Cargando…

Comparison of Sun Protection Factor (SPF) 30 Persistence Between Inorganic and Organic Sunscreen in Swimmers: Protocol for a Multicenter, Randomized, Noninferiority, Split-Body, Double-Blind Clinical Trial

BACKGROUND: Outdoor swimming athletes are often exposed to undesirable environmental conditions such as long-term sun exposure. The risk of sunburn can still occur in this population due to the loss of sunscreen and an increase in the sensitivity of the skin to ultraviolet rays, particularly ultravi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rachmani, Karin, Yusharyahya, Shannaz Nadia, Sampurna, Adhimukti, Ranakusuma, Respati W, Widaty, Sandra
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: JMIR Publications 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9813813/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36542453
http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/42504
_version_ 1784864002034106368
author Rachmani, Karin
Yusharyahya, Shannaz Nadia
Sampurna, Adhimukti
Ranakusuma, Respati W
Widaty, Sandra
author_facet Rachmani, Karin
Yusharyahya, Shannaz Nadia
Sampurna, Adhimukti
Ranakusuma, Respati W
Widaty, Sandra
author_sort Rachmani, Karin
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Outdoor swimming athletes are often exposed to undesirable environmental conditions such as long-term sun exposure. The risk of sunburn can still occur in this population due to the loss of sunscreen and an increase in the sensitivity of the skin to ultraviolet rays, particularly ultraviolet B, in wet conditions. Some previous trials showed that organic sunscreens had a longer shelf-life than inorganic sunscreens after exercise due to their characteristics to bind better with the skin layer. Meanwhile, inorganic sunscreens tend to form layers on the skin’s surface so that they can be more easily removed. To our knowledge, no studies evaluate sunscreens' resistance, either inorganic or organic, after exercising in Indonesia. OBJECTIVE: This study aims to evaluate the persistence of inorganic versus organic sunscreens used by swimmers. The primary objective is to assess whether the inorganic sunscreen is as good as the organic sunscreen in the field of the persistence of sunscreens after swimming for 1.5 hours. METHODS: This study is a randomized, split-body, double-blind, noninferiority, and multicenter clinical trial in Cikini, Jakarta, Indonesia. An estimated 22 athletes in each group, who aged 18-40 years and practice in the morning or afternoon, will be randomized using a computer-generated randomization method. We calculated the sample size using the difference in the average decrease in sun protection factor (SPF) levels that is considered significant based on the clinical judgment set by the researchers, which was 5. Neither the research subjects nor the researchers are aware of the type of sunscreen that will be applied. The hypothesis will be tested using paired-sample t test or Wilcoxon to assess the difference of SPF levels in each group between organic and inorganic sunscreens with SPSS (version 20.0; IBM Corp). RESULTS: This study has been approved by the Ethical Committee Faculty of Medicine Universitas Indonesia and is funded by the International Publication Grant from Universitas Indonesia. The enrollment process was completed in December 2020. CONCLUSIONS: This study will test all procedures in preparation for conducting the main study, including several potential obstacles and challenges from the perspective of participating physicians and eligible swimmers. The study results will be disseminated through publications in a peer-reviewed journal with Open Access format. This study will provide information about SPF 30 persistence in sunscreens and the best type of sunscreen to be used while swimming, particularly for athletes. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04618536; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04618536?term=NCT04618536 INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): RR1-10.2196/42504
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9813813
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher JMIR Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-98138132023-01-06 Comparison of Sun Protection Factor (SPF) 30 Persistence Between Inorganic and Organic Sunscreen in Swimmers: Protocol for a Multicenter, Randomized, Noninferiority, Split-Body, Double-Blind Clinical Trial Rachmani, Karin Yusharyahya, Shannaz Nadia Sampurna, Adhimukti Ranakusuma, Respati W Widaty, Sandra JMIR Res Protoc Protocol BACKGROUND: Outdoor swimming athletes are often exposed to undesirable environmental conditions such as long-term sun exposure. The risk of sunburn can still occur in this population due to the loss of sunscreen and an increase in the sensitivity of the skin to ultraviolet rays, particularly ultraviolet B, in wet conditions. Some previous trials showed that organic sunscreens had a longer shelf-life than inorganic sunscreens after exercise due to their characteristics to bind better with the skin layer. Meanwhile, inorganic sunscreens tend to form layers on the skin’s surface so that they can be more easily removed. To our knowledge, no studies evaluate sunscreens' resistance, either inorganic or organic, after exercising in Indonesia. OBJECTIVE: This study aims to evaluate the persistence of inorganic versus organic sunscreens used by swimmers. The primary objective is to assess whether the inorganic sunscreen is as good as the organic sunscreen in the field of the persistence of sunscreens after swimming for 1.5 hours. METHODS: This study is a randomized, split-body, double-blind, noninferiority, and multicenter clinical trial in Cikini, Jakarta, Indonesia. An estimated 22 athletes in each group, who aged 18-40 years and practice in the morning or afternoon, will be randomized using a computer-generated randomization method. We calculated the sample size using the difference in the average decrease in sun protection factor (SPF) levels that is considered significant based on the clinical judgment set by the researchers, which was 5. Neither the research subjects nor the researchers are aware of the type of sunscreen that will be applied. The hypothesis will be tested using paired-sample t test or Wilcoxon to assess the difference of SPF levels in each group between organic and inorganic sunscreens with SPSS (version 20.0; IBM Corp). RESULTS: This study has been approved by the Ethical Committee Faculty of Medicine Universitas Indonesia and is funded by the International Publication Grant from Universitas Indonesia. The enrollment process was completed in December 2020. CONCLUSIONS: This study will test all procedures in preparation for conducting the main study, including several potential obstacles and challenges from the perspective of participating physicians and eligible swimmers. The study results will be disseminated through publications in a peer-reviewed journal with Open Access format. This study will provide information about SPF 30 persistence in sunscreens and the best type of sunscreen to be used while swimming, particularly for athletes. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04618536; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04618536?term=NCT04618536 INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): RR1-10.2196/42504 JMIR Publications 2022-12-21 /pmc/articles/PMC9813813/ /pubmed/36542453 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/42504 Text en ©Karin Rachmani, Shannaz Nadia Yusharyahya, Adhimukti Sampurna, Respati W Ranakusuma, Sandra Widaty. Originally published in JMIR Research Protocols (https://www.researchprotocols.org), 21.12.2022. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work, first published in JMIR Research Protocols, is properly cited. The complete bibliographic information, a link to the original publication on https://www.researchprotocols.org, as well as this copyright and license information must be included.
spellingShingle Protocol
Rachmani, Karin
Yusharyahya, Shannaz Nadia
Sampurna, Adhimukti
Ranakusuma, Respati W
Widaty, Sandra
Comparison of Sun Protection Factor (SPF) 30 Persistence Between Inorganic and Organic Sunscreen in Swimmers: Protocol for a Multicenter, Randomized, Noninferiority, Split-Body, Double-Blind Clinical Trial
title Comparison of Sun Protection Factor (SPF) 30 Persistence Between Inorganic and Organic Sunscreen in Swimmers: Protocol for a Multicenter, Randomized, Noninferiority, Split-Body, Double-Blind Clinical Trial
title_full Comparison of Sun Protection Factor (SPF) 30 Persistence Between Inorganic and Organic Sunscreen in Swimmers: Protocol for a Multicenter, Randomized, Noninferiority, Split-Body, Double-Blind Clinical Trial
title_fullStr Comparison of Sun Protection Factor (SPF) 30 Persistence Between Inorganic and Organic Sunscreen in Swimmers: Protocol for a Multicenter, Randomized, Noninferiority, Split-Body, Double-Blind Clinical Trial
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Sun Protection Factor (SPF) 30 Persistence Between Inorganic and Organic Sunscreen in Swimmers: Protocol for a Multicenter, Randomized, Noninferiority, Split-Body, Double-Blind Clinical Trial
title_short Comparison of Sun Protection Factor (SPF) 30 Persistence Between Inorganic and Organic Sunscreen in Swimmers: Protocol for a Multicenter, Randomized, Noninferiority, Split-Body, Double-Blind Clinical Trial
title_sort comparison of sun protection factor (spf) 30 persistence between inorganic and organic sunscreen in swimmers: protocol for a multicenter, randomized, noninferiority, split-body, double-blind clinical trial
topic Protocol
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9813813/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36542453
http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/42504
work_keys_str_mv AT rachmanikarin comparisonofsunprotectionfactorspf30persistencebetweeninorganicandorganicsunscreeninswimmersprotocolforamulticenterrandomizednoninferioritysplitbodydoubleblindclinicaltrial
AT yusharyahyashannaznadia comparisonofsunprotectionfactorspf30persistencebetweeninorganicandorganicsunscreeninswimmersprotocolforamulticenterrandomizednoninferioritysplitbodydoubleblindclinicaltrial
AT sampurnaadhimukti comparisonofsunprotectionfactorspf30persistencebetweeninorganicandorganicsunscreeninswimmersprotocolforamulticenterrandomizednoninferioritysplitbodydoubleblindclinicaltrial
AT ranakusumarespatiw comparisonofsunprotectionfactorspf30persistencebetweeninorganicandorganicsunscreeninswimmersprotocolforamulticenterrandomizednoninferioritysplitbodydoubleblindclinicaltrial
AT widatysandra comparisonofsunprotectionfactorspf30persistencebetweeninorganicandorganicsunscreeninswimmersprotocolforamulticenterrandomizednoninferioritysplitbodydoubleblindclinicaltrial