Cargando…

A comparative analysis of conventional and speckle-tracking strain echocardiographic findings in diabetic and non-diabetic kidney disease patients with normal ejection fraction

This study aimed to compare the differences in echocardiographic and strain parameters in patients with diabetic kidney disease (DKD) and non-diabetic kidney disease (NDKD) in a cohort with pre-dialysis chronic kidney disease (CKD) and normal ejection fraction (EF). In this single-center prospective...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Paramasivam, Ganesh, Rao, Indu Ramachandra, Samanth, Jyothi, Nayak, Krishnananda, Nayak, Rakshitha, Martis, Simran Agnes, Jerome, Rinkle, Nagaraju, Shankar Prasad, Prabhu, Ravindra Attur, Devasia, Tom
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Netherlands 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9813174/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36598685
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10554-022-02687-9
_version_ 1784863876141023232
author Paramasivam, Ganesh
Rao, Indu Ramachandra
Samanth, Jyothi
Nayak, Krishnananda
Nayak, Rakshitha
Martis, Simran Agnes
Jerome, Rinkle
Nagaraju, Shankar Prasad
Prabhu, Ravindra Attur
Devasia, Tom
author_facet Paramasivam, Ganesh
Rao, Indu Ramachandra
Samanth, Jyothi
Nayak, Krishnananda
Nayak, Rakshitha
Martis, Simran Agnes
Jerome, Rinkle
Nagaraju, Shankar Prasad
Prabhu, Ravindra Attur
Devasia, Tom
author_sort Paramasivam, Ganesh
collection PubMed
description This study aimed to compare the differences in echocardiographic and strain parameters in patients with diabetic kidney disease (DKD) and non-diabetic kidney disease (NDKD) in a cohort with pre-dialysis chronic kidney disease (CKD) and normal ejection fraction (EF). In this single-center prospective study, patients with CKD stages 3–5 and EF > 55% were included. We compared cardiac structure and function using conventional and speckle-tracking strain echocardiography among DKD and NDKD groups. Cardiovascular outcomes were assessed at the end of the study. Of the included 117 patients, 56 (47.9%) had DKD, and 61 (52.1%) had NDKD. Patients with DKD had higher ratios of early mitral inflow velocity and mitral annular early diastolic velocity (E/e’) (11.9 ± 4.4 vs. 9.8 ± 3.5; p = 0.004), lower septal e’ velocity (7.1 ± 2.5 vs. 8.2 ± 2.8; p = 0.031), lower lateral e’ velocity (9.2 ± 2.9 vs. 10.4 ± 3.8; p = 0.045) and longer deceleration times (209.2 ± 41.5 vs. 189.1 ± 48.0; p = 0.017), compared to those with NDKD. Left ventricular mass index (LVMI), global longitudinal strain (GLS), early diastolic strain rate (SR(E),) and E/SR(E) were similar. At a median follow-up of 239 days, 3-P MACE (11.5% vs. 4.9%; p = 0.047) and 4-P MACE (28.6% vs. 11.5%; p = 0.020) were observed to be higher in the DKD group. Diastolic dysfunction was more common in patients with DKD, compared to those with NDKD, although both groups had similar LVMI and GLS. Those with DKD also had poorer cardiovascular outcomes. This highlights the importance of the assessment of diastolic function in CKD, particularly in those with diabetic CKD.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9813174
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Springer Netherlands
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-98131742023-01-06 A comparative analysis of conventional and speckle-tracking strain echocardiographic findings in diabetic and non-diabetic kidney disease patients with normal ejection fraction Paramasivam, Ganesh Rao, Indu Ramachandra Samanth, Jyothi Nayak, Krishnananda Nayak, Rakshitha Martis, Simran Agnes Jerome, Rinkle Nagaraju, Shankar Prasad Prabhu, Ravindra Attur Devasia, Tom Int J Cardiovasc Imaging Original Paper This study aimed to compare the differences in echocardiographic and strain parameters in patients with diabetic kidney disease (DKD) and non-diabetic kidney disease (NDKD) in a cohort with pre-dialysis chronic kidney disease (CKD) and normal ejection fraction (EF). In this single-center prospective study, patients with CKD stages 3–5 and EF > 55% were included. We compared cardiac structure and function using conventional and speckle-tracking strain echocardiography among DKD and NDKD groups. Cardiovascular outcomes were assessed at the end of the study. Of the included 117 patients, 56 (47.9%) had DKD, and 61 (52.1%) had NDKD. Patients with DKD had higher ratios of early mitral inflow velocity and mitral annular early diastolic velocity (E/e’) (11.9 ± 4.4 vs. 9.8 ± 3.5; p = 0.004), lower septal e’ velocity (7.1 ± 2.5 vs. 8.2 ± 2.8; p = 0.031), lower lateral e’ velocity (9.2 ± 2.9 vs. 10.4 ± 3.8; p = 0.045) and longer deceleration times (209.2 ± 41.5 vs. 189.1 ± 48.0; p = 0.017), compared to those with NDKD. Left ventricular mass index (LVMI), global longitudinal strain (GLS), early diastolic strain rate (SR(E),) and E/SR(E) were similar. At a median follow-up of 239 days, 3-P MACE (11.5% vs. 4.9%; p = 0.047) and 4-P MACE (28.6% vs. 11.5%; p = 0.020) were observed to be higher in the DKD group. Diastolic dysfunction was more common in patients with DKD, compared to those with NDKD, although both groups had similar LVMI and GLS. Those with DKD also had poorer cardiovascular outcomes. This highlights the importance of the assessment of diastolic function in CKD, particularly in those with diabetic CKD. Springer Netherlands 2022-07-22 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC9813174/ /pubmed/36598685 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10554-022-02687-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Paper
Paramasivam, Ganesh
Rao, Indu Ramachandra
Samanth, Jyothi
Nayak, Krishnananda
Nayak, Rakshitha
Martis, Simran Agnes
Jerome, Rinkle
Nagaraju, Shankar Prasad
Prabhu, Ravindra Attur
Devasia, Tom
A comparative analysis of conventional and speckle-tracking strain echocardiographic findings in diabetic and non-diabetic kidney disease patients with normal ejection fraction
title A comparative analysis of conventional and speckle-tracking strain echocardiographic findings in diabetic and non-diabetic kidney disease patients with normal ejection fraction
title_full A comparative analysis of conventional and speckle-tracking strain echocardiographic findings in diabetic and non-diabetic kidney disease patients with normal ejection fraction
title_fullStr A comparative analysis of conventional and speckle-tracking strain echocardiographic findings in diabetic and non-diabetic kidney disease patients with normal ejection fraction
title_full_unstemmed A comparative analysis of conventional and speckle-tracking strain echocardiographic findings in diabetic and non-diabetic kidney disease patients with normal ejection fraction
title_short A comparative analysis of conventional and speckle-tracking strain echocardiographic findings in diabetic and non-diabetic kidney disease patients with normal ejection fraction
title_sort comparative analysis of conventional and speckle-tracking strain echocardiographic findings in diabetic and non-diabetic kidney disease patients with normal ejection fraction
topic Original Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9813174/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36598685
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10554-022-02687-9
work_keys_str_mv AT paramasivamganesh acomparativeanalysisofconventionalandspeckletrackingstrainechocardiographicfindingsindiabeticandnondiabetickidneydiseasepatientswithnormalejectionfraction
AT raoinduramachandra acomparativeanalysisofconventionalandspeckletrackingstrainechocardiographicfindingsindiabeticandnondiabetickidneydiseasepatientswithnormalejectionfraction
AT samanthjyothi acomparativeanalysisofconventionalandspeckletrackingstrainechocardiographicfindingsindiabeticandnondiabetickidneydiseasepatientswithnormalejectionfraction
AT nayakkrishnananda acomparativeanalysisofconventionalandspeckletrackingstrainechocardiographicfindingsindiabeticandnondiabetickidneydiseasepatientswithnormalejectionfraction
AT nayakrakshitha acomparativeanalysisofconventionalandspeckletrackingstrainechocardiographicfindingsindiabeticandnondiabetickidneydiseasepatientswithnormalejectionfraction
AT martissimranagnes acomparativeanalysisofconventionalandspeckletrackingstrainechocardiographicfindingsindiabeticandnondiabetickidneydiseasepatientswithnormalejectionfraction
AT jeromerinkle acomparativeanalysisofconventionalandspeckletrackingstrainechocardiographicfindingsindiabeticandnondiabetickidneydiseasepatientswithnormalejectionfraction
AT nagarajushankarprasad acomparativeanalysisofconventionalandspeckletrackingstrainechocardiographicfindingsindiabeticandnondiabetickidneydiseasepatientswithnormalejectionfraction
AT prabhuravindraattur acomparativeanalysisofconventionalandspeckletrackingstrainechocardiographicfindingsindiabeticandnondiabetickidneydiseasepatientswithnormalejectionfraction
AT devasiatom acomparativeanalysisofconventionalandspeckletrackingstrainechocardiographicfindingsindiabeticandnondiabetickidneydiseasepatientswithnormalejectionfraction
AT paramasivamganesh comparativeanalysisofconventionalandspeckletrackingstrainechocardiographicfindingsindiabeticandnondiabetickidneydiseasepatientswithnormalejectionfraction
AT raoinduramachandra comparativeanalysisofconventionalandspeckletrackingstrainechocardiographicfindingsindiabeticandnondiabetickidneydiseasepatientswithnormalejectionfraction
AT samanthjyothi comparativeanalysisofconventionalandspeckletrackingstrainechocardiographicfindingsindiabeticandnondiabetickidneydiseasepatientswithnormalejectionfraction
AT nayakkrishnananda comparativeanalysisofconventionalandspeckletrackingstrainechocardiographicfindingsindiabeticandnondiabetickidneydiseasepatientswithnormalejectionfraction
AT nayakrakshitha comparativeanalysisofconventionalandspeckletrackingstrainechocardiographicfindingsindiabeticandnondiabetickidneydiseasepatientswithnormalejectionfraction
AT martissimranagnes comparativeanalysisofconventionalandspeckletrackingstrainechocardiographicfindingsindiabeticandnondiabetickidneydiseasepatientswithnormalejectionfraction
AT jeromerinkle comparativeanalysisofconventionalandspeckletrackingstrainechocardiographicfindingsindiabeticandnondiabetickidneydiseasepatientswithnormalejectionfraction
AT nagarajushankarprasad comparativeanalysisofconventionalandspeckletrackingstrainechocardiographicfindingsindiabeticandnondiabetickidneydiseasepatientswithnormalejectionfraction
AT prabhuravindraattur comparativeanalysisofconventionalandspeckletrackingstrainechocardiographicfindingsindiabeticandnondiabetickidneydiseasepatientswithnormalejectionfraction
AT devasiatom comparativeanalysisofconventionalandspeckletrackingstrainechocardiographicfindingsindiabeticandnondiabetickidneydiseasepatientswithnormalejectionfraction