Cargando…

A non-randomised controlled study to assess the effectiveness of a new proactive multidisciplinary care intervention for older people living with frailty

BACKGROUND: Integrated care may improve outcomes for older people living with frailty. We aimed to assess the effectiveness of a new, anticipatory, multidisciplinary care service in improving the wellbeing and quality of life (QoL) of older people living with severe frailty. METHODS: A community-bas...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Murtagh, Fliss E. M., Okoeki, Mabel, Ukoha-kalu, Blessing Onyinye, Khamis, Assem, Clark, Joseph, Boland, Jason W., Pask, Sophie, Nwulu, Ugochinyere, Elliott-Button, Helene, Folwell, Anna, Harman, Daniel, Johnson, Miriam J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9813451/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36604609
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12877-023-03727-2
_version_ 1784863923174899712
author Murtagh, Fliss E. M.
Okoeki, Mabel
Ukoha-kalu, Blessing Onyinye
Khamis, Assem
Clark, Joseph
Boland, Jason W.
Pask, Sophie
Nwulu, Ugochinyere
Elliott-Button, Helene
Folwell, Anna
Harman, Daniel
Johnson, Miriam J.
author_facet Murtagh, Fliss E. M.
Okoeki, Mabel
Ukoha-kalu, Blessing Onyinye
Khamis, Assem
Clark, Joseph
Boland, Jason W.
Pask, Sophie
Nwulu, Ugochinyere
Elliott-Button, Helene
Folwell, Anna
Harman, Daniel
Johnson, Miriam J.
author_sort Murtagh, Fliss E. M.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Integrated care may improve outcomes for older people living with frailty. We aimed to assess the effectiveness of a new, anticipatory, multidisciplinary care service in improving the wellbeing and quality of life (QoL) of older people living with severe frailty. METHODS: A community-based non-randomised controlled study. Participants (≥65 years, electronic Frailty Index ≥0.36) received either the new integrated care service plus usual care, or usual care alone. Data collection was at three time points: baseline, 2-4 weeks, and 10-14 weeks. The primary outcome was patient wellbeing (symptoms and other concerns) at 2-4 weeks, measured using the Integrated Palliative care Outcome Scale (IPOS); the secondary outcome was QoL, measured using EQ-5D-5L. To test duration of effect and safety, wellbeing and QoL were also measured at 10-14 weeks. Descriptive statistics were used to characterise and compare intervention and control groups (eligible but had not accessed the new service), with t-test, Chi-Square, or Mann-Whitney U tests (as appropriate) to test differences at each time point. Generalised linear modelling, with propensity score matching, was used for further group comparisons. Data were analysed using STATA v17. RESULTS: 199 intervention and 54 control participants were recruited. At baseline, intervention and control groups were similar in age, gender, ethnicity, living status, and body mass index, but not functional status or area deprivation score. At 2-4 weeks, wellbeing had improved in the intervention group but worsened in the control (median IPOS -5 versus 2, p<0.001). QoL improved in the intervention group but was unchanged in the control (median EQ-5D-5L 0.12, versus 0.00, p<0.001). After adjusting for age, gender, and living status, the intervention group had an average total IPOS score reduction at 2-4 weeks of 6.34 (95% CI: -9.01: -4.26, p<0.05); this improvement was sustained, with an average total IPOS score reduction at 10-14 weeks of 6.36 (95% CI: -8.91:-3.80, p<0.05). After propensity score matching based on functional status/area deprivation, modelling showed similar results, with a reduction in IPOS score at 2-4 weeks in the intervention group of 7.88 (95% CI: -12.80: -2.96, p<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that the new, anticipatory, multidisciplinary care service may have improved the overall wellbeing and quality of life of older people living with frailty at 2-4 weeks and the improvement in wellbeing was sustained at three months. ETHICS APPROVAL: NHS Research Ethics Committee 18/YH/0470 and IRAS-250981. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The trial was retrospectively registered at the International Standard Randomised Controlled Trial Number (ISRCTN) registry (registration date: 01/08/2022, registration number: ISRCTN10613839).
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9813451
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-98134512023-01-05 A non-randomised controlled study to assess the effectiveness of a new proactive multidisciplinary care intervention for older people living with frailty Murtagh, Fliss E. M. Okoeki, Mabel Ukoha-kalu, Blessing Onyinye Khamis, Assem Clark, Joseph Boland, Jason W. Pask, Sophie Nwulu, Ugochinyere Elliott-Button, Helene Folwell, Anna Harman, Daniel Johnson, Miriam J. BMC Geriatr Research BACKGROUND: Integrated care may improve outcomes for older people living with frailty. We aimed to assess the effectiveness of a new, anticipatory, multidisciplinary care service in improving the wellbeing and quality of life (QoL) of older people living with severe frailty. METHODS: A community-based non-randomised controlled study. Participants (≥65 years, electronic Frailty Index ≥0.36) received either the new integrated care service plus usual care, or usual care alone. Data collection was at three time points: baseline, 2-4 weeks, and 10-14 weeks. The primary outcome was patient wellbeing (symptoms and other concerns) at 2-4 weeks, measured using the Integrated Palliative care Outcome Scale (IPOS); the secondary outcome was QoL, measured using EQ-5D-5L. To test duration of effect and safety, wellbeing and QoL were also measured at 10-14 weeks. Descriptive statistics were used to characterise and compare intervention and control groups (eligible but had not accessed the new service), with t-test, Chi-Square, or Mann-Whitney U tests (as appropriate) to test differences at each time point. Generalised linear modelling, with propensity score matching, was used for further group comparisons. Data were analysed using STATA v17. RESULTS: 199 intervention and 54 control participants were recruited. At baseline, intervention and control groups were similar in age, gender, ethnicity, living status, and body mass index, but not functional status or area deprivation score. At 2-4 weeks, wellbeing had improved in the intervention group but worsened in the control (median IPOS -5 versus 2, p<0.001). QoL improved in the intervention group but was unchanged in the control (median EQ-5D-5L 0.12, versus 0.00, p<0.001). After adjusting for age, gender, and living status, the intervention group had an average total IPOS score reduction at 2-4 weeks of 6.34 (95% CI: -9.01: -4.26, p<0.05); this improvement was sustained, with an average total IPOS score reduction at 10-14 weeks of 6.36 (95% CI: -8.91:-3.80, p<0.05). After propensity score matching based on functional status/area deprivation, modelling showed similar results, with a reduction in IPOS score at 2-4 weeks in the intervention group of 7.88 (95% CI: -12.80: -2.96, p<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that the new, anticipatory, multidisciplinary care service may have improved the overall wellbeing and quality of life of older people living with frailty at 2-4 weeks and the improvement in wellbeing was sustained at three months. ETHICS APPROVAL: NHS Research Ethics Committee 18/YH/0470 and IRAS-250981. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The trial was retrospectively registered at the International Standard Randomised Controlled Trial Number (ISRCTN) registry (registration date: 01/08/2022, registration number: ISRCTN10613839). BioMed Central 2023-01-05 /pmc/articles/PMC9813451/ /pubmed/36604609 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12877-023-03727-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Murtagh, Fliss E. M.
Okoeki, Mabel
Ukoha-kalu, Blessing Onyinye
Khamis, Assem
Clark, Joseph
Boland, Jason W.
Pask, Sophie
Nwulu, Ugochinyere
Elliott-Button, Helene
Folwell, Anna
Harman, Daniel
Johnson, Miriam J.
A non-randomised controlled study to assess the effectiveness of a new proactive multidisciplinary care intervention for older people living with frailty
title A non-randomised controlled study to assess the effectiveness of a new proactive multidisciplinary care intervention for older people living with frailty
title_full A non-randomised controlled study to assess the effectiveness of a new proactive multidisciplinary care intervention for older people living with frailty
title_fullStr A non-randomised controlled study to assess the effectiveness of a new proactive multidisciplinary care intervention for older people living with frailty
title_full_unstemmed A non-randomised controlled study to assess the effectiveness of a new proactive multidisciplinary care intervention for older people living with frailty
title_short A non-randomised controlled study to assess the effectiveness of a new proactive multidisciplinary care intervention for older people living with frailty
title_sort non-randomised controlled study to assess the effectiveness of a new proactive multidisciplinary care intervention for older people living with frailty
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9813451/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36604609
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12877-023-03727-2
work_keys_str_mv AT murtaghflissem anonrandomisedcontrolledstudytoassesstheeffectivenessofanewproactivemultidisciplinarycareinterventionforolderpeoplelivingwithfrailty
AT okoekimabel anonrandomisedcontrolledstudytoassesstheeffectivenessofanewproactivemultidisciplinarycareinterventionforolderpeoplelivingwithfrailty
AT ukohakalublessingonyinye anonrandomisedcontrolledstudytoassesstheeffectivenessofanewproactivemultidisciplinarycareinterventionforolderpeoplelivingwithfrailty
AT khamisassem anonrandomisedcontrolledstudytoassesstheeffectivenessofanewproactivemultidisciplinarycareinterventionforolderpeoplelivingwithfrailty
AT clarkjoseph anonrandomisedcontrolledstudytoassesstheeffectivenessofanewproactivemultidisciplinarycareinterventionforolderpeoplelivingwithfrailty
AT bolandjasonw anonrandomisedcontrolledstudytoassesstheeffectivenessofanewproactivemultidisciplinarycareinterventionforolderpeoplelivingwithfrailty
AT pasksophie anonrandomisedcontrolledstudytoassesstheeffectivenessofanewproactivemultidisciplinarycareinterventionforolderpeoplelivingwithfrailty
AT nwuluugochinyere anonrandomisedcontrolledstudytoassesstheeffectivenessofanewproactivemultidisciplinarycareinterventionforolderpeoplelivingwithfrailty
AT elliottbuttonhelene anonrandomisedcontrolledstudytoassesstheeffectivenessofanewproactivemultidisciplinarycareinterventionforolderpeoplelivingwithfrailty
AT folwellanna anonrandomisedcontrolledstudytoassesstheeffectivenessofanewproactivemultidisciplinarycareinterventionforolderpeoplelivingwithfrailty
AT harmandaniel anonrandomisedcontrolledstudytoassesstheeffectivenessofanewproactivemultidisciplinarycareinterventionforolderpeoplelivingwithfrailty
AT johnsonmiriamj anonrandomisedcontrolledstudytoassesstheeffectivenessofanewproactivemultidisciplinarycareinterventionforolderpeoplelivingwithfrailty
AT murtaghflissem nonrandomisedcontrolledstudytoassesstheeffectivenessofanewproactivemultidisciplinarycareinterventionforolderpeoplelivingwithfrailty
AT okoekimabel nonrandomisedcontrolledstudytoassesstheeffectivenessofanewproactivemultidisciplinarycareinterventionforolderpeoplelivingwithfrailty
AT ukohakalublessingonyinye nonrandomisedcontrolledstudytoassesstheeffectivenessofanewproactivemultidisciplinarycareinterventionforolderpeoplelivingwithfrailty
AT khamisassem nonrandomisedcontrolledstudytoassesstheeffectivenessofanewproactivemultidisciplinarycareinterventionforolderpeoplelivingwithfrailty
AT clarkjoseph nonrandomisedcontrolledstudytoassesstheeffectivenessofanewproactivemultidisciplinarycareinterventionforolderpeoplelivingwithfrailty
AT bolandjasonw nonrandomisedcontrolledstudytoassesstheeffectivenessofanewproactivemultidisciplinarycareinterventionforolderpeoplelivingwithfrailty
AT pasksophie nonrandomisedcontrolledstudytoassesstheeffectivenessofanewproactivemultidisciplinarycareinterventionforolderpeoplelivingwithfrailty
AT nwuluugochinyere nonrandomisedcontrolledstudytoassesstheeffectivenessofanewproactivemultidisciplinarycareinterventionforolderpeoplelivingwithfrailty
AT elliottbuttonhelene nonrandomisedcontrolledstudytoassesstheeffectivenessofanewproactivemultidisciplinarycareinterventionforolderpeoplelivingwithfrailty
AT folwellanna nonrandomisedcontrolledstudytoassesstheeffectivenessofanewproactivemultidisciplinarycareinterventionforolderpeoplelivingwithfrailty
AT harmandaniel nonrandomisedcontrolledstudytoassesstheeffectivenessofanewproactivemultidisciplinarycareinterventionforolderpeoplelivingwithfrailty
AT johnsonmiriamj nonrandomisedcontrolledstudytoassesstheeffectivenessofanewproactivemultidisciplinarycareinterventionforolderpeoplelivingwithfrailty