Cargando…

Genetic load in incomplete lupus erythematosus

OBJECTIVE: Patients with incomplete lupus erythematosus (ILE) have lupus features but insufficient criteria for SLE classification. Some patients with ILE transition to SLE, but most avoid major organ involvement. This study tested whether the milder disease course in ILE is influenced by reduced SL...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Slief, Matt, Kheir, Joseph M, Smith, Miles, Mowery, Colin, Macwana, Susan, DeJager, Wade, Wagner, Catriona A, Aberle, Teresa, James, Judith A, Guthridge, Joel M
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9815005/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36599633
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/lupus-2022-000843
_version_ 1784864260292083712
author Slief, Matt
Kheir, Joseph M
Smith, Miles
Mowery, Colin
Macwana, Susan
DeJager, Wade
Wagner, Catriona A
Aberle, Teresa
James, Judith A
Guthridge, Joel M
author_facet Slief, Matt
Kheir, Joseph M
Smith, Miles
Mowery, Colin
Macwana, Susan
DeJager, Wade
Wagner, Catriona A
Aberle, Teresa
James, Judith A
Guthridge, Joel M
author_sort Slief, Matt
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: Patients with incomplete lupus erythematosus (ILE) have lupus features but insufficient criteria for SLE classification. Some patients with ILE transition to SLE, but most avoid major organ involvement. This study tested whether the milder disease course in ILE is influenced by reduced SLE risk allele genetic load. METHODS: We calculated the genetic load based on 99 SLE-associated risk alleles in European American patients with SLE (≥4 American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 1997 criteria, n=170), patients with ILE (3 ACR 1997 criteria, n=169), a subset of patients with ILE not meeting Systemic Lupus International Collaborating Clinics (SLICC) classification (ILE(SLICC), n=119) and healthy controls (n=133). Unweighted genetic loads were calculated as the total sum of risk alleles for each individual, while weighted genetic loads were defined as the sum of risk alleles multiplied by the natural logarithm of the previously published OR of each risk allele for SLE susceptibility. RESULTS: The median unweighted and weighted SLE risk allele genetic load was significantly greater in patients with ILE (unweighted: 81, p value=0.01; weighted: 16.3, p value=0.001) and patients with SLE (80, p value=0.02; 16.29, p value=0.0006) compared with healthy controls (78, 15.76). Patients with ILE(SLICC) trended towards an increased genetic load, although not statistically significant (unweighted: 80, p value=0.14; weighted: 16.05, p value=0.07). However, the median genetic load did not significantly differ between ILE and SLE, and genetic load did not differentiate patients with ILE and SLE (area under the curve=0.51, p=0.78) by receiver operator characteristic analysis. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with ILE and SLE have comparable genetic loads of SLE risk loci, suggesting similar genetic predispositions between these conditions. Phenotypical differences between SLE and ILE may instead be influenced by ILE-specific variants and gene–environment interactions.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9815005
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-98150052023-01-06 Genetic load in incomplete lupus erythematosus Slief, Matt Kheir, Joseph M Smith, Miles Mowery, Colin Macwana, Susan DeJager, Wade Wagner, Catriona A Aberle, Teresa James, Judith A Guthridge, Joel M Lupus Sci Med Brief Communication OBJECTIVE: Patients with incomplete lupus erythematosus (ILE) have lupus features but insufficient criteria for SLE classification. Some patients with ILE transition to SLE, but most avoid major organ involvement. This study tested whether the milder disease course in ILE is influenced by reduced SLE risk allele genetic load. METHODS: We calculated the genetic load based on 99 SLE-associated risk alleles in European American patients with SLE (≥4 American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 1997 criteria, n=170), patients with ILE (3 ACR 1997 criteria, n=169), a subset of patients with ILE not meeting Systemic Lupus International Collaborating Clinics (SLICC) classification (ILE(SLICC), n=119) and healthy controls (n=133). Unweighted genetic loads were calculated as the total sum of risk alleles for each individual, while weighted genetic loads were defined as the sum of risk alleles multiplied by the natural logarithm of the previously published OR of each risk allele for SLE susceptibility. RESULTS: The median unweighted and weighted SLE risk allele genetic load was significantly greater in patients with ILE (unweighted: 81, p value=0.01; weighted: 16.3, p value=0.001) and patients with SLE (80, p value=0.02; 16.29, p value=0.0006) compared with healthy controls (78, 15.76). Patients with ILE(SLICC) trended towards an increased genetic load, although not statistically significant (unweighted: 80, p value=0.14; weighted: 16.05, p value=0.07). However, the median genetic load did not significantly differ between ILE and SLE, and genetic load did not differentiate patients with ILE and SLE (area under the curve=0.51, p=0.78) by receiver operator characteristic analysis. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with ILE and SLE have comparable genetic loads of SLE risk loci, suggesting similar genetic predispositions between these conditions. Phenotypical differences between SLE and ILE may instead be influenced by ILE-specific variants and gene–environment interactions. BMJ Publishing Group 2023-01-04 /pmc/articles/PMC9815005/ /pubmed/36599633 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/lupus-2022-000843 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2023. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Brief Communication
Slief, Matt
Kheir, Joseph M
Smith, Miles
Mowery, Colin
Macwana, Susan
DeJager, Wade
Wagner, Catriona A
Aberle, Teresa
James, Judith A
Guthridge, Joel M
Genetic load in incomplete lupus erythematosus
title Genetic load in incomplete lupus erythematosus
title_full Genetic load in incomplete lupus erythematosus
title_fullStr Genetic load in incomplete lupus erythematosus
title_full_unstemmed Genetic load in incomplete lupus erythematosus
title_short Genetic load in incomplete lupus erythematosus
title_sort genetic load in incomplete lupus erythematosus
topic Brief Communication
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9815005/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36599633
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/lupus-2022-000843
work_keys_str_mv AT sliefmatt geneticloadinincompletelupuserythematosus
AT kheirjosephm geneticloadinincompletelupuserythematosus
AT smithmiles geneticloadinincompletelupuserythematosus
AT mowerycolin geneticloadinincompletelupuserythematosus
AT macwanasusan geneticloadinincompletelupuserythematosus
AT dejagerwade geneticloadinincompletelupuserythematosus
AT wagnercatrionaa geneticloadinincompletelupuserythematosus
AT aberleteresa geneticloadinincompletelupuserythematosus
AT jamesjuditha geneticloadinincompletelupuserythematosus
AT guthridgejoelm geneticloadinincompletelupuserythematosus