Cargando…

Comparison of high-flow nasal cannula and conventional oxygen therapy for high-risk patients during bronchoscopy examination: protocol for a randomized controlled trial

INTRODUCTION: High-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) has been proven to improve oxygenation and avoid intubation in hypoxemic patients. It has also been utilized during endoscopy examination to reduce the incidence of hypoxia. However, little is known about the effects of HFNC versus conventional oxygen the...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Qin, Hao, Jing, Guo-Qiang, Tan, Wei, Wang, Jun, Yin, Yi-Nan, Chen, Rong-Zhang, Zhang, Wei, Li, Jie
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9815677/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36604711
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-022-07001-5
_version_ 1784864375189798912
author Qin, Hao
Jing, Guo-Qiang
Tan, Wei
Wang, Jun
Yin, Yi-Nan
Chen, Rong-Zhang
Zhang, Wei
Li, Jie
author_facet Qin, Hao
Jing, Guo-Qiang
Tan, Wei
Wang, Jun
Yin, Yi-Nan
Chen, Rong-Zhang
Zhang, Wei
Li, Jie
author_sort Qin, Hao
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: High-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) has been proven to improve oxygenation and avoid intubation in hypoxemic patients. It has also been utilized during endoscopy examination to reduce the incidence of hypoxia. However, little is known about the effects of HFNC versus conventional oxygen therapy (COT) on oxygenation during bronchoscopy examination via nasal route; particularly, no study has compared the use of HFNC with that of COT at similar F(I)O(2) for patients who have high-risk factors of desaturation during bronchoscopy examination. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This randomized controlled trial will be implemented in four academic centers in China. Patients who have high-risk factors including hypoxemia, hypercapnia, morbid obesity, and narrow airway will be enrolled to use HFNC or COT during bronchoscopy examination. In the HFNC group, the initial gas flow will be set at 50 L/min with a fraction of inspired oxygen (F(I)O(2)) at 0.45, if the patient tolerates, the flow can be increased to 60L/min at most, while in the COT group, oxygen flow will be set at 6 L/min via a conventional nasal cannula. After 5 min pre-oxygenation, the bronchoscope will be inserted via the nasal route. Vital signs, oxygenation (SpO(2)), and transcutaneous CO(2) (PtCO(2)) will be continuously monitored. The primary outcome is the incidence of hypoxemia, defined as SpO(2) < 90% for 10 s during bronchoscopy examination, and secondary outcomes include the need for treatment escalation and adverse events. DISCUSSION: Hypoxia is a common complication of bronchoscopy, our study attempted to demonstrate that HFNC may reduce the probability of hypoxia during bronchoscopy in high-risk patients. The results will be disseminated through peer-reviewed journals and national and international conferences. TRIAL REGISTRATION: http://www.chictr.org.cn/: ChiCTR2100055038. Registered on 31 December 2021.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9815677
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-98156772023-01-06 Comparison of high-flow nasal cannula and conventional oxygen therapy for high-risk patients during bronchoscopy examination: protocol for a randomized controlled trial Qin, Hao Jing, Guo-Qiang Tan, Wei Wang, Jun Yin, Yi-Nan Chen, Rong-Zhang Zhang, Wei Li, Jie Trials Study Protocol INTRODUCTION: High-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) has been proven to improve oxygenation and avoid intubation in hypoxemic patients. It has also been utilized during endoscopy examination to reduce the incidence of hypoxia. However, little is known about the effects of HFNC versus conventional oxygen therapy (COT) on oxygenation during bronchoscopy examination via nasal route; particularly, no study has compared the use of HFNC with that of COT at similar F(I)O(2) for patients who have high-risk factors of desaturation during bronchoscopy examination. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This randomized controlled trial will be implemented in four academic centers in China. Patients who have high-risk factors including hypoxemia, hypercapnia, morbid obesity, and narrow airway will be enrolled to use HFNC or COT during bronchoscopy examination. In the HFNC group, the initial gas flow will be set at 50 L/min with a fraction of inspired oxygen (F(I)O(2)) at 0.45, if the patient tolerates, the flow can be increased to 60L/min at most, while in the COT group, oxygen flow will be set at 6 L/min via a conventional nasal cannula. After 5 min pre-oxygenation, the bronchoscope will be inserted via the nasal route. Vital signs, oxygenation (SpO(2)), and transcutaneous CO(2) (PtCO(2)) will be continuously monitored. The primary outcome is the incidence of hypoxemia, defined as SpO(2) < 90% for 10 s during bronchoscopy examination, and secondary outcomes include the need for treatment escalation and adverse events. DISCUSSION: Hypoxia is a common complication of bronchoscopy, our study attempted to demonstrate that HFNC may reduce the probability of hypoxia during bronchoscopy in high-risk patients. The results will be disseminated through peer-reviewed journals and national and international conferences. TRIAL REGISTRATION: http://www.chictr.org.cn/: ChiCTR2100055038. Registered on 31 December 2021. BioMed Central 2023-01-05 /pmc/articles/PMC9815677/ /pubmed/36604711 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-022-07001-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Study Protocol
Qin, Hao
Jing, Guo-Qiang
Tan, Wei
Wang, Jun
Yin, Yi-Nan
Chen, Rong-Zhang
Zhang, Wei
Li, Jie
Comparison of high-flow nasal cannula and conventional oxygen therapy for high-risk patients during bronchoscopy examination: protocol for a randomized controlled trial
title Comparison of high-flow nasal cannula and conventional oxygen therapy for high-risk patients during bronchoscopy examination: protocol for a randomized controlled trial
title_full Comparison of high-flow nasal cannula and conventional oxygen therapy for high-risk patients during bronchoscopy examination: protocol for a randomized controlled trial
title_fullStr Comparison of high-flow nasal cannula and conventional oxygen therapy for high-risk patients during bronchoscopy examination: protocol for a randomized controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of high-flow nasal cannula and conventional oxygen therapy for high-risk patients during bronchoscopy examination: protocol for a randomized controlled trial
title_short Comparison of high-flow nasal cannula and conventional oxygen therapy for high-risk patients during bronchoscopy examination: protocol for a randomized controlled trial
title_sort comparison of high-flow nasal cannula and conventional oxygen therapy for high-risk patients during bronchoscopy examination: protocol for a randomized controlled trial
topic Study Protocol
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9815677/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36604711
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-022-07001-5
work_keys_str_mv AT qinhao comparisonofhighflownasalcannulaandconventionaloxygentherapyforhighriskpatientsduringbronchoscopyexaminationprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT jingguoqiang comparisonofhighflownasalcannulaandconventionaloxygentherapyforhighriskpatientsduringbronchoscopyexaminationprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT tanwei comparisonofhighflownasalcannulaandconventionaloxygentherapyforhighriskpatientsduringbronchoscopyexaminationprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT wangjun comparisonofhighflownasalcannulaandconventionaloxygentherapyforhighriskpatientsduringbronchoscopyexaminationprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT yinyinan comparisonofhighflownasalcannulaandconventionaloxygentherapyforhighriskpatientsduringbronchoscopyexaminationprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT chenrongzhang comparisonofhighflownasalcannulaandconventionaloxygentherapyforhighriskpatientsduringbronchoscopyexaminationprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT zhangwei comparisonofhighflownasalcannulaandconventionaloxygentherapyforhighriskpatientsduringbronchoscopyexaminationprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT lijie comparisonofhighflownasalcannulaandconventionaloxygentherapyforhighriskpatientsduringbronchoscopyexaminationprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial