Cargando…

Top-down and bottom-up forces explain patch utilization by two deer species and forest recruitment

Ungulates play an important role in temperate systems. Through their feeding behaviour, they can respond to vegetation by selecting patches or modify vegetation composition by herbivory. The degree in which they interact with vegetation can either reinforce landscape heterogeneity by creating distur...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ramirez, J. Ignacio, Poorter, Lourens, Jansen, Patrick A., den Ouden, Jan, Siewert, Matthias, Olofsson, Johan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9813088/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36424509
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00442-022-05292-8
_version_ 1784863857102028800
author Ramirez, J. Ignacio
Poorter, Lourens
Jansen, Patrick A.
den Ouden, Jan
Siewert, Matthias
Olofsson, Johan
author_facet Ramirez, J. Ignacio
Poorter, Lourens
Jansen, Patrick A.
den Ouden, Jan
Siewert, Matthias
Olofsson, Johan
author_sort Ramirez, J. Ignacio
collection PubMed
description Ungulates play an important role in temperate systems. Through their feeding behaviour, they can respond to vegetation by selecting patches or modify vegetation composition by herbivory. The degree in which they interact with vegetation can either reinforce landscape heterogeneity by creating disturbance or reduce heterogeneity in case of overbrowsing. This study evaluates how bottom-up (patch quality, structure), top-down forces (hunting, distance to village, forest edge) and deer features (feeding type, abundance) mediate patch utilization in a temperate forest and assess the implications of patch utilization and light on forest recruitment. Theory predicts that animals seek to maximize their energetic gains by food intake while minimizing the costs associated to foraging, such as the energy required for avoiding predators and exploiting resources. We focused on two deer species with contrasting feeding type: a browser (C. capreolus) and a mixed feeder (C. elaphus). We paired camera traps to vegetation sub-plots in ten forest sites in the Netherlands that widely ranged in deer abundance and landscape heterogeneity. Results showed that patch utilization is simultaneously explained by bottom-up, top-down forces and by deer abundance, as predicted by the safety-in-numbers hypothesis. Yet, forces best explaining patch utilization differed between deer species. Overall, higher patch utilization came with higher browsing, lower tree diversity and a large difference in forest composition: from a mix of broadleaves and conifers towards only conifers. We conclude that these two deer species, although living in the same area and belonging to the same guild, differentially perceive, interact with and shape their surrounding landscape. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00442-022-05292-8.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9813088
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-98130882023-01-06 Top-down and bottom-up forces explain patch utilization by two deer species and forest recruitment Ramirez, J. Ignacio Poorter, Lourens Jansen, Patrick A. den Ouden, Jan Siewert, Matthias Olofsson, Johan Oecologia Ecosystem Ecology – Original Research Ungulates play an important role in temperate systems. Through their feeding behaviour, they can respond to vegetation by selecting patches or modify vegetation composition by herbivory. The degree in which they interact with vegetation can either reinforce landscape heterogeneity by creating disturbance or reduce heterogeneity in case of overbrowsing. This study evaluates how bottom-up (patch quality, structure), top-down forces (hunting, distance to village, forest edge) and deer features (feeding type, abundance) mediate patch utilization in a temperate forest and assess the implications of patch utilization and light on forest recruitment. Theory predicts that animals seek to maximize their energetic gains by food intake while minimizing the costs associated to foraging, such as the energy required for avoiding predators and exploiting resources. We focused on two deer species with contrasting feeding type: a browser (C. capreolus) and a mixed feeder (C. elaphus). We paired camera traps to vegetation sub-plots in ten forest sites in the Netherlands that widely ranged in deer abundance and landscape heterogeneity. Results showed that patch utilization is simultaneously explained by bottom-up, top-down forces and by deer abundance, as predicted by the safety-in-numbers hypothesis. Yet, forces best explaining patch utilization differed between deer species. Overall, higher patch utilization came with higher browsing, lower tree diversity and a large difference in forest composition: from a mix of broadleaves and conifers towards only conifers. We conclude that these two deer species, although living in the same area and belonging to the same guild, differentially perceive, interact with and shape their surrounding landscape. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00442-022-05292-8. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2022-11-24 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC9813088/ /pubmed/36424509 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00442-022-05292-8 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Ecosystem Ecology – Original Research
Ramirez, J. Ignacio
Poorter, Lourens
Jansen, Patrick A.
den Ouden, Jan
Siewert, Matthias
Olofsson, Johan
Top-down and bottom-up forces explain patch utilization by two deer species and forest recruitment
title Top-down and bottom-up forces explain patch utilization by two deer species and forest recruitment
title_full Top-down and bottom-up forces explain patch utilization by two deer species and forest recruitment
title_fullStr Top-down and bottom-up forces explain patch utilization by two deer species and forest recruitment
title_full_unstemmed Top-down and bottom-up forces explain patch utilization by two deer species and forest recruitment
title_short Top-down and bottom-up forces explain patch utilization by two deer species and forest recruitment
title_sort top-down and bottom-up forces explain patch utilization by two deer species and forest recruitment
topic Ecosystem Ecology – Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9813088/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36424509
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00442-022-05292-8
work_keys_str_mv AT ramirezjignacio topdownandbottomupforcesexplainpatchutilizationbytwodeerspeciesandforestrecruitment
AT poorterlourens topdownandbottomupforcesexplainpatchutilizationbytwodeerspeciesandforestrecruitment
AT jansenpatricka topdownandbottomupforcesexplainpatchutilizationbytwodeerspeciesandforestrecruitment
AT denoudenjan topdownandbottomupforcesexplainpatchutilizationbytwodeerspeciesandforestrecruitment
AT siewertmatthias topdownandbottomupforcesexplainpatchutilizationbytwodeerspeciesandforestrecruitment
AT olofssonjohan topdownandbottomupforcesexplainpatchutilizationbytwodeerspeciesandforestrecruitment