Cargando…

Comparison of Pericapsular Nerve Group Block with Fascia Iliaca Compartment Block in Adult Patients Undergoing Hip Surgeries: A Double-Blinded Randomized Control Study

BACKGROUND: Hip fractures are the most common orthopedic condition in elderly patients. In this patient group, efficient preoperative analgesia that reduces the requirement for opioids and their negative side effects is crucial. This study aims for evaluating the efficiency of fascia iliaca compartm...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kalashetty, Mahindra B., Channappagoudar, Ranganath, Alwandikar, Vanishree, Naik, Dinesh L., Hulakund, S. Y., Guddad, Aishwarya
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9813981/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36620112
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/aer.aer_123_22
_version_ 1784864033058324480
author Kalashetty, Mahindra B.
Channappagoudar, Ranganath
Alwandikar, Vanishree
Naik, Dinesh L.
Hulakund, S. Y.
Guddad, Aishwarya
author_facet Kalashetty, Mahindra B.
Channappagoudar, Ranganath
Alwandikar, Vanishree
Naik, Dinesh L.
Hulakund, S. Y.
Guddad, Aishwarya
author_sort Kalashetty, Mahindra B.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Hip fractures are the most common orthopedic condition in elderly patients. In this patient group, efficient preoperative analgesia that reduces the requirement for opioids and their negative side effects is crucial. This study aims for evaluating the efficiency of fascia iliaca compartment block (FICB) and pericapsular nerve group (PENG) in providing the appropriate analgesia before positioning patients for spinal anesthesia (SA). METHODS: Ninety participants undergoing hip surgeries under SA were selected randomly to receive PENG block (n = 45) using 20 mL 0.25% bupivacaine or FICB using 30 mL of 0.25% bupivacaine. The blinded observer assessed Visual Analog Scale (VAS) scores at rest, with passive leg raise to 15° before and after 30 min of the block. The blinded observer also recorded hemodynamic parameters including noninvasive blood pressure respiratory rate and heart rate. The data were analyzed using SPSS version 19. Using the appropriate statistical methodology, continuous and categorical data were analyzed, and P ≤ 0.05 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS: At rest and with a passive leg raise to 15°, VAS scores in the PENG and FICB groups decreased significantly (P < 0.0001). After 30 minutes of performing the PENG block, the VAS scores at rest and passive leg raise were 2.16±0.67 and 3.29±0.73 respectively, whereas with the fascia iliaca block the VAS scores at rest and passive leg raise were 4.07±0.69 and 5.11±0.71 with the p = 0.001, which is highly significant. CONCLUSION: PENG block outperforms fascia iliaca block in providing effective analgesia before positioning patients undergoing hip surgery under SA.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9813981
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-98139812023-01-06 Comparison of Pericapsular Nerve Group Block with Fascia Iliaca Compartment Block in Adult Patients Undergoing Hip Surgeries: A Double-Blinded Randomized Control Study Kalashetty, Mahindra B. Channappagoudar, Ranganath Alwandikar, Vanishree Naik, Dinesh L. Hulakund, S. Y. Guddad, Aishwarya Anesth Essays Res Original Article BACKGROUND: Hip fractures are the most common orthopedic condition in elderly patients. In this patient group, efficient preoperative analgesia that reduces the requirement for opioids and their negative side effects is crucial. This study aims for evaluating the efficiency of fascia iliaca compartment block (FICB) and pericapsular nerve group (PENG) in providing the appropriate analgesia before positioning patients for spinal anesthesia (SA). METHODS: Ninety participants undergoing hip surgeries under SA were selected randomly to receive PENG block (n = 45) using 20 mL 0.25% bupivacaine or FICB using 30 mL of 0.25% bupivacaine. The blinded observer assessed Visual Analog Scale (VAS) scores at rest, with passive leg raise to 15° before and after 30 min of the block. The blinded observer also recorded hemodynamic parameters including noninvasive blood pressure respiratory rate and heart rate. The data were analyzed using SPSS version 19. Using the appropriate statistical methodology, continuous and categorical data were analyzed, and P ≤ 0.05 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS: At rest and with a passive leg raise to 15°, VAS scores in the PENG and FICB groups decreased significantly (P < 0.0001). After 30 minutes of performing the PENG block, the VAS scores at rest and passive leg raise were 2.16±0.67 and 3.29±0.73 respectively, whereas with the fascia iliaca block the VAS scores at rest and passive leg raise were 4.07±0.69 and 5.11±0.71 with the p = 0.001, which is highly significant. CONCLUSION: PENG block outperforms fascia iliaca block in providing effective analgesia before positioning patients undergoing hip surgery under SA. Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2022 2022-12-09 /pmc/articles/PMC9813981/ /pubmed/36620112 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/aer.aer_123_22 Text en Copyright: © 2022 Anesthesia: Essays and Researches https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Original Article
Kalashetty, Mahindra B.
Channappagoudar, Ranganath
Alwandikar, Vanishree
Naik, Dinesh L.
Hulakund, S. Y.
Guddad, Aishwarya
Comparison of Pericapsular Nerve Group Block with Fascia Iliaca Compartment Block in Adult Patients Undergoing Hip Surgeries: A Double-Blinded Randomized Control Study
title Comparison of Pericapsular Nerve Group Block with Fascia Iliaca Compartment Block in Adult Patients Undergoing Hip Surgeries: A Double-Blinded Randomized Control Study
title_full Comparison of Pericapsular Nerve Group Block with Fascia Iliaca Compartment Block in Adult Patients Undergoing Hip Surgeries: A Double-Blinded Randomized Control Study
title_fullStr Comparison of Pericapsular Nerve Group Block with Fascia Iliaca Compartment Block in Adult Patients Undergoing Hip Surgeries: A Double-Blinded Randomized Control Study
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Pericapsular Nerve Group Block with Fascia Iliaca Compartment Block in Adult Patients Undergoing Hip Surgeries: A Double-Blinded Randomized Control Study
title_short Comparison of Pericapsular Nerve Group Block with Fascia Iliaca Compartment Block in Adult Patients Undergoing Hip Surgeries: A Double-Blinded Randomized Control Study
title_sort comparison of pericapsular nerve group block with fascia iliaca compartment block in adult patients undergoing hip surgeries: a double-blinded randomized control study
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9813981/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36620112
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/aer.aer_123_22
work_keys_str_mv AT kalashettymahindrab comparisonofpericapsularnervegroupblockwithfasciailiacacompartmentblockinadultpatientsundergoinghipsurgeriesadoubleblindedrandomizedcontrolstudy
AT channappagoudarranganath comparisonofpericapsularnervegroupblockwithfasciailiacacompartmentblockinadultpatientsundergoinghipsurgeriesadoubleblindedrandomizedcontrolstudy
AT alwandikarvanishree comparisonofpericapsularnervegroupblockwithfasciailiacacompartmentblockinadultpatientsundergoinghipsurgeriesadoubleblindedrandomizedcontrolstudy
AT naikdineshl comparisonofpericapsularnervegroupblockwithfasciailiacacompartmentblockinadultpatientsundergoinghipsurgeriesadoubleblindedrandomizedcontrolstudy
AT hulakundsy comparisonofpericapsularnervegroupblockwithfasciailiacacompartmentblockinadultpatientsundergoinghipsurgeriesadoubleblindedrandomizedcontrolstudy
AT guddadaishwarya comparisonofpericapsularnervegroupblockwithfasciailiacacompartmentblockinadultpatientsundergoinghipsurgeriesadoubleblindedrandomizedcontrolstudy