants for the treatment of adults with major depressive disorder in the maintenance phase: a systematic review and network meta-analysis
title Antidepressants for the treatment of adults with major depressive disorder in the maintenance phase: a systematic review and network meta-analysis
title_full Antidepressants for the treatment of adults with major depressive disorder in the maintenance phase: a systematic review and network meta-analysis
title_fullStr Antidepressants for the treatment of adults with major depressive disorder in the maintenance phase: a systematic review and network meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Antidepressants for the treatment of adults with major depressive disorder in the maintenance phase: a systematic review and network meta-analysis
title_short Antidepressants for the treatment of adults with major depressive disorder in the maintenance phase: a systematic review and network meta-analysis
title_sort antidepressants for the treatment of adults with major depressive disorder in the maintenance phase: a systematic review and network meta-analysis
topic Systematic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9812779/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36253442
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41380-022-01824-z
work_keys_str_mv AT kishitaro antidepressantsforthetreatmentofadultswithmajordepressivedisorderinthemaintenancephaseasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis
AT ikutatoshikazu antidepressantsforthetreatmentofadultswithmajordepressivedisorderinthemaintenancephaseasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis
AT sakumakenji antidepressantsforthetreatmentofadultswithmajordepressivedisorderinthemaintenancephaseasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis
AT okuyamakoto antidepressantsforthetreatmentofadultswithmajordepressivedisorderinthemaintenancephaseasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis
AT hatanomasakazu antidepressantsforthetreatmentofadultswithmajordepressivedisorderinthemaintenancephaseasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis
AT matsudayuki antidepressantsforthetreatmentofadultswithmajordepressivedisorderinthemaintenancephaseasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis
AT iwatanakao antidepressantsforthetreatmentofadultswithmajordepressivedisorderinthemaintenancephaseasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis