Cargando…
Top-down and bottom-up forces explain patch utilization by two deer species and forest recruitment
Ungulates play an important role in temperate systems. Through their feeding behaviour, they can respond to vegetation by selecting patches or modify vegetation composition by herbivory. The degree in which they interact with vegetation can either reinforce landscape heterogeneity by creating distur...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9813088/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36424509 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00442-022-05292-8 |
_version_ | 1784863857102028800 |
---|---|
author | Ramirez, J. Ignacio Poorter, Lourens Jansen, Patrick A. den Ouden, Jan Siewert, Matthias Olofsson, Johan |
author_facet | Ramirez, J. Ignacio Poorter, Lourens Jansen, Patrick A. den Ouden, Jan Siewert, Matthias Olofsson, Johan |
author_sort | Ramirez, J. Ignacio |
collection | PubMed |
description | Ungulates play an important role in temperate systems. Through their feeding behaviour, they can respond to vegetation by selecting patches or modify vegetation composition by herbivory. The degree in which they interact with vegetation can either reinforce landscape heterogeneity by creating disturbance or reduce heterogeneity in case of overbrowsing. This study evaluates how bottom-up (patch quality, structure), top-down forces (hunting, distance to village, forest edge) and deer features (feeding type, abundance) mediate patch utilization in a temperate forest and assess the implications of patch utilization and light on forest recruitment. Theory predicts that animals seek to maximize their energetic gains by food intake while minimizing the costs associated to foraging, such as the energy required for avoiding predators and exploiting resources. We focused on two deer species with contrasting feeding type: a browser (C. capreolus) and a mixed feeder (C. elaphus). We paired camera traps to vegetation sub-plots in ten forest sites in the Netherlands that widely ranged in deer abundance and landscape heterogeneity. Results showed that patch utilization is simultaneously explained by bottom-up, top-down forces and by deer abundance, as predicted by the safety-in-numbers hypothesis. Yet, forces best explaining patch utilization differed between deer species. Overall, higher patch utilization came with higher browsing, lower tree diversity and a large difference in forest composition: from a mix of broadleaves and conifers towards only conifers. We conclude that these two deer species, although living in the same area and belonging to the same guild, differentially perceive, interact with and shape their surrounding landscape. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00442-022-05292-8. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9813088 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Springer Berlin Heidelberg |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-98130882023-01-06 Top-down and bottom-up forces explain patch utilization by two deer species and forest recruitment Ramirez, J. Ignacio Poorter, Lourens Jansen, Patrick A. den Ouden, Jan Siewert, Matthias Olofsson, Johan Oecologia Ecosystem Ecology – Original Research Ungulates play an important role in temperate systems. Through their feeding behaviour, they can respond to vegetation by selecting patches or modify vegetation composition by herbivory. The degree in which they interact with vegetation can either reinforce landscape heterogeneity by creating disturbance or reduce heterogeneity in case of overbrowsing. This study evaluates how bottom-up (patch quality, structure), top-down forces (hunting, distance to village, forest edge) and deer features (feeding type, abundance) mediate patch utilization in a temperate forest and assess the implications of patch utilization and light on forest recruitment. Theory predicts that animals seek to maximize their energetic gains by food intake while minimizing the costs associated to foraging, such as the energy required for avoiding predators and exploiting resources. We focused on two deer species with contrasting feeding type: a browser (C. capreolus) and a mixed feeder (C. elaphus). We paired camera traps to vegetation sub-plots in ten forest sites in the Netherlands that widely ranged in deer abundance and landscape heterogeneity. Results showed that patch utilization is simultaneously explained by bottom-up, top-down forces and by deer abundance, as predicted by the safety-in-numbers hypothesis. Yet, forces best explaining patch utilization differed between deer species. Overall, higher patch utilization came with higher browsing, lower tree diversity and a large difference in forest composition: from a mix of broadleaves and conifers towards only conifers. We conclude that these two deer species, although living in the same area and belonging to the same guild, differentially perceive, interact with and shape their surrounding landscape. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00442-022-05292-8. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2022-11-24 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC9813088/ /pubmed/36424509 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00442-022-05292-8 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Ecosystem Ecology – Original Research Ramirez, J. Ignacio Poorter, Lourens Jansen, Patrick A. den Ouden, Jan Siewert, Matthias Olofsson, Johan Top-down and bottom-up forces explain patch utilization by two deer species and forest recruitment |
title | Top-down and bottom-up forces explain patch utilization by two deer species and forest recruitment |
title_full | Top-down and bottom-up forces explain patch utilization by two deer species and forest recruitment |
title_fullStr | Top-down and bottom-up forces explain patch utilization by two deer species and forest recruitment |
title_full_unstemmed | Top-down and bottom-up forces explain patch utilization by two deer species and forest recruitment |
title_short | Top-down and bottom-up forces explain patch utilization by two deer species and forest recruitment |
title_sort | top-down and bottom-up forces explain patch utilization by two deer species and forest recruitment |
topic | Ecosystem Ecology – Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9813088/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36424509 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00442-022-05292-8 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ramirezjignacio topdownandbottomupforcesexplainpatchutilizationbytwodeerspeciesandforestrecruitment AT poorterlourens topdownandbottomupforcesexplainpatchutilizationbytwodeerspeciesandforestrecruitment AT jansenpatricka topdownandbottomupforcesexplainpatchutilizationbytwodeerspeciesandforestrecruitment AT denoudenjan topdownandbottomupforcesexplainpatchutilizationbytwodeerspeciesandforestrecruitment AT siewertmatthias topdownandbottomupforcesexplainpatchutilizationbytwodeerspeciesandforestrecruitment AT olofssonjohan topdownandbottomupforcesexplainpatchutilizationbytwodeerspeciesandforestrecruitment |