Cargando…

Hodges’ model: the Sustainable Development Goals and public health – universal health coverage demands a universal framework

BACKGROUND TO ISSUE: Future sustainable healthcare delivery and systems need reflective practitioners and critical thinkers to engage the public to achieve health policy aims and objectives. Therefore, this descriptive review introduces a generic conceptual framework, adopting a specific theme to il...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jones, Peter, Wirnitzer, Katharina
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9813637/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36619330
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjnph-2021-000254
_version_ 1784863963318583296
author Jones, Peter
Wirnitzer, Katharina
author_facet Jones, Peter
Wirnitzer, Katharina
author_sort Jones, Peter
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND TO ISSUE: Future sustainable healthcare delivery and systems need reflective practitioners and critical thinkers to engage the public to achieve health policy aims and objectives. Therefore, this descriptive review introduces a generic conceptual framework, adopting a specific theme to illustrate and demonstrate a model of care or any other context. Whatever the purpose, context or philosophical stance in healthcare and health literacy, there is no standardised generic conceptual framework to structure reflection and critical thinking. This work presents a pragmatic solution focused on the one-to-one relationship of learner–mentor, patient–clinician, public health professional–public and groups. METHODS: The method is constructivist, an educational exercise, practical and the target group can be defined/viewed as student, teacher, patient, carer or member of the public in a health promotion campaign, for example. The building blocks are health and care concepts that arise clinically in practice, or for a student writing an assignment. As will be explained, concepts (including the Sustainable Development Goals) are assigned by the subject(s)—in this instance the authors—to a domain of knowledge. RESULTS: As two-by-two tables, the results represent the structure of the conceptual framework, framing the content in a series of four knowledge (care) domains. The contents, ultimately the Sustainable Development Goals, may then be linked and relationships discussed. Results are produced gradually, building a cognitive or mind-map. The results, it must be stressed, are therefore qualitative. CONCLUSION: Drawing on educational theory and practice, the results are explored and justified using the theme of nutrition, and the often stated desirability in education of reflective practice and critical thinking abilities. Providing a series of cross-disciplinary, the reader will gain insight into the potential of Hodges’ model to facilitate integrated, person-centred and care that improves parity of esteem, supporting students and qualified personnel in their learning careers.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9813637
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-98136372023-01-06 Hodges’ model: the Sustainable Development Goals and public health – universal health coverage demands a universal framework Jones, Peter Wirnitzer, Katharina BMJ Nutr Prev Health Review BACKGROUND TO ISSUE: Future sustainable healthcare delivery and systems need reflective practitioners and critical thinkers to engage the public to achieve health policy aims and objectives. Therefore, this descriptive review introduces a generic conceptual framework, adopting a specific theme to illustrate and demonstrate a model of care or any other context. Whatever the purpose, context or philosophical stance in healthcare and health literacy, there is no standardised generic conceptual framework to structure reflection and critical thinking. This work presents a pragmatic solution focused on the one-to-one relationship of learner–mentor, patient–clinician, public health professional–public and groups. METHODS: The method is constructivist, an educational exercise, practical and the target group can be defined/viewed as student, teacher, patient, carer or member of the public in a health promotion campaign, for example. The building blocks are health and care concepts that arise clinically in practice, or for a student writing an assignment. As will be explained, concepts (including the Sustainable Development Goals) are assigned by the subject(s)—in this instance the authors—to a domain of knowledge. RESULTS: As two-by-two tables, the results represent the structure of the conceptual framework, framing the content in a series of four knowledge (care) domains. The contents, ultimately the Sustainable Development Goals, may then be linked and relationships discussed. Results are produced gradually, building a cognitive or mind-map. The results, it must be stressed, are therefore qualitative. CONCLUSION: Drawing on educational theory and practice, the results are explored and justified using the theme of nutrition, and the often stated desirability in education of reflective practice and critical thinking abilities. Providing a series of cross-disciplinary, the reader will gain insight into the potential of Hodges’ model to facilitate integrated, person-centred and care that improves parity of esteem, supporting students and qualified personnel in their learning careers. BMJ Publishing Group 2022-09-15 /pmc/articles/PMC9813637/ /pubmed/36619330 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjnph-2021-000254 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Review
Jones, Peter
Wirnitzer, Katharina
Hodges’ model: the Sustainable Development Goals and public health – universal health coverage demands a universal framework
title Hodges’ model: the Sustainable Development Goals and public health – universal health coverage demands a universal framework
title_full Hodges’ model: the Sustainable Development Goals and public health – universal health coverage demands a universal framework
title_fullStr Hodges’ model: the Sustainable Development Goals and public health – universal health coverage demands a universal framework
title_full_unstemmed Hodges’ model: the Sustainable Development Goals and public health – universal health coverage demands a universal framework
title_short Hodges’ model: the Sustainable Development Goals and public health – universal health coverage demands a universal framework
title_sort hodges’ model: the sustainable development goals and public health – universal health coverage demands a universal framework
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9813637/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36619330
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjnph-2021-000254
work_keys_str_mv AT jonespeter hodgesmodelthesustainabledevelopmentgoalsandpublichealthuniversalhealthcoveragedemandsauniversalframework
AT wirnitzerkatharina hodgesmodelthesustainabledevelopmentgoalsandpublichealthuniversalhealthcoveragedemandsauniversalframework