Cargando…
A comparative analysis of conventional and speckle-tracking strain echocardiographic findings in diabetic and non-diabetic kidney disease patients with normal ejection fraction
This study aimed to compare the differences in echocardiographic and strain parameters in patients with diabetic kidney disease (DKD) and non-diabetic kidney disease (NDKD) in a cohort with pre-dialysis chronic kidney disease (CKD) and normal ejection fraction (EF). In this single-center prospective...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Netherlands
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9813174/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36598685 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10554-022-02687-9 |
_version_ | 1784863876141023232 |
---|---|
author | Paramasivam, Ganesh Rao, Indu Ramachandra Samanth, Jyothi Nayak, Krishnananda Nayak, Rakshitha Martis, Simran Agnes Jerome, Rinkle Nagaraju, Shankar Prasad Prabhu, Ravindra Attur Devasia, Tom |
author_facet | Paramasivam, Ganesh Rao, Indu Ramachandra Samanth, Jyothi Nayak, Krishnananda Nayak, Rakshitha Martis, Simran Agnes Jerome, Rinkle Nagaraju, Shankar Prasad Prabhu, Ravindra Attur Devasia, Tom |
author_sort | Paramasivam, Ganesh |
collection | PubMed |
description | This study aimed to compare the differences in echocardiographic and strain parameters in patients with diabetic kidney disease (DKD) and non-diabetic kidney disease (NDKD) in a cohort with pre-dialysis chronic kidney disease (CKD) and normal ejection fraction (EF). In this single-center prospective study, patients with CKD stages 3–5 and EF > 55% were included. We compared cardiac structure and function using conventional and speckle-tracking strain echocardiography among DKD and NDKD groups. Cardiovascular outcomes were assessed at the end of the study. Of the included 117 patients, 56 (47.9%) had DKD, and 61 (52.1%) had NDKD. Patients with DKD had higher ratios of early mitral inflow velocity and mitral annular early diastolic velocity (E/e’) (11.9 ± 4.4 vs. 9.8 ± 3.5; p = 0.004), lower septal e’ velocity (7.1 ± 2.5 vs. 8.2 ± 2.8; p = 0.031), lower lateral e’ velocity (9.2 ± 2.9 vs. 10.4 ± 3.8; p = 0.045) and longer deceleration times (209.2 ± 41.5 vs. 189.1 ± 48.0; p = 0.017), compared to those with NDKD. Left ventricular mass index (LVMI), global longitudinal strain (GLS), early diastolic strain rate (SR(E),) and E/SR(E) were similar. At a median follow-up of 239 days, 3-P MACE (11.5% vs. 4.9%; p = 0.047) and 4-P MACE (28.6% vs. 11.5%; p = 0.020) were observed to be higher in the DKD group. Diastolic dysfunction was more common in patients with DKD, compared to those with NDKD, although both groups had similar LVMI and GLS. Those with DKD also had poorer cardiovascular outcomes. This highlights the importance of the assessment of diastolic function in CKD, particularly in those with diabetic CKD. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9813174 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Springer Netherlands |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-98131742023-01-06 A comparative analysis of conventional and speckle-tracking strain echocardiographic findings in diabetic and non-diabetic kidney disease patients with normal ejection fraction Paramasivam, Ganesh Rao, Indu Ramachandra Samanth, Jyothi Nayak, Krishnananda Nayak, Rakshitha Martis, Simran Agnes Jerome, Rinkle Nagaraju, Shankar Prasad Prabhu, Ravindra Attur Devasia, Tom Int J Cardiovasc Imaging Original Paper This study aimed to compare the differences in echocardiographic and strain parameters in patients with diabetic kidney disease (DKD) and non-diabetic kidney disease (NDKD) in a cohort with pre-dialysis chronic kidney disease (CKD) and normal ejection fraction (EF). In this single-center prospective study, patients with CKD stages 3–5 and EF > 55% were included. We compared cardiac structure and function using conventional and speckle-tracking strain echocardiography among DKD and NDKD groups. Cardiovascular outcomes were assessed at the end of the study. Of the included 117 patients, 56 (47.9%) had DKD, and 61 (52.1%) had NDKD. Patients with DKD had higher ratios of early mitral inflow velocity and mitral annular early diastolic velocity (E/e’) (11.9 ± 4.4 vs. 9.8 ± 3.5; p = 0.004), lower septal e’ velocity (7.1 ± 2.5 vs. 8.2 ± 2.8; p = 0.031), lower lateral e’ velocity (9.2 ± 2.9 vs. 10.4 ± 3.8; p = 0.045) and longer deceleration times (209.2 ± 41.5 vs. 189.1 ± 48.0; p = 0.017), compared to those with NDKD. Left ventricular mass index (LVMI), global longitudinal strain (GLS), early diastolic strain rate (SR(E),) and E/SR(E) were similar. At a median follow-up of 239 days, 3-P MACE (11.5% vs. 4.9%; p = 0.047) and 4-P MACE (28.6% vs. 11.5%; p = 0.020) were observed to be higher in the DKD group. Diastolic dysfunction was more common in patients with DKD, compared to those with NDKD, although both groups had similar LVMI and GLS. Those with DKD also had poorer cardiovascular outcomes. This highlights the importance of the assessment of diastolic function in CKD, particularly in those with diabetic CKD. Springer Netherlands 2022-07-22 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC9813174/ /pubmed/36598685 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10554-022-02687-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Original Paper Paramasivam, Ganesh Rao, Indu Ramachandra Samanth, Jyothi Nayak, Krishnananda Nayak, Rakshitha Martis, Simran Agnes Jerome, Rinkle Nagaraju, Shankar Prasad Prabhu, Ravindra Attur Devasia, Tom A comparative analysis of conventional and speckle-tracking strain echocardiographic findings in diabetic and non-diabetic kidney disease patients with normal ejection fraction |
title | A comparative analysis of conventional and speckle-tracking strain echocardiographic findings in diabetic and non-diabetic kidney disease patients with normal ejection fraction |
title_full | A comparative analysis of conventional and speckle-tracking strain echocardiographic findings in diabetic and non-diabetic kidney disease patients with normal ejection fraction |
title_fullStr | A comparative analysis of conventional and speckle-tracking strain echocardiographic findings in diabetic and non-diabetic kidney disease patients with normal ejection fraction |
title_full_unstemmed | A comparative analysis of conventional and speckle-tracking strain echocardiographic findings in diabetic and non-diabetic kidney disease patients with normal ejection fraction |
title_short | A comparative analysis of conventional and speckle-tracking strain echocardiographic findings in diabetic and non-diabetic kidney disease patients with normal ejection fraction |
title_sort | comparative analysis of conventional and speckle-tracking strain echocardiographic findings in diabetic and non-diabetic kidney disease patients with normal ejection fraction |
topic | Original Paper |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9813174/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36598685 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10554-022-02687-9 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT paramasivamganesh acomparativeanalysisofconventionalandspeckletrackingstrainechocardiographicfindingsindiabeticandnondiabetickidneydiseasepatientswithnormalejectionfraction AT raoinduramachandra acomparativeanalysisofconventionalandspeckletrackingstrainechocardiographicfindingsindiabeticandnondiabetickidneydiseasepatientswithnormalejectionfraction AT samanthjyothi acomparativeanalysisofconventionalandspeckletrackingstrainechocardiographicfindingsindiabeticandnondiabetickidneydiseasepatientswithnormalejectionfraction AT nayakkrishnananda acomparativeanalysisofconventionalandspeckletrackingstrainechocardiographicfindingsindiabeticandnondiabetickidneydiseasepatientswithnormalejectionfraction AT nayakrakshitha acomparativeanalysisofconventionalandspeckletrackingstrainechocardiographicfindingsindiabeticandnondiabetickidneydiseasepatientswithnormalejectionfraction AT martissimranagnes acomparativeanalysisofconventionalandspeckletrackingstrainechocardiographicfindingsindiabeticandnondiabetickidneydiseasepatientswithnormalejectionfraction AT jeromerinkle acomparativeanalysisofconventionalandspeckletrackingstrainechocardiographicfindingsindiabeticandnondiabetickidneydiseasepatientswithnormalejectionfraction AT nagarajushankarprasad acomparativeanalysisofconventionalandspeckletrackingstrainechocardiographicfindingsindiabeticandnondiabetickidneydiseasepatientswithnormalejectionfraction AT prabhuravindraattur acomparativeanalysisofconventionalandspeckletrackingstrainechocardiographicfindingsindiabeticandnondiabetickidneydiseasepatientswithnormalejectionfraction AT devasiatom acomparativeanalysisofconventionalandspeckletrackingstrainechocardiographicfindingsindiabeticandnondiabetickidneydiseasepatientswithnormalejectionfraction AT paramasivamganesh comparativeanalysisofconventionalandspeckletrackingstrainechocardiographicfindingsindiabeticandnondiabetickidneydiseasepatientswithnormalejectionfraction AT raoinduramachandra comparativeanalysisofconventionalandspeckletrackingstrainechocardiographicfindingsindiabeticandnondiabetickidneydiseasepatientswithnormalejectionfraction AT samanthjyothi comparativeanalysisofconventionalandspeckletrackingstrainechocardiographicfindingsindiabeticandnondiabetickidneydiseasepatientswithnormalejectionfraction AT nayakkrishnananda comparativeanalysisofconventionalandspeckletrackingstrainechocardiographicfindingsindiabeticandnondiabetickidneydiseasepatientswithnormalejectionfraction AT nayakrakshitha comparativeanalysisofconventionalandspeckletrackingstrainechocardiographicfindingsindiabeticandnondiabetickidneydiseasepatientswithnormalejectionfraction AT martissimranagnes comparativeanalysisofconventionalandspeckletrackingstrainechocardiographicfindingsindiabeticandnondiabetickidneydiseasepatientswithnormalejectionfraction AT jeromerinkle comparativeanalysisofconventionalandspeckletrackingstrainechocardiographicfindingsindiabeticandnondiabetickidneydiseasepatientswithnormalejectionfraction AT nagarajushankarprasad comparativeanalysisofconventionalandspeckletrackingstrainechocardiographicfindingsindiabeticandnondiabetickidneydiseasepatientswithnormalejectionfraction AT prabhuravindraattur comparativeanalysisofconventionalandspeckletrackingstrainechocardiographicfindingsindiabeticandnondiabetickidneydiseasepatientswithnormalejectionfraction AT devasiatom comparativeanalysisofconventionalandspeckletrackingstrainechocardiographicfindingsindiabeticandnondiabetickidneydiseasepatientswithnormalejectionfraction |