Cargando…
A non-randomised controlled study to assess the effectiveness of a new proactive multidisciplinary care intervention for older people living with frailty
BACKGROUND: Integrated care may improve outcomes for older people living with frailty. We aimed to assess the effectiveness of a new, anticipatory, multidisciplinary care service in improving the wellbeing and quality of life (QoL) of older people living with severe frailty. METHODS: A community-bas...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9813451/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36604609 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12877-023-03727-2 |
_version_ | 1784863923174899712 |
---|---|
author | Murtagh, Fliss E. M. Okoeki, Mabel Ukoha-kalu, Blessing Onyinye Khamis, Assem Clark, Joseph Boland, Jason W. Pask, Sophie Nwulu, Ugochinyere Elliott-Button, Helene Folwell, Anna Harman, Daniel Johnson, Miriam J. |
author_facet | Murtagh, Fliss E. M. Okoeki, Mabel Ukoha-kalu, Blessing Onyinye Khamis, Assem Clark, Joseph Boland, Jason W. Pask, Sophie Nwulu, Ugochinyere Elliott-Button, Helene Folwell, Anna Harman, Daniel Johnson, Miriam J. |
author_sort | Murtagh, Fliss E. M. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Integrated care may improve outcomes for older people living with frailty. We aimed to assess the effectiveness of a new, anticipatory, multidisciplinary care service in improving the wellbeing and quality of life (QoL) of older people living with severe frailty. METHODS: A community-based non-randomised controlled study. Participants (≥65 years, electronic Frailty Index ≥0.36) received either the new integrated care service plus usual care, or usual care alone. Data collection was at three time points: baseline, 2-4 weeks, and 10-14 weeks. The primary outcome was patient wellbeing (symptoms and other concerns) at 2-4 weeks, measured using the Integrated Palliative care Outcome Scale (IPOS); the secondary outcome was QoL, measured using EQ-5D-5L. To test duration of effect and safety, wellbeing and QoL were also measured at 10-14 weeks. Descriptive statistics were used to characterise and compare intervention and control groups (eligible but had not accessed the new service), with t-test, Chi-Square, or Mann-Whitney U tests (as appropriate) to test differences at each time point. Generalised linear modelling, with propensity score matching, was used for further group comparisons. Data were analysed using STATA v17. RESULTS: 199 intervention and 54 control participants were recruited. At baseline, intervention and control groups were similar in age, gender, ethnicity, living status, and body mass index, but not functional status or area deprivation score. At 2-4 weeks, wellbeing had improved in the intervention group but worsened in the control (median IPOS -5 versus 2, p<0.001). QoL improved in the intervention group but was unchanged in the control (median EQ-5D-5L 0.12, versus 0.00, p<0.001). After adjusting for age, gender, and living status, the intervention group had an average total IPOS score reduction at 2-4 weeks of 6.34 (95% CI: -9.01: -4.26, p<0.05); this improvement was sustained, with an average total IPOS score reduction at 10-14 weeks of 6.36 (95% CI: -8.91:-3.80, p<0.05). After propensity score matching based on functional status/area deprivation, modelling showed similar results, with a reduction in IPOS score at 2-4 weeks in the intervention group of 7.88 (95% CI: -12.80: -2.96, p<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that the new, anticipatory, multidisciplinary care service may have improved the overall wellbeing and quality of life of older people living with frailty at 2-4 weeks and the improvement in wellbeing was sustained at three months. ETHICS APPROVAL: NHS Research Ethics Committee 18/YH/0470 and IRAS-250981. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The trial was retrospectively registered at the International Standard Randomised Controlled Trial Number (ISRCTN) registry (registration date: 01/08/2022, registration number: ISRCTN10613839). |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9813451 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-98134512023-01-05 A non-randomised controlled study to assess the effectiveness of a new proactive multidisciplinary care intervention for older people living with frailty Murtagh, Fliss E. M. Okoeki, Mabel Ukoha-kalu, Blessing Onyinye Khamis, Assem Clark, Joseph Boland, Jason W. Pask, Sophie Nwulu, Ugochinyere Elliott-Button, Helene Folwell, Anna Harman, Daniel Johnson, Miriam J. BMC Geriatr Research BACKGROUND: Integrated care may improve outcomes for older people living with frailty. We aimed to assess the effectiveness of a new, anticipatory, multidisciplinary care service in improving the wellbeing and quality of life (QoL) of older people living with severe frailty. METHODS: A community-based non-randomised controlled study. Participants (≥65 years, electronic Frailty Index ≥0.36) received either the new integrated care service plus usual care, or usual care alone. Data collection was at three time points: baseline, 2-4 weeks, and 10-14 weeks. The primary outcome was patient wellbeing (symptoms and other concerns) at 2-4 weeks, measured using the Integrated Palliative care Outcome Scale (IPOS); the secondary outcome was QoL, measured using EQ-5D-5L. To test duration of effect and safety, wellbeing and QoL were also measured at 10-14 weeks. Descriptive statistics were used to characterise and compare intervention and control groups (eligible but had not accessed the new service), with t-test, Chi-Square, or Mann-Whitney U tests (as appropriate) to test differences at each time point. Generalised linear modelling, with propensity score matching, was used for further group comparisons. Data were analysed using STATA v17. RESULTS: 199 intervention and 54 control participants were recruited. At baseline, intervention and control groups were similar in age, gender, ethnicity, living status, and body mass index, but not functional status or area deprivation score. At 2-4 weeks, wellbeing had improved in the intervention group but worsened in the control (median IPOS -5 versus 2, p<0.001). QoL improved in the intervention group but was unchanged in the control (median EQ-5D-5L 0.12, versus 0.00, p<0.001). After adjusting for age, gender, and living status, the intervention group had an average total IPOS score reduction at 2-4 weeks of 6.34 (95% CI: -9.01: -4.26, p<0.05); this improvement was sustained, with an average total IPOS score reduction at 10-14 weeks of 6.36 (95% CI: -8.91:-3.80, p<0.05). After propensity score matching based on functional status/area deprivation, modelling showed similar results, with a reduction in IPOS score at 2-4 weeks in the intervention group of 7.88 (95% CI: -12.80: -2.96, p<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that the new, anticipatory, multidisciplinary care service may have improved the overall wellbeing and quality of life of older people living with frailty at 2-4 weeks and the improvement in wellbeing was sustained at three months. ETHICS APPROVAL: NHS Research Ethics Committee 18/YH/0470 and IRAS-250981. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The trial was retrospectively registered at the International Standard Randomised Controlled Trial Number (ISRCTN) registry (registration date: 01/08/2022, registration number: ISRCTN10613839). BioMed Central 2023-01-05 /pmc/articles/PMC9813451/ /pubmed/36604609 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12877-023-03727-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Murtagh, Fliss E. M. Okoeki, Mabel Ukoha-kalu, Blessing Onyinye Khamis, Assem Clark, Joseph Boland, Jason W. Pask, Sophie Nwulu, Ugochinyere Elliott-Button, Helene Folwell, Anna Harman, Daniel Johnson, Miriam J. A non-randomised controlled study to assess the effectiveness of a new proactive multidisciplinary care intervention for older people living with frailty |
title | A non-randomised controlled study to assess the effectiveness of a new proactive multidisciplinary care intervention for older people living with frailty |
title_full | A non-randomised controlled study to assess the effectiveness of a new proactive multidisciplinary care intervention for older people living with frailty |
title_fullStr | A non-randomised controlled study to assess the effectiveness of a new proactive multidisciplinary care intervention for older people living with frailty |
title_full_unstemmed | A non-randomised controlled study to assess the effectiveness of a new proactive multidisciplinary care intervention for older people living with frailty |
title_short | A non-randomised controlled study to assess the effectiveness of a new proactive multidisciplinary care intervention for older people living with frailty |
title_sort | non-randomised controlled study to assess the effectiveness of a new proactive multidisciplinary care intervention for older people living with frailty |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9813451/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36604609 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12877-023-03727-2 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT murtaghflissem anonrandomisedcontrolledstudytoassesstheeffectivenessofanewproactivemultidisciplinarycareinterventionforolderpeoplelivingwithfrailty AT okoekimabel anonrandomisedcontrolledstudytoassesstheeffectivenessofanewproactivemultidisciplinarycareinterventionforolderpeoplelivingwithfrailty AT ukohakalublessingonyinye anonrandomisedcontrolledstudytoassesstheeffectivenessofanewproactivemultidisciplinarycareinterventionforolderpeoplelivingwithfrailty AT khamisassem anonrandomisedcontrolledstudytoassesstheeffectivenessofanewproactivemultidisciplinarycareinterventionforolderpeoplelivingwithfrailty AT clarkjoseph anonrandomisedcontrolledstudytoassesstheeffectivenessofanewproactivemultidisciplinarycareinterventionforolderpeoplelivingwithfrailty AT bolandjasonw anonrandomisedcontrolledstudytoassesstheeffectivenessofanewproactivemultidisciplinarycareinterventionforolderpeoplelivingwithfrailty AT pasksophie anonrandomisedcontrolledstudytoassesstheeffectivenessofanewproactivemultidisciplinarycareinterventionforolderpeoplelivingwithfrailty AT nwuluugochinyere anonrandomisedcontrolledstudytoassesstheeffectivenessofanewproactivemultidisciplinarycareinterventionforolderpeoplelivingwithfrailty AT elliottbuttonhelene anonrandomisedcontrolledstudytoassesstheeffectivenessofanewproactivemultidisciplinarycareinterventionforolderpeoplelivingwithfrailty AT folwellanna anonrandomisedcontrolledstudytoassesstheeffectivenessofanewproactivemultidisciplinarycareinterventionforolderpeoplelivingwithfrailty AT harmandaniel anonrandomisedcontrolledstudytoassesstheeffectivenessofanewproactivemultidisciplinarycareinterventionforolderpeoplelivingwithfrailty AT johnsonmiriamj anonrandomisedcontrolledstudytoassesstheeffectivenessofanewproactivemultidisciplinarycareinterventionforolderpeoplelivingwithfrailty AT murtaghflissem nonrandomisedcontrolledstudytoassesstheeffectivenessofanewproactivemultidisciplinarycareinterventionforolderpeoplelivingwithfrailty AT okoekimabel nonrandomisedcontrolledstudytoassesstheeffectivenessofanewproactivemultidisciplinarycareinterventionforolderpeoplelivingwithfrailty AT ukohakalublessingonyinye nonrandomisedcontrolledstudytoassesstheeffectivenessofanewproactivemultidisciplinarycareinterventionforolderpeoplelivingwithfrailty AT khamisassem nonrandomisedcontrolledstudytoassesstheeffectivenessofanewproactivemultidisciplinarycareinterventionforolderpeoplelivingwithfrailty AT clarkjoseph nonrandomisedcontrolledstudytoassesstheeffectivenessofanewproactivemultidisciplinarycareinterventionforolderpeoplelivingwithfrailty AT bolandjasonw nonrandomisedcontrolledstudytoassesstheeffectivenessofanewproactivemultidisciplinarycareinterventionforolderpeoplelivingwithfrailty AT pasksophie nonrandomisedcontrolledstudytoassesstheeffectivenessofanewproactivemultidisciplinarycareinterventionforolderpeoplelivingwithfrailty AT nwuluugochinyere nonrandomisedcontrolledstudytoassesstheeffectivenessofanewproactivemultidisciplinarycareinterventionforolderpeoplelivingwithfrailty AT elliottbuttonhelene nonrandomisedcontrolledstudytoassesstheeffectivenessofanewproactivemultidisciplinarycareinterventionforolderpeoplelivingwithfrailty AT folwellanna nonrandomisedcontrolledstudytoassesstheeffectivenessofanewproactivemultidisciplinarycareinterventionforolderpeoplelivingwithfrailty AT harmandaniel nonrandomisedcontrolledstudytoassesstheeffectivenessofanewproactivemultidisciplinarycareinterventionforolderpeoplelivingwithfrailty AT johnsonmiriamj nonrandomisedcontrolledstudytoassesstheeffectivenessofanewproactivemultidisciplinarycareinterventionforolderpeoplelivingwithfrailty |