Cargando…

Publication bias in trials registered in the Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry: Is it a problem? A cross-sectional study

BACKGROUND: Timely publication of clinical trials is critical to ensure the dissemination and implementation of high-quality healthcare evidence. This study investigates the publication rate and time to publication of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) registered in the Australian New Zealand Clini...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Showell, Marian, Buckman, Sam, Berber, Slavica, Ata Allah, Nada, Patterson, Ben, Cole, Samantha, Farquhar, Cynthia, Jordan, Vanessa
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9815633/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36602999
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0279926
_version_ 1784864364613861376
author Showell, Marian
Buckman, Sam
Berber, Slavica
Ata Allah, Nada
Patterson, Ben
Cole, Samantha
Farquhar, Cynthia
Jordan, Vanessa
author_facet Showell, Marian
Buckman, Sam
Berber, Slavica
Ata Allah, Nada
Patterson, Ben
Cole, Samantha
Farquhar, Cynthia
Jordan, Vanessa
author_sort Showell, Marian
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Timely publication of clinical trials is critical to ensure the dissemination and implementation of high-quality healthcare evidence. This study investigates the publication rate and time to publication of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) registered in the Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ANZCTR). MATERIALS AND METHODS: We conducted a cross-sectional study of RCTs registered with the ANZCTR in 2007, 2009, and 2011. Multiple bibliographic databases were searched until October 2021 to identify trial publications. We then calculated publication rates, proportions, and the time to publish calculated from the date of first participation enrolment to publication date. RESULTS: Of 1,970 trial registrations, 541 (27%) remained unpublished 10 to 14 years later, and the proportion of trials published decreased by 7% from 2007 to 2011. The average time to publish was 4.63 years. The prospective trial registration rate for 2007, 2009 and 2011 was 48% (952 trials) and over this time there was an increase of 19% (280 prospective trials). Trials funded by non-Industry organizations were more likely to be published (74%, 1204/1625 trials) than the industry-funded trials (61%, 224/345 trials). Larger trials with at least 1000 participants were published at a rate of 88% (85/97 trials) and on average took 5.4 years to be published. Smaller trials with less than 100 participants were published at a lower rate with 67% (687/1024 trials) published and these trials took 4.31 years on average to publish. CONCLUSIONS: Just over a quarter of all trials on the ANZCTR for 2007, 2009, and 2011 remain unpublished over a decade later. The average time to publication of nearly five years may reflect the larger trials which will have taken longer to recruit participants. Over half of study sample trials were retrospectively registered, but prospective registration improved over time, highlighting the role of mandating trial registration.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9815633
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-98156332023-01-06 Publication bias in trials registered in the Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry: Is it a problem? A cross-sectional study Showell, Marian Buckman, Sam Berber, Slavica Ata Allah, Nada Patterson, Ben Cole, Samantha Farquhar, Cynthia Jordan, Vanessa PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: Timely publication of clinical trials is critical to ensure the dissemination and implementation of high-quality healthcare evidence. This study investigates the publication rate and time to publication of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) registered in the Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ANZCTR). MATERIALS AND METHODS: We conducted a cross-sectional study of RCTs registered with the ANZCTR in 2007, 2009, and 2011. Multiple bibliographic databases were searched until October 2021 to identify trial publications. We then calculated publication rates, proportions, and the time to publish calculated from the date of first participation enrolment to publication date. RESULTS: Of 1,970 trial registrations, 541 (27%) remained unpublished 10 to 14 years later, and the proportion of trials published decreased by 7% from 2007 to 2011. The average time to publish was 4.63 years. The prospective trial registration rate for 2007, 2009 and 2011 was 48% (952 trials) and over this time there was an increase of 19% (280 prospective trials). Trials funded by non-Industry organizations were more likely to be published (74%, 1204/1625 trials) than the industry-funded trials (61%, 224/345 trials). Larger trials with at least 1000 participants were published at a rate of 88% (85/97 trials) and on average took 5.4 years to be published. Smaller trials with less than 100 participants were published at a lower rate with 67% (687/1024 trials) published and these trials took 4.31 years on average to publish. CONCLUSIONS: Just over a quarter of all trials on the ANZCTR for 2007, 2009, and 2011 remain unpublished over a decade later. The average time to publication of nearly five years may reflect the larger trials which will have taken longer to recruit participants. Over half of study sample trials were retrospectively registered, but prospective registration improved over time, highlighting the role of mandating trial registration. Public Library of Science 2023-01-05 /pmc/articles/PMC9815633/ /pubmed/36602999 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0279926 Text en © 2023 Showell et al https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Showell, Marian
Buckman, Sam
Berber, Slavica
Ata Allah, Nada
Patterson, Ben
Cole, Samantha
Farquhar, Cynthia
Jordan, Vanessa
Publication bias in trials registered in the Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry: Is it a problem? A cross-sectional study
title Publication bias in trials registered in the Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry: Is it a problem? A cross-sectional study
title_full Publication bias in trials registered in the Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry: Is it a problem? A cross-sectional study
title_fullStr Publication bias in trials registered in the Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry: Is it a problem? A cross-sectional study
title_full_unstemmed Publication bias in trials registered in the Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry: Is it a problem? A cross-sectional study
title_short Publication bias in trials registered in the Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry: Is it a problem? A cross-sectional study
title_sort publication bias in trials registered in the australian new zealand clinical trials registry: is it a problem? a cross-sectional study
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9815633/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36602999
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0279926
work_keys_str_mv AT showellmarian publicationbiasintrialsregisteredintheaustraliannewzealandclinicaltrialsregistryisitaproblemacrosssectionalstudy
AT buckmansam publicationbiasintrialsregisteredintheaustraliannewzealandclinicaltrialsregistryisitaproblemacrosssectionalstudy
AT berberslavica publicationbiasintrialsregisteredintheaustraliannewzealandclinicaltrialsregistryisitaproblemacrosssectionalstudy
AT ataallahnada publicationbiasintrialsregisteredintheaustraliannewzealandclinicaltrialsregistryisitaproblemacrosssectionalstudy
AT pattersonben publicationbiasintrialsregisteredintheaustraliannewzealandclinicaltrialsregistryisitaproblemacrosssectionalstudy
AT colesamantha publicationbiasintrialsregisteredintheaustraliannewzealandclinicaltrialsregistryisitaproblemacrosssectionalstudy
AT farquharcynthia publicationbiasintrialsregisteredintheaustraliannewzealandclinicaltrialsregistryisitaproblemacrosssectionalstudy
AT jordanvanessa publicationbiasintrialsregisteredintheaustraliannewzealandclinicaltrialsregistryisitaproblemacrosssectionalstudy