Cargando…

Cancer survival differentials for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples in Queensland: the impact of remoteness

PURPOSE: In Australia, Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples (First Nations population) often have low overall cancer survival, as do all residents of geographically remote areas. This study aimed to quantify the survival disparity between First Nations and other Queenslanders for 12 common...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Cramb, S. M., Whop, L. J., Garvey, G., Baade, P. D.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9816203/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36266522
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10552-022-01643-1
_version_ 1784864479855509504
author Cramb, S. M.
Whop, L. J.
Garvey, G.
Baade, P. D.
author_facet Cramb, S. M.
Whop, L. J.
Garvey, G.
Baade, P. D.
author_sort Cramb, S. M.
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: In Australia, Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples (First Nations population) often have low overall cancer survival, as do all residents of geographically remote areas. This study aimed to quantify the survival disparity between First Nations and other Queenslanders for 12 common cancer types by remoteness areas. METHODS: For all Queensland residents aged 20–89 years diagnosed with a primary invasive cancer during 1997–2016, we ran flexible parametric survival models incorporating age, First Nations status, sex, diagnosis time period, area-level socioeconomic status, remoteness categories and where appropriate, broad cancer type. Three survival measures were predicted: cause-specific survival, survival differences and the comparative survival ratio, each standardised to First Nations peoples’ covariate distributions. RESULTS: The standardised five-year cause-specific cancer survival was 60% for urban First Nations and 65% for other Queenslanders, while remote residents were 54% (First Nations) and 58% (other). The absolute survival differential between First Nations and other Queenslanders was often similar, regardless of remoteness of residence. The greatest absolute difference in five-year standardised cancer survival was for head and neck cancers, followed by cervical cancer. The five-year comparative survival ratio (First Nations: other Queenslanders) for urban cancer patients was 0.91 (95% CI 0.90–0.93), similar to outer regional, inner regional and remote areas. The greatest comparative survival differential was for oesophageal cancer. CONCLUSION: First Nations’ survival inequalities are largely independent of geographical remoteness. It remains a priority to determine the contribution of other potential factors such as the availability of culturally acceptable diagnostic, management and/or support services. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s10552-022-01643-1.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9816203
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-98162032023-01-07 Cancer survival differentials for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples in Queensland: the impact of remoteness Cramb, S. M. Whop, L. J. Garvey, G. Baade, P. D. Cancer Causes Control Original Paper PURPOSE: In Australia, Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples (First Nations population) often have low overall cancer survival, as do all residents of geographically remote areas. This study aimed to quantify the survival disparity between First Nations and other Queenslanders for 12 common cancer types by remoteness areas. METHODS: For all Queensland residents aged 20–89 years diagnosed with a primary invasive cancer during 1997–2016, we ran flexible parametric survival models incorporating age, First Nations status, sex, diagnosis time period, area-level socioeconomic status, remoteness categories and where appropriate, broad cancer type. Three survival measures were predicted: cause-specific survival, survival differences and the comparative survival ratio, each standardised to First Nations peoples’ covariate distributions. RESULTS: The standardised five-year cause-specific cancer survival was 60% for urban First Nations and 65% for other Queenslanders, while remote residents were 54% (First Nations) and 58% (other). The absolute survival differential between First Nations and other Queenslanders was often similar, regardless of remoteness of residence. The greatest absolute difference in five-year standardised cancer survival was for head and neck cancers, followed by cervical cancer. The five-year comparative survival ratio (First Nations: other Queenslanders) for urban cancer patients was 0.91 (95% CI 0.90–0.93), similar to outer regional, inner regional and remote areas. The greatest comparative survival differential was for oesophageal cancer. CONCLUSION: First Nations’ survival inequalities are largely independent of geographical remoteness. It remains a priority to determine the contribution of other potential factors such as the availability of culturally acceptable diagnostic, management and/or support services. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s10552-022-01643-1. Springer International Publishing 2022-10-20 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC9816203/ /pubmed/36266522 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10552-022-01643-1 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Paper
Cramb, S. M.
Whop, L. J.
Garvey, G.
Baade, P. D.
Cancer survival differentials for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples in Queensland: the impact of remoteness
title Cancer survival differentials for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples in Queensland: the impact of remoteness
title_full Cancer survival differentials for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples in Queensland: the impact of remoteness
title_fullStr Cancer survival differentials for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples in Queensland: the impact of remoteness
title_full_unstemmed Cancer survival differentials for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples in Queensland: the impact of remoteness
title_short Cancer survival differentials for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples in Queensland: the impact of remoteness
title_sort cancer survival differentials for aboriginal and torres strait islander peoples in queensland: the impact of remoteness
topic Original Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9816203/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36266522
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10552-022-01643-1
work_keys_str_mv AT crambsm cancersurvivaldifferentialsforaboriginalandtorresstraitislanderpeoplesinqueenslandtheimpactofremoteness
AT whoplj cancersurvivaldifferentialsforaboriginalandtorresstraitislanderpeoplesinqueenslandtheimpactofremoteness
AT garveyg cancersurvivaldifferentialsforaboriginalandtorresstraitislanderpeoplesinqueenslandtheimpactofremoteness
AT baadepd cancersurvivaldifferentialsforaboriginalandtorresstraitislanderpeoplesinqueenslandtheimpactofremoteness