Cargando…

Targeting Predialysis Glucose up to 180 mg/dl Reduces Glycemic Variability in End Stage Diabetic Nephropathy

CONTEXT: Glycemic variability plays a major role in the development as well as the progression of cardiovascular disease in diabetes. AIMS: We compared the mean plasma glucose and glycemic variability (GV) parameters on and off hemodialysis (HD) in patients with End-Stage Diabetic Nephropathy (ESDN)...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Shah, Nikita, Gada, Jugal V., Billa, Vishwanath S., Kothari, Jatin Piyush, Bichu, Shrirang D., Usulumarty, Deepa H., Khaire, Suhas S., Varthakavi, Premlata K., Bhagwat, Nikhil M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9815189/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36618515
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ijem.ijem_157_22
Descripción
Sumario:CONTEXT: Glycemic variability plays a major role in the development as well as the progression of cardiovascular disease in diabetes. AIMS: We compared the mean plasma glucose and glycemic variability (GV) parameters on and off hemodialysis (HD) in patients with End-Stage Diabetic Nephropathy (ESDN) and End-Stage Renal Disease (ESRD). SETTINGS AND DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. METHODS AND MATERIAL: We included 23 ESDN and 6 ESRD patients who underwent continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) (iPro2) for 6 days and a glucose-free dialysate for 4 hours thrice weekly. EasyGV software was used to calculate the variability parameters {mean glucose, Time in range (TIR), Time above and below range (TAR/TBR), CV (Coefficient of Variation) and MAGE}. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS USED: The quantitative data variables were expressed by using mean and SD. Unpaired t-test was used to compare the two groups. P value <0.05 was considered significant. RESULTS: In the ESDN group, TIR was significantly lower whereas TAR and TBR were significantly higher on HD day. MAGE (101.88 ± 40.5 v/s 89.46 ± 30.0, P < 0.007) and CV (29.41% v/s 21.67%) were higher on HD day. Subjects with pre-HD glucose values ≥180 mg/dl (Group B, n = 24) had a rapid drop with a delayed higher rise in glucose values than those with pre-HD glucose values <180 mg/dl (Group A, n = 27). Ten patients had 13 episodes of hypoglycemia. The CGM parameters were not different in the ESRD group. CONCLUSIONS: Targeting a pre- HD glucose value <180 mg/dl could be a good strategy to prevent larger fluctuation during and post HD.