Cargando…
Implications and prognostic impact of mass spectrometry in patients with newly-diagnosed multiple myeloma
Mass spectrometry (MS) is a promising tool for monitoring monoclonal protein in plasma cell dyscrasias. We included 480 transplant-eligible newly-diagnosed multiple myeloma (MM) patients from the GMMG-MM5 trial (EudraCT No. 2010-019173-16) and performed a retrospective MS analysis at baseline (480 p...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group UK
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9812999/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36599831 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41408-022-00772-9 |
_version_ | 1784863837455908864 |
---|---|
author | Mai, Elias K. Huhn, Stefanie Miah, Kaya Poos, Alexandra M. Scheid, Christof Weisel, Katja C. Bertsch, Uta Munder, Markus Berlanga, Oscar Hose, Dirk Seckinger, Anja Jauch, Anna Blau, Igor W. Hänel, Mathias Salwender, Hans J. Benner, Axel Raab, Marc S. Goldschmidt, Hartmut Weinhold, Niels |
author_facet | Mai, Elias K. Huhn, Stefanie Miah, Kaya Poos, Alexandra M. Scheid, Christof Weisel, Katja C. Bertsch, Uta Munder, Markus Berlanga, Oscar Hose, Dirk Seckinger, Anja Jauch, Anna Blau, Igor W. Hänel, Mathias Salwender, Hans J. Benner, Axel Raab, Marc S. Goldschmidt, Hartmut Weinhold, Niels |
author_sort | Mai, Elias K. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Mass spectrometry (MS) is a promising tool for monitoring monoclonal protein in plasma cell dyscrasias. We included 480 transplant-eligible newly-diagnosed multiple myeloma (MM) patients from the GMMG-MM5 trial (EudraCT No. 2010-019173-16) and performed a retrospective MS analysis at baseline (480 patients) and at the pre-defined, consecutive time points after induction (444 patients), prior to maintenance (305 patients) and after one year of maintenance (227 patients). We found that MS negativity was significantly associated with improved progression-free survival (PFS) even in patients with complete response (CR) at all investigated follow-up time points. The prognostic impact was independent of established risk factors, such as the revised International Staging System. Combining MS and baseline cytogenetics improved the prediction of outcome: MS-positive patients with high-risk cytogenetics had a dismal PFS of 1.9 years (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.6–2.3 years) from the start of maintenance. Testing the value of sequential MS prior to and after one year of maintenance, patients converting from MS positivity to negativity had an excellent PFS (median not reached) while patients converting from MS negativity to positivity progressed early (median 0.6 years, 95% CI: 0.3-not reached). Among patients with sustained MS positivity, the baseline high-risk cytogenetic status had a significant impact and defined a group with poor PFS. Combining minimal residual disease (MRD) in the bone marrow and MS allowed the identification of double negative patients with a favorable PFS (median 3.33 years, 95% CI: 3.08-not reached) and no overall survival events. Our study provides strong evidence that MS is superior to conventional response monitoring, highlighting the potential of MS to become a new standard. Our data indicate that MS should be performed sequentially and combined with baseline disease features and MRD to improve its clinical value. Clinical Trials Register: EudraCT No. 2010-019173-16 |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9812999 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group UK |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-98129992023-01-06 Implications and prognostic impact of mass spectrometry in patients with newly-diagnosed multiple myeloma Mai, Elias K. Huhn, Stefanie Miah, Kaya Poos, Alexandra M. Scheid, Christof Weisel, Katja C. Bertsch, Uta Munder, Markus Berlanga, Oscar Hose, Dirk Seckinger, Anja Jauch, Anna Blau, Igor W. Hänel, Mathias Salwender, Hans J. Benner, Axel Raab, Marc S. Goldschmidt, Hartmut Weinhold, Niels Blood Cancer J Article Mass spectrometry (MS) is a promising tool for monitoring monoclonal protein in plasma cell dyscrasias. We included 480 transplant-eligible newly-diagnosed multiple myeloma (MM) patients from the GMMG-MM5 trial (EudraCT No. 2010-019173-16) and performed a retrospective MS analysis at baseline (480 patients) and at the pre-defined, consecutive time points after induction (444 patients), prior to maintenance (305 patients) and after one year of maintenance (227 patients). We found that MS negativity was significantly associated with improved progression-free survival (PFS) even in patients with complete response (CR) at all investigated follow-up time points. The prognostic impact was independent of established risk factors, such as the revised International Staging System. Combining MS and baseline cytogenetics improved the prediction of outcome: MS-positive patients with high-risk cytogenetics had a dismal PFS of 1.9 years (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.6–2.3 years) from the start of maintenance. Testing the value of sequential MS prior to and after one year of maintenance, patients converting from MS positivity to negativity had an excellent PFS (median not reached) while patients converting from MS negativity to positivity progressed early (median 0.6 years, 95% CI: 0.3-not reached). Among patients with sustained MS positivity, the baseline high-risk cytogenetic status had a significant impact and defined a group with poor PFS. Combining minimal residual disease (MRD) in the bone marrow and MS allowed the identification of double negative patients with a favorable PFS (median 3.33 years, 95% CI: 3.08-not reached) and no overall survival events. Our study provides strong evidence that MS is superior to conventional response monitoring, highlighting the potential of MS to become a new standard. Our data indicate that MS should be performed sequentially and combined with baseline disease features and MRD to improve its clinical value. Clinical Trials Register: EudraCT No. 2010-019173-16 Nature Publishing Group UK 2023-01-04 /pmc/articles/PMC9812999/ /pubmed/36599831 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41408-022-00772-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Article Mai, Elias K. Huhn, Stefanie Miah, Kaya Poos, Alexandra M. Scheid, Christof Weisel, Katja C. Bertsch, Uta Munder, Markus Berlanga, Oscar Hose, Dirk Seckinger, Anja Jauch, Anna Blau, Igor W. Hänel, Mathias Salwender, Hans J. Benner, Axel Raab, Marc S. Goldschmidt, Hartmut Weinhold, Niels Implications and prognostic impact of mass spectrometry in patients with newly-diagnosed multiple myeloma |
title | Implications and prognostic impact of mass spectrometry in patients with newly-diagnosed multiple myeloma |
title_full | Implications and prognostic impact of mass spectrometry in patients with newly-diagnosed multiple myeloma |
title_fullStr | Implications and prognostic impact of mass spectrometry in patients with newly-diagnosed multiple myeloma |
title_full_unstemmed | Implications and prognostic impact of mass spectrometry in patients with newly-diagnosed multiple myeloma |
title_short | Implications and prognostic impact of mass spectrometry in patients with newly-diagnosed multiple myeloma |
title_sort | implications and prognostic impact of mass spectrometry in patients with newly-diagnosed multiple myeloma |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9812999/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36599831 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41408-022-00772-9 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT maieliask implicationsandprognosticimpactofmassspectrometryinpatientswithnewlydiagnosedmultiplemyeloma AT huhnstefanie implicationsandprognosticimpactofmassspectrometryinpatientswithnewlydiagnosedmultiplemyeloma AT miahkaya implicationsandprognosticimpactofmassspectrometryinpatientswithnewlydiagnosedmultiplemyeloma AT poosalexandram implicationsandprognosticimpactofmassspectrometryinpatientswithnewlydiagnosedmultiplemyeloma AT scheidchristof implicationsandprognosticimpactofmassspectrometryinpatientswithnewlydiagnosedmultiplemyeloma AT weiselkatjac implicationsandprognosticimpactofmassspectrometryinpatientswithnewlydiagnosedmultiplemyeloma AT bertschuta implicationsandprognosticimpactofmassspectrometryinpatientswithnewlydiagnosedmultiplemyeloma AT mundermarkus implicationsandprognosticimpactofmassspectrometryinpatientswithnewlydiagnosedmultiplemyeloma AT berlangaoscar implicationsandprognosticimpactofmassspectrometryinpatientswithnewlydiagnosedmultiplemyeloma AT hosedirk implicationsandprognosticimpactofmassspectrometryinpatientswithnewlydiagnosedmultiplemyeloma AT seckingeranja implicationsandprognosticimpactofmassspectrometryinpatientswithnewlydiagnosedmultiplemyeloma AT jauchanna implicationsandprognosticimpactofmassspectrometryinpatientswithnewlydiagnosedmultiplemyeloma AT blauigorw implicationsandprognosticimpactofmassspectrometryinpatientswithnewlydiagnosedmultiplemyeloma AT hanelmathias implicationsandprognosticimpactofmassspectrometryinpatientswithnewlydiagnosedmultiplemyeloma AT salwenderhansj implicationsandprognosticimpactofmassspectrometryinpatientswithnewlydiagnosedmultiplemyeloma AT benneraxel implicationsandprognosticimpactofmassspectrometryinpatientswithnewlydiagnosedmultiplemyeloma AT raabmarcs implicationsandprognosticimpactofmassspectrometryinpatientswithnewlydiagnosedmultiplemyeloma AT goldschmidthartmut implicationsandprognosticimpactofmassspectrometryinpatientswithnewlydiagnosedmultiplemyeloma AT weinholdniels implicationsandprognosticimpactofmassspectrometryinpatientswithnewlydiagnosedmultiplemyeloma |