Cargando…
Comparison of high-flow nasal cannula and conventional oxygen therapy for high-risk patients during bronchoscopy examination: protocol for a randomized controlled trial
INTRODUCTION: High-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) has been proven to improve oxygenation and avoid intubation in hypoxemic patients. It has also been utilized during endoscopy examination to reduce the incidence of hypoxia. However, little is known about the effects of HFNC versus conventional oxygen the...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9815677/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36604711 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-022-07001-5 |
_version_ | 1784864375189798912 |
---|---|
author | Qin, Hao Jing, Guo-Qiang Tan, Wei Wang, Jun Yin, Yi-Nan Chen, Rong-Zhang Zhang, Wei Li, Jie |
author_facet | Qin, Hao Jing, Guo-Qiang Tan, Wei Wang, Jun Yin, Yi-Nan Chen, Rong-Zhang Zhang, Wei Li, Jie |
author_sort | Qin, Hao |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: High-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) has been proven to improve oxygenation and avoid intubation in hypoxemic patients. It has also been utilized during endoscopy examination to reduce the incidence of hypoxia. However, little is known about the effects of HFNC versus conventional oxygen therapy (COT) on oxygenation during bronchoscopy examination via nasal route; particularly, no study has compared the use of HFNC with that of COT at similar F(I)O(2) for patients who have high-risk factors of desaturation during bronchoscopy examination. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This randomized controlled trial will be implemented in four academic centers in China. Patients who have high-risk factors including hypoxemia, hypercapnia, morbid obesity, and narrow airway will be enrolled to use HFNC or COT during bronchoscopy examination. In the HFNC group, the initial gas flow will be set at 50 L/min with a fraction of inspired oxygen (F(I)O(2)) at 0.45, if the patient tolerates, the flow can be increased to 60L/min at most, while in the COT group, oxygen flow will be set at 6 L/min via a conventional nasal cannula. After 5 min pre-oxygenation, the bronchoscope will be inserted via the nasal route. Vital signs, oxygenation (SpO(2)), and transcutaneous CO(2) (PtCO(2)) will be continuously monitored. The primary outcome is the incidence of hypoxemia, defined as SpO(2) < 90% for 10 s during bronchoscopy examination, and secondary outcomes include the need for treatment escalation and adverse events. DISCUSSION: Hypoxia is a common complication of bronchoscopy, our study attempted to demonstrate that HFNC may reduce the probability of hypoxia during bronchoscopy in high-risk patients. The results will be disseminated through peer-reviewed journals and national and international conferences. TRIAL REGISTRATION: http://www.chictr.org.cn/: ChiCTR2100055038. Registered on 31 December 2021. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9815677 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-98156772023-01-06 Comparison of high-flow nasal cannula and conventional oxygen therapy for high-risk patients during bronchoscopy examination: protocol for a randomized controlled trial Qin, Hao Jing, Guo-Qiang Tan, Wei Wang, Jun Yin, Yi-Nan Chen, Rong-Zhang Zhang, Wei Li, Jie Trials Study Protocol INTRODUCTION: High-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) has been proven to improve oxygenation and avoid intubation in hypoxemic patients. It has also been utilized during endoscopy examination to reduce the incidence of hypoxia. However, little is known about the effects of HFNC versus conventional oxygen therapy (COT) on oxygenation during bronchoscopy examination via nasal route; particularly, no study has compared the use of HFNC with that of COT at similar F(I)O(2) for patients who have high-risk factors of desaturation during bronchoscopy examination. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This randomized controlled trial will be implemented in four academic centers in China. Patients who have high-risk factors including hypoxemia, hypercapnia, morbid obesity, and narrow airway will be enrolled to use HFNC or COT during bronchoscopy examination. In the HFNC group, the initial gas flow will be set at 50 L/min with a fraction of inspired oxygen (F(I)O(2)) at 0.45, if the patient tolerates, the flow can be increased to 60L/min at most, while in the COT group, oxygen flow will be set at 6 L/min via a conventional nasal cannula. After 5 min pre-oxygenation, the bronchoscope will be inserted via the nasal route. Vital signs, oxygenation (SpO(2)), and transcutaneous CO(2) (PtCO(2)) will be continuously monitored. The primary outcome is the incidence of hypoxemia, defined as SpO(2) < 90% for 10 s during bronchoscopy examination, and secondary outcomes include the need for treatment escalation and adverse events. DISCUSSION: Hypoxia is a common complication of bronchoscopy, our study attempted to demonstrate that HFNC may reduce the probability of hypoxia during bronchoscopy in high-risk patients. The results will be disseminated through peer-reviewed journals and national and international conferences. TRIAL REGISTRATION: http://www.chictr.org.cn/: ChiCTR2100055038. Registered on 31 December 2021. BioMed Central 2023-01-05 /pmc/articles/PMC9815677/ /pubmed/36604711 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-022-07001-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Study Protocol Qin, Hao Jing, Guo-Qiang Tan, Wei Wang, Jun Yin, Yi-Nan Chen, Rong-Zhang Zhang, Wei Li, Jie Comparison of high-flow nasal cannula and conventional oxygen therapy for high-risk patients during bronchoscopy examination: protocol for a randomized controlled trial |
title | Comparison of high-flow nasal cannula and conventional oxygen therapy for high-risk patients during bronchoscopy examination: protocol for a randomized controlled trial |
title_full | Comparison of high-flow nasal cannula and conventional oxygen therapy for high-risk patients during bronchoscopy examination: protocol for a randomized controlled trial |
title_fullStr | Comparison of high-flow nasal cannula and conventional oxygen therapy for high-risk patients during bronchoscopy examination: protocol for a randomized controlled trial |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of high-flow nasal cannula and conventional oxygen therapy for high-risk patients during bronchoscopy examination: protocol for a randomized controlled trial |
title_short | Comparison of high-flow nasal cannula and conventional oxygen therapy for high-risk patients during bronchoscopy examination: protocol for a randomized controlled trial |
title_sort | comparison of high-flow nasal cannula and conventional oxygen therapy for high-risk patients during bronchoscopy examination: protocol for a randomized controlled trial |
topic | Study Protocol |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9815677/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36604711 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-022-07001-5 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT qinhao comparisonofhighflownasalcannulaandconventionaloxygentherapyforhighriskpatientsduringbronchoscopyexaminationprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT jingguoqiang comparisonofhighflownasalcannulaandconventionaloxygentherapyforhighriskpatientsduringbronchoscopyexaminationprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT tanwei comparisonofhighflownasalcannulaandconventionaloxygentherapyforhighriskpatientsduringbronchoscopyexaminationprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT wangjun comparisonofhighflownasalcannulaandconventionaloxygentherapyforhighriskpatientsduringbronchoscopyexaminationprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT yinyinan comparisonofhighflownasalcannulaandconventionaloxygentherapyforhighriskpatientsduringbronchoscopyexaminationprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT chenrongzhang comparisonofhighflownasalcannulaandconventionaloxygentherapyforhighriskpatientsduringbronchoscopyexaminationprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT zhangwei comparisonofhighflownasalcannulaandconventionaloxygentherapyforhighriskpatientsduringbronchoscopyexaminationprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT lijie comparisonofhighflownasalcannulaandconventionaloxygentherapyforhighriskpatientsduringbronchoscopyexaminationprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial |