Cargando…

High rate of missed Barrett’s esophagus when screening with forceps biopsies

BACKGROUND: Screening for Barrett’s esophagus (BE) with endoscopy plus forceps biopsy (FB) has poor compliance with the recommended Seattle protocol and fails to sample large areas of mucosa. This statistical modeling study estimates, for the first time, the actual frequency of missed BE cases by FB...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Singer, Mendel E., Odze, Robert D.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Nature Singapore 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9813185/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35864425
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10388-022-00943-4
_version_ 1784863878805454848
author Singer, Mendel E.
Odze, Robert D.
author_facet Singer, Mendel E.
Odze, Robert D.
author_sort Singer, Mendel E.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Screening for Barrett’s esophagus (BE) with endoscopy plus forceps biopsy (FB) has poor compliance with the recommended Seattle protocol and fails to sample large areas of mucosa. This statistical modeling study estimates, for the first time, the actual frequency of missed BE cases by FB. METHODS: Published, calibrated models in the literature were combined to calculate the age-specific prevalence of BE in white males with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). We started with estimates of the prevalence of BE and GERD, and applied the relative risk for BE in patients with GERD based on the literature. This created estimates of the true prevalence of BE in white males with GERD by decade of life. The proportion of BE missed was calculated as the difference between the prevalence and the proportion with a positive screen. RESULTS: The prevalence of BE in white males with GERD was 8.9%, 12.1%, 15.3%, 18.7% and 22.0% for the third through eighth decades of life. Even after assuming no false positives, missed cases of BE were about 50% when estimated for patients of ages 50 or 60 years, and over 60% for ages of 30, 40 or 70 years. Sensitivity analysis was done for all variables in the model calculations. For ages 50 and 60 years, this resulted in values from 30.3 to 57.3% and 36.4 to 60.9%. CONCLUSION: Screening for BE with endoscopy and FB misses approximately 50% of BE cases. More sensitive methods of BE detection or better adherence to the Seattle protocol are needed.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9813185
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Springer Nature Singapore
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-98131852023-01-06 High rate of missed Barrett’s esophagus when screening with forceps biopsies Singer, Mendel E. Odze, Robert D. Esophagus Original Article BACKGROUND: Screening for Barrett’s esophagus (BE) with endoscopy plus forceps biopsy (FB) has poor compliance with the recommended Seattle protocol and fails to sample large areas of mucosa. This statistical modeling study estimates, for the first time, the actual frequency of missed BE cases by FB. METHODS: Published, calibrated models in the literature were combined to calculate the age-specific prevalence of BE in white males with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). We started with estimates of the prevalence of BE and GERD, and applied the relative risk for BE in patients with GERD based on the literature. This created estimates of the true prevalence of BE in white males with GERD by decade of life. The proportion of BE missed was calculated as the difference between the prevalence and the proportion with a positive screen. RESULTS: The prevalence of BE in white males with GERD was 8.9%, 12.1%, 15.3%, 18.7% and 22.0% for the third through eighth decades of life. Even after assuming no false positives, missed cases of BE were about 50% when estimated for patients of ages 50 or 60 years, and over 60% for ages of 30, 40 or 70 years. Sensitivity analysis was done for all variables in the model calculations. For ages 50 and 60 years, this resulted in values from 30.3 to 57.3% and 36.4 to 60.9%. CONCLUSION: Screening for BE with endoscopy and FB misses approximately 50% of BE cases. More sensitive methods of BE detection or better adherence to the Seattle protocol are needed. Springer Nature Singapore 2022-07-22 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC9813185/ /pubmed/35864425 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10388-022-00943-4 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Article
Singer, Mendel E.
Odze, Robert D.
High rate of missed Barrett’s esophagus when screening with forceps biopsies
title High rate of missed Barrett’s esophagus when screening with forceps biopsies
title_full High rate of missed Barrett’s esophagus when screening with forceps biopsies
title_fullStr High rate of missed Barrett’s esophagus when screening with forceps biopsies
title_full_unstemmed High rate of missed Barrett’s esophagus when screening with forceps biopsies
title_short High rate of missed Barrett’s esophagus when screening with forceps biopsies
title_sort high rate of missed barrett’s esophagus when screening with forceps biopsies
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9813185/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35864425
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10388-022-00943-4
work_keys_str_mv AT singermendele highrateofmissedbarrettsesophaguswhenscreeningwithforcepsbiopsies
AT odzerobertd highrateofmissedbarrettsesophaguswhenscreeningwithforcepsbiopsies