Cargando…

Central hepatectomy versus major hepatectomy for patients with centrally located hepatocellular carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND AND AIM: For those with a centrally located HCC, the two types of liver sectionectomy that can be performed are extended hepatectomy (EH) and central hepatectomy (CH). This meta-analysis aimed to compare the short- and long-term outcomes between patients treated with CH and patients treat...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gadallah, Edward Atef, Elkomos, Beshoy Effat, Khalil, Ahmed, fawzy, Fawzy Salah, Abdelaal, Amr
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9814185/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36600282
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12893-022-01891-7
_version_ 1784864078798258176
author Gadallah, Edward Atef
Elkomos, Beshoy Effat
Khalil, Ahmed
fawzy, Fawzy Salah
Abdelaal, Amr
author_facet Gadallah, Edward Atef
Elkomos, Beshoy Effat
Khalil, Ahmed
fawzy, Fawzy Salah
Abdelaal, Amr
author_sort Gadallah, Edward Atef
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND AND AIM: For those with a centrally located HCC, the two types of liver sectionectomy that can be performed are extended hepatectomy (EH) and central hepatectomy (CH). This meta-analysis aimed to compare the short- and long-term outcomes between patients treated with CH and patients treated with EH for those with centrally located HCC. METHOD: We searched PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Cochrane library for eligible studies from inception to 1 April 2022 and a systematic review and meta-analysis were done to compare the outcomes between the two groups. RESULTS: we included 9 studies with a total of 1674 patients in this study. The pooled results in this meta-analysis showed equal long-term overall survival, Disease-free survival, recurrence and mortality between the two groups (5-year OS, RR = 1.14, 95% CI = 0.96–1.35, P = 0.12; I(2) = 56%), (5-year DFS, RR = 0.81, 95% CI = 0.61–1.08, P = 0.15; I(2) = 60%), (Recurrence, RR = 1.04, 95% CI = 0.94–1.15, P = 0.45; I(2) = 27%), and (Mortality, RR = 0.55, 95% CI = 0.26–1.15, P = 0.11; I(2) = 0%). In addition to that, no significant difference could be detected in the overall incidence of complications between the two groups (Complications, RR = 0.94, 95% CI = 0.76–1.16, P = 0.57; I(2) = 0%). However, CH is associated with a remarkable increase in the rate of biliary fistula (Biliary fistula, RR = 1.90, 95% CI = 1.07–3.40, P = 0.03; I(2) = 0%). And Liver cell failure was higher in the case of EH (LCF, RR = 0.47, 95% CI = 0.30–0.76, P = 0.002; I(2) = 0%). Regarding the operative details, CH is associated with longer operative time (Time of the operation, Mean difference = 0.82, 95% CI = 0.36, 1.27, P = 0.0004; I(2) = 57%). CONCLUSION: No significant difference in the short and long-term survival and recurrence between CH and MH for CL-HCC. However, CH is associated with greater future remnant liver volume that decreases the incidence of LCF and provides more opportunities for a repeat hepatectomy after tumour recurrence. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12893-022-01891-7.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9814185
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-98141852023-01-06 Central hepatectomy versus major hepatectomy for patients with centrally located hepatocellular carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis Gadallah, Edward Atef Elkomos, Beshoy Effat Khalil, Ahmed fawzy, Fawzy Salah Abdelaal, Amr BMC Surg Research BACKGROUND AND AIM: For those with a centrally located HCC, the two types of liver sectionectomy that can be performed are extended hepatectomy (EH) and central hepatectomy (CH). This meta-analysis aimed to compare the short- and long-term outcomes between patients treated with CH and patients treated with EH for those with centrally located HCC. METHOD: We searched PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Cochrane library for eligible studies from inception to 1 April 2022 and a systematic review and meta-analysis were done to compare the outcomes between the two groups. RESULTS: we included 9 studies with a total of 1674 patients in this study. The pooled results in this meta-analysis showed equal long-term overall survival, Disease-free survival, recurrence and mortality between the two groups (5-year OS, RR = 1.14, 95% CI = 0.96–1.35, P = 0.12; I(2) = 56%), (5-year DFS, RR = 0.81, 95% CI = 0.61–1.08, P = 0.15; I(2) = 60%), (Recurrence, RR = 1.04, 95% CI = 0.94–1.15, P = 0.45; I(2) = 27%), and (Mortality, RR = 0.55, 95% CI = 0.26–1.15, P = 0.11; I(2) = 0%). In addition to that, no significant difference could be detected in the overall incidence of complications between the two groups (Complications, RR = 0.94, 95% CI = 0.76–1.16, P = 0.57; I(2) = 0%). However, CH is associated with a remarkable increase in the rate of biliary fistula (Biliary fistula, RR = 1.90, 95% CI = 1.07–3.40, P = 0.03; I(2) = 0%). And Liver cell failure was higher in the case of EH (LCF, RR = 0.47, 95% CI = 0.30–0.76, P = 0.002; I(2) = 0%). Regarding the operative details, CH is associated with longer operative time (Time of the operation, Mean difference = 0.82, 95% CI = 0.36, 1.27, P = 0.0004; I(2) = 57%). CONCLUSION: No significant difference in the short and long-term survival and recurrence between CH and MH for CL-HCC. However, CH is associated with greater future remnant liver volume that decreases the incidence of LCF and provides more opportunities for a repeat hepatectomy after tumour recurrence. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12893-022-01891-7. BioMed Central 2023-01-05 /pmc/articles/PMC9814185/ /pubmed/36600282 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12893-022-01891-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Gadallah, Edward Atef
Elkomos, Beshoy Effat
Khalil, Ahmed
fawzy, Fawzy Salah
Abdelaal, Amr
Central hepatectomy versus major hepatectomy for patients with centrally located hepatocellular carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title Central hepatectomy versus major hepatectomy for patients with centrally located hepatocellular carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full Central hepatectomy versus major hepatectomy for patients with centrally located hepatocellular carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_fullStr Central hepatectomy versus major hepatectomy for patients with centrally located hepatocellular carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Central hepatectomy versus major hepatectomy for patients with centrally located hepatocellular carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_short Central hepatectomy versus major hepatectomy for patients with centrally located hepatocellular carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_sort central hepatectomy versus major hepatectomy for patients with centrally located hepatocellular carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9814185/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36600282
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12893-022-01891-7
work_keys_str_mv AT gadallahedwardatef centralhepatectomyversusmajorhepatectomyforpatientswithcentrallylocatedhepatocellularcarcinomaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT elkomosbeshoyeffat centralhepatectomyversusmajorhepatectomyforpatientswithcentrallylocatedhepatocellularcarcinomaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT khalilahmed centralhepatectomyversusmajorhepatectomyforpatientswithcentrallylocatedhepatocellularcarcinomaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT fawzyfawzysalah centralhepatectomyversusmajorhepatectomyforpatientswithcentrallylocatedhepatocellularcarcinomaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT abdelaalamr centralhepatectomyversusmajorhepatectomyforpatientswithcentrallylocatedhepatocellularcarcinomaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis