Cargando…

Current treatment strategies for primary upper extremity deep venous thrombosis; a retrospective observational multicenter case series

INTRODUCTION: Current treatment strategies for primary upper extremity deep venous thrombosis (pUEDVT) range from conservative treatment with anticoagulation therapy to invasive treatment with thoracic outlet decompression surgery (TOD), frequently combined with catheter directed thrombolysis, percu...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: de Kleijn, R. J. C. M. F., Schropp, L., Westerink, J., Nijkeuter, M., van Laanen, J., Teijink, J., Ünlu, C., Vos, A. W. F., van Hattum, E. S., Petri, B. J., de Borst, G. J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9815523/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36620382
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fsurg.2022.1080584
_version_ 1784864336875880448
author de Kleijn, R. J. C. M. F.
Schropp, L.
Westerink, J.
Nijkeuter, M.
van Laanen, J.
Teijink, J.
Ünlu, C.
Vos, A. W. F.
van Hattum, E. S.
Petri, B. J.
de Borst, G. J.
author_facet de Kleijn, R. J. C. M. F.
Schropp, L.
Westerink, J.
Nijkeuter, M.
van Laanen, J.
Teijink, J.
Ünlu, C.
Vos, A. W. F.
van Hattum, E. S.
Petri, B. J.
de Borst, G. J.
author_sort de Kleijn, R. J. C. M. F.
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Current treatment strategies for primary upper extremity deep venous thrombosis (pUEDVT) range from conservative treatment with anticoagulation therapy to invasive treatment with thoracic outlet decompression surgery (TOD), frequently combined with catheter directed thrombolysis, percutaneous transluminal angioplasty, or stenting. Due to a lack of large prospective series with uniform data collection or a randomized trial, the optimal treatment strategy is still under debate. We conducted a multicenter observational study to assess the efficacy and safety of both the conservative and invasive treatment strategies for patients with pUEDVT. METHODS: We retrospectively collected data from patients treated in five vascular referral and teaching hospitals in the Netherlands between 2008 and 2019. Patients were divided into a conservative (Group 1), an invasive treatment group (Group 2) and a cross-over group (Group 3) of patients who received surgical treatment after initial conservative therapy. Follow-up consisted of outpatient clinic visits and an electronic survey. Primary outcome was symptom free survival defined as absence of any symptom of the affected arm reported at last follow-up regardless of severity, or extent of functional disability. Secondary outcomes were incidence of bleeding complications, recurrent venous thromboembolism, surgical complications, and reinterventions. RESULTS: A total of 115 patients were included (group 1 (N = 45), group 2 (N = 53) or group 3 (N = 27). The symptom free survival was 35.6%, 54.7% and 48.1% after a median follow-up of 36, 26 and 22 months in groups 1, 2 and 3 respectively. Incidence of bleeding complications was 8.6%, 3.8% and 18.5% and recurrent thrombosis occurred in 15.6%, 13.2% and 14.8% in groups 1–3 respectively. CONCLUSION: In this multicenter retrospective observational cohort analysis the conservative and direct invasive treatments for pUEDVT were deemed safe with low percentages of bleeding complications. Symptom free survival was highest in the direct surgical treatment group but still modest in all subgroups. Perioperative complications were infrequent with no related long term morbidity. Of relevance, pUEDVT patients with confirmed VTOS and recurrent symptoms after conservative treatment may still benefit from TOD surgery. However, symptom free survival of this delayed TOD seems lower than direct surgical treatment and bleeding complications seem to occur more frequently.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9815523
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-98155232023-01-06 Current treatment strategies for primary upper extremity deep venous thrombosis; a retrospective observational multicenter case series de Kleijn, R. J. C. M. F. Schropp, L. Westerink, J. Nijkeuter, M. van Laanen, J. Teijink, J. Ünlu, C. Vos, A. W. F. van Hattum, E. S. Petri, B. J. de Borst, G. J. Front Surg Surgery INTRODUCTION: Current treatment strategies for primary upper extremity deep venous thrombosis (pUEDVT) range from conservative treatment with anticoagulation therapy to invasive treatment with thoracic outlet decompression surgery (TOD), frequently combined with catheter directed thrombolysis, percutaneous transluminal angioplasty, or stenting. Due to a lack of large prospective series with uniform data collection or a randomized trial, the optimal treatment strategy is still under debate. We conducted a multicenter observational study to assess the efficacy and safety of both the conservative and invasive treatment strategies for patients with pUEDVT. METHODS: We retrospectively collected data from patients treated in five vascular referral and teaching hospitals in the Netherlands between 2008 and 2019. Patients were divided into a conservative (Group 1), an invasive treatment group (Group 2) and a cross-over group (Group 3) of patients who received surgical treatment after initial conservative therapy. Follow-up consisted of outpatient clinic visits and an electronic survey. Primary outcome was symptom free survival defined as absence of any symptom of the affected arm reported at last follow-up regardless of severity, or extent of functional disability. Secondary outcomes were incidence of bleeding complications, recurrent venous thromboembolism, surgical complications, and reinterventions. RESULTS: A total of 115 patients were included (group 1 (N = 45), group 2 (N = 53) or group 3 (N = 27). The symptom free survival was 35.6%, 54.7% and 48.1% after a median follow-up of 36, 26 and 22 months in groups 1, 2 and 3 respectively. Incidence of bleeding complications was 8.6%, 3.8% and 18.5% and recurrent thrombosis occurred in 15.6%, 13.2% and 14.8% in groups 1–3 respectively. CONCLUSION: In this multicenter retrospective observational cohort analysis the conservative and direct invasive treatments for pUEDVT were deemed safe with low percentages of bleeding complications. Symptom free survival was highest in the direct surgical treatment group but still modest in all subgroups. Perioperative complications were infrequent with no related long term morbidity. Of relevance, pUEDVT patients with confirmed VTOS and recurrent symptoms after conservative treatment may still benefit from TOD surgery. However, symptom free survival of this delayed TOD seems lower than direct surgical treatment and bleeding complications seem to occur more frequently. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-12-22 /pmc/articles/PMC9815523/ /pubmed/36620382 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fsurg.2022.1080584 Text en © 2022 de Kleijn, Schropp, Westerink, Nijkeuter, van Laanen, Teijink, Vos, Ünlü, Van Hattum, Petri and De Borst. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Surgery
de Kleijn, R. J. C. M. F.
Schropp, L.
Westerink, J.
Nijkeuter, M.
van Laanen, J.
Teijink, J.
Ünlu, C.
Vos, A. W. F.
van Hattum, E. S.
Petri, B. J.
de Borst, G. J.
Current treatment strategies for primary upper extremity deep venous thrombosis; a retrospective observational multicenter case series
title Current treatment strategies for primary upper extremity deep venous thrombosis; a retrospective observational multicenter case series
title_full Current treatment strategies for primary upper extremity deep venous thrombosis; a retrospective observational multicenter case series
title_fullStr Current treatment strategies for primary upper extremity deep venous thrombosis; a retrospective observational multicenter case series
title_full_unstemmed Current treatment strategies for primary upper extremity deep venous thrombosis; a retrospective observational multicenter case series
title_short Current treatment strategies for primary upper extremity deep venous thrombosis; a retrospective observational multicenter case series
title_sort current treatment strategies for primary upper extremity deep venous thrombosis; a retrospective observational multicenter case series
topic Surgery
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9815523/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36620382
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fsurg.2022.1080584
work_keys_str_mv AT dekleijnrjcmf currenttreatmentstrategiesforprimaryupperextremitydeepvenousthrombosisaretrospectiveobservationalmulticentercaseseries
AT schroppl currenttreatmentstrategiesforprimaryupperextremitydeepvenousthrombosisaretrospectiveobservationalmulticentercaseseries
AT westerinkj currenttreatmentstrategiesforprimaryupperextremitydeepvenousthrombosisaretrospectiveobservationalmulticentercaseseries
AT nijkeuterm currenttreatmentstrategiesforprimaryupperextremitydeepvenousthrombosisaretrospectiveobservationalmulticentercaseseries
AT vanlaanenj currenttreatmentstrategiesforprimaryupperextremitydeepvenousthrombosisaretrospectiveobservationalmulticentercaseseries
AT teijinkj currenttreatmentstrategiesforprimaryupperextremitydeepvenousthrombosisaretrospectiveobservationalmulticentercaseseries
AT unluc currenttreatmentstrategiesforprimaryupperextremitydeepvenousthrombosisaretrospectiveobservationalmulticentercaseseries
AT vosawf currenttreatmentstrategiesforprimaryupperextremitydeepvenousthrombosisaretrospectiveobservationalmulticentercaseseries
AT vanhattumes currenttreatmentstrategiesforprimaryupperextremitydeepvenousthrombosisaretrospectiveobservationalmulticentercaseseries
AT petribj currenttreatmentstrategiesforprimaryupperextremitydeepvenousthrombosisaretrospectiveobservationalmulticentercaseseries
AT deborstgj currenttreatmentstrategiesforprimaryupperextremitydeepvenousthrombosisaretrospectiveobservationalmulticentercaseseries