Cargando…

Removing ocular artifacts from magnetoencephalographic data on naturalistic reading of continuous texts

Naturalistic reading paradigms and stimuli consisting of long continuous texts are essential for characterizing the cortical basis of reading. Due to the highly dynamic nature of the reading process, electrophysiological brain imaging methods with high spatial and temporal resolution, such as magnet...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mäkelä, Sasu, Kujala, Jan, Salmelin, Riitta
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9815455/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36620454
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2022.974162
_version_ 1784864323066134528
author Mäkelä, Sasu
Kujala, Jan
Salmelin, Riitta
author_facet Mäkelä, Sasu
Kujala, Jan
Salmelin, Riitta
author_sort Mäkelä, Sasu
collection PubMed
description Naturalistic reading paradigms and stimuli consisting of long continuous texts are essential for characterizing the cortical basis of reading. Due to the highly dynamic nature of the reading process, electrophysiological brain imaging methods with high spatial and temporal resolution, such as magnetoencephalography (MEG), are ideal for tracking them. However, as electrophysiological recordings are sensitive to electromagnetic artifacts, data recorded during naturalistic reading is confounded by ocular artifacts. In this study, we evaluate two different pipelines for removing ocular artifacts from MEG data collected during continuous, naturalistic reading, with the focus on saccades and blinks. Both pipeline alternatives are based on blind source separation methods but differ fundamentally in their approach. The first alternative is a multi-part process, in which saccades are first extracted by applying Second-Order Blind Identification (SOBI) and, subsequently, FastICA is used to extract blinks. The other alternative uses a single powerful method, Adaptive Mixture ICA (AMICA), to remove all artifact types at once. The pipelines were tested, and their effects compared on MEG data recorded from 13 subjects in a naturalistic reading task where the subjects read texts with the length of multiple pages. Both pipelines performed well, extracting the artifacts in a single component per artifact type in most subjects. Signal power was reduced across the whole cortex in all studied frequency bands from 1 to 90 Hz, but especially in the frontal cortex and temporal pole. The results were largely similar for the two pipelines, with the exception that SOBI-FastICA reduced signal in the right frontal cortex in all studied frequency bands more than AMICA. However, there was considerable interindividual variation in the effects of the pipelines. As a holistic conclusion, we choose to recommend AMICA for removing artifacts from MEG data on naturalistic reading but note that the SOBI-FastICA pipeline has also various favorable characteristics.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9815455
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-98154552023-01-06 Removing ocular artifacts from magnetoencephalographic data on naturalistic reading of continuous texts Mäkelä, Sasu Kujala, Jan Salmelin, Riitta Front Neurosci Neuroscience Naturalistic reading paradigms and stimuli consisting of long continuous texts are essential for characterizing the cortical basis of reading. Due to the highly dynamic nature of the reading process, electrophysiological brain imaging methods with high spatial and temporal resolution, such as magnetoencephalography (MEG), are ideal for tracking them. However, as electrophysiological recordings are sensitive to electromagnetic artifacts, data recorded during naturalistic reading is confounded by ocular artifacts. In this study, we evaluate two different pipelines for removing ocular artifacts from MEG data collected during continuous, naturalistic reading, with the focus on saccades and blinks. Both pipeline alternatives are based on blind source separation methods but differ fundamentally in their approach. The first alternative is a multi-part process, in which saccades are first extracted by applying Second-Order Blind Identification (SOBI) and, subsequently, FastICA is used to extract blinks. The other alternative uses a single powerful method, Adaptive Mixture ICA (AMICA), to remove all artifact types at once. The pipelines were tested, and their effects compared on MEG data recorded from 13 subjects in a naturalistic reading task where the subjects read texts with the length of multiple pages. Both pipelines performed well, extracting the artifacts in a single component per artifact type in most subjects. Signal power was reduced across the whole cortex in all studied frequency bands from 1 to 90 Hz, but especially in the frontal cortex and temporal pole. The results were largely similar for the two pipelines, with the exception that SOBI-FastICA reduced signal in the right frontal cortex in all studied frequency bands more than AMICA. However, there was considerable interindividual variation in the effects of the pipelines. As a holistic conclusion, we choose to recommend AMICA for removing artifacts from MEG data on naturalistic reading but note that the SOBI-FastICA pipeline has also various favorable characteristics. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-12-22 /pmc/articles/PMC9815455/ /pubmed/36620454 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2022.974162 Text en Copyright © 2022 Mäkelä, Kujala and Salmelin. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Neuroscience
Mäkelä, Sasu
Kujala, Jan
Salmelin, Riitta
Removing ocular artifacts from magnetoencephalographic data on naturalistic reading of continuous texts
title Removing ocular artifacts from magnetoencephalographic data on naturalistic reading of continuous texts
title_full Removing ocular artifacts from magnetoencephalographic data on naturalistic reading of continuous texts
title_fullStr Removing ocular artifacts from magnetoencephalographic data on naturalistic reading of continuous texts
title_full_unstemmed Removing ocular artifacts from magnetoencephalographic data on naturalistic reading of continuous texts
title_short Removing ocular artifacts from magnetoencephalographic data on naturalistic reading of continuous texts
title_sort removing ocular artifacts from magnetoencephalographic data on naturalistic reading of continuous texts
topic Neuroscience
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9815455/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36620454
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2022.974162
work_keys_str_mv AT makelasasu removingocularartifactsfrommagnetoencephalographicdataonnaturalisticreadingofcontinuoustexts
AT kujalajan removingocularartifactsfrommagnetoencephalographicdataonnaturalisticreadingofcontinuoustexts
AT salmelinriitta removingocularartifactsfrommagnetoencephalographicdataonnaturalisticreadingofcontinuoustexts