Cargando…
First-pass Success Rate and Number of Attempts Required for Intubation in Anticipated Difficult Airway: Comparison between Macintosh and Channeled King Vision Video Laryngoscopes
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Video laryngoscopy has been shown to improvise Cormack–Lehane grading and rate of successful tracheal intubation and is now incorporated in most of the difficult airway guidelines. Since there is scarce literature regarding the use of channeled blade of King Vision video laryngo...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9813986/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36620107 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/aer.aer_68_22 |
_version_ | 1784864034277818368 |
---|---|
author | Raja, Rameez Gupta, Sunana Mehta, Nandita Attal, Prerna |
author_facet | Raja, Rameez Gupta, Sunana Mehta, Nandita Attal, Prerna |
author_sort | Raja, Rameez |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Video laryngoscopy has been shown to improvise Cormack–Lehane grading and rate of successful tracheal intubation and is now incorporated in most of the difficult airway guidelines. Since there is scarce literature regarding the use of channeled blade of King Vision video laryngoscope (KVVL) in anticipated difficult intubation, we planned to undertake this randomized control trial to assess the performance of channeled blade of KVVL and Macintosh laryngoscope in patients with anticipated difficult intubation. DESIGN AND SETTING: This prospective randomized study was conducted in a tertiary care hospital. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients fulfilling the inclusion criteria were randomly assigned equally to the KVVL group or Macintosh group. The primary outcome of the study was intubation success in the first attempt and number of attempts required for intubation, and the secondary outcomes were Cormack–Lehane grading and time required to intubate in both the groups. RESULTS: The first-pass success of intubation was 88.6% in the KVVL group and 76.5% in the Macintosh group (P = 0.035). The second attempt of intubation was required in 11.4% and 20.6% of patients in the KVVL and Macintosh groups, respectively. Cormack Lehane Grade I was achieved in 100% of patients of the KVVL group as compared to 29.4% of patients in the Macintosh group. Moreover, the difference was statistically significant (P = 0.035). The mean duration of intubation was prolonged in the KVVL group as compared to the Macintosh group, and the difference was statistically significant (P = 0.04). CONCLUSION: The channeled blade of KVVL had a higher first-pass success rate and required fewer attempts to intubate when used in patients with anticipated difficult intubation. Further, the KVVL was found to be significantly better than the Macintosh laryngoscope in terms of Cormack–Lehane grading, but the time taken to intubate the trachea was more in the KVVL group. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9813986 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Wolters Kluwer - Medknow |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-98139862023-01-06 First-pass Success Rate and Number of Attempts Required for Intubation in Anticipated Difficult Airway: Comparison between Macintosh and Channeled King Vision Video Laryngoscopes Raja, Rameez Gupta, Sunana Mehta, Nandita Attal, Prerna Anesth Essays Res Original Article BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Video laryngoscopy has been shown to improvise Cormack–Lehane grading and rate of successful tracheal intubation and is now incorporated in most of the difficult airway guidelines. Since there is scarce literature regarding the use of channeled blade of King Vision video laryngoscope (KVVL) in anticipated difficult intubation, we planned to undertake this randomized control trial to assess the performance of channeled blade of KVVL and Macintosh laryngoscope in patients with anticipated difficult intubation. DESIGN AND SETTING: This prospective randomized study was conducted in a tertiary care hospital. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients fulfilling the inclusion criteria were randomly assigned equally to the KVVL group or Macintosh group. The primary outcome of the study was intubation success in the first attempt and number of attempts required for intubation, and the secondary outcomes were Cormack–Lehane grading and time required to intubate in both the groups. RESULTS: The first-pass success of intubation was 88.6% in the KVVL group and 76.5% in the Macintosh group (P = 0.035). The second attempt of intubation was required in 11.4% and 20.6% of patients in the KVVL and Macintosh groups, respectively. Cormack Lehane Grade I was achieved in 100% of patients of the KVVL group as compared to 29.4% of patients in the Macintosh group. Moreover, the difference was statistically significant (P = 0.035). The mean duration of intubation was prolonged in the KVVL group as compared to the Macintosh group, and the difference was statistically significant (P = 0.04). CONCLUSION: The channeled blade of KVVL had a higher first-pass success rate and required fewer attempts to intubate when used in patients with anticipated difficult intubation. Further, the KVVL was found to be significantly better than the Macintosh laryngoscope in terms of Cormack–Lehane grading, but the time taken to intubate the trachea was more in the KVVL group. Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2022 2022-10-31 /pmc/articles/PMC9813986/ /pubmed/36620107 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/aer.aer_68_22 Text en Copyright: © 2022 Anesthesia: Essays and Researches https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Raja, Rameez Gupta, Sunana Mehta, Nandita Attal, Prerna First-pass Success Rate and Number of Attempts Required for Intubation in Anticipated Difficult Airway: Comparison between Macintosh and Channeled King Vision Video Laryngoscopes |
title | First-pass Success Rate and Number of Attempts Required for Intubation in Anticipated Difficult Airway: Comparison between Macintosh and Channeled King Vision Video Laryngoscopes |
title_full | First-pass Success Rate and Number of Attempts Required for Intubation in Anticipated Difficult Airway: Comparison between Macintosh and Channeled King Vision Video Laryngoscopes |
title_fullStr | First-pass Success Rate and Number of Attempts Required for Intubation in Anticipated Difficult Airway: Comparison between Macintosh and Channeled King Vision Video Laryngoscopes |
title_full_unstemmed | First-pass Success Rate and Number of Attempts Required for Intubation in Anticipated Difficult Airway: Comparison between Macintosh and Channeled King Vision Video Laryngoscopes |
title_short | First-pass Success Rate and Number of Attempts Required for Intubation in Anticipated Difficult Airway: Comparison between Macintosh and Channeled King Vision Video Laryngoscopes |
title_sort | first-pass success rate and number of attempts required for intubation in anticipated difficult airway: comparison between macintosh and channeled king vision video laryngoscopes |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9813986/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36620107 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/aer.aer_68_22 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT rajarameez firstpasssuccessrateandnumberofattemptsrequiredforintubationinanticipateddifficultairwaycomparisonbetweenmacintoshandchanneledkingvisionvideolaryngoscopes AT guptasunana firstpasssuccessrateandnumberofattemptsrequiredforintubationinanticipateddifficultairwaycomparisonbetweenmacintoshandchanneledkingvisionvideolaryngoscopes AT mehtanandita firstpasssuccessrateandnumberofattemptsrequiredforintubationinanticipateddifficultairwaycomparisonbetweenmacintoshandchanneledkingvisionvideolaryngoscopes AT attalprerna firstpasssuccessrateandnumberofattemptsrequiredforintubationinanticipateddifficultairwaycomparisonbetweenmacintoshandchanneledkingvisionvideolaryngoscopes |