Cargando…

 Restoration and coral adaptation delay, but do not prevent, climate-driven reef framework erosion of an inshore site in the Florida Keys

For reef framework to persist, calcium carbonate production by corals and other calcifiers needs to outpace loss due to physical, chemical, and biological erosion. This balance is both delicate and dynamic and is currently threatened by the effects of ocean warming and acidification. Although the pr...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Webb, Alice E., Enochs, Ian C., van Hooidonk, Ruben, van Westen, René M., Besemer, Nicole, Kolodziej, Graham, Viehman, T. Shay, Manzello, Derek P.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9816163/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36604530
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-26930-4
_version_ 1784864470174007296
author Webb, Alice E.
Enochs, Ian C.
van Hooidonk, Ruben
van Westen, René M.
Besemer, Nicole
Kolodziej, Graham
Viehman, T. Shay
Manzello, Derek P.
author_facet Webb, Alice E.
Enochs, Ian C.
van Hooidonk, Ruben
van Westen, René M.
Besemer, Nicole
Kolodziej, Graham
Viehman, T. Shay
Manzello, Derek P.
author_sort Webb, Alice E.
collection PubMed
description For reef framework to persist, calcium carbonate production by corals and other calcifiers needs to outpace loss due to physical, chemical, and biological erosion. This balance is both delicate and dynamic and is currently threatened by the effects of ocean warming and acidification. Although the protection and recovery of ecosystem functions are at the center of most restoration and conservation programs, decision makers are limited by the lack of predictive tools to forecast habitat persistence under different emission scenarios. To address this, we developed a modelling approach, based on carbonate budgets, that ties species-specific responses to site-specific global change using the latest generation of climate models projections (CMIP6). We applied this model to Cheeca Rocks, an outlier in the Florida Keys in terms of high coral cover, and explored the outcomes of restoration targets scheduled in the coming 20 years at this site by the Mission: Iconic Reefs restoration initiative. Additionally, we examined the potential effects of coral thermal adaptation by increasing the bleaching threshold by 0.25, 0.5, 1 and 2˚C. Regardless of coral adaptative capacity or restoration, net carbonate production at Cheeca Rocks declines heavily once the threshold for the onset of annual severe bleaching is reached. The switch from net accretion to net erosion, however, is significantly delayed by mitigation and adaptation. The maintenance of framework accretion until 2100 and beyond is possible under a decreased emission scenario coupled with thermal adaptation above 0.5˚C. Although restoration initiatives increase reef accretion estimates, Cheeca Rocks will only be able to keep pace with future sea-level rise in a world where anthropogenic CO(2) emissions are reduced. Present results, however, attest to the potential of restoration interventions combined with increases in coral thermal tolerance to delay the onset of mass bleaching mortalities, possibly in time for a low-carbon economy to be implemented and complementary mitigation measures to become effective.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9816163
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-98161632023-01-07  Restoration and coral adaptation delay, but do not prevent, climate-driven reef framework erosion of an inshore site in the Florida Keys Webb, Alice E. Enochs, Ian C. van Hooidonk, Ruben van Westen, René M. Besemer, Nicole Kolodziej, Graham Viehman, T. Shay Manzello, Derek P. Sci Rep Article For reef framework to persist, calcium carbonate production by corals and other calcifiers needs to outpace loss due to physical, chemical, and biological erosion. This balance is both delicate and dynamic and is currently threatened by the effects of ocean warming and acidification. Although the protection and recovery of ecosystem functions are at the center of most restoration and conservation programs, decision makers are limited by the lack of predictive tools to forecast habitat persistence under different emission scenarios. To address this, we developed a modelling approach, based on carbonate budgets, that ties species-specific responses to site-specific global change using the latest generation of climate models projections (CMIP6). We applied this model to Cheeca Rocks, an outlier in the Florida Keys in terms of high coral cover, and explored the outcomes of restoration targets scheduled in the coming 20 years at this site by the Mission: Iconic Reefs restoration initiative. Additionally, we examined the potential effects of coral thermal adaptation by increasing the bleaching threshold by 0.25, 0.5, 1 and 2˚C. Regardless of coral adaptative capacity or restoration, net carbonate production at Cheeca Rocks declines heavily once the threshold for the onset of annual severe bleaching is reached. The switch from net accretion to net erosion, however, is significantly delayed by mitigation and adaptation. The maintenance of framework accretion until 2100 and beyond is possible under a decreased emission scenario coupled with thermal adaptation above 0.5˚C. Although restoration initiatives increase reef accretion estimates, Cheeca Rocks will only be able to keep pace with future sea-level rise in a world where anthropogenic CO(2) emissions are reduced. Present results, however, attest to the potential of restoration interventions combined with increases in coral thermal tolerance to delay the onset of mass bleaching mortalities, possibly in time for a low-carbon economy to be implemented and complementary mitigation measures to become effective. Nature Publishing Group UK 2023-01-05 /pmc/articles/PMC9816163/ /pubmed/36604530 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-26930-4 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Article
Webb, Alice E.
Enochs, Ian C.
van Hooidonk, Ruben
van Westen, René M.
Besemer, Nicole
Kolodziej, Graham
Viehman, T. Shay
Manzello, Derek P.
 Restoration and coral adaptation delay, but do not prevent, climate-driven reef framework erosion of an inshore site in the Florida Keys
title  Restoration and coral adaptation delay, but do not prevent, climate-driven reef framework erosion of an inshore site in the Florida Keys
title_full  Restoration and coral adaptation delay, but do not prevent, climate-driven reef framework erosion of an inshore site in the Florida Keys
title_fullStr  Restoration and coral adaptation delay, but do not prevent, climate-driven reef framework erosion of an inshore site in the Florida Keys
title_full_unstemmed  Restoration and coral adaptation delay, but do not prevent, climate-driven reef framework erosion of an inshore site in the Florida Keys
title_short  Restoration and coral adaptation delay, but do not prevent, climate-driven reef framework erosion of an inshore site in the Florida Keys
title_sort  restoration and coral adaptation delay, but do not prevent, climate-driven reef framework erosion of an inshore site in the florida keys
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9816163/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36604530
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-26930-4
work_keys_str_mv AT webbalicee restorationandcoraladaptationdelaybutdonotpreventclimatedrivenreefframeworkerosionofaninshoresiteinthefloridakeys
AT enochsianc restorationandcoraladaptationdelaybutdonotpreventclimatedrivenreefframeworkerosionofaninshoresiteinthefloridakeys
AT vanhooidonkruben restorationandcoraladaptationdelaybutdonotpreventclimatedrivenreefframeworkerosionofaninshoresiteinthefloridakeys
AT vanwestenrenem restorationandcoraladaptationdelaybutdonotpreventclimatedrivenreefframeworkerosionofaninshoresiteinthefloridakeys
AT besemernicole restorationandcoraladaptationdelaybutdonotpreventclimatedrivenreefframeworkerosionofaninshoresiteinthefloridakeys
AT kolodziejgraham restorationandcoraladaptationdelaybutdonotpreventclimatedrivenreefframeworkerosionofaninshoresiteinthefloridakeys
AT viehmantshay restorationandcoraladaptationdelaybutdonotpreventclimatedrivenreefframeworkerosionofaninshoresiteinthefloridakeys
AT manzelloderekp restorationandcoraladaptationdelaybutdonotpreventclimatedrivenreefframeworkerosionofaninshoresiteinthefloridakeys