Cargando…
Key design elements of successful acute ischemic stroke treatment trials
PURPOSE: We review key design elements of positive randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in acute ischemic stroke (AIS) treatment and summarize their main characteristics. METHOD: We searched Medline, Pubmed and Cochrane databases for positive RCTs in AIS treatment. Trials were included if (1) they ha...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9814432/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36600257 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s42466-022-00221-9 |
_version_ | 1784864132156096512 |
---|---|
author | Yperzeele, L. Shoamanesh, A. Venugopalan, Y. V. Chapman, S. Mazya, M. V. Charalambous, M. Caso, V. Hacke, W. Bath, P. M. Koltsov, I. |
author_facet | Yperzeele, L. Shoamanesh, A. Venugopalan, Y. V. Chapman, S. Mazya, M. V. Charalambous, M. Caso, V. Hacke, W. Bath, P. M. Koltsov, I. |
author_sort | Yperzeele, L. |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: We review key design elements of positive randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in acute ischemic stroke (AIS) treatment and summarize their main characteristics. METHOD: We searched Medline, Pubmed and Cochrane databases for positive RCTs in AIS treatment. Trials were included if (1) they had a randomized controlled design, with (at least partial) blinding for endpoints, (2) they tested against placebo (or on top of standard therapy in a superiority design) or against approved therapy; (3) the protocol was registered and/or published before trial termination and unblinding (if required at study commencement); (4) the primary endpoint was positive in the intention to treat analysis; and (5) the study findings led to approval of the investigational product and/or high ranked recommendations. A topical approach was used, therefore the findings were summarized as a narrative review. FINDINGS: Seventeen positive RCTs met the inclusion criteria. The majority of trials included less than 1000 patients (n = 15), had highly selective inclusion criteria (n = 16), used the modified Rankin score as a primary endpoint (n = 15) and had a frequentist design (n = 16). Trials tended to be national (n = 12), investigator-initiated and performed with public funding (n = 11). DISCUSSION: Smaller but selective trials are useful to identify efficacy in a particular subgroup of stroke patients. It may also be of advantage to limit the number of participating countries and centers to avoid heterogeneity in stroke management and bureaucratic burden. CONCLUSION: The key characteristics of positive RCTs in AIS treatment described here may assist in the design of further trials investigating a single intervention with a potentially high effect size. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9814432 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-98144322023-01-06 Key design elements of successful acute ischemic stroke treatment trials Yperzeele, L. Shoamanesh, A. Venugopalan, Y. V. Chapman, S. Mazya, M. V. Charalambous, M. Caso, V. Hacke, W. Bath, P. M. Koltsov, I. Neurol Res Pract Review PURPOSE: We review key design elements of positive randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in acute ischemic stroke (AIS) treatment and summarize their main characteristics. METHOD: We searched Medline, Pubmed and Cochrane databases for positive RCTs in AIS treatment. Trials were included if (1) they had a randomized controlled design, with (at least partial) blinding for endpoints, (2) they tested against placebo (or on top of standard therapy in a superiority design) or against approved therapy; (3) the protocol was registered and/or published before trial termination and unblinding (if required at study commencement); (4) the primary endpoint was positive in the intention to treat analysis; and (5) the study findings led to approval of the investigational product and/or high ranked recommendations. A topical approach was used, therefore the findings were summarized as a narrative review. FINDINGS: Seventeen positive RCTs met the inclusion criteria. The majority of trials included less than 1000 patients (n = 15), had highly selective inclusion criteria (n = 16), used the modified Rankin score as a primary endpoint (n = 15) and had a frequentist design (n = 16). Trials tended to be national (n = 12), investigator-initiated and performed with public funding (n = 11). DISCUSSION: Smaller but selective trials are useful to identify efficacy in a particular subgroup of stroke patients. It may also be of advantage to limit the number of participating countries and centers to avoid heterogeneity in stroke management and bureaucratic burden. CONCLUSION: The key characteristics of positive RCTs in AIS treatment described here may assist in the design of further trials investigating a single intervention with a potentially high effect size. BioMed Central 2023-01-05 /pmc/articles/PMC9814432/ /pubmed/36600257 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s42466-022-00221-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Review Yperzeele, L. Shoamanesh, A. Venugopalan, Y. V. Chapman, S. Mazya, M. V. Charalambous, M. Caso, V. Hacke, W. Bath, P. M. Koltsov, I. Key design elements of successful acute ischemic stroke treatment trials |
title | Key design elements of successful acute ischemic stroke treatment trials |
title_full | Key design elements of successful acute ischemic stroke treatment trials |
title_fullStr | Key design elements of successful acute ischemic stroke treatment trials |
title_full_unstemmed | Key design elements of successful acute ischemic stroke treatment trials |
title_short | Key design elements of successful acute ischemic stroke treatment trials |
title_sort | key design elements of successful acute ischemic stroke treatment trials |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9814432/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36600257 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s42466-022-00221-9 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT yperzeelel keydesignelementsofsuccessfulacuteischemicstroketreatmenttrials AT shoamanesha keydesignelementsofsuccessfulacuteischemicstroketreatmenttrials AT venugopalanyv keydesignelementsofsuccessfulacuteischemicstroketreatmenttrials AT chapmans keydesignelementsofsuccessfulacuteischemicstroketreatmenttrials AT mazyamv keydesignelementsofsuccessfulacuteischemicstroketreatmenttrials AT charalambousm keydesignelementsofsuccessfulacuteischemicstroketreatmenttrials AT casov keydesignelementsofsuccessfulacuteischemicstroketreatmenttrials AT hackew keydesignelementsofsuccessfulacuteischemicstroketreatmenttrials AT bathpm keydesignelementsofsuccessfulacuteischemicstroketreatmenttrials AT koltsovi keydesignelementsofsuccessfulacuteischemicstroketreatmenttrials |