Cargando…

Hyperglycemia Risk Evaluation of Hydrocortisone Intermittent Boluses versus Continuous Infusion in Septic Shock: A Prospective Randomized Trial

BACKGROUND: Hydrocortisone showed an important role in reversal of shock when added to standard therapy in managing septic shock. Hyperglycemia is one of the most common side effects associated with corticosteroid treatment. AIMS: This study aimed to evaluate the risk of hyperglycemia of intermitten...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ram, Ganesh Kumar, Shekhar, Saurav, Singh, Raj Bahadur, Anand, Ravi, De, Ranjeet Rana, Kumar, Nitin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9813985/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36620116
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/aer.aer_115_22
_version_ 1784864034040840192
author Ram, Ganesh Kumar
Shekhar, Saurav
Singh, Raj Bahadur
Anand, Ravi
De, Ranjeet Rana
Kumar, Nitin
author_facet Ram, Ganesh Kumar
Shekhar, Saurav
Singh, Raj Bahadur
Anand, Ravi
De, Ranjeet Rana
Kumar, Nitin
author_sort Ram, Ganesh Kumar
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Hydrocortisone showed an important role in reversal of shock when added to standard therapy in managing septic shock. Hyperglycemia is one of the most common side effects associated with corticosteroid treatment. AIMS: This study aimed to evaluate the risk of hyperglycemia of intermittent hydrocortisone boluses versus continuous infusion in septic shock patients. SETTINGS AND DESIGN: This was a prospective randomized controlled study conducted in a tertiary care teaching hospital. MATERIALS AND METHODS: One hundred and forty patients with septic shock and who received noradrenaline were enrolled in this randomized study. Group 1 was intermittent bolus hydrocortisone group (n = 70) and Group 2 was continuous infusion group (n = 70). All patients who were admitted with septic shock and who received noradrenaline and hydrocortisone were included in the study. Those patients who had exceeded 200 mg per day of hydrocortisone were excluded from the study. The primary outcome of the study was mean blood glucose. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS USED: Qualitative variables were compared between the two groups with the Chi-square of the Fisher's exact test and continuous variables were compared using the Student's t-test or the Wilcoxon rank-sum test. RESULTS: Out of 112 patients, 54 patients received hydrocortisone as intermittent boluses (48.2%), and 58 patients (51.8%) received continuous infusion. For the primary outcome, no statistically or clinically significant difference was found in the blood glucose estimated marginal mean: 154.44 mg.dL(−1) (95% confidence interval [CI]: 144.18–166.88) in the bolus group and 160.2 mg.dL(−1) (95% CI: 143.82–176.76) in the infusion group with a mean difference of 05.76 mg.dL(−1) (95% CI: −13.86–25.38). For the secondary outcomes of the study, no difference was found between the two groups in hyperglycemic or hypoglycemic events, mortality, length of stay in intensive care unit, and reversal of shock. CONCLUSIONS: The risk of hyperglycemia is almost equal in both intermittent and continuous infusions of hydrocortisone in septic shock patients.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9813985
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-98139852023-01-06 Hyperglycemia Risk Evaluation of Hydrocortisone Intermittent Boluses versus Continuous Infusion in Septic Shock: A Prospective Randomized Trial Ram, Ganesh Kumar Shekhar, Saurav Singh, Raj Bahadur Anand, Ravi De, Ranjeet Rana Kumar, Nitin Anesth Essays Res Original Article BACKGROUND: Hydrocortisone showed an important role in reversal of shock when added to standard therapy in managing septic shock. Hyperglycemia is one of the most common side effects associated with corticosteroid treatment. AIMS: This study aimed to evaluate the risk of hyperglycemia of intermittent hydrocortisone boluses versus continuous infusion in septic shock patients. SETTINGS AND DESIGN: This was a prospective randomized controlled study conducted in a tertiary care teaching hospital. MATERIALS AND METHODS: One hundred and forty patients with septic shock and who received noradrenaline were enrolled in this randomized study. Group 1 was intermittent bolus hydrocortisone group (n = 70) and Group 2 was continuous infusion group (n = 70). All patients who were admitted with septic shock and who received noradrenaline and hydrocortisone were included in the study. Those patients who had exceeded 200 mg per day of hydrocortisone were excluded from the study. The primary outcome of the study was mean blood glucose. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS USED: Qualitative variables were compared between the two groups with the Chi-square of the Fisher's exact test and continuous variables were compared using the Student's t-test or the Wilcoxon rank-sum test. RESULTS: Out of 112 patients, 54 patients received hydrocortisone as intermittent boluses (48.2%), and 58 patients (51.8%) received continuous infusion. For the primary outcome, no statistically or clinically significant difference was found in the blood glucose estimated marginal mean: 154.44 mg.dL(−1) (95% confidence interval [CI]: 144.18–166.88) in the bolus group and 160.2 mg.dL(−1) (95% CI: 143.82–176.76) in the infusion group with a mean difference of 05.76 mg.dL(−1) (95% CI: −13.86–25.38). For the secondary outcomes of the study, no difference was found between the two groups in hyperglycemic or hypoglycemic events, mortality, length of stay in intensive care unit, and reversal of shock. CONCLUSIONS: The risk of hyperglycemia is almost equal in both intermittent and continuous infusions of hydrocortisone in septic shock patients. Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2022 2022-12-09 /pmc/articles/PMC9813985/ /pubmed/36620116 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/aer.aer_115_22 Text en Copyright: © 2022 Anesthesia: Essays and Researches https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Original Article
Ram, Ganesh Kumar
Shekhar, Saurav
Singh, Raj Bahadur
Anand, Ravi
De, Ranjeet Rana
Kumar, Nitin
Hyperglycemia Risk Evaluation of Hydrocortisone Intermittent Boluses versus Continuous Infusion in Septic Shock: A Prospective Randomized Trial
title Hyperglycemia Risk Evaluation of Hydrocortisone Intermittent Boluses versus Continuous Infusion in Septic Shock: A Prospective Randomized Trial
title_full Hyperglycemia Risk Evaluation of Hydrocortisone Intermittent Boluses versus Continuous Infusion in Septic Shock: A Prospective Randomized Trial
title_fullStr Hyperglycemia Risk Evaluation of Hydrocortisone Intermittent Boluses versus Continuous Infusion in Septic Shock: A Prospective Randomized Trial
title_full_unstemmed Hyperglycemia Risk Evaluation of Hydrocortisone Intermittent Boluses versus Continuous Infusion in Septic Shock: A Prospective Randomized Trial
title_short Hyperglycemia Risk Evaluation of Hydrocortisone Intermittent Boluses versus Continuous Infusion in Septic Shock: A Prospective Randomized Trial
title_sort hyperglycemia risk evaluation of hydrocortisone intermittent boluses versus continuous infusion in septic shock: a prospective randomized trial
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9813985/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36620116
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/aer.aer_115_22
work_keys_str_mv AT ramganeshkumar hyperglycemiariskevaluationofhydrocortisoneintermittentbolusesversuscontinuousinfusioninsepticshockaprospectiverandomizedtrial
AT shekharsaurav hyperglycemiariskevaluationofhydrocortisoneintermittentbolusesversuscontinuousinfusioninsepticshockaprospectiverandomizedtrial
AT singhrajbahadur hyperglycemiariskevaluationofhydrocortisoneintermittentbolusesversuscontinuousinfusioninsepticshockaprospectiverandomizedtrial
AT anandravi hyperglycemiariskevaluationofhydrocortisoneintermittentbolusesversuscontinuousinfusioninsepticshockaprospectiverandomizedtrial
AT deranjeetrana hyperglycemiariskevaluationofhydrocortisoneintermittentbolusesversuscontinuousinfusioninsepticshockaprospectiverandomizedtrial
AT kumarnitin hyperglycemiariskevaluationofhydrocortisoneintermittentbolusesversuscontinuousinfusioninsepticshockaprospectiverandomizedtrial